Abbott
ABT
$104.89
+0.20%
Abbott Laboratories is a diversified global healthcare enterprise operating four core segments — Medical Devices (the largest at roughly $5.85B in quarterly sales), Diagnostics, Nutritional Products, and Established Pharmaceuticals — spanning cardiovascular rhythm management, structural heart, diabetes care, point-of-care and molecular diagnostics, and pediatric/adult nutrition. As one of the largest and most diversified medical-device and diagnostics franchises in the world, Abbott is a defensive, dividend-paying compounder (409 consecutive quarterly dividends and a multi-decade streak of increases) rather than a high-growth disruptor, with its identity increasingly anchored in its Medical Devices and Diagnostics platforms. The current investor narrative is a tug-of-war between a strong underlying operating recovery — Q2 2026 revenue of $12.59B grew 13.0% year-over-year with gross margin expanding to 58.0% — and a 2026 guidance cut that overshadowed an earnings beat in April, alongside the strategic Exact Sciences acquisition that has reshaped the balance sheet and cash flow profile. Bulls point to resilient device growth, margin expansion, and a depressed valuation as a long-term buying opportunity, while bears focus on near-term headwinds, integration risk, and the stock's sharp underperformance versus the broader market over the past year.…
ABT
Abbott
$104.89
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy ABT Today?
The synthesized recommendation is a Buy, anchored by the strong_buy analyst consensus (mean rating 1.46) and an average target price of $120.72, implying 15.1% upside. The core thesis is that Abbott's underlying operating momentum, characterized by 13.0% revenue growth and gross margin expansion to 58.0%, is being masked by temporary acquisition-related expenses, and the forward valuation of 17.3x PE offers an attractive entry point for a defensive compounder. Supporting evidence includes the robust free cash flow of $8.72B, which comfortably funds the dividend and buybacks, and the conservative debt-to-equity of 0.289. The forward PE of 17.3x is well below the trailing 33.5x, reflecting expected EPS recovery to $8.29 in 2027, and the dividend yield of 1.88% with a 63.1% payout ratio is sustainable. However, risks include integration challenges from Exact Sciences, potential delays in margin recovery, and the stock's recent underperformance (-17.8% over one year). The rating would upgrade to a Strong Buy if forward EPS estimates rise or if the stock breaks above $120, and downgrade to Hold if revenue growth decelerates below 8% or if interest expenses remain elevated. Relative to its history and peers, the stock appears fairly valued on a forward basis but undervalued if the recovery materializes.
Sign up to view all
ABT 12-Month Price Forecast
The forward-looking view is cautiously bullish, supported by the attractive forward valuation and strong analyst sentiment. The key driver is the expected EPS recovery to $8.29 in 2027, which would make the stock look cheap at 17.3x forward earnings. However, confidence is tempered by the recent guidance cut and integration risks. An upgrade to high confidence would require evidence of margin recovery and successful Exact Sciences integration, while a downgrade to neutral would follow a revenue growth deceleration below 8% or a failure to meet EPS estimates.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Abbott's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $120.72 and implied upside of +15.1% versus the current price.
Average Target
$120.72
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+15.1%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$103 - $135
Analyst target range
Coverage is deep and overwhelmingly bullish: 26 analysts follow Abbott with a consensus recommendation of "strong_buy" (mean rating 1.46 on a 1-5 scale) and an average target price of $120.72, implying roughly +15.1% upside from the current $104.89. The consensus leans firmly bullish, and recent institutional actions reinforce that stance — TD Cowen reiterated Buy multiple times through August and September 2026, Citigroup and UBS maintained Buy, and Wolfe Research upgraded to Outperform from Peer Perform on August 13, 2026. The pattern of reiterations and an upgrade, with no visible downgrades, suggests analysts view the pullback as an opportunity rather than a deterioration. The target range spans $103.00 to $135.00 — a spread of about 31% around the average, signaling moderate rather than extreme uncertainty. The high target of $135 (roughly +29% upside) likely assumes successful Exact Sciences integration, device-segment acceleration, margin recovery as acquisition-related interest normalizes, and a re-rating toward the forward-earnings multiple; the low target of $103 (about -1.8%, essentially flat) prices in continued guidance pressure, integration friction, and multiple compression. Consensus 2027 EPS of $8.29 (range $7.79-$8.43) and revenue of $67.85B underpin the bullish case, and the tight clustering of estimates around the average suggests reasonable conviction in the recovery trajectory despite the wide price-target spread.
Bulls vs Bears: ABT Investment Factors
The bull case for Abbott rests on its resilient revenue growth (13% YoY), expanding gross margins, and a deeply discounted forward valuation (17.3x forward PE) that implies a sharp earnings recovery. Analyst sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with a strong_buy consensus and a $120.72 average target, supported by recent upgrades. However, the bear case is equally compelling: the stock has severely underperformed, down 17.8% over the past year with a 39.6% max drawdown, and earnings quality has deteriorated due to acquisition-related interest expenses. The guidance cut and integration risks surrounding Exact Sciences add near-term uncertainty. The most critical tension is whether the projected EPS recovery to $8.29 in 2027 is achievable; if it is, the stock is undervalued, but failure to deliver would leave it looking expensive on trailing metrics. Currently, the bear evidence (price action, earnings pressure) is more immediate, but the bull case has stronger long-term fundamentals and analyst support.
Bullish
- Strong revenue growth and margin expansion: Q2 2026 revenue grew 13.0% YoY to $12.59B, well above Abbott's historical mid-single-digit trajectory, while gross margin expanded to 58.0% from 56.4% a year earlier. This demonstrates underlying operating momentum and pricing power, even as net margin was pressured by acquisition-related interest.
- Analyst consensus strongly bullish with upside: 26 analysts rate ABT a 'strong_buy' (mean 1.46) with an average target price of $120.72, implying 15.1% upside from $104.89. Recent actions include a Wolfe Research upgrade to Outperform on August 13, 2026, and reiterated Buy ratings from TD Cowen, Citigroup, and UBS, with no visible downgrades.
- Attractive forward valuation: Forward PE of 17.29x is well below the trailing 33.5x, reflecting expected EPS recovery to $8.29 in 2027. This forward multiple is reasonable for a diversified medtech with defensive characteristics, especially compared to the stock's own historical band in the high-20s to mid-30s.
- Defensive low-beta profile with dividend: Beta of 0.583 makes ABT roughly 42% less volatile than the market, providing downside protection in turbulent markets. The 1.88% dividend yield, backed by 409 consecutive quarterly dividends and a 54-year streak of increases, offers steady income.
Bearish
- Significant underperformance and deep drawdown: ABT is down 17.82% over the past year and 15.54% YTD, with a maximum drawdown of 39.57%. The 1-year relative strength versus SPY is -33.35, highlighting a severe loss of investor confidence and a challenging recovery path.
- Earnings quality deterioration: Q2 2026 net income fell to $928M (7.37% net margin) from $1.78B (15.97% margin) a year ago, despite revenue growth. The decline stems from higher interest expense ($299M vs. $121M) and a $258M other-expense drag related to acquisition financing, which may persist.
- Guidance cut and integration risk: The 2026 guidance cut in April overshadowed an earnings beat, signaling near-term headwinds. The $19.8B Exact Sciences acquisition carries integration risk and has already strained the cash position (cash fell to $6.80B from $8.52B), potentially limiting financial flexibility.
- Premium trailing valuation: Trailing PE of 33.5x sits near the upper end of its normalized band (high-20s to mid-30s), while EV/EBITDA of 18.9x and P/B of 4.20x are in line with peers but not cheap. If the expected earnings recovery fails to materialize, the stock could de-rate.
ABT Technical Analysis
Abbott is in a recovery phase within a longer-term downtrend: the stock is down 17.82% over the trailing year and 15.54% year-to-date, yet has rebounded 8.35% over six months and 4.18% over three months. At $104.89, the shares sit at roughly 47% of the 52-week range ($81.97 low to $132.03 high), meaning price has climbed off the lows but remains far below the highs — a positioning that reflects repair rather than momentum-driven overextension. The 39.57% maximum drawdown underscores how deep the prior decline was, and the current level suggests the market is still rebuilding conviction rather than chasing the stock. Recent momentum is clearly positive and accelerating: the stock is up 2.47% over the past month versus a 1.22% gain for SPY (relative strength of 1.25), and up 4.18% over three months versus 2.69% for SPY (relative strength of 1.49). This short-term outperformance diverges sharply from the 1-year relative strength of -33.35, a classic mean-reversion signature in which a beaten-down name begins to outperform as the longer-term downtrend decelerates. The 6-month relative strength of 0.87 shows the stock roughly tracking the market over that window, consistent with a base-building phase rather than a fresh breakdown. Key resistance sits at the 52-week high of $132.03, roughly 26% above the current price; a decisive breakout above that level would signal a full trend reversal and likely require a fundamental catalyst such as guidance stabilization or device-segment acceleration. Support rests at the 52-week low of $81.97, about 22% below current levels; a breakdown there would confirm the downtrend's resumption and likely coincide with renewed fundamental disappointment. With a beta of just 0.583, Abbott is roughly 42% less volatile than the market, which supports defensive position sizing but also means the stock will likely lag in strong risk-on rallies — a profile consistent with its low-beta healthcare defensive framing in recent coverage.
Beta
0.58
0.58x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-39.6%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$82-$132
Price range past year
Annual Return
-17.8%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | ABT Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +2.5% | +0.2% |
| 3m | +4.2% | +2.9% |
| 6m | +8.3% | +8.4% |
| 1y | -17.8% | +14.9% |
| ytd | -15.5% | +11.9% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
ABT Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is growing at a healthy clip: Q2 2026 sales of $12.59B rose 13.02% year-over-year versus $11.14B in Q2 2025, and the sequential progression from $11.16B in Q1 2026 to $12.59B in Q2 shows solid momentum. The segment mix reveals the growth engine — Medical Devices at $5.85B (roughly 46% of quarterly revenue) is the largest contributor, followed by Diagnostics at $3.09B, Nutritional Products at $2.14B, and Established Pharmaceuticals at $1.50B. The 13% growth rate, well above Abbott's historical mid-single-digit trajectory, implies either strong underlying device/diagnostics demand or acquisition contribution (the Exact Sciences deal), and the investment case hinges on whether this pace is durable or deal-driven. Profitability is solid but uneven: Q2 2026 net income was $928M on a 7.37% net margin, down from $1.78B and a 15.97% margin in Q2 2025, while gross margin expanded to 58.0% from 56.4% a year earlier. The margin compression at the net line stems from below-the-line items — Q2 2026 interest expense of $299M (versus $121M a year ago) and a $258M net other-expense drag tied to acquisition financing — rather than operating deterioration, as operating margin held at 14.15%. Gross margin has trended up from 52.6% in Q1 2025 to 58.0% in Q2 2026, a genuine positive, but the elevated interest burden from the Exact Sciences transaction is the key swing factor for earnings recovery. The balance sheet remains conservative: debt-to-equity is just 0.289, the current ratio is 1.58, and trailing free cash flow is a robust $8.72B, with Q2 2026 FCF of $2.89B on operating cash flow of $2.49B. ROE of 12.51% and ROA of 5.33% are respectable for a capital-intensive medtech, and the company comfortably funds its $1.10B quarterly dividend and $1.05B in buybacks from internal cash generation. The main watch item is the Q1 2026 financing activity — $18.5B of debt repayment and $19.8B of acquisitions — which temporarily strained the cash position (cash fell to $6.80B from $8.52B) but left leverage at a manageable 0.29x equity.
Quarterly Revenue
$12.6B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
+13.0%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
58.0%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$8.7B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is ABT Overvalued?
Because Abbott is profitable (Q2 2026 net income of $928M; trailing EPS positive), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric. The stock trades at a trailing PE of 33.5x but a forward PE of just 17.29x — a dramatic gap that implies the market expects earnings to roughly double, consistent with consensus 2027 EPS of $8.29 versus a depressed trailing figure distorted by acquisition-related interest and one-off items. That forward multiple is the more meaningful anchor and frames Abbott as a reasonably valued defensive compounder rather than an expensive one. On a peer basis, the picture is mixed: the PS ratio of 4.94x and EV/Sales of 4.48x look moderate for a diversified medtech, while EV/EBITDA of 18.9x and P/B of 4.20x sit in line with large-cap device peers. The 1.88% dividend yield and 63.1% payout ratio are consistent with a mature income name, and the negative PEG ratio (-0.65) is a mechanical artifact of trailing-earnings distortion rather than a genuine signal — investors should weight the forward PE and EV/EBITDA over the trailing multiples when benchmarking against the sector. Historically, Abbott's PE has ranged widely — from roughly 5.3x in Q4 2024 (inflated by a one-time tax benefit) to 42.8x in Q2 2026 — with the more normal band in the high-20s to mid-30s (e.g., 30.7x in Q4 2025, 33.3x in Q2 2025). The current trailing 33.5x sits near the upper end of that normalized band, but the forward 17.3x implies the market is pricing a sharp earnings recovery; if that recovery materializes, the stock is cheap on a forward basis, while failure to deliver would leave it looking expensive on trailing numbers.
PE
33.5x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Mid-Range
5-Year PE Range 21x~47x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
18.9x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks are centered on the company's increased leverage and earnings volatility following the Exact Sciences acquisition. Q2 2026 interest expense surged to $299M from $121M a year earlier, and a $258M other-expense drag contributed to a net margin collapse to 7.37% from 15.97%. While debt-to-equity remains manageable at 0.289, the $19.8B acquisition and $18.5B debt repayment in Q1 2026 reduced cash to $6.80B from $8.52B, limiting flexibility. Additionally, revenue concentration in Medical Devices (46% of Q2 2026 sales) exposes Abbott to competitive pressures and reimbursement changes in that segment. Market and competitive risks include valuation compression if the expected earnings recovery does not materialize. The stock trades at a trailing PE of 33.5x, near the upper end of its historical range, and a forward PE of 17.3x that already prices in a doubling of earnings. Any delay in EPS recovery could trigger multiple contraction. The low beta of 0.583 offers downside protection but also means the stock may lag in bull markets, as reflected in the 1-year relative strength of -33.35. Competitive threats in diabetes care (e.g., from continuous glucose monitoring rivals) and diagnostics could pressure growth. The worst-case scenario involves a failure to integrate Exact Sciences, persistent margin pressure from higher interest costs, and a delay in the EPS recovery. This could drive the stock down to its 52-week low of $81.97, representing a 22% decline from the current $104.89. A more severe outcome, such as a recession or competitive disruption, could push shares below that level, but the 52-week low serves as a realistic downside anchor given the defensive nature of the business.
FAQ
The most severe risk is integration and financial risk from the Exact Sciences acquisition, which has already increased interest expense to $299M in Q2 2026 and strained cash reserves. Second, earnings quality risk: net margin collapsed to 7.37% from 15.97% a year ago, and if this persists, the stock could de-rate. Third, competitive risk in Medical Devices, which represents 46% of revenue, where rivals could pressure pricing and market share. Fourth, macro risk: although low beta (0.583) provides defense, a recession could slow elective procedures and healthcare spending. These risks are ranked by severity, with integration/financial risk being the most immediate.
The 12-month forecast includes a base case (50% probability) targeting $115-$125, aligned with the analyst average of $120.72, assuming steady EPS recovery to $8.29. The bull case (30% probability) targets $130-$135, driven by successful integration and margin expansion. The bear case (20% probability) targets $82-$103, reflecting integration failures or persistent margin pressure. The most likely scenario is the base case, hinging on the company achieving consensus EPS estimates and maintaining revenue growth in the high-single digits. Key catalysts include Q3 2026 earnings and updates on Exact Sciences synergies.
On a trailing basis, ABT appears overvalued with a PE of 33.5x, near the upper end of its historical range. However, the forward PE of 17.3x suggests the market is pricing in a significant earnings recovery, making the stock undervalued if that recovery materializes. The EV/EBITDA of 18.9x and P/B of 4.20x are in line with large-cap medtech peers, indicating fair value relative to the sector. The wide gap between trailing and forward multiples implies the market expects EPS to roughly double to $8.29 in 2027. If achieved, the stock is cheap; if not, it could be expensive. Thus, the valuation verdict is fairly valued on a forward basis but with upside if execution meets expectations.
From a risk/reward perspective, ABT offers a favorable setup with 15.1% upside to the average analyst target of $120.72 and a forward PE of 17.3x that is reasonable for a defensive medtech. The biggest downside risk is a failure to achieve the expected EPS recovery, which could push shares to the 52-week low of $81.97, representing a 22% decline. However, the low beta of 0.583 and strong dividend history provide a margin of safety. For long-term investors comfortable with near-term volatility and seeking income and defensive exposure, ABT is a good buy at current levels. Short-term traders may find better opportunities elsewhere given the stock's recent underperformance and lack of immediate catalysts.
ABT is best suited for long-term investment, given its defensive characteristics, low beta (0.583), and 54-year history of dividend increases. The stock's recent volatility and 39.57% max drawdown highlight short-term risks, but the underlying business is stable and cash-generative. Earnings visibility is moderate, with consensus EPS estimates for 2027 providing a roadmap. A minimum holding period of 2-3 years is recommended to allow for the earnings recovery and integration of Exact Sciences to play out. Short-term traders may find the low beta and lack of immediate catalysts less appealing, but long-term income and value investors should benefit from the current discounted valuation.

