Ingersoll Rand Inc.
is a global provider of mission-critical airflow and industrial technologies within the industrial machinery sector. The company is a leader in creating innovative and sustainable solutions, such as compressors and fluid management equipment, known for its strong brand recognition and operational efficiency.
Updated: January 14, 2026, 16:00 EST
Technical Analysis IR demonstrates strong bullish momentum, significantly outperforming the market over recent periods despite high volatility. While currently positioned neutrally relative to its 52-week range (~10% below highs), its elevated beta and historical drawdown warrant caution against potential pullbacks.
Fundamentals Revenue has recovered to $1.96 billion with improved profitability, supported by a healthy debt structure and strong liquidity. However, operational efficiencies remain modest, with relatively low asset turnover and ROE indicating room for improvement in capital utilization.
Valuation & Peer Comparison Valuation metrics signal overvaluation, with high TTM P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios suggesting limited earnings support at current prices. A definitive conclusion requires industry benchmark comparisons, as sector norms could contextualize whether these premiums are justified.
Risk Assessment IR exhibits above-average volatility (beta = 1.33) and a notable maximum drawdown (~29%), implying higher sensitivity to market swings. While short interest is low, investors should monitor trading volumes and sector-specific risks.
---
Consider with Caution. IR shows strong operational recovery and financial health, but its elevated valuation and volatility temper near-term appeal. Investors with higher risk tolerance may find its momentum and fundamentals attractive, though a clearer peer comparison is advised before commitment. Await stabilization in valuation metrics or sector-wide data for a more decisive entry point.
*Note: This is not investment advice, for reference only.*
Based on the provided analysis, here is a 12-month outlook for Ingersoll Rand (IR):
12-Month Outlook for IR
The outlook for IR over the next year is cautiously neutral, balancing solid fundamentals against a demanding valuation. Key positive catalysts include the continuation of its strong operational recovery, robust financial health, and potential for market-beating momentum if industrial sector sentiment remains favorable. However, the primary risks are its significant volatility (beta of 1.33) and the potential for a valuation-based pullback, as its high TTM P/E and EV/EBITDA ratios suggest the stock price may be ahead of its earnings support. In the absence of a specific analyst target, a prudent target range would be contingent on the stock re-rating towards sector valuation norms, requiring investors to monitor for either an expansion in earnings or a more attractive entry point.
Most Wall Street analysts are optimistic about IR's 12-month outlook, with consensus target around $85.99, indicating expected upside potential.
Overall, IR has investment potential but also faces challenges. Here are key factors to weigh before investing.
IR has delivered strong positive returns over both short-term and medium-term periods, significantly outperforming the market during this bullish phase.
Over the past three months, IR has surged 9.37%, substantially outpacing the broader market by 6.0% while demonstrating higher volatility with a beta of 1.33. The stock's 2.86% one-month gain further confirms this positive momentum trend despite the elevated volatility.
Currently trading at $85.83, IR sits about 69% above its 52-week low but remains 10.5% below its yearly high, positioning it closer to a neutral zone rather than extreme overbought or oversold territory. However, the stock's historical volatility and substantial 29.2% maximum drawdown indicate investors should remain cautious of potential pullbacks.
| Period | IR Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +5.2% | +1.3% |
| 3m | +13.0% | +5.7% |
| 6m | -1.9% | +10.6% |
| 1y | -5.0% | +16.5% |
| ytd | +7.8% | +1.1% |
Revenue & Profitability Revenue improved to $1.96 billion in Q3 2025 with a net income ratio of 12.5%, marking a significant recovery from Q2's net loss. The company demonstrates solid gross profit margins near 44%, though operating expenses remain substantial. Profitability trends show volatility, with Q2 results heavily impacted by elevated other expenses that normalized materially in Q3.
Financial Health IR maintains a conservative debt structure with a debt ratio of 27% and interest coverage of 5.8x, indicating manageable leverage. The current ratio of 2.2 reflects strong short-term liquidity, while cash flow to debt ratio of 0.07 suggests modest debt servicing capacity from operations. Cash position appears adequate with cash per share of $2.94 supporting ongoing operations.
Operational Efficiency The company shows moderate operational metrics with ROE of 2.4% and asset turnover of 0.11, indicating relatively low capital efficiency. Inventory turnover of 0.87 and operating cycle of 169 days suggest potential working capital optimization opportunities. Fixed asset turnover of 2.2 demonstrates reasonable utilization of property and equipment investments.
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
Try Now & Get Tesla Stock RewardValuation Level: IR's current valuation metrics present a concerning picture, with a TTM PE of 67.07 and an EV/EBITDA of 72.23 indicating significant overvaluation relative to earnings and cash flow generation. The forward PE of 33.89 suggests some earnings growth is anticipated, though it remains elevated, while the negative PEG ratio of -0.11 signals either negative earnings growth expectations or calculation anomalies that undermine traditional growth-adjusted valuation perspectives. The high PB ratio of 3.34 and PS ratio of 4.62 further confirm the stock is trading at premium multiples to its asset base and revenue.
Peer Comparison: Unfortunately, without corresponding industry average data, a meaningful comparative analysis cannot be conducted to determine IR's relative valuation standing against sector peers. The absence of industry benchmarks prevents assessment of whether these elevated multiples are justified by sector norms or represent an outlier positioning. For a complete evaluation, obtaining industry-specific comparable ratios would be essential to contextualize these valuation metrics properly.
Based on the provided metrics, IR carries above-average volatility risk compared to the broader market. With a Beta of 1.332, the stock is theoretically about 33% more volatile than the market, meaning it's likely to experience larger price swings both upward and downward. This elevated sensitivity to market movements is corroborated by the significant one-year maximum drawdown of -29.16%, indicating the stock has recently endured a substantial peak-to-trough decline, which represents a high level of price risk for investors.
Regarding other specific risks, the lack of reported short interest suggests that there is not a significant contingent of investors actively betting on the stock's price to decline, which can sometimes be a positive signal. However, this absence does not eliminate other potential risks such as company-specific operational challenges, liquidity constraints if trading volume is low, or broader sector-wide headwinds that are not captured by these particular metrics.
Neutral - this stock presents a mixed risk/reward profile at current levels.
The bullish case is supported by strong revenue growth momentum and solid institutional backing, while bearish concerns center on premium valuation metrics and disappointing earnings guidance. Technical momentum remains positive but volatility is elevated.
Most suitable for momentum investors comfortable with above-average volatility, though value investors may find current multiples stretched. A "hold" approach seems prudent until valuation concerns ease or earnings visibility improves.
Based on the valuation metrics presented, IR stock appears significantly overvalued. The TTM P/E ratio of 67.07 and forward P/E of 33.89 are extremely high, indicating investors are paying a substantial premium for its earnings. The Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of 4.62 and Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 3.34 further confirm this premium valuation relative to its revenue and assets.
The primary driver of this overvaluation seems to be a disconnect between its current stock price and underlying fundamentals. Despite a recent quarterly recovery, the negative PEG ratio (-0.11) signals negative earnings growth expectations, which contradicts the high P/E multiples. Furthermore, operational efficiency metrics like a low ROE (2.4%) and asset turnover (0.11) do not support such elevated valuation levels, suggesting the market may be pricing in overly optimistic growth prospects that are not yet reflected in the company's financial performance.
Of course. Based on the provided information, here is a professional risk assessment for holding stock in IR (Ingersoll Rand).
While the stock shows positive momentum, several risks warrant attention, ordered from most to least critical based on the potential impact on share price.
1. Elevated Price Volatility: The stock's high beta (1.33) indicates it is significantly more volatile than the broader market, exposing investors to larger and more frequent price swings, which is confirmed by its substantial 29.2% maximum drawdown over the past year. 2. Operational Inefficiency and Profitability Volatility: The company's low asset turnover (0.11) and Return on Equity (2.4%) signal poor efficiency in using its capital to generate earnings, a fundamental risk that is compounded by quarterly earnings volatility, as evidenced by the swing from a net loss in Q2 to a 12.5% net income ratio in Q3. 3. Market Sentiment and Momentum Dependency: Recent strong performance (e.g., +9.37% over three months) appears to be a key driver of the stock's price, creating a risk that any failure to meet high growth expectations or a broader market downturn could lead to a sharp correction, especially given its high volatility. 4. Industry Cycle Exposure: Although not explicitly detailed in the data, the company's operational metrics—such as a long operating cycle (169 days) and moderate inventory turnover (0.87)—suggest sensitivity to economic cycles, posing a risk that an industrial sector slowdown could pressure its financial performance.
Of course. Here is a professional forecast for Ingersoll Rand (IR) stock performance through 2026.
Ingersoll Rand (IR) Stock Forecast: 2024-2026
1. Target Price Range for 2026: * Base Case (Most Likely): $95 - $110. This assumes continued execution on margins and mid-single-digit organic growth, with the valuation multiple (P/E) remaining near current elevated levels. * Bull Case: $115 - $130. This scenario requires above-trend industrial growth, successful high-margin acquisitions, and a expansion of the valuation multiple due to increased investor confidence in its "mission-critical" product portfolio.
2. Key Growth Drivers: * Industrial & Energy Transition Trends: Strong demand from sectors like LNG, hydrogen, and decarbonization projects, which leverage IR's compressor and vacuum technologies. * Operational Excellence & Margin Expansion: Continued execution on pricing strategies and cost-saving initiatives (like the IRX program) to protect and expand its already solid ~44% gross margins. * Strategic Capital Deployment: A robust balance sheet provides firepower for accretive mergers and acquisitions (M&A) to bolster growth in adjacent, high-margin markets.
3. Main Assumptions: * The global industrial economy avoids a severe recession. * The company successfully manages inflationary pressures and supply chain challenges. * Management continues its disciplined capital allocation strategy, balancing M&A with shareholder returns.
4. Forecast Uncertainty: It is important to note that this forecast is highly sensitive to broader economic conditions. The stock's high beta (1.33) indicates it will likely be more volatile than the overall market. Any significant industrial slowdown or failure to meet margin targets could result in underperformance relative to these projections.