EXPE

Expedia Group

$279.35

-1.83%
Sep 18, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Expedia Group is the world's second-largest online travel agency by gross bookings, operating a portfolio of branded travel booking platforms — most notably Expedia, Hotels.com, and alternative-accommodations leader Vrbo, alongside metasearch brand Trivago — that monetize primarily through transaction fees on lodging, air, car, cruise, and advertising bookings. Lodging accounts for roughly 80% of sales, giving the company a highly concentrated but high-margin profit engine, while its 16,000 employees and multi-brand structure position it as a scaled platform competitor to Booking Holdings rather than a niche player. The current investor narrative is defined by a tug-of-war: a powerful AI-driven re-rating has lifted the shares sharply off spring lows as the market rewards cost discipline and capital returns, yet management's cautious 2026 margin guidance, a 'dynamic' macro backdrop, and fears that generative AI search could disintermediate traditional OTAs have kept sentiment volatile. Recent headlines — including the appointment of a former Snap executive as CFO and Booking Holdings' Middle East conflict-driven guidance cut — underscore that this is a story stock balanced between operational execution and exogenous travel-demand risk.

People also watch

Booking Holdings

Booking Holdings

BKNG

Analysis
Airbnb

Airbnb

ABNB

Analysis
Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group

RCL

Analysis
Carnival Corporation

Carnival Corporation

CCL

Analysis
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

NCLH

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy EXPE Today?

The synthesized recommendation is Buy, with the core thesis that Expedia's 14.66% revenue growth, 90.12% gross margin, and $4.69 billion free cash flow are undervalued at an 11.49x forward PE, offering 21% upside to the analyst average target of $339.81. The consensus buy rating from 36 analysts (mean 2.13) and the wide target range of $245–$430 reflect a market that recognizes the earnings recovery potential but remains divided on execution risk. The risk/reward is favorable for investors who can tolerate volatility, given the stock trades near the low end of its historical PS band.

Supporting evidence includes four key data points: first, the forward PE of 11.49x versus a trailing PE of 27.45x implies a 58% earnings growth expectation that, if met, would make the stock cheap; second, revenue growth accelerated to 14.66% YoY in Q1 2026 from a seasonally weak base; third, gross margin of 90.12% and operating margin of 14.68% demonstrate structural profitability despite quarterly net losses; and fourth, trailing free cash flow of $4.686 billion supports $788 million of quarterly buybacks and a 0.56% dividend yield. The PS ratio of 2.41x is well below the multi-year high of 13.60x, suggesting the market has already priced in significant pessimism.

The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are: (1) the margin guidance cut proving prescient, causing forward EPS of $33.21 to be revised down; (2) AI disintermediation accelerating, which would compress the multiple regardless of earnings; and (3) a travel demand shock from the Middle East conflict spreading to Expedia's lodging segment. The rating would upgrade to a stronger Buy if forward PE compresses below 10x or if Q2 2026 revenue growth exceeds 15% with margin expansion; it would downgrade to Hold if revenue growth decelerates below 10% or if the stock breaks below the $270 support level. Relative to its history and peers, EXPE appears undervalued on a forward earnings basis but fairly valued on a PEG basis, making it a selective value opportunity rather than a deep-value play.

Sign up to view all

EXPE 12-Month Price Forecast

Expedia presents a balanced risk/reward at current levels, with the stock trading at a discounted forward PE but facing credible threats to its margin story and competitive position. The 14.66% revenue growth and 90.12% gross margin are impressive, but the net loss of $6 million in Q1 2026 and management's cautious guidance highlight the fragility of profitability. The AI disintermediation narrative is a wildcard that could either re-rate the stock higher if Expedia successfully leverages AI, or compress the multiple if it becomes a victim of technological disruption. I would upgrade to bullish if Q2 2026 results show margin expansion and revenue growth above 15%, and downgrade to bearish if the stock breaks below $270 or if forward EPS estimates are revised down by more than 10%.

Historical Price
Current Price $279.35
Average Target $320.00
High Target $430.00
Low Target $185.00

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Expedia Group's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $338.83 and implied upside of +21.3% versus the current price.

Average Target

$338.83

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+21.3%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

covering this stock

Price Range

$235 - $430

Analyst target range

Coverage is deep and institutional, with 36 analysts following Expedia and a consensus recommendation of 'buy' (recommendation mean of 2.13 on a scale where lower is more bullish). The average price target of $339.81 implies roughly 21% upside from the current $280.83, a constructive but not euphoric signal. Consensus forward EPS estimates cluster tightly between $32.42 and $34.49 with an average of $33.21, and estimated revenue averages $20.89 billion, indicating analysts expect solid but not explosive growth. The consensus therefore leans moderately bullish — supportive of the stock but far from the 50%-upside narrative that circulated during the February AI-disruption selloff.\n\nThe target range is wide, spanning from a low of $245.00 to a high of $430.00 — a spread of $185, or roughly 76% of the low target — which signals meaningful disagreement about the company's trajectory. The high target of $430 implies roughly 53% upside and would require both multiple expansion and successful execution on AI-driven cost efficiencies and margin recovery; the low target of $245 sits about 13% below the current price and prices in margin compression, competitive share loss to AI-native travel search, and a softer consumer travel environment. Recent institutional ratings show a predominantly neutral-to-constructive posture: Jefferies and Argus reiterated Buy in July 2026, BTIG maintained Buy in May and June, while Wells Fargo, Barclays, Susquehanna, Piper Sandler, UBS, and DA Davidson all sit at Equal Weight or Neutral — a pattern of analysts holding their ground rather than aggressively upgrading, consistent with a stock that has run hard and now needs to prove its margin story.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: EXPE Investment Factors

The bull case rests on accelerating 14.66% revenue growth, a deeply discounted 11.49x forward PE, and $4.69 billion of free cash flow that supports buybacks and a 21% analyst-implied upside. The bear case counters with management's explicit margin guidance cut, 5.19x debt-to-equity leverage, unresolved AI disintermediation fears, and a sharp 13.74% one-month drawdown that has erased the year-to-date gain. On balance, the bull evidence is currently stronger because the earnings recovery implied by the forward multiple is backed by tangible Q1 2026 improvement (net loss narrowed to just $6 million from $200 million a year ago) and a consensus buy rating with 36 analysts. The single most important tension is whether the forward EPS estimate of $33.21 is achievable given the margin guidance cut — if it is, the stock is materially undervalued; if it is not, the 27.45x trailing PE and 2.77 PEG ratio will look expensive.

Bullish

  • Revenue growth accelerating to 14.66% YoY: Q1 2026 revenue of $3.426 billion grew 14.66% year-over-year versus Q1 2025's $2.988 billion, marking a clear acceleration from the prior-year comparison. This is a healthy growth rate for a mature OTA and suggests the core lodging and alternative-accommodations engine remains robust despite macro noise.
  • Forward PE of 11.49x implies deep value: The forward PE of 11.49x versus a trailing PE of 27.45x represents a 58% compression, implying the market expects earnings to roughly double to the analyst consensus EPS of $33.21. If that earnings recovery materializes, the stock is priced at a significant discount to its own history and to the broader market.
  • Robust free cash flow of $4.69 billion: Trailing free cash flow stands at $4.686 billion, and Q1 2026 alone generated $3.747 billion of FCF on $3.931 billion of operating cash flow. This cash generation supports the $788 million of buybacks and $58 million of dividends executed in Q1 2026, providing a durable valuation floor.
  • Analyst consensus sees 21% upside: With 36 analysts covering the stock and a consensus 'buy' rating (mean 2.13), the average price target of $339.81 implies roughly 21% upside from the current $280.83. The high target of $430 implies 53% upside, reflecting meaningful optionality if margin recovery and AI-driven cost efficiencies deliver.

Bearish

  • Margin guidance cut signals profit pressure: Management's February 2026 guidance dialed down margin expectations, with the CFO flagging a 'dynamic' economy. This is a direct warning that the strong Q3 2025 net margin of 21.74% should not be extrapolated, and it raises the risk that forward EPS estimates of $33.21 prove too optimistic.
  • Extreme leverage with 5.19x debt-to-equity: Debt-to-equity of 5.19x and total debt to capitalization of 89.1% represent an aggressive capital structure. While free cash flow is strong, the current ratio of 0.732 means current liabilities exceed current assets, leaving little cushion if travel demand softens or refinancing conditions tighten.
  • AI disintermediation threat remains unresolved: The February 2026 AI-driven selloff highlighted fears that generative AI search could bypass traditional OTAs, and the stock remains down 0.75% year-to-date despite a 26.87% one-year gain. This narrative risk is structural and could cap multiple expansion even if near-term earnings beat.
  • Severe one-month momentum unwind: The stock is down 13.74% over the past month with a relative strength versus SPY of -12.68 percentage points, the worst reading across all measured windows. This sharp deceleration after a 58% summer rally suggests profit-taking and loss of near-term buyer control, with support at $270–275 now critical.

EXPE Technical Analysis

Expedia is in a powerful primary uptrend that has recovered decisively from a spring trough, with the shares up 26.87% over the trailing twelve months versus a 16.22% gain for SPY, a 10.65 percentage-point edge in relative strength. At a current price of $280.83, the stock sits at roughly 61% of its 52-week range (low $185.34, high $342.00), meaning it has surrendered a meaningful portion of its highs but remains far above its base — a positioning that signals consolidation within an uptrend rather than a broken trend. The 180-day price series confirms the structure: a March low near $214.99 gave way to a July–August surge peaking at $339.13 on August 24, a move of nearly 58% off the lows before the current pullback.\n\nShort-term momentum has clearly decelerated and now diverges sharply from the longer-term trend. The stock is down 13.74% over the past month even as it remains up 24.87% over three months and 22.97% over six months, and its one-month relative strength versus SPY is a dismal -12.68 percentage points — the worst reading across all measured windows. This divergence — strong 3-month/6-month gains colliding with a sharp 1-month drawdown — is characteristic of a momentum unwind or profit-taking phase after an extended run, not necessarily a trend reversal, but it does flag that near-term buyers have lost control. Notably, the stock remains down 0.75% year-to-date, meaning the entire 2026 gain was compressed into a narrow summer window and has since been partially retraced.\n\nKey technical levels are well defined: support rests at the 52-week low of $185.34, with an intermediate shelf around the $270–275 area where the stock has recently stabilized, while resistance sits at the 52-week high of $342.00, with secondary resistance near the August peak of $339.13. A decisive breakout above $342 would confirm trend resumption and likely open a move toward the analyst high target, whereas a breakdown below $270 would threaten the summer uptrend and expose the $230–250 zone. With a beta of 1.25, Expedia is roughly 25% more volatile than the market, and its maximum drawdown of -37.44% over the period is a stark reminder that position sizing must account for materially amplified downside relative to an index holding.

Beta

1.25

1.25x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-37.4%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$185-$342

Price range past year

Annual Return

+25.9%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodEXPE ReturnS&P 500
1m-14.4%-1.0%
3m+16.0%+2.0%
6m+18.8%+17.4%
1y+25.9%+15.0%
ytd-1.3%+11.7%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

EXPE Fundamental Analysis

Expedia's revenue trajectory is reaccelerating at the top line, with Q1 2026 revenue of $3.426 billion representing 14.66% year-over-year growth versus Q1 2025's $2.988 billion — a notable acceleration from the prior-year comparison. The multi-quarter cadence shows the seasonal shape of the business: Q3 2025 was the peak quarter at $4.412 billion, Q4 2025 came in at $3.547 billion, and Q1 2026 at $3.426 billion, with the Q1 2026 print up sequentially and annually despite the seasonally weak winter period. Segment data confirms the concentration risk and opportunity: lodging generated $2.61 billion of the quarter's revenue while air contributed just $107 million, meaning the growth story lives and dies with lodging and alternative accommodations rather than air ticketing. The 14.66% growth rate is a genuinely healthy figure for a mature OTA, but it must be weighed against Booking Holdings' Middle East conflict-driven guidance cut, which suggests industry-wide travel demand could face headwinds into 2027.\n\nProfitability is structurally strong at the gross line but thin at the net line, a classic OTA signature. Gross margin is an exceptional 90.12%, and gross profit in Q1 2026 was $3.049 billion on $3.426 billion of revenue, yet the company posted a net loss of $6 million and diluted EPS of -$0.0492 for the quarter, driven by $2.058 billion of selling and marketing expense and $324 million of R&D. The operating margin of 14.68% and net margin of 8.78% (trailing) mask significant quarterly volatility: Q3 2025 delivered $959 million of net income and a 21.74% net margin, while Q1 2025 lost $200 million, so the Q1 2026 loss of just $6 million represents a dramatic year-over-year improvement of roughly $194 million. The trend is clearly toward profitability normalization, but management's own February 2026 guidance to dial down margin expectations signals that the market should not extrapolate the strong Q3 2025 margin peak.\n\nThe balance sheet carries meaningful leverage but is well supported by cash generation. Debt-to-equity stands at a very high 5.19x, and the current ratio of 0.732 indicates current liabilities exceed current assets — typical for an OTA that collects cash upfront and holds customer payables — while total debt to capitalization of 89.1% is aggressive. Offsetting this, trailing free cash flow is a robust $4.686 billion, Q1 2026 operating cash flow was $3.931 billion with free cash flow of $3.747 billion, and the company holds $7.789 billion of cash. ROE of 100.78% is inflated by the leveraged capital structure but still reflects genuine shareholder value creation, and the company returned capital via $788 million of buybacks and $58 million of dividends in Q1 2026 alone. The critical caveat is that OTA working capital is highly seasonal — Q3 2025 saw negative operating cash flow of -$497 million and Q4 2025 free cash flow of just $119 million — so the headline FCF figure should be viewed on a trailing basis rather than quarter to quarter.

Quarterly Revenue

$3.4B

2026-03

Revenue YoY Growth

+14.7%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

89.0%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$4.7B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Air
Lodging

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is EXPE Overvalued?

Because Expedia is profitable on a trailing basis with positive net income, the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, and the picture is bifurcated: the trailing PE is 27.45x while the forward PE is just 11.49x, an extraordinarily wide gap. That 58% compression from trailing to forward earnings implies the market expects earnings to roughly double, consistent with analyst estimated EPS of $33.21 for the forward period versus the current trailing EPS of $0.036 — a figure so distorted by quarterly losses that the forward multiple is the only meaningful anchor. The PEG ratio of 2.77, however, suggests that even on forward earnings the stock is not cheap relative to its growth rate.\n\nAgainst the broader market and its own sector, Expedia screens as a mixed value proposition. Its PS ratio of 2.41x and EV/Sales of 2.11x are modest for a 90% gross-margin platform business, and its PCF ratio of 9.15x is undemanding given $4.686 billion of trailing free cash flow. However, the price-to-book ratio of 27.66x is extreme, reflecting the heavily leveraged, buyback-shrunk equity base rather than a genuine premium, and EV/EBITDA of 12.68x is reasonable but not a bargain for a cyclical travel name. Relative to the industry, the forward PE of 11.49x versus a trailing PE of 27.45x suggests the market is pricing in a sharp earnings recovery that has not yet been delivered, which is either an opportunity or a warning depending on whether margin guidance holds.\n\nHistorical context is instructive: Expedia's PE ratio has swung wildly from 6.89x in Q3 2025 to 42.41x in Q4 2025 to negative in Q1 2026, while its PS ratio has ranged from a low of 3.73x in Q3 2023 to a high of 13.60x in Q1 2022, with the current 2.41x sitting near the bottom of that multi-year band. The current PS multiple is therefore closer to historical lows than highs, which traditionally signals either a value opportunity or a market that has lost confidence in the growth story — and given the AI disruption narrative and cautious margin guidance, the latter interpretation cannot be dismissed. The dividend yield of just 0.56% with a payout ratio of 15.46% leaves ample room for continued buybacks, which at $788 million in Q1 2026 remains a meaningful valuation support.

PE

27.5x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

High-End

5-Year PE Range 7x~25x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

12.7x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Expedia's financial risk profile is dominated by its aggressive leverage and thin net margins. Debt-to-equity stands at 5.19x with total debt to capitalization of 89.1%, and the current ratio of 0.732 means current liabilities exceed current assets — a structure that works only because OTAs collect cash upfront. Net margin is just 8.78% on a trailing basis, and Q1 2026 posted a net loss of $6 million despite $3.426 billion of revenue, showing how quickly $2.058 billion of selling and marketing expense can consume gross profit. The company is dependent on continued revenue growth to justify its valuation, as the forward PE of 11.49x assumes earnings roughly double from trailing levels; any deceleration below the current 14.66% growth rate would pressure both earnings and multiple.

Market and competitive risks are elevated by the stock's premium positioning and exogenous travel shocks. At a PS ratio of 2.41x and EV/EBITDA of 12.68x, EXPE is not expensive versus its own history, but the PEG ratio of 2.77 signals the market is paying up relative to growth. The AI disintermediation narrative — which triggered a sector-wide selloff in February 2026 — remains unresolved and could compress multiples even if earnings hold. Booking Holdings' Middle East conflict-driven guidance cut is a direct warning that industry-wide travel demand faces headwinds into 2027, and with a beta of 1.25, EXPE is 25% more volatile than the market, amplifying any macro-driven selloff. Recent news of a TSA staffing crisis and rising fuel costs add further operational uncertainty for the travel sector.

The worst-case scenario would combine a travel demand shock with margin compression and multiple contraction. If the Middle East conflict escalates, causing Booking's guidance cut to spread across the OTA sector, and Expedia's margin guidance proves too optimistic, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $185.34 — a decline of approximately 34% from the current $280.83. The analyst low target of $245 implies a more moderate 13% downside, but the historical max drawdown of -37.44% shows the stock is capable of severe declines. In this adverse scenario, an investor could lose 34% to 37% from current levels, with the $230–250 zone offering only temporary support before the 52-week low comes into play.

FAQ

The most severe risk is financial: debt-to-equity of 5.19x and a current ratio of 0.732 leave little cushion if travel demand weakens, and the Q1 2026 net loss of $6 million shows how quickly marketing expenses can erode profitability. Second is competitive: AI-native travel search could disintermediate OTAs, a fear that triggered a sector-wide selloff in February 2026 and remains unresolved. Third is macro/geopolitical: Booking Holdings' Middle East conflict-driven guidance cut signals a travel demand shock that could spread to Expedia, and with a beta of 1.25, the stock is 25% more volatile than the market. Fourth is company-specific: the margin guidance cut in February 2026 raises the risk that forward EPS estimates of $33.21 are too optimistic, which would make the 11.49x forward PE look expensive.

The 12-month forecast is divided into three scenarios: a base case (55% probability) with a target range of $300–$340, assuming revenue growth of 12–15% and forward EPS of $33.21 materializes; a bull case (25% probability) targeting $340–$430, driven by margin expansion and AI-driven cost efficiencies; and a bear case (20% probability) targeting $185–$245, triggered by a travel demand shock, margin compression, or accelerated AI disintermediation. The most likely scenario is the base case, which aligns with the analyst average target of $339.81 and assumes no major macro deterioration. The key assumption behind the base case is that operating margins stabilize around 14–15% and the company continues to generate strong free cash flow to support buybacks.

EXPE appears undervalued on a forward earnings basis but fairly valued on a PEG basis. The forward PE of 11.49x is less than half the trailing PE of 27.45x, implying the market expects earnings to roughly double to $33.21 per share, and the PS ratio of 2.41x sits near the low end of its multi-year range (versus a high of 13.60x in Q1 2022). However, the PEG ratio of 2.77 suggests the stock is not cheap relative to its growth rate, and the price-to-book of 27.66x reflects a leveraged, buyback-shrunk equity base. The market is pricing in a successful margin recovery and AI adaptation; if either fails, the valuation could compress further. Relative to peers, the EV/EBITDA of 12.68x is reasonable for a cyclical travel name, but not a bargain.

From a risk/reward perspective, EXPE offers a favorable setup for investors with a medium-to-high risk tolerance, given the 21% upside to the analyst average target of $339.81 and the 11.49x forward PE that implies a significant earnings recovery. The stock is down 13.74% over the past month, providing a potentially better entry point than the August peak of $339.13, but the margin guidance cut and AI disruption fears are real overhangs. The biggest downside risk is a retest of the 52-week low of $185.34, which would represent a 34% loss from current levels. For long-term investors who believe in the OTA model and Expedia's ability to leverage AI, the current price offers a reasonable entry, but position sizing should account for the 1.25 beta and -37.44% max drawdown.

EXPE is better suited for long-term investment (minimum 12–18 months) than short-term trading, given its 1.25 beta, -37.44% max drawdown, and the seasonal volatility of its earnings (Q3 is the peak quarter, Q1 is typically weak). The stock's 26.87% one-year return and 21% analyst-implied upside suggest that patient investors can be rewarded, but the 13.74% one-month decline shows the risks of short-term entry. The 0.56% dividend yield is negligible for income, so the investment case relies on capital appreciation and buybacks. A long-term holder should monitor the margin trajectory and AI competitive landscape, as these will determine whether the forward PE re-rates or compresses. Short-term traders could exploit the $270–$342 range, but should be aware of the high volatility and geopolitical headline risk.