RMD

ResMed

$253.06

+2.79%
Oct 22, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
ResMed Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes respiratory care devices — flow generators, masks, humidifiers, and accessories — for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and other respiratory conditions, alongside a growing SaaS portfolio (AirView, Brightree, MatrixCare) serving home medical equipment providers and out-of-hospital care settings. The company is the global duopoly leader in sleep apnea therapy hardware alongside Philips, distinguished by its vertically integrated mask franchise, high recurring resupply revenue, and a digital health platform that supplies clinical adherence data to patients, providers, and payers. The current investor debate centers on whether ResMed can sustain double-digit mask and device growth as GLP-1 obesity drugs reshape the long-term sleep apnea funnel, while competitive noise from Philips' re-entry and the recent $340 million Noctrix Health acquisition (adding a first-in-class restless legs syndrome therapy) frame the growth-versus-disruption narrative. Sentiment has improved markedly since mid-year — RBC Capital upgraded the stock to Outperform on September 15, 2026 — but the Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) and mixed sell-side stance reflect lingering uncertainty over competitive intensity and the durability of margin expansion.

People also watch

Intuitive Surgical

Intuitive Surgical

ISRG

Analysis
Becton Dickinson

Becton Dickinson

BDX

Analysis
Modernland Realty Ltd

Modernland Realty Ltd

MDLN

Analysis
West Pharmaceutical Services (United States)

West Pharmaceutical Services (United States)

WST

Analysis
Hologic

Hologic

HOLX

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy RMD Today?

Rating: Hold with a constructive bias. The core thesis is that ResMed is a high-quality duopoly franchise with 61% gross margins, 26.9% net margins and ~10% free cash flow yield trading at 18.7x earnings — near the bottom of its multi-year valuation band — but the stock has already rallied 20% in three months to within 5.4% of the $251.99 average analyst target, so the easy money from the re-rating has been made. The consensus 'buy' rating (mean 2.3 across 17 analysts) supports owning the name, but the divided sell-side (Citigroup Neutral, Piper/Wells/Jefferies Hold, Zacks Rank #3) argues against chasing at $238.97. Supporting evidence is strong: revenue grew 8.58% YoY to $1.464B in Q4 FY2026 with clean sequential progression across four quarters; gross margin expanded from 58.6% to a 62.2% peak before a mix-driven 58.8% in Q4; trailing free cash flow was $2.89B ($11.40 per share) against a $28.2B market cap; ROE is 23.1% and ROA 14.0%; and the 18.67x trailing PE sits at a discount to the low-to-mid-20s typical of healthcare equipment peers and far below RMD's own 47.1x in Q1 FY2022. The 12.80x EV/EBITDA and 4.99x PS are modest for a 61%-gross-margin franchise. The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are GLP-1-driven structural erosion of sleep apnea demand, Philips' competitive re-entry compressing the 61% gross margin, and margin mix deterioration already visible in the Q4 gross margin dip to 58.84%. This Hold would upgrade to Buy on a pullback toward the $210-$220 zone (roughly 14x forward EPS of $15.61) or on evidence that mask resupply growth is accelerating; it would downgrade to Sell if gross margin falls below 57% for two consecutive quarters or if revenue growth decelerates below 5%. Valuation verdict: fairly valued to modestly undervalued relative to history and peers, but not a compelling entry at current levels after the rally.

Sign up to view all

RMD 12-Month Price Forecast

Historical Price
Current Price $253.06
Average Target $252.50
High Target $320.00
Low Target $175.00

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on ResMed's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $252.69 and implied upside of -0.1% versus the current price.

Average Target

$252.69

0 analysts

Implied Upside

-0.1%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

—

covering this stock

Price Range

$175 - $320

Analyst target range

Coverage is broad and constructive: 17 analysts cover ResMed with a consensus recommendation of "buy" (mean rating 2.3 on a 1-5 scale where lower is more bullish). The average target price is $251.99, implying +5.4% upside from the current $238.97 — a modest but positive signal, and notably the stock has already rallied 20% in three months toward that target. Consensus FY revenue of $7.06 billion (range $6.96B-$7.34B) and EPS of $15.61 (range $15.32-$16.41) imply continued mid-single-digit growth with stable margins. The target range is wide — $175 low to $320 high, a spread of 83% around the average — signaling genuine disagreement about the GLP-1 and competitive impact. The $320 high target assumes multiple re-expansion toward the low-20s PE plus sustained double-digit mask growth and successful integration of Noctrix; the $175 low target prices in margin compression from Philips competition and/or demand erosion from obesity drugs. Institutional ratings show a clear positive inflection: RBC Capital upgraded to Outperform from Sector Perform on September 15, 2026, and KeyBanc has maintained Overweight — but Citigroup downgraded to Neutral from Buy in July and Piper Sandler, Wells Fargo, and Jefferies remain Neutral/Hold/Equal Weight, so the bullish consensus masks a divided sell-side. The recent upgrade pattern tilts positive, but the wide dispersion and the stock's proximity to the average target argue for patience rather than chasing at current levels.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: RMD Investment Factors

The bull case currently has stronger evidence: RMD trades at 18.7x earnings near the bottom of its multi-year valuation band, generates $2.89B of free cash flow, carries a 0.125 debt-to-equity ratio, and has rallied 20% in three months on a +17.40% relative-strength swing with an RBC upgrade as confirmation. The bear case rests largely on a thesis — GLP-1 erosion of the sleep apnea funnel and Philips competition — that has not yet shown up in the numbers, since revenue grew 8.58% and margins remain top-tier. The single most important tension is whether obesity-drug adoption structurally impairs sleep apnea treatment volumes: if it does, the 18.7x multiple is a value trap and the $175 bear target is in play; if it does not, the multiple is a discount that should close toward the low-20s and the $320 high target becomes reachable. Everything else — Philips, Noctrix integration, margin mix — is secondary to that demand question.

Bullish

  • Valuation near multi-year lows: At 18.67x trailing and 18.06x forward earnings, RMD trades at a steep discount to its own history (47.1x in Q1 FY2022, 39.4x in Q4 FY2022) and below the low-to-mid-20s typical of healthcare equipment peers. With a 61.1% gross margin, 26.9% net margin and ~10% FCF yield ($2.89B FCF on a $28.2B market cap), the multiple looks inconsistent with the quality of the franchise.
  • Fortress balance sheet, high capital returns: Debt-to-equity of just 0.125 and a current ratio of 3.10, with $1.469B of cash at fiscal year-end, give RMD substantial flexibility. The company returned $700.0M in buybacks and $349.7M in dividends in Q4 alone while still funding $350.7M of acquisitions and $156.3M of capex, and the 23% payout ratio leaves room for more.
  • Steady revenue growth, expanding margins: Q4 FY2026 revenue of $1.464B grew 8.58% YoY, with a clean sequential progression from $1.336B to $1.423B to $1.431B to $1.464B across the last four quarters. Gross margin climbed from 58.6% in Q4 FY2025 to 61.5% in Q1 FY2026 and 62.2% in Q2 before a mix-driven 58.8% in Q4, and ROE of 23.1% confirms high capital efficiency.
  • Momentum inflection and relative strength: The stock is up 20.09% over three months versus SPY's 2.69%, a +17.40% relative strength swing that contrasts sharply with the -27.02% one-year relative strength. The RBC Capital upgrade to Outperform on September 15, 2026 and the recovery from the $182.82 June trough to $238.97 suggest a re-rating is underway.

Bearish

  • GLP-1 overhang on sleep apnea funnel: The central debate is whether obesity drugs structurally shrink the sleep apnea patient funnel, and the market's persistent de-rating from 47x to 18.7x PE reflects that fear. The 83% spread between the $175 low and $320 high analyst targets quantifies how unresolved this question remains among the sell-side.
  • Divided sell-side, limited near-term upside: Despite the 'buy' consensus, Citigroup downgraded to Neutral in July and Piper Sandler, Wells Fargo and Jefferies remain Neutral/Hold/Equal Weight, while Zacks carries a Rank #3 (Hold). With the stock at $238.97 against a $251.99 average target, only +5.4% remains to consensus after a 20% three-month rally.
  • Philips re-entry and competitive intensity: ResMed's duopoly economics depend on Philips' absence from the mask and flow generator market, and Philips' re-entry is cited as a key risk behind the $175 bear target. Competitive pressure could compress the 61% gross margin that underpins the entire earnings base.
  • Q4 margin and earnings deceleration: Q4 FY2026 gross margin fell to 58.84% from 62.25% in Q3, and operating income slipped to $448.7M from $454.5M in Q4 FY2025 despite 8.6% higher revenue. R&D rose to $105.7M (7.2% of sales) from $86.4M, and the Noctrix cost base pressures near-term margins.

RMD Technical Analysis

ResMed is in a recovery uptrend within a longer-term corrective structure. The stock is down 11.49% over the trailing year and 2.39% year-to-date, yet the current price of $238.97 sits at roughly 60% of its 52-week range (low $180.27, high $277.67) — well off the lows but still 13.9% below the high, a positioning that suggests improving momentum rather than either overextension or a falling knife. The 180-day price series confirms the pattern: a grinding decline from ~$226 in April to a $182.82 trough on June 2, followed by a persistent stair-step recovery to the $230s-$240s. Recent momentum is decisively positive and accelerating. The stock has gained 20.09% over three months and 4.70% over the past month, versus just 2.69% and 1.22% for SPY — relative strength of +17.40% over three months and +3.48% over one month. That 3-month outperformance sharply diverges from the -27.02% one-year relative strength, a classic mean-reversion signature: the stock was oversold on a 12-month basis and is now being re-rated as fundamentals stabilize. The 6-month change of +4.76% versus SPY's +7.48% shows the recovery is recent rather than entrenched. Key levels are well defined. Support sits at the $180.27 52-week low, with secondary support around the $190-$195 June/July consolidation zone; resistance is the $277.67 52-week high, with the $240-$242 area (the August 28-31 highs and the October 15 close of $242.23) acting as the immediate ceiling the stock is currently testing. A breakout above $242 on volume would confirm the recovery trend and open a path toward the prior high; a breakdown below $190 would invalidate the structure and re-test the lows. With a beta of 0.75, ResMed is roughly 25% less volatile than the market, and its -35.46% max drawdown underscores that defensive characteristics did not insulate it from a sector-wide de-rating — position sizing should account for the stock's tendency toward sharp, sentiment-driven gaps despite low beta.

Beta

0.75

0.75x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-35.5%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$180-$278

Price range past year

Annual Return

-5.0%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodRMD ReturnS&P 500
1m+14.0%-1.2%
3m+29.6%+3.4%
6m+15.1%+7.0%
1y-5.0%+14.4%
ytd+3.4%+12.0%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

RMD Fundamental Analysis

Revenue is growing at a healthy, stable clip. Fiscal Q4 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026) revenue was $1.464 billion, up 8.58% year-over-year, and the trailing four quarters show a clean sequential progression: $1.336B (Q1), $1.423B (Q2), $1.431B (Q3), $1.464B (Q4) — roughly $5.65 billion in annualized revenue with no quarter-to-quarter deterioration. The Sleep and Respiratory segment at $1.256 billion remains the engine (~86% of segment disclosure), while Residential Care Software contributes $166.9 million; the mask resupply franchise is the growth driver per recent commentary, and the Noctrix acquisition adds an adjacent RLS therapy vertical. Growth is steady rather than accelerating, consistent with a mature duopoly — the investment case rests on durable mid-to-high single-digit top-line growth plus operating leverage rather than hypergrowth. Profitability is robust and margins are expanding. Q4 2026 net income was $383.4 million on a 26.2% net margin, with gross margin of 58.84% and operating margin of 30.66%; notably, gross margin has climbed from 58.6% (Q4 2025) through 61.5% (Q1 2026) and 62.2% (Q2 2026) before settling at 58.8% in Q4 — the Q4 dip reflects mix and the Noctrix-related cost base, but the full-year trend is clearly upward. Operating income rose from $454.5 million in Q4 2025 to $448.7 million in Q4 2026 on 8.6% higher revenue, with R&D up to $105.7 million (7.2% of sales) from $86.4 million — investment is being stepped up, which pressures near-term margin but supports the long-term moat. A 26-28% net margin and 61% gross margin are top-tier for medical devices. The balance sheet is fortress-like. Debt-to-equity is just 0.125, the current ratio is 3.10, and cash stood at $1.469 billion at fiscal year-end. Trailing free cash flow was $2.89 billion (FCF per share of $11.40), operating cash flow was $1.806 billion in Q4 alone, and the company returned capital aggressively — $700.0 million in buybacks and $349.7 million in dividends in Q4 — while still funding $350.7 million of acquisitions and $156.3 million of capex. ROE of 23.1% and ROA of 14.0% confirm high capital efficiency; the 1.24% dividend yield with a 23% payout ratio leaves ample room for continued buybacks and bolt-on M&A without external financing.

Quarterly Revenue

$1.5B

2026-06

Revenue YoY Growth

+8.6%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

58.8%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$2.9B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Residential Care Software
Sleep And Respiratory

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is RMD Overvalued?

Because ResMed is solidly profitable (Q4 2026 net income of $383.4 million; TTM net income of $1.523 billion), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric. The stock trades at 18.67x trailing earnings and 18.06x forward earnings — a narrow gap that implies the market expects only modest EPS growth, consistent with the consensus FY estimate of $15.61 (versus the current run-rate). The PEG ratio of 2.00 and EV/EBITDA of 12.80x suggest the multiple is not stretched relative to the company's growth and cash-generation profile. Against the medical devices sector, ResMed screens cheap on several measures: PS of 4.99x, P/B of 4.28x, and EV/Sales of 6.07x are modest for a 61% gross-margin, 26% net-margin franchise, and the 18.7x trailing PE sits at a discount to the broader healthcare equipment group's typical low-to-mid-20s multiple. The discount appears unjustified by fundamentals — ROE of 23.1%, FCF yield of roughly 10% ($2.89B FCF on a $28.2B market cap), and a near-monopoly position in masks — and more likely reflects GLP-1 overhang and Philips competition fears. Historical context is striking: ResMed's PE has compressed from 47.1x in Q1 FY2022 and 39.4x in Q4 FY2022 to 18.4x today, while PS fell from 42.5x to 19.3x (and 4.99x on the current-market-cap basis). The stock is near the bottom of its own multi-year valuation band — a level that historically has coincided with attractive entry points, though it also reflects the market's persistent concern that sleep apnea treatment volumes could be structurally impaired by obesity-drug adoption.

PE

18.7x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Low-End

5-Year PE Range 18x~50x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

12.8x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial and operational risks are modest but not absent. The balance sheet is strong (debt-to-equity 0.125, current ratio 3.10, $1.469B cash), so leverage is not a threat; the real risk is margin mix. Q4 FY2026 gross margin fell to 58.84% from 62.25% in Q3 and 61.46% in Q1, and operating income declined to $448.7M from $454.5M a year earlier despite 8.6% revenue growth, as R&D stepped up to $105.7M (7.2% of sales) from $86.4M. Revenue is also concentrated: the Sleep and Respiratory segment at $1.256B is roughly 86% of segment disclosure, so any mask or flow generator share loss hits the core directly. The Noctrix acquisition ($340M) adds integration and reimbursement risk in an adjacent RLS indication that has not yet contributed revenue. Market and competitive risks center on valuation compression and competitive re-entry. At 18.67x trailing and 18.06x forward earnings, RMD is already cheap versus its own history (47.1x in Q1 FY2022), so further compression would require earnings deterioration rather than multiple normalization — but the PEG of 2.00 and EV/EBITDA of 12.80x leave little cushion if growth slows. Philips' re-entry into sleep devices is the most direct competitive threat to the duopoly economics behind the 61% gross margin, and the 83% spread between the $175 and $320 analyst targets shows the market has no consensus on its impact. With a beta of 0.75 the stock is 25% less volatile than the market, but the -35.46% max drawdown and -27.02% one-year relative strength show that defensive characteristics did not prevent a sentiment-driven de-rating. The worst-case scenario is a GLP-1 demand scare coinciding with visible Philips share gains: mask resupply growth decelerates, gross margin compresses toward the mid-50s, and the multiple stays at 18x or lower on falling estimates. From $238.97, a retest of the $180.27 52-week low would be a -24.6% loss, and the $175 analyst low target implies -26.8%; a break below the $190-$195 June/July consolidation zone would confirm that structure and open the path to those levels. Given the -35.46% historical max drawdown, a 25-30% drawdown in an adverse scenario is a realistic planning assumption rather than a tail event.