SMR's primary business is plate fabrication within the boiler shop industry.
It is positioned as a specialized manufacturer, focusing on heavy steel manufacturing and custom metalworking solutions.
Updated: February 27, 2026, 16:00 EST
Based on the provided data, here is a comprehensive analysis of NuScale Power Corp. (SMR).
Technical Analysis SMR exhibits severe technical weakness, having declined dramatically and significantly underperformed the broader market. While the stock appears deeply oversold as it trades near its 52-week low, its extreme volatility (beta of 2.15) and massive 76% drawdown indicate a high risk of continued price erosion. The technical picture suggests substantial caution is warranted.
Fundamentals The company's fundamentals are deeply concerning. Despite the positive of having no debt, SMR is grappling with negative revenue, substantial operating losses, and a severe cash burn problem. Key operational efficiency metrics are negative, pointing to fundamental challenges in utilizing assets effectively and achieving profitability. The financial health is precarious due to persistent operational cash outflows.
Valuation & Risk Valuation is challenging due to negative earnings, though a high price-to-book ratio could suggest overvaluation absent strong growth. The risk profile is exceptionally high, dominated by extreme price volatility and the tangible threat of further capital loss, as evidenced by the severe drawdown. The fundamental operational issues compound these market risks significantly.
Investment Recommendation
Based on this analysis, SMR is not recommended for purchase at this time. The combination of catastrophic price deterioration, deeply negative fundamentals with no clear path to profitability, and an exceptionally high-risk profile presents an untenable proposition for most investors. While the stock is oversold, the underlying operational dysfunction and cash burn suggest the current low price may be justified rather than an opportunity. Investors should wait for concrete evidence of a fundamental turnaround, such as sustained revenue generation and a credible plan to achieve positive cash flow.
*Note: This is not investment advice, for reference only.*
Based on a comprehensive assessment, the 12-month outlook for NuScale Power Corp. (SMR) is overwhelmingly negative.
The primary potential catalyst would be a surprise announcement of a new, fully-funded power project agreement, which could serve as concrete evidence of a viable path to revenue generation. However, the risks are severe and dominant, including the continuation of its substantial cash burn without a clear timeline to profitability, the potential for further cancellation of existing projects, and the extreme stock price volatility that could lead to significant additional capital loss. Given the non-existent analyst target price and the company's deeply challenged fundamentals, investors should not anchor on a specific price target but rather view any price action with extreme caution, as the risk of further depreciation remains high. A prudent strategy would be to avoid the stock until there is demonstrable proof of a fundamental operational turnaround.
Most Wall Street analysts are optimistic about NuScale Power Corporation's 12-month outlook, with consensus target around $12.85, indicating expected upside potential.
Overall, SMR has investment potential but also faces challenges. Here are key factors to weigh before investing.
SMR has demonstrated severe underperformance with substantial price deterioration across all measured timeframes. The stock exhibits extreme volatility, reflected in its high beta of 2.15, and has experienced a maximum drawdown of -76% over the past year, indicating significant investor capital erosion.
The stock's short-term performance has been catastrophic, with a 1-month decline of -36% and a 3-month drop of nearly -30%. SMR has dramatically underperformed the broader market by approximately -34 percentage points over three months, highlighting its pronounced weakness amid challenging market conditions relative to its benchmark.
Currently trading at $13.06, SMR sits just 18% above its 52-week low of $11.08 and 77% below its 52-week high of $57.42. Given the magnitude of recent declines and proximity to annual lows, the stock appears deeply oversold from a technical perspective despite its volatile nature.
| Period | SMR Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -37.3% | -1.4% |
| 3m | -30.9% | +4.1% |
| 6m | -62.0% | +7.5% |
| 1y | -25.2% | +15.4% |
| ytd | -21.2% | +0.4% |
Revenue & Profitability: SMR displays concerning revenue volatility, with Q4 2025 revenue turning negative (-$29.7M) after positive revenue in Q3 ($8.2M). Profitability remains deeply challenged, with substantial operating losses (-$72.7M in Q4) and negative net margins. Operating expenses dramatically exceeded revenue in both quarters, indicating severe cost structure issues relative to sales generation.
Financial Health: The company maintains zero debt, as evidenced by all-zero debt ratios, which provides financial stability. However, liquidity metrics are inflated by negative revenue calculations, and cash flow metrics show substantial outflows with negative operating cash flow per share (-$1.24). The absence of debt is positive but cannot offset persistent cash burn from operations.
Operational Efficiency: Operational efficiency metrics reveal fundamental challenges, with negative returns on assets (-3.6%) and equity (-4.3%) reflecting poor capital utilization. Asset turnover ratios are negative due to revenue issues, while negative fixed asset turnover (-15.4) suggests inefficient use of property and equipment. These metrics collectively indicate significant operational dysfunction affecting overall business performance.
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
Try Now & Get Tesla Stock RewardValuation Level The valuation metrics present a complex picture due to SMR's negative earnings, as indicated by the negative trailing and forward PE ratios and negative EV/EBITDA. These negative values suggest the company is currently unprofitable, making traditional earnings-based valuation metrics unusable for assessing fair value. The high price-to-book ratio of 8.67 implies the market is valuing the company significantly above its net asset value, which could indicate overvaluation unless supported by strong growth prospects or intangible assets not captured in book value.
Peer Comparison Without industry average data, a comparative analysis cannot be performed to contextualize SMR's valuation multiples against sector norms. The PEG ratio of approximately 0.12, which is notably low, suggests the market may be pricing in high earnings growth expectations relative to the current valuation. However, the absence of industry benchmarks limits the ability to determine whether SMR's multiples are aligned with or deviate from typical industry valuations.
Volatility Risk: With an exceptionally high beta of 2.15, SMR exhibits extreme sensitivity to broader market movements and is subject to significant volatility risk. This is compounded by a severe one-year maximum drawdown of -76.42%, indicating a substantial risk of capital loss during market downturns.
Other Risks: The absence of reported short interest is noteworthy but does not eliminate fundamental risks, which may include operational or liquidity challenges inherent to a low-float security. The combination of extreme volatility and potential illiquidity creates a high-risk profile for which a normal market environment may not be a reliable indicator.
Bearish. SMR is not recommended for purchase at this time due to severe technical deterioration (down ~76% in a year), fundamental weaknesses including negative revenue and persistent cash burn, and a bearish "Sell" consensus from analysts. This high-risk, speculative stock is only suitable for aggressive investors with a high tolerance for volatility and a very long-term horizon, betting on its nuclear technology partnerships despite current operational challenges.
Based on the metrics provided, SMR stock appears overvalued. The valuation is exceptionally high relative to its current fundamentals, with a price-to-sales (PS) ratio of 125.07 and a price-to-book (PB) ratio of 8.67 suggesting investors are paying a massive premium for minimal revenue and net assets.
The negative earnings make traditional P/E ratios unusable, but the high PS and PB ratios are difficult to justify given the company's operational challenges, including negative revenue volatility, severe cash burn, and poor returns on assets and equity. While the low PEG ratio hints at high growth expectations, these hopes seem disconnected from the current reality of significant operational dysfunction and a lack of profitability.
Based on the provided information, here are the key risks of holding SMR stock, ordered by importance:
1. Extreme Market Volatility and Capital Erosion Risk: With an exceptionally high beta of 2.15 and a catastrophic maximum drawdown of -76.42% over the past year, the stock is acutely sensitive to market downturns, posing a severe risk of significant capital loss. 2. Severe Business Model and Profitability Risk: The company exhibits a fundamentally broken business model, evidenced by negative revenue, massive operating losses that dramatically exceed sales, and poor returns on assets and equity, indicating an inability to generate profitable operations. 3. Persistent Cash Burn and Liquidity Risk: Despite having no debt, the company is experiencing substantial cash outflows from operations, as shown by negative operating cash flow, which creates a risk to its ongoing liquidity and ability to fund operations without raising additional capital.
Based on the severely challenged fundamentals and negative 12-month outlook, forecasting a specific target price for SMR to 2026 is highly speculative. A plausible base case range is $0-$5, reflecting the high risk of continued operational losses and potential corporate restructuring, while a bull case of $15-$20 would require a surprise, fully-funded major project announcement that demonstrates a viable path to revenue.
Key growth drivers are purely potential catalysts at this stage: 1) securing a new, funded power project agreement, 2) a significant reduction in its cash burn rate, and 3) a broader surge in policy support for Small Modular Reactors.
The primary assumptions are that the current negative revenue trend and substantial cash burn persist without a clear turnaround catalyst, and that no major new projects materialize. This forecast carries extreme uncertainty, as SMR's future is binaryโit is highly dependent on securing a major contract to validate its business model, making the stock exceptionally high-risk.