DAY

Based on the comprehensive analysis, DAY presents a highly speculative and risky investment opportunity that is not suitable for most investors.

Fundamentally, the company is deeply troubled. While it maintains decent gross margins and moderate debt, it is currently unprofitable with a severe negative net income and concerning operational inefficiencies (negative ROA/ROE). The constrained liquidity and weak cash flow relative to debt further heighten solvency risks. The valuation is impossible to assess using conventional metrics due to negative P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios, signaling significant financial distress. The only available risk metric, a Beta above 1, suggests higher-than-market volatility, compounding the uncertainty from missing critical data.

Recommendation: Do Not Buy. The combination of unsustainable profitability, poor operational health, and unquantifiable risks makes DAY an unattractive investment. Until the company demonstrates a credible path to restoring profitability and improves its financial transparency, investors should avoid this stock and seek opportunities with clearer fundamentals and positive earnings.

RockFlow Model Forecast: Three Scenarios for 2026

Based on the provided analysis, the 12-month outlook for DAY is highly unfavorable.

The primary catalyst for any potential recovery would be the company successfully executing a credible turnaround plan that demonstrates a clear path to profitability and improved operational efficiency. However, the significant risks far outweigh any potential upside; these include a high risk of continued financial distress due to negative earnings, poor cash flow, and potential solvency issues, exacerbated by a lack of financial transparency. Given the severe fundamental weaknesses and the absence of analyst targets, a target price cannot be reasonably established, and the stock is expected to remain exceptionally volatile and speculative.

Wall Street Consensus

Most Wall Street analysts are optimistic about DAY's 12-month outlook, with consensus target around $0.00, indicating expected upside potential.

Overall, DAY has investment potential but also faces challenges. Here are key factors to weigh before investing.

Unfortunately, I cannot perform a technical analysis as the provided data is insufficient. Critical performance metrics like the current price, recent price changes, and 52-week range are listed as unavailable.

The only available metric, a beta of 1.167, indicates that DAY is theoretically 16.7% more volatile than the overall market. However, without price data to apply this to, its implications for recent performance cannot be determined.

For a meaningful assessment, complete data on price history, changes, and trading range is required. With the current information, no conclusions can be drawn about the stock's trend, relative strength, or current market position.

Revenue & Profitability Revenue grew 3.6% quarter-over-quarter to $481.6 million, while profitability deteriorated sharply as the net income ratio fell from 4.6% to -40.9%. The significant loss in Q3 was driven by substantial other expenses, despite a resilient gross profit margin of 62.7%. This indicates a company with strong underlying product margins but experiencing volatile bottom-line performance.

Financial Health The company maintains a moderate debt level with a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46 and a low debt ratio of 14.1%. However, liquidity is constrained with a current ratio of just 1.04 and minimal cash reserves relative to obligations. The weak cash flow to debt ratio of 0.03 suggests limited capacity to service debt from operating activities.

Operational Efficiency Operational efficiency metrics are concerning, with negative returns on assets (-2.3%) and equity (-7.3%) reflecting poor capital allocation. The low asset turnover of 0.06 indicates inefficient utilization of the company's asset base to generate sales. While the cash conversion cycle of 16 days shows reasonable working capital management, overall operational performance remains suboptimal.

Valuation Level Analysis

Based on the provided metrics, DAY's valuation presents a challenging and fundamentally weak picture. The company has negative trailing and forward PE ratios (-73.54 and -13.98, respectively), which indicates it is currently unprofitable on a net income basis. This makes the PE ratio unusable for traditional valuation assessment. The negative EV/EBITDA of -113.91 further confirms severe operational cash flow issues relative to its enterprise value, rendering standard valuation multiples meaningless and signaling significant financial distress.

Peer Comparison

A direct peer comparison using industry averages is not possible with the available data. However, the provided metrics themselves are highly aberrant; profitable companies typically have positive PE and EV/EBITDA ratios, while DAY's deeply negative values place it in a precarious position relative to any healthy industry benchmark. The only marginally positive metric is the PEG ratio of 0.013, which suggests that if the company's negative earnings were to reverse and grow, the growth rate is theoretically high, but this is speculative given the current lack of profitability.

Of course. Here is a risk analysis for the stock based on the provided metrics.

1. Volatility Risk The stock exhibits a Beta of 1.167, indicating it is more volatile than the broader market. This means it is likely to experience larger price swings, both upward and downward, compared to the market average. The inability to calculate a maximum drawdown for the period suggests either a lack of significant decline or, more concerningly, a lack of sufficient trading history or data for a proper volatility assessment, which is in itself a risk factor.

2. Other Risks Critical risk metrics such as Short Interest and Maximum Drawdown are not available, presenting a significant analytical challenge. This lack of data makes it difficult to gauge market sentiment (via short interest) or to understand the stock's worst-case historical loss potential. This absence of information underscores a liquidity or transparency risk, as investors cannot fully assess the bearish sentiment or historical downside volatility.