CMS Energy is a utility company operating in the electric and gas services industry.
It is Michigan's primary energy provider, known for its stable, regulated operations and commitment to clean energy investments through its "Consumers Energy" brand.
Updated: January 14, 2026, 16:00 EST
Of course. Here is a comprehensive analysis of CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) based on the provided data.
Based on a balanced assessment of its stable utility profile against its current valuation, CMS presents a case for a HOLD recommendation for existing investors, while new investors may want to wait for a more attractive entry point.
Technical & Market Position: CMS exhibits the classic characteristics of a defensive utility stock, with low volatility (Beta 0.48) and contained downside risk. However, its recent underperformance against the market and its position in the upper half of its 52-week range suggest limited near-term upward momentum. It appears to be in a period of consolidation.
Fundamental Health & Operations: The company shows a mixed fundamental picture. While revenue growth is positive, profitability is under pressure with contracting margins. The negative free cash flow per share is a point of concern, indicating potential strain on liquidity despite otherwise manageable debt levels. Operational efficiency metrics are modest, which is not unusual for a regulated utility but leaves little room for error.
Valuation & Peer Context: Valuation is CMS's most significant hurdle. While the P/E ratio seems reasonable, the extremely high EV/EBITDA ratio of 48 is a major red flag, suggesting the stock is very expensive relative to its core operating earnings. Without direct peer comparison, it's challenging to be definitive, but this metric alone signals a premium valuation that may already price in future growth.
Investment Decision Rationale: CMS is a high-quality, low-volatility utility suitable for risk-averse investors seeking stability and income. However, the current valuation, particularly the elevated EV/EBITDA, makes it difficult to justify a new investment at this level. The stock's appeal would significantly increase on a market-driven pullback to a lower price point.
*Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. Please conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.*
Here is a 12-month outlook for CMS Energy (CMS):
12-Month Outlook for CMS Energy (CMS)
The primary catalyst for CMS over the next year is the continued execution of its long-term capital investment plan in Michigan's clean energy transition, which should support steady rate-base growth and predictable dividend increases. The key risk remains its premium valuation, particularly the high EV/EBITDA multiple, which makes the stock vulnerable to a de-rating if interest rates remain elevated or if regulatory approvals are less favorable than expected. Given the lack of a specific analyst target and the current price near the high end of its recent range, we view the stock as fairly valued with a neutral outlook, suggesting a target price range around $68 - $75, implying limited upside from the current price of $70.56.
Most Wall Street analysts are optimistic about CMS's 12-month outlook, with consensus target around $70.92, indicating expected upside potential.
Overall, CMS has investment potential but also faces challenges. Here are key factors to weigh before investing.
Overall Assessment: CMS shows mixed performance with relatively modest recent gains but slightly negative medium-term momentum, trading in the upper portion of its yearly range.
Short-term Performance: The stock gained 1.18% over the past month but declined 3.71% over three months, underperforming the broader market by 7.08% during the latter period. This suggests recent weakness relative to market benchmarks despite some near-term stabilization.
Current Position: Trading at $70.56, CMS sits approximately 61% up from its 52-week low and about 8% below its 52-week high, indicating it is in the upper-middle portion of its yearly range. The low beta of 0.484 points to lower volatility than the market, while the -9.19% maximum drawdown reflects contained downside risk over the past year, suggesting the stock is not currently in overbought or oversold territory.
| Period | CMS Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +1.6% | +1.3% |
| 3m | -4.3% | +5.7% |
| 6m | +1.7% | +10.6% |
| 1y | +6.5% | +16.5% |
| ytd | +0.7% | +1.1% |
Revenue & Profitability CMS demonstrated sequential revenue growth from $1.84B to $2.02B quarter-over-quarter, though profitability metrics showed pressure with gross margin contracting from 38.8% to 29.1%. The company maintained a stable net income margin of 13.7% in Q3, supported by improved operating income margin expansion to 23.8% from 17.2% in the prior quarter.
Financial Health The company carries moderate leverage with a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.04 and interest coverage of 2.37, indicating adequate but constrained debt servicing capacity. Notably, free cash flow per share was negative at -2.13, suggesting potential liquidity strain despite an operating cash flow to sales ratio of 17%.
Operational Efficiency CMS shows modest operational efficiency with return on equity of 3.13% and asset turnover of 0.053, reflecting relatively low capital utilization. The cash conversion cycle of 26.6 days indicates reasonable working capital management, though fixed asset turnover of 0.068 suggests underutilization of long-term assets.
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
Try Now & Get Tesla Stock RewardValuation Level: CMS's current valuation presents a mixed picture. The trailing and forward P/E ratios in the low 20s, combined with a PEG ratio significantly below 1.0, suggest the stock may be reasonably valued or even undervalued relative to its earnings growth potential. However, the exceptionally high EV/EBITDA ratio of nearly 48 raises a major concern regarding cash flow generation and overall enterprise value, indicating a potentially expensive valuation on that critical metric. The PB and PS ratios also appear elevated, pointing to a premium pricing.
Peer Comparison: Unfortunately, a direct peer comparison cannot be performed as the relevant industry average data is not available. To properly contextualize these valuation metrics, benchmarks from the utility sector or a defined peer group would be required to determine if CMS's multiples represent a premium or discount to its competitors. The analysis remains incomplete without this comparative industry framework.
Based on the provided metrics, CMS exhibits low volatility risk. The Beta of 0.484 indicates the stock is significantly less volatile than the broader market, typically moving less than half as much. This characteristic, combined with a modest one-year maximum drawdown of -9.19%, suggests historical price stability and relatively low exposure to broad market swings.
Regarding other risks, the notable absence of reported short interest points to a general lack of bearish sentiment or perceived downside catalysts from sophisticated investors. However, this lack of speculative activity could also be associated with low trading liquidity, which may pose a risk of wider bid-ask spreads and potential price impact during large transactions.
Neutral/Hold. While CMS offers stable regulated revenue (95% from Michigan utilities) and a clear renewable growth strategy through its $20B capital plan, its elevated debt levels (D/E of 2.04) and premium valuation (EV/EBITDA ~48) create headwinds. This stock is best suited for income-focused, long-term investors who prioritize dividends and can tolerate execution risks from large infrastructure projects.
Based on the provided data, CMS appears slightly undervalued, primarily driven by its exceptionally strong PEG ratio. The key metrics are a PEG ratio of 0.50 (significantly below 1.0, implying undervaluation relative to growth) and a Forward P/E of 19.7. While the high EV/EBITDA and moderate PB/PS ratios are concerns, the PEG ratio below 1.0 is a powerful bullish signal, suggesting the market is not fully pricing in the company's earnings growth potential. This growth expectation seems to offset concerns about current profitability and operational efficiency.
Of course. As a risk management analyst, here are the key risks of holding CMS stock, ordered by importance.
1. Profitability and Liquidity Pressure: Despite revenue growth, the company faces squeezed profitability, as evidenced by the significant quarter-over-quarter contraction in gross margin (from 38.8% to 29.1%) and negative free cash flow per share (-2.13), indicating potential strain on generating cash after capital expenditures. 2. Moderate Financial Leverage: The company's debt-to-equity ratio of 2.04 and an interest coverage ratio of 2.37 indicate a leveraged balance sheet with limited cushion for servicing debt, especially in a rising interest rate environment. 3. Operational Inefficiency: Low asset utilization metrics, including a Return on Equity of 3.13% and an Asset Turnover of 0.053, suggest the company is not generating strong returns on its invested capital, which could hinder long-term growth and value creation.
Based on CMS Energy's 5-year capital investment plan, my forecast sees the stock reaching $80-$85 (base case) and $90-$95 (bull case) by 2026. Key growth drivers are the execution of its $17B regulated capital plan in Michigan, supportive regulatory outcomes for its clean energy transition, and predictable dividend growth underpinned by rate-base expansion. This assumes timely regulatory approvals, manageable financing costs, and continued execution on its long-term strategy. The forecast is inherently uncertain and highly sensitive to interest rates and the regulatory environment in Michigan, which could significantly impact the final valuation.