EAT

Brinker International

$190.11

+1.09%
Oct 22, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Brinker International is a leading casual-dining operator and franchisor whose flagship Chili's banner is the second-largest casual-dining concept in the US, generating roughly $5.3 billion (92% of consolidated sales) across 1,114 company-owned domestic units and 469 franchised locations, complemented by the smaller Maggiano's Italian concept with 52 domestic restaurants. The company is a scale incumbent rather than a disruptor, competing on value pricing, menu innovation, and marketing reach against peers like Darden, Texas Roadhouse, and Applebee's, with a franchise-light international footprint. The current investor narrative centers on a genuine brand turnaround at Chili's — value-led traffic gains, roughly doubled restaurant-level profits, and margin expansion — that has driven a multi-quarter re-rating, while the debate has shifted to whether slowing same-store sales, a stretched balance sheet, and a stock that has already more than doubled can sustain the momentum. Recent headlines highlight a Northcoast upgrade to Buy with a $275 target, a $400 million share-repurchase program, and analyst debate over whether the rally still leaves room given a still-reasonable earnings multiple.

People also watch

McDonald's

McDonald's

MCD

Analysis
Starbucks

Starbucks

SBUX

Analysis
Chipotle Mexican Grill

Chipotle Mexican Grill

CMG

Analysis
Yum! Brands

Yum! Brands

YUM

Analysis
Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International

QSR

Analysis

EAT 12-Month Price Forecast

Historical Price
Current Price $190.11
Average Target $190.11
High Target $218.63
Low Target $161.59

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Brinker International's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $259.09 and implied upside of +36.3% versus the current price.

Average Target

$259.09

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+36.3%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

—

covering this stock

Price Range

$151 - $310

Analyst target range

Coverage is broad and bullish: 22 analysts follow EAT, the consensus recommendation is a strong buy (mean rating of 1.48 on a 1-5 scale), and the average target price of $261.00 implies roughly 27.9% upside from the current $204.14. The consensus leans decisively bullish, supported by recent actions — Northcoast upgraded to Buy from Neutral on September 22, and Morgan Stanley, BofA, UBS, TD Cowen, Stephens, and Freedom Capital all maintain Buy/Overweight ratings — though DA Davidson and Piper Sandler remain Neutral, reflecting lingering caution on same-store sales deceleration.

The target range is wide, from a low of $151.00 (about 26% downside) to a high of $310.00 (about 52% upside), a spread of more than 100% of the current price that signals meaningful disagreement about the durability of the Chili's turnaround. The high target assumes sustained margin expansion, continued share repurchases, and multiple re-rating toward peer levels; the low target prices in slowing traffic, margin compression, and leverage risk. The wide dispersion, combined with a 1.26 beta and a 3.53-day short ratio, implies elevated uncertainty and volatility — investors should treat the consensus target as a directional signal rather than a precise price objective, and watch same-store sales and FCF conversion as the key swing factors.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: EAT Investment Factors

The bull case currently has stronger evidence: EAT trades at 15.2x trailing and 14.0x forward earnings, a 25-40% discount to casual-dining peers, while generating $557.5 million in TTM free cash flow and expanding operating margins from 8.7% to 10.7% over four quarters. The strong-buy consensus (1.48 mean rating) and $261 average target imply 27.9% upside, and the $400 million buyback provides a floor under EPS. The bear case rests on real but secondary concerns — 3.96x debt-to-equity, a 0.455 current ratio, and decelerating 5.06% revenue growth — that matter most if traffic turns negative. The single most important tension is whether Chili's same-store sales can hold positive as pricing-driven gains fade; if traffic stays positive, margins and the multiple can both expand, but if same-store sales turn negative, the leverage and single-brand concentration would compress the stock toward the $151 low target.

Bullish

  • Earnings recovery is dramatic and real: Q4 2026 net income of $131.1 million on an 8.54% net margin compares with $99.5 million in Q1, and diluted EPS rose from $2.17 in Q1 to $2.96 in Q4. Operating margin expanded from 8.7% in Q1 to 11.5% in Q3 and 10.7% in Q4, showing the Chili's turnaround is translating into durable profit, not just traffic.
  • Valuation still cheap versus peers: At 15.2x trailing and 14.0x forward earnings, EAT trades at roughly a 25-40% discount to the 20-25x range typical of quality casual-dining peers like Darden and Texas Roadhouse. A PEG of 0.51 and EV/EBITDA of 10.8x suggest the market is not paying up for the turnaround.
  • Strong analyst consensus and target upside: 22 analysts cover EAT with a mean rating of 1.48 (strong buy) and an average target of $261.00, implying 27.9% upside from $204.14. Northcoast upgraded to Buy with a $275 target on September 22, and Morgan Stanley, BofA, UBS, TD Cowen, Stephens and Freedom Capital all maintain Buy/Overweight.
  • Robust free cash flow funds buybacks: TTM free cash flow is $557.5 million, with $159.2 million generated in Q4 alone, funding $58.4 million of capex and $100.5 million of buybacks. This supports the $400 million repurchase program announced in the 2026 outlook, which should lift EPS even if growth slows.

Bearish

  • Leverage leaves little margin for error: Debt-to-equity is 3.96x, total debt to capitalization is 79.8%, and the current ratio is a thin 0.455 with a cash ratio of just 0.16. Interest coverage of 17.9x is comfortable today, but a traffic slowdown would strain the balance sheet precisely when buybacks are consuming free cash flow.
  • Same-store sales growth is decelerating: Revenue grew 5.06% year-over-year in Q4 2026, down from the high-single-digit same-store sales cited earlier in the year. With Chili's at 93% of sales and Maggiano's a neutral-to-drag contributor, the investment case now depends on margin durability rather than accelerating top-line growth.
  • Stock has already delivered a major re-rating: EAT is up 59.1% over one year and 34.7% YTD, and at $204.14 sits about 20% below its $254.99 peak. One-month performance of -3.1% versus SPY's +1.2% and relative strength of -4.3 points show momentum has decelerated and the easy money has been made.
  • Wide analyst dispersion signals uncertainty: Targets range from $151 (26% downside) to $310 (52% upside), a spread exceeding 100% of the current price. DA Davidson and Piper Sandler remain Neutral on same-store sales deceleration, and the 1.26 beta plus -35.65% max drawdown underscore how volatile the outcome could be.

EAT Technical Analysis

EAT is in a powerful, sustained uptrend: the stock is up 59.1% over the past year and 34.7% year-to-date, and at $204.14 it sits at roughly 67% of its 52-week range of $100.30 to $254.99 — well above the midpoint but about 20% below the July/August peak near $255. That positioning signals a stock that has already delivered the bulk of a major re-rating and is now consolidating its gains rather than breaking to fresh highs, a pattern more consistent with digestion than with fresh breakout momentum. Relative strength confirms the leadership: EAT has outperformed SPY by 43.6 percentage points over one year and 22.8 points YTD, though the 1-month relative strength of -4.3 points shows the stock has recently lagged a rising market.

Short-term momentum has clearly decelerated and diverged from the longer-term trend. The stock is down 3.1% over the past month versus a 1.2% gain for SPY, even as it remains up 7.8% over three months and 29.1% over six months — a classic pattern of a maturing advance where the 1-month pullback reflects profit-taking and mean reversion after the August spike to $254.99 rather than a trend reversal, given the still-positive 3-month and 6-month readings. The recent sequence of lower highs from the August peak ($254.99) through the September decline to $185.31 in early October, followed by a bounce back to $204, suggests a consolidation range forming between roughly $185 and $215. Volume of about 1.12 million shares and a short ratio of 3.53 days indicate moderate short interest that could fuel squeezes on upside breaks but is not extreme.

Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the October low near $185 and, more significantly, the 52-week low at $100.30, while resistance is the 52-week high of $254.99. A breakout above $255 would signal a resumption of the primary uptrend and likely invite momentum buyers, whereas a breakdown below $185 would confirm a deeper correction and put the 200-day trend at risk. With a beta of 1.257, EAT is roughly 26% more volatile than the market, and a max drawdown of -35.65% over the period underscores that position sizing and stop discipline matter — a 1.26 beta means a 10% market decline could translate into roughly a 12.6% drawdown for EAT.

Beta

1.26

1.26x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-29.1%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$100-$255

Price range past year

Annual Return

+44.0%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodEAT ReturnS&P 500
1m-8.1%-1.2%
3m+1.7%+3.4%
6m+37.1%+7.0%
1y+44.0%+14.4%
ytd+25.5%+12.0%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

EAT Fundamental Analysis

Revenue is growing at a solid but decelerating pace. Fiscal Q4 2026 revenue was $1.536 billion, up 5.06% year-over-year, and the trailing four quarters totaled roughly $5.90 billion ($1.349B + $1.452B + $1.470B + $1.536B), with sequential growth from $1.349 billion in Q1 to $1.536 billion in Q4. Segment data shows Chili's at $1.423 billion and Maggiano's at $112.8 million in the latest quarter, meaning Chili's drives about 93% of sales and is the sole engine of growth — Maggiano's remains a small drag/neutral contributor. The trend of mid-single-digit growth, down from the high-single-digit same-store sales cited earlier in the year, implies the investment case now hinges on margin durability and capital returns rather than accelerating top-line growth.

Profitability is strong and improving. Q4 2026 net income was $131.1 million on a net margin of 8.54%, with operating income of $164.9 million (10.7% operating margin) and EBITDA of $233.9 million (15.2% EBITDA margin); net income rose from $99.5 million in Q1 to $131.1 million in Q4, and operating margin expanded from 8.7% in Q1 to 11.5% in Q3 before settling at 10.7% in Q4. The reported gross margin of 18.6% (and the anomalous -83.7% figure in the Q4 filing, which reflects a cost-of-revenue classification quirk rather than economic reality) is typical for company-owned casual dining, where food and labor costs consume the majority of sales; the key takeaway is that restaurant-level margin expansion, not gross margin, is driving the profit inflection. EPS of $3.10 in Q4 versus $2.23 in the year-ago Q1 illustrates the magnitude of the earnings recovery.

Balance-sheet leverage is the principal financial risk. Debt-to-equity stands at 3.96x, the current ratio is a thin 0.455, and total debt to capitalization is 79.8%, reflecting a heavily levered, asset-light-but-lease-heavy structure; interest coverage of 17.9x is comfortable but the low cash ratio (0.16) leaves little liquidity buffer. Free cash flow is robust — $557.5 million TTM, with quarterly FCF of $159.2 million in Q4 and $180.9 million in Q3 — and operating cash flow of $217.6 million in Q4 comfortably funded $58.4 million of capex and $100.5 million of buybacks. ROE of 109.8% is inflated by the thin equity base (a 6.34x equity multiplier), so it overstates true returns; the more meaningful signal is FCF conversion of roughly 73% of operating cash flow, which supports the $400 million repurchase program but leaves limited room for error if traffic slows.

Quarterly Revenue

$1.5B

2026-06

Revenue YoY Growth

+5.1%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

-83.7%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$557500000.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Chili's Restaurants
Maggiano's Restaurants

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is EAT Overvalued?

Because Brinker is solidly profitable (Q4 net income of $131.1 million), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric. The stock trades at 15.2x trailing earnings and just 14.0x forward earnings, a modest 8% compression that implies the market expects only modest EPS growth — consistent with the consensus estimate of $19.07 for the forward period. The PEG ratio of 0.51 and EV/EBITDA of 10.8x suggest the valuation is not demanding relative to the earnings trajectory, though the 1.28x P/S and 16.7x P/B reflect the leverage-inflated equity base rather than a rich sales multiple.

Against the restaurant sector, EAT screens cheap on earnings: a 15.2x trailing PE and 14.0x forward PE are below the typical 20-25x range commanded by quality casual-dining peers such as Darden and Texas Roadhouse, representing roughly a 25-40% discount, while the 10.8x EV/EBITDA is in line to modestly below sector norms. The discount is partly justified by the 3.96x debt-to-equity leverage and the single-brand concentration in Chili's, but the 0.51 PEG and 8.5% net margin argue the market is underpaying for the turnaround's durability. The 1.28x P/S is low for a business with 10.7% operating margins, reinforcing the value case.

Historically, EAT's PE has ranged from the low teens to over 20x during the turnaround, with the current 15.2x trailing and 14.0x forward sitting in the lower-middle of that band — well below the 18-21x levels seen in mid-2025 and far above the distressed single-digit multiples of 2022-2023. The P/B of 16.7x is near the low end of its recent 15.7-26.4x range, and the EV/EBITDA multiple of 10.8x is below the 36-47x enterprise-value-to-EBITDA readings in the historical ratios table (which use a different denominator convention). Net-net, the stock is priced for continued execution but not for perfection, leaving room for multiple expansion if margins hold.

PE

15.2x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

High-End

5-Year PE Range 8x~18x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

10.8x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial and operational risks center on the leveraged balance sheet. Debt-to-equity of 3.96x and total debt to capitalization of 79.8% mean the company carries substantial fixed obligations, while a current ratio of 0.455 and cash ratio of 0.16 leave almost no liquidity buffer. Free cash flow of $557.5 million TTM is robust, but $400 million earmarked for buybacks plus $58.4 million of quarterly capex consumes most of it, so a traffic-driven EBITDA decline would quickly constrain both debt service and shareholder returns. Revenue concentration compounds this: Chili's is roughly 92-93% of sales, so a single-brand stumble is effectively a company-wide stumble.

Market and competitive risks are dominated by valuation compression and sector rotation. At 15.2x trailing earnings EAT is cheap versus Darden and Texas Roadhouse at 20-25x, but that discount reflects the leverage and single-brand risk; if same-store sales decelerate further from the current 5.06% revenue growth, the market could re-rate the stock toward the low end of its historical band. Beta of 1.257 means a 10% market decline translates to roughly a 12.6% drawdown, and the 1-month relative strength of -4.3 points shows the stock already lagging a rising market. Competitive pressure from Applebee's value promotions and Darden's scale, plus consumer sensitivity to menu pricing after several years of inflation, are live threats.

The worst-case scenario is a same-store sales decline combined with margin compression and multiple de-rating. If Chili's traffic turns negative, restaurant-level margins erode, free cash flow falls below the level needed to fund the $400 million buyback, and analysts cut toward the $151 low target — about 26% below the current $204.14. A deeper correction toward the October low of $185.31 would be roughly -9%, while a full retracement to the 52-week low of $100.30 would represent about -51%. Given the -35.65% max drawdown already observed, a realistic adverse outcome is a 25-35% decline to the $130-$150 range, consistent with the bear-case analyst target.