ON

onsemi

$73.20

+2.16%
Sep 15, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
ON Semiconductor (onsemi) is a vertically integrated supplier of power semiconductors and intelligent sensing products, manufacturing the majority of its chips in-house and selling into automotive drivetrains, safety systems, industrial automation, energy infrastructure, and data centers. It is the world's second-largest power chipmaker and one of the largest automotive image-sensor suppliers, giving it a distinct position as a high-content, design-win-driven supplier rather than a broad commodity logic vendor. The current investor narrative is dominated by the company's roughly $7 billion acquisition of Synaptics, a bold pivot into physical AI and edge inference that management frames as a growth accelerant but that the market initially punished, with the stock dropping sharply around the late-June announcement. That debate — whether the deal is a transformative entry into AI-adjacent compute or an expensive, balance-sheet-stretching diversification away from a cyclical auto/industrial core — is now the central question for investors, layered on top of a still-weak near-term earnings picture.

People also watch

Nvidia

Nvidia

NVDA

Analysis
Broadcom

Broadcom

AVGO

Analysis
Micron Technology

Micron Technology

MU

Analysis
AMD

AMD

AMD

Analysis
Intel

Intel

INTC

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy ON Today?

Based on the synthesis of analyst consensus, valuation, and growth prospects, ON receives a Hold rating with a bullish bias. The core thesis is that the stock is deeply undervalued on forward earnings (16.8x PE) and has unanimous analyst support (average target $107.08, implying 40.6% upside), but near-term earnings are deteriorating and the Synaptics acquisition adds uncertainty. The risk/reward is attractive for patient investors, but the lack of a near-term catalyst warrants caution.

The supporting evidence is compelling: ON trades at a forward PE of 16.81x, well below the 20x–30x sector average; revenue growth is positive at 4.68% YoY but decelerating; trailing free cash flow is robust at $1.453 billion; and the balance sheet is strong with a debt-to-equity of 0.45 and current ratio of 4.52. The average analyst target of $107.08 implies significant upside, and even the lowest target of $85.00 is above the current price. However, the trailing net margin of 2.02% and negative EBITDA in Q1 2026 highlight the earnings risk.

The biggest risks are a prolonged auto/industrial downturn, Synaptics integration challenges, and the possibility that forward EPS estimates are too optimistic. The rating would upgrade to Buy if the stock sustains above $85–$90 and gross margins stabilize above 40%, or if Synaptics accretes faster than expected. It would downgrade to Sell if revenue growth turns negative or if free cash flow deteriorates below $1 billion annually. Relative to its own history, ON is undervalued on PS and PB, but the discount reflects real fundamental deterioration; thus, it is fairly valued until earnings show a clear recovery.

Sign up to view all

ON 12-Month Price Forecast

ON presents a classic value-vs.-growth dilemma: the stock is statistically cheap on forward earnings and has unanimous analyst support, but the near-term fundamentals are deteriorating. The Synaptics acquisition is a bold strategic pivot that could reignite growth, but it also introduces execution and integration risks. The risk/reward is skewed to the upside for long-term investors, but the lack of a near-term catalyst and high beta (1.997) suggest the stock could remain volatile. I would upgrade to bullish if the company demonstrates two consecutive quarters of margin expansion and revenue acceleration; I would downgrade to bearish if forward EPS estimates are cut by more than 20%.

Historical Price
Current Price $73.20
Average Target $105.00
High Target $150.00
Low Target $45.00

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on onsemi's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $106.88 and implied upside of +46.0% versus the current price.

Average Target

$106.88

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+46.0%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

covering this stock

Price Range

$85 - $150

Analyst target range

Coverage on ON is robust, with 25 analysts and a consensus recommendation of "buy" (recommendation mean of 2.17, where lower is more bullish). The average price target is $107.08, which implies roughly +40.6% upside from the current $76.14, and even the lowest target of $85.00 sits about 11.6% above the current price — a striking signal that the entire analyst community views the recent selloff as overdone. Consensus estimates call for EPS of $5.87 (range $4.59 to $6.80) and revenue of $8.41 billion (range $8.03 billion to $9.29 billion), which underpins the bullish forward valuation case. The consensus clearly leans bullish, and the fact that no analyst target is below the current price is unusual and suggests the market has overshot to the downside relative to fundamental expectations. The target range is wide — $85.00 to $150.00, a spread of $65 or roughly 76% of the low end — which signals high uncertainty and genuine disagreement about the Synaptics deal and the pace of the auto/industrial recovery. The high target of $150.00 implies roughly +97% upside and would require both multiple expansion and successful execution on the physical AI/edge inference thesis, including Synaptics accretion and a cyclical demand recovery. The low target of $85.00 still implies upside but prices in continued margin compression, a slow auto recovery, and skepticism that the deal creates value near term. Recent institutional actions are notably stable rather than directional — Susquehanna, Mizuho, B. Riley, Needham, and Evercore ISI all maintained positive ratings through late June and early July 2026, while TD Cowen, Cantor Fitzgerald, Stifel, and Citigroup stayed neutral — indicating analysts are holding their ground through the volatility rather than capitulating, which supports the view that the selloff is sentiment-driven rather than fundamentally justified.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: ON Investment Factors

The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence, given the Q1 loss, negative EBITDA, and 34.8% three-month price decline. However, the bull case rests on a powerful combination of deep value (16.8x forward PE), unanimous analyst optimism (average target $107.08), and a strong balance sheet that can fund the Synaptics pivot. The single most important tension is whether the forward EPS of $5.87 is achievable; if it is, the stock is significantly undervalued, but if earnings fail to recover, the current multiple could compress further. The market is clearly in a show-me phase, and the next few quarters will determine whether this is a cyclical trough or a structural breakdown.

Bullish

  • Analyst targets imply 40% upside: All 25 covering analysts have price targets above the current $76.14, with an average target of $107.08 (+40.6%) and a low target of $85.00 (+11.6%). This unanimity suggests the recent selloff is sentiment-driven rather than fundamentally justified, especially since no analyst has capitulated despite the Synaptics deal and weak Q1.
  • Forward PE of 16.8x is cheap: ON trades at just 16.81x forward EPS of $5.87, well below the 20x–30x range typical for analog and power semiconductor peers. If the consensus earnings recovery materializes, the stock is significantly undervalued relative to its sector.
  • Strong balance sheet and cash flow: Debt-to-equity is only 0.45 and the current ratio is 4.52, with $2.005 billion in cash. ON generated $1.453 billion in trailing free cash flow and $217.2 million in Q1 2026 alone, providing ample liquidity to fund the Synaptics acquisition without straining the balance sheet.
  • Synaptics deal opens AI edge opportunity: The $7 billion acquisition of Synaptics positions ON in physical AI and edge inference, a high-growth adjacency to its power and sensing franchises. Management and several analysts view the post-announcement selloff as an overreaction, with the deal potentially accelerating revenue growth beyond the current 4.68% YoY.

Bearish

  • Earnings have collapsed to a loss: Q1 2026 swung to a net loss of $33.4 million (EPS -$0.08) from net income of $181.8 million in Q4 2025, with EBITDA turning negative at -$46.7 million. The trailing net margin is just 2.02%, down from over 22% in 2024, highlighting a severe profitability downturn.
  • Revenue growth has stalled: Q1 2026 revenue of $1.513 billion grew only 4.68% YoY and has been range-bound between $1.47 billion and $1.55 billion for five consecutive quarters. The core auto/industrial markets remain in a demand trough, and the Synaptics deal is a bet on future re-acceleration rather than a response to current momentum.
  • Synaptics acquisition adds execution risk: The $7 billion deal for Synaptics is a major diversification away from ON's cyclical auto/industrial core, and the market initially punished the stock, which dropped sharply around the late-June announcement. Integration challenges and potential balance-sheet strain could pressure the stock further if synergies disappoint.
  • High volatility and relative underperformance: With a beta of 1.997 and a max drawdown of -47.61%, ON is roughly twice as volatile as the S&P 500. The stock has underperformed SPY by 37.85 percentage points over three months and 7.56 points over one month, signaling a loss of momentum and investor confidence.

ON Technical Analysis

ON is in a volatile recovery that has rolled over into a sharp intermediate downtrend. The stock is up 55.32% over the past year and 34.29% year-to-date, but at $76.14 it sits only about 35% of the way up its 52-week range of $44.56 to $134.92, meaning it has surrendered the majority of its earlier gains and is trading far closer to its lows than its highs. That positioning signals a damaged but not broken longer-term uptrend — momentum buyers have been flushed out, and the stock is now in a show-me phase rather than a momentum melt-up. Recent momentum is decisively negative and diverging from the 1-year trend: ON is down 8.62% over the past month and 34.81% over three months, even as the 1-year figure remains strongly positive. Relative strength tells the same story — ON trails SPY by 7.56 percentage points over one month and 37.85 points over three months, versus outperforming by 39.10 points over a year, a classic deceleration pattern that suggests the market is repricing the Synaptics deal and the weak Q1 print rather than simply taking profits. The single-day 8.51% jump on September 11 (from $70.17 to $76.14) on 11.28 million shares hints at a possible short-term capitulation bounce, but with a short ratio of 3.46 and no RSI provided, the bounce needs follow-through before it can be called a trend change. Key levels are well defined: the 52-week low at $44.56 is the ultimate support, while the 52-week high at $134.92 is distant resistance, with the more immediate battleground being the $70–$76 zone the stock just reclaimed. A sustained break below $70 would open the door to a retest of the mid-$60s and potentially the $44.56 low, while reclaiming and holding above $85–$90 would be the first real evidence of a durable bottom. With a beta of 1.997, ON is roughly twice as volatile as the S&P 500, and a max drawdown of -47.61% confirms that position sizing and stop discipline matter enormously here — this is not a stock to hold at full weight through drawdowns.

Beta

2.00

2.00x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-47.6%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$45-$135

Price range past year

Annual Return

+52.2%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodON ReturnS&P 500
1m-11.4%-2.4%
3m-35.2%+2.2%
6m+23.5%+14.8%
1y+52.2%+14.6%
ytd+29.1%+11.1%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

ON Fundamental Analysis

ON's revenue trajectory has flattened and is now showing signs of strain. The most recent quarter (Q1 2026, ended April 3) delivered $1.513 billion in revenue, up just 4.68% year-over-year, a sharp deceleration from the $1.7225 billion reported in Q4 2024 and the $1.7619 billion in Q3 2024. Sequentially, revenue has been essentially range-bound between roughly $1.47 billion and $1.55 billion for five straight quarters, and the segment mix shows Power Solutions Group at $736.6 million, Analog Solutions Group at $540.4 million, and Intelligent Sensing Group at just $236.3 million — meaning the growth story still rests heavily on the power franchise while the sensing business that Synaptics is meant to bolster remains the smallest contributor. The implication is that ON is a cyclical industrial/auto supplier stuck in a demand trough, and the Synaptics deal is a bet on re-accelerating growth rather than a response to existing momentum. Profitability has deteriorated sharply and is now the core fundamental problem. Q1 2026 swung to a net loss of $33.4 million (EPS of -$0.08) from net income of $181.8 million in Q4 2025 and $255.0 million in Q3 2025, with EBITDA turning negative at -$46.7 million versus $449.3 million in Q4 2025. Gross margin compressed to 38.53% in Q1 2026 from 45.23% in Q4 2024, and the trailing net margin is just 2.02% against a gross margin of 32.29% and operating margin of 12.47% on a trailing basis — a dramatic fall from the 22%+ net margins ON posted through 2024. The company remains marginally profitable on a trailing basis (EPS of $0.0054), but the trend is clearly negative, and the gap between the 38.5% quarterly gross margin and the 32.3% trailing figure underscores how much the recent quarters have dragged down the average. The balance sheet is the strongest part of the story and the main source of resilience. ON carries a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.45 and a current ratio of 4.52, with $2.005 billion in cash at the end of Q1 2026 against minimal near-term maturities, and it generated $217.2 million in free cash flow in Q1 2026 and $1.453 billion on a trailing basis. Operating cash flow of $239.1 million in Q1 comfortably covered $21.9 million of capex, and the company returned capital aggressively with $345.7 million of stock repurchases in the quarter even while posting a net loss. ROE of just 1.58% and ROA of 6.75% show that returns on capital have collapsed with the earnings downturn, and the pending Synaptics acquisition will likely consume cash and/or add debt, so the key question is whether FCF holds up well enough to fund the deal without straining the balance sheet.

Quarterly Revenue

$1.5B

2026-04

Revenue YoY Growth

+4.7%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

38.5%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$1.5B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Analog Solutions Group
Intelligent Sensing Group
Power Solutions Group

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is ON Overvalued?

Because ON's trailing net income is barely positive (EPS of $0.0054), the trailing PE of 186.7x is economically meaningless and distorted by the near-zero earnings base, so the more informative metric is the forward PE of 16.81x, which reflects consensus EPS of $5.87 for the coming year. The enormous gap between the 186.7x trailing and 16.8x forward multiple implies the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery — roughly a 1,000x+ swing in EPS — which is an extremely high bar and explains why the stock has been so volatile around earnings and the Synaptics announcement. On a sales basis, ON trades at a PS of 3.71x and an EV/Sales of 4.55x, with EV/EBITDA at 26.5x, elevated because trailing EBITDA has been crushed by the Q1 loss. Relative to the semiconductor sector, ON's forward PE of 16.8x screens cheap — many analog and power peers trade in the 20x–30x forward range, and the sector's AI-driven leaders command far higher multiples — but that discount is arguably justified by ON's negative near-term earnings momentum, 2.02% net margin, and heavy auto/industrial cyclicality versus AI-datacenter-exposed peers. The premium/discount debate hinges entirely on whether the forward EPS estimate of $5.87 is achievable; if it is, ON is a value stock, and if it is not, the 16.8x is a value trap. Historically, ON's own valuation band has compressed dramatically: its PS ratio was 16.9x–19.5x in 2023, 12.8x–18.0x in 2022, and now sits at just 3.71x, while its PB has fallen from 5.8x in mid-2023 to 2.90x today. That places ON near the bottom of its own multi-year valuation range on both sales and book value, which historically has marked attractive entry points — but the compression also reflects genuine fundamental deterioration (net margin down from 27.9% in Q4 2023 to 2.02% now), so the market is pricing in real earnings risk rather than simply mispricing the stock. The PEG ratio of -2.03 is negative and therefore not useful given the earnings trough.

PE

186.7x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

High-End

5-Year PE Range 11x~22x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

26.5x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

ON faces significant financial and operational risks. The company swung to a net loss of $33.4 million in Q1 2026, with EBITDA turning negative at -$46.7 million, and gross margin compressed to 38.53% from 45.23% a year earlier. Revenue growth has stalled at 4.68% YoY, and the business remains heavily concentrated in cyclical automotive and industrial markets, which together account for the bulk of sales. The $7 billion Synaptics acquisition, while strategically aimed at diversifying into AI, could strain the balance sheet if it requires debt funding, especially given the current earnings trough. Additionally, ON's ROE has collapsed to 1.58%, reflecting poor capital returns during this downturn.

Market and competitive risks are elevated. ON trades at a forward PE of 16.81x, which is cheap relative to peers, but that discount could persist if earnings fail to recover. The stock's beta of 1.997 makes it highly sensitive to market swings, and it has underperformed SPY by 37.85 percentage points over three months. The semiconductor sector is intensely competitive, with larger players like Texas Instruments and Infineon also targeting automotive and industrial power. The Synaptics deal introduces integration risk and could distract management from the core business. Regulatory risks, such as export controls or tariffs, could also impact ON's global sales.

In a worst-case scenario, a continued auto/industrial downturn, coupled with Synaptics integration missteps and further earnings declines, could drive the stock back to its 52-week low of $44.56, representing a 41.5% decline from the current $76.14. If the forward EPS estimate of $5.87 is not met and instead falls toward the low end of $4.59, the stock could trade at a lower multiple, potentially testing the mid-$50s. The maximum drawdown over the past year was -47.61%, indicating that such a decline is within the realm of possibility. Investors could lose over 40% from current levels in this adverse scenario.

FAQ

The most severe risk is a continued downturn in auto and industrial demand, which could keep revenue growth stagnant and push earnings further below estimates. Financial risk is elevated due to the Q1 2026 net loss and negative EBITDA, though the balance sheet remains strong with debt-to-equity of 0.45. The $7 billion Synaptics acquisition adds integration and execution risk, and could strain cash flow if synergies are delayed. Finally, the stock's high beta (1.997) makes it vulnerable to market-wide selloffs, and it has underperformed SPY by 37.85 percentage points over three months.

Our 12-month forecast has a base case (50% probability) of $95–$115, assuming revenue grows 5-7% and EPS meets the $5.87 consensus. The bull case (30% probability) targets $120–$150 if Synaptics accretes faster and auto/industrial demand recovers strongly. The bear case (20% probability) sees $45–$70 if the downturn persists and earnings estimates are cut. The most likely scenario is the base case, hinging on a gradual cyclical recovery and successful integration of Synaptics.

ON appears undervalued on forward earnings, trading at 16.81x forward EPS of $5.87, which is below the 20x–30x range of many analog and power semiconductor peers. On a sales basis, the PS ratio of 3.71x and EV/Sales of 4.55x are near multi-year lows, compared to PS ratios above 12x in 2022–2023. However, the trailing PE of 186.7x is distorted by near-zero earnings, and the discount reflects real fundamental deterioration (net margin of 2.02%). The market is pricing in a significant earnings recovery; if that fails to materialize, the stock could be fairly valued or even overvalued.

ON could be a good buy for value-oriented investors with a long time horizon, given the 40.6% upside to the average analyst target of $107.08 and a forward PE of just 16.81x. However, the company is currently unprofitable on a quarterly basis (Q1 2026 net loss of $33.4 million) and faces cyclical headwinds in auto and industrial markets. The risk/reward is attractive if you believe in the earnings recovery story, but the high beta (1.997) and 47.61% max drawdown mean significant volatility. It is best suited for investors who can tolerate short-term pain for potential long-term gains.

ON is more suitable for long-term investment (at least 2-3 years) given its cyclical nature and the time needed for the Synaptics acquisition to contribute meaningfully. The stock does not pay a dividend, so returns depend entirely on capital appreciation. Short-term trading is risky due to high volatility (beta 1.997) and the potential for sharp drawdowns, as evidenced by the 47.61% max drawdown. Investors should have a minimum holding period of 18-24 months to ride out the semiconductor cycle and realize the AI diversification benefits.