LUNR

Intuitive Machines

$10.78

-6.83%
Oct 16, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Intuitive Machines is a space infrastructure and services company that designs, builds, integrates, and operates space systems, offering infrastructure-as-a-service across low Earth orbit, geostationary orbit, cislunar space, and deep space, with capabilities spanning spacecraft development, lunar landers, and space-based network connectivity for commercial, civil, and national security customers. The company occupies a distinctive position as one of NASA's primary Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) contractors, pairing a hardware-heavy product business (roughly 82% of revenue) with a smaller but strategically important services segment, making it a pure-play bet on the emerging lunar economy rather than a diversified aerospace prime. The current investor narrative is dominated by the tension between a record ~$1.8 billion backlog and seven NASA missions on the manifest against a history of lander mishaps, a recent revenue miss, and a deeply dilutive capital raise — management has been funding the growth story through equity issuance rather than internal cash generation. Sentiment has also been pressured by sector-wide 'SpaceX IPO fatigue' that triggered a broad repricing across public space names, leaving LUNR down sharply year-to-date even as the long-term contract pipeline has arguably never looked stronger.

People also watch

SpaceX

SpaceX

SPCX

Analysis
GE Aerospace

GE Aerospace

GE

Analysis
RTX

RTX

RTX

Analysis
Boeing

Boeing

BA

Analysis
Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

LMT

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy LUNR Today?

Rating: Hold (speculative). The core thesis is that LUNR's record $1.8 billion backlog and seven NASA missions provide a credible path to revenue growth, but the company's -$190.5 million free cash flow burn and 51.5% share dilution over the past year mean the equity is a high-risk option on execution. The analyst consensus is strong buy (mean 1.3) with an average target of $29.00, implying ~169% upside, but the stock's 60.9% six-month decline and -39.7% YTD performance show the market is skeptical of near-term delivery.

Supporting evidence: revenue grew 3.1% year-over-year to $206.2 million in Q2 2026 and 10.4% sequentially, gross margin recovered to 17.4% from -23.5%, and the current ratio of 4.96 indicates adequate liquidity. However, net margin is -39.7%, operating margin -41.5%, and trailing EPS is -$0.29, while the stock trades at 9.2x sales — a rich multiple for an unprofitable company. The implied upside to the $29 average target is substantial, but the low target of $13.00 is only 20.6% above the current price, suggesting limited downside support from analysts.

Key risks that could invalidate the thesis include another dilutive equity raise (shares already up 51.5% year-over-year), a mission failure that delays revenue, and continued cash burn of -$190.5 million TTM. The rating would upgrade to Buy if free cash flow turns positive or if the company secures non-dilutive funding and demonstrates consistent gross margins above 25%. It would downgrade to Sell if the stock breaks below the $7.78 52-week low or if another revenue miss is accompanied by a capital raise. Valuation verdict: fairly valued to slightly overvalued on sales (9.2x) given negative margins, but undervalued relative to the $29 analyst target if execution improves — a binary outcome that justifies a Hold.

Sign up to view all

LUNR 12-Month Price Forecast

The forward view is balanced: the $1.8 billion backlog and seven NASA missions provide a credible growth runway, but the company's -$190.5 million cash burn and history of dilution mean equity holders bear substantial risk. The stock's 60.9% six-month decline has reset valuation to 9.2x sales, which is still rich for a negative-margin business, but the analyst consensus of strong buy with a $29 target suggests the selloff may be overdone. I would upgrade to bullish if LUNR demonstrates two consecutive quarters of positive free cash flow or secures a major non-dilutive contract, and downgrade to bearish if another mission failure occurs or if the stock breaks below $7.78. With 50% probability assigned to the base case range of $13-$20, the risk/reward is roughly symmetric at current levels, favoring a neutral stance.

Historical Price
Current Price $10.78
Average Target $16.50
High Target $43.00
Low Target $7.78

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Intuitive Machines's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $29.00 and implied upside of +169.0% versus the current price.

Average Target

$29.00

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+169.0%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

—

covering this stock

Price Range

$13 - $43

Analyst target range

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: LUNR Investment Factors

The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: LUNR is burning $190.5 million in free cash flow annually, has diluted shareholders by 51.5% in a year, and trades at a negative net margin of -39.7% while underperforming the S&P 500 by 68.4% over six months. However, the bull case rests on a record $1.8 billion backlog, seven NASA missions, and an analyst consensus strong buy with a $29 average target — implying the market may be mispricing the contract pipeline. The single most important tension is whether LUNR can convert its backlog into revenue and positive cash flow before needing another dilutive raise; resolution of that question — likely visible in the next two to three quarters of execution — will determine whether the stock re-rates toward analyst targets or continues to bleed toward the 52-week low.

Bullish

  • Record $1.8B backlog underpins growth: Intuitive Machines carries a record ~$1.8 billion backlog, roughly 8.8x the $206.2 million in Q2 2026 revenue, providing multi-year revenue visibility. With seven NASA missions on the manifest, the contract pipeline has arguably never been stronger even as the stock has sold off.
  • Analyst consensus remains strong buy: All 9 covering analysts rate the stock a strong buy (mean recommendation 1.3) with an average target of $29.00, implying ~169% upside from the $10.78 current price. Even the low target of $13.00 sits ~20.6% above the current price, suggesting the selloff has overshot fundamental views.
  • Revenue inflected sharply higher: Q2 2026 revenue of $206.2 million grew 3.1% year-over-year versus $50.3 million in Q2 2025, and rose 10.4% sequentially from Q1 2026's $186.7 million. The step-change reflects conversion of backlog into hardware deliveries, with gross margin recovering to 17.4% from -23.5% a year earlier.
  • Balance sheet liquidity is solid: The current ratio stands at 4.96, indicating ample short-term liquidity to fund operations, and debt-to-equity is negative (-0.50) because the company holds more cash than debt. This gives LUNR runway to execute on its manifest without immediate solvency pressure.

Bearish

  • Massive cash burn and dilution: Free cash flow TTM is -$190.5 million against a $2.4 billion market cap, and the company has funded growth through equity issuance — shares outstanding rose from 107.1 million in Q2 2025 to 162.2 million in Q2 2026, a 51.5% increase in one year. This dilution directly erodes per-share value and reflects dependence on capital markets.
  • Deeply unprofitable with negative margins: Net margin is -39.7%, operating margin -41.5%, and trailing EPS is -$0.29 in Q2 2026 alone. Gross margin of 15.6% is thin for an aerospace contractor and volatile (Q1 2026 was 39.0%, Q2 2025 was -23.5%), showing execution inconsistency.
  • Severe relative underperformance: LUNR is down 60.9% over six months and 39.7% year-to-date versus the S&P 500's +7.5% and +11.9% respectively, a relative strength gap of -68.4% over six months. The stock has lost 76.4% from its peak (max drawdown), reflecting a persistent downtrend and negative sentiment.
  • High beta and volatility risk: Beta of 1.86 means LUNR is nearly twice as volatile as the market, and the 52-week range of $7.78 to $46.75 represents a 6x spread. The short ratio of 5.07 days indicates meaningful bearish positioning that can amplify moves in either direction.

LUNR Technical Analysis

Beta

1.86

1.86x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-76.4%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$8-$47

Price range past year

Annual Return

-8.9%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodLUNR ReturnS&P 500
1m-22.3%+0.2%
3m-20.3%+2.9%
6m-60.9%+8.4%
1y-8.9%+14.9%
ytd-39.7%+11.9%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

LUNR Fundamental Analysis

Quarterly Revenue

$206168000.0B

2026-06

Revenue YoY Growth

+309.8%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

17.4%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$-190506000.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Product
Service

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is LUNR Overvalued?

PE

-23.2x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Low-End

5-Year PE Range 0x~3x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

-23.4x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial and operational risks are acute. Free cash flow TTM is -$190.5 million, and the company has no dividend (payout ratio 0), meaning it must fund operations externally. Shares outstanding grew from 107.1 million in Q2 2025 to 162.2 million in Q2 2026 — a 51.5% increase — directly diluting existing holders. Gross margin is volatile (17.4% in Q2 2026, 39.0% in Q1 2026, -23.5% in Q2 2025), and net margin is -39.7%, so profitability depends on flawless execution of fixed-price contracts. Revenue concentration in NASA CLPS missions adds binary mission-failure risk.

Market and competitive risks are significant. The stock trades at 9.2x sales and 6.8x EV/sales — a premium for an unprofitable company — leaving little room for disappointment. Beta of 1.86 means a 10% market decline could translate to an ~18.6% drop in LUNR, and the recent 'SpaceX IPO fatigue' selloff shows how sector sentiment can overwhelm company fundamentals. Competition from Voyager (which acquired Astrobotic) and Firefly in lunar landers, plus MDA Space's $620 million U.S. defense push, intensifies the competitive landscape. Regulatory and funding risk tied to NASA budget cycles is a persistent overhang.

Worst-case scenario: a high-profile mission failure or another revenue miss triggers a loss of confidence, forcing a dilutive raise at depressed prices. The stock could retest its 52-week low of $7.78, representing a -27.8% decline from the current $10.78, and in a severe sector-wide repricing could approach the analyst low target of $13.00 (which is above current price, so downside is better framed by the 52-week low). The max drawdown of -76.4% from the peak illustrates the tail risk; a repeat of that magnitude from current levels would imply a price near $2.50, though the $7.78 low is the more immediate reference point.

FAQ

The most severe risk is financial: free cash flow TTM is -$190.5 million, and the company has diluted shareholders by 51.5% in one year (shares outstanding up from 107.1 million to 162.2 million), with further dilution likely. Second is execution risk — past lander mishaps and a recent revenue miss show that mission failures can delay revenue and damage credibility with NASA. Third is market risk: beta of 1.86 means the stock is nearly twice as volatile as the market, and the recent 'SpaceX IPO fatigue' selloff demonstrates how sector sentiment can overwhelm fundamentals. Fourth is competitive risk from Voyager/Astrobotic, Firefly, and MDA Space, which could pressure contract wins and margins. Ranked by severity: financial/dilution first, execution second, market volatility third, competition fourth.

The 12-month forecast has three scenarios: bull case (25% probability) targeting $29-$43 on successful mission execution and backlog conversion; base case (50% probability) targeting $13-$20 on mixed execution and another modest capital raise; and bear case (25% probability) targeting $7.78-$10 on a mission failure or revenue miss. The base case is most likely, with the key assumption that revenue grows 20-30% year-over-year but misses the $2.05 billion analyst estimate, and gross margins stabilize in the 15-20% range. The analyst consensus average target of $29 aligns with the bull case, while the low target of $13 aligns with the upper end of the base case. The wide range reflects the binary nature of lunar mission outcomes.

LUNR trades at 9.2x trailing sales and 6.8x EV/sales, which is a premium multiple for a company with a -39.7% net margin and negative free cash flow. On earnings, the trailing PE is negative (-23.2) and forward PE is -57.2, so traditional valuation metrics are not meaningful. However, the PEG ratio of 0.27 and forward EPS estimate of $0.94 suggest that if the company hits analyst estimates, the stock could be undervalued relative to growth. The market appears to be pricing in significant execution risk — the stock is down 60.9% over six months — which may create an opportunity if the backlog converts to revenue. Relative to its own history, the stock is near the low end of its 52-week range ($7.78-$46.75), suggesting the market is paying a discount to recent peak valuation.

From a risk/reward perspective, LUNR offers substantial potential upside — the analyst average target of $29 implies ~169% upside from $10.78 — but the downside is equally real, with a 52-week low of $7.78 representing -27.8% from current levels. The company's -$190.5 million free cash flow burn and 51.5% share dilution over the past year mean the equity is a leveraged bet on execution, not a value play. It is a good buy only for investors with a high risk tolerance and a multi-year horizon who believe in the lunar economy and can withstand a beta of 1.86. For most investors, a Hold rating is more appropriate until free cash flow inflects or the company demonstrates consistent margin expansion.

LUNR is more suitable for long-term, risk-tolerant investors than short-term traders, despite its high volatility. The company is in a growth stage with negative earnings, no dividend (payout ratio 0), and a path to profitability not expected until 2027, so near-term earnings visibility is low. Beta of 1.86 and a max drawdown of -76.4% mean short-term trading requires precise timing and carries substantial risk. For long-term holders, the $1.8 billion backlog and seven NASA missions provide a multi-year revenue runway that could reward patience if execution improves. A suggested minimum holding period is 2-3 years to allow for mission cycles and the expected profitability inflection, with position sizing that accounts for the possibility of a 50%+ drawdown.