SMR

NuScale

$8.79

+6.29%
Sep 21, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
NuScale Power Corporation is a nuclear technology company developing proprietary small modular reactor (SMR) technology, principally its Light Water Nuclear Reactor NuScale Power Module (NPM) rated at 77 MWe, sold through its VOYGR power plant and E2 Center product lines, operating within the Industrials sector's Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. As the first and only SMR design to have received U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission certification, NuScale holds a distinct first-mover regulatory position among a small cohort of pre-revenue advanced nuclear developers, though it remains a commercialization-stage company with just 428 employees and no meaningful recurring revenue base. The current investor narrative is dominated by the tension between long-term AI data-center power demand and near-term execution risk: headlines through mid-2026 highlight a historic but non-binding 6-gigawatt SMR deployment program, Big Tech's multi-decade SMR contracting interest, and a 12% single-day rally on data-center optimism, offset by NuScale's exclusion from the Trump administration's "Project Prometheus" nuclear initiative, a major shareholder exit, and peer Holtec's cancelled IPO. With the stock down sharply year-to-date and analysts split between Sell and Buy ratings, the debate centers on whether NuScale can convert its regulatory head start into firm commercial contracts before its cash reserves are exhausted.

People also watch

Vertiv

Vertiv

VRT

Analysis
Bloom Energy

Bloom Energy

BE

Analysis
Ametek

Ametek

AME

Analysis
Hubbell Incorporated

Hubbell Incorporated

HUBB

Analysis
Acuity Brands

Acuity Brands

AYI

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy SMR Today?

The synthesized recommendation is Hold, with a speculative bias. The core thesis is that NuScale's first-mover regulatory advantage and the massive long-term SMR opportunity are real, but the company's near-term financials are deteriorating rapidly and the valuation is extreme on any cash-flow metric. The analyst consensus rating is 'hold' with a recommendation mean of 2.667, and the average target price of $11.97 implies 44.7% upside, but this upside is contingent on contract catalysts that have not yet materialized.

Supporting evidence for the Hold rating includes: (1) the PS ratio of 73.70x and EV/Sales of 242.92x are extraordinarily high versus the sector's 1-3x PS range; (2) revenue collapsed 95.78% year-over-year to $565,000 in Q1 2026, with no recurring revenue base; (3) gross margin turned negative at -43.19% and net margin was -77.90% in Q1 2026; (4) free cash flow is deeply negative at -$753.5 million trailing twelve months, with cash declining $495.3 million in a single quarter; and (5) the stock trades at just 2.1% above its 52-week low, reflecting collapsed expectations. The debt-free balance sheet and $346 million cash position are the only genuine strengths, but they are being consumed rapidly.

The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are: (1) failure to convert the 6-GW deployment program into binding contracts, which would likely trigger a further leg down toward the $6.00 analyst low target; (2) a dilutive equity raise at current depressed prices, which would further pressure the stock; and (3) loss of government support following exclusion from Project Prometheus. The rating would upgrade to Buy if NuScale announces a firm, binding contract for multiple SMR modules with a creditworthy counterparty, or if the stock falls below $6.00 with cash still above $200 million. The rating would downgrade to Sell if cash falls below $150 million without a signed contract, or if revenue fails to exceed $10 million in any quarter over the next year. On valuation, the stock is overvalued relative to its current financials but could be undervalued if the long-term contract pipeline converts; the market is pricing in a binary outcome.

Sign up to view all

SMR 12-Month Price Forecast

NuScale presents a classic pre-revenue binary option: the long-term opportunity in small modular reactors is substantial, supported by AI data-center demand and a 6-GW deployment program, but the company's near-term financials are deteriorating rapidly. The 95.78% revenue decline, negative gross margin, and $495 million quarterly cash burn create a funding cliff that could force highly dilutive financing within two quarters. The stock's 78.31% one-year decline and 2.1% proximity to its 52-week low reflect collapsed expectations, but the analyst average target of $11.97 implies 44.7% upside if contracts materialize. I would upgrade to bullish if NuScale announces a binding contract for at least 6 modules with a creditworthy counterparty, and downgrade to bearish if cash falls below $150 million without a signed contract or if the company announces a distressed equity raise below $7 per share. Until then, the risk-reward is balanced but highly speculative, suitable only for investors with high risk tolerance and a long time horizon.

Historical Price
Current Price $8.79
Average Target $11.00
High Target $20.00
Low Target $6.00

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on NuScale's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $11.97 and implied upside of +36.1% versus the current price.

Average Target

$11.97

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+36.1%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

covering this stock

Price Range

$6 - $20

Analyst target range

NuScale is covered by 15 analysts with a consensus recommendation of "hold" (recommendation mean of 2.667 on a 1-5 scale where higher is more bearish), and an average target price of $11.97 — implying +44.7% upside from the current $8.27 price. The sentiment is genuinely mixed rather than uniformly bearish: recent institutional ratings show Citigroup maintaining a Sell, B. Riley Securities maintaining a Buy, UBS and Goldman Sachs at Neutral, RBC Capital at Sector Perform, Canaccord Genuity at Buy, Cantor Fitzgerald at Overweight, and Barclays at Equal Weight. The consensus leans neutral-to-cautious, with the bullish camp (B. Riley, Canaccord, Cantor) offset by explicit Sell ratings from Citigroup, and the absence of any recent upgrades suggests analysts are waiting for firm contract news before changing their stance.\n\nThe target range is wide — from a low of $6.00 to a high of $20.00, a 3.3x spread that signals very high uncertainty about the company's future. The high target of $20.00 (roughly +142% from current) likely assumes successful conversion of the 6-gigawatt deployment program into binding contracts, multiple large Big Tech SMR deals, and a re-rating toward the upper end of the historical valuation band; the low target of $6.00 (roughly -27% from current) prices in continued commercialization delays, further cash burn requiring dilutive financing, and the loss of government support implied by NuScale's exclusion from Project Prometheus. The estimated EPS range of -$0.431 to -$0.056 and revenue range of $690 million to $2.994 billion further illustrate the binary nature of the outlook. With the stock trading near its 52-week low and the average target implying meaningful upside, the risk-reward is asymmetric on paper, but the wide dispersion and the fact that the consensus sits at "hold" rather than "buy" indicate that analysts see the upside as contingent on catalysts that have not yet materialized — making this a high-volatility, event-driven position rather than a consensus long.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: SMR Investment Factors

The bear case currently has stronger evidence, driven by the 95.8% year-over-year revenue collapse, a $495 million quarterly cash burn that could exhaust reserves within two quarters, and an extreme PS ratio of 73.70x against a sector average of 1-3x. The bull case rests almost entirely on future contract conversions from the 6-GW deployment program and Big Tech interest, which remain non-binding. The single most important tension is whether NuScale can convert its regulatory head start into firm commercial contracts before its cash reserves are depleted, which would likely require dilutive financing at current prices. Analyst consensus is 'hold' with a wide target range of $6 to $20, reflecting genuine uncertainty rather than a clear directional bet. Until binding contracts are announced, the stock remains a high-risk, event-driven speculation rather than a fundamental investment.

Bullish

  • First and only NRC-certified SMR design: NuScale's NPM is the only small modular reactor design to have received U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission certification, a regulatory moat that competitors like Oklo and X-Energy have not yet achieved. This first-mover advantage could translate into commercial contracts if utilities and data-center operators prioritize regulatory certainty over price.
  • Analyst average target implies 44.7% upside: The 15-analyst consensus average target price is $11.97, which is 44.7% above the current $8.27 price. The high target of $20.00 implies 142% upside, suggesting that if contract catalysts materialize, the stock could re-rate sharply.
  • Debt-free balance sheet with $346M cash: NuScale has zero debt-to-equity and a current ratio of 4.30, with $346.2 million in cash at Q1 2026 quarter-end. This provides a funding runway of roughly one to two quarters at the current burn rate, but also means no near-term solvency risk from debt covenants.
  • 6-GW deployment program and Big Tech interest: A historic 6-gigawatt SMR deployment program and multi-decade Big Tech contracting interest highlight the massive addressable market for SMRs. If even a portion of these non-binding agreements convert to firm contracts, NuScale's revenue could inflect from $565,000 in Q1 2026 toward the analyst consensus estimate of $1.487 billion.

Bearish

  • Revenue collapsed 95.8% year-over-year: Q1 2026 revenue was just $565,000, down 95.78% from $13.375 million in Q1 2025 and down sequentially from $1.808 million in Q4 2025. The company has no meaningful recurring revenue base, and the only disclosed segment is 'Other' at $32,000.
  • Cash burn of $495M in a single quarter: Cash declined from $841.5 million at the start of Q1 2026 to $346.2 million at quarter-end, a $495.3 million net cash decline. Free cash flow was -$316.2 million for Q1 2026 and -$753.5 million on a trailing twelve-month basis, implying the remaining cash could be exhausted in one to two quarters without new financing.
  • Extreme valuation on any cash-flow metric: The trailing PS ratio is 73.70x and EV/Sales is 242.92x, versus a typical Industrials/Electrical Equipment sector PS of 1-3x. The forward PE is -12.53x and trailing PE is -6.53x, confirming the company is unprofitable on both a current and forecast basis.
  • Exclusion from Project Prometheus signals fading support: NuScale was excluded from the Trump administration's 'Project Prometheus' nuclear initiative, which instead selected X-Energy, Oklo, and Standard Nuclear. This exclusion, combined with a major shareholder exit and peer Holtec's cancelled IPO, suggests waning government and market support for NuScale specifically.

SMR Technical Analysis

NuScale is in a sustained, severe downtrend, with the 1-year price change at -78.31% and the current price of $8.27 sitting at just 2.1% above its 52-week low of $7.21 and 85.6% below its 52-week high of $57.42 — effectively at the very bottom of its 52-week range (approximately 2% of range). This positioning reflects persistent distribution rather than a basing pattern, and with a maximum drawdown of -85.79%, the stock has destroyed the majority of its prior-cycle value; traders should treat this as a falling-knife setup where "cheap" is a function of collapsing expectations rather than a valuation floor. The relative strength figures reinforce the damage: -93.32% versus SPY over 1 year and -60.99% year-to-date, meaning the stock has massively underperformed a market that itself rose 15.01% over the past year.\n\nShort-term momentum is negative but less catastrophic than the annual trend, with the 1-month change at -10.98% and the 3-month change at -29.56%, both deteriorating versus the 6-month change of -27.71%. The most recent session saw an -8.52% single-day drop from $9.04 to $8.27, erasing a brief early-September spike to $11.18 on September 8 — a failed rally that reversed violently within three sessions, which is characteristic of bear-market rallies rather than trend reversals. Momentum is therefore decelerating rather than stabilizing: the 1-month relative strength of -10.02% versus SPY confirms the stock is losing ground even as the broader market is roughly flat (-0.96% for SPY over 1 month), and the elevated volume of 64.1 million shares on a sub-$10 stock suggests heavy speculative turnover and capitulation-style selling rather than accumulation.\n\nKey technical levels are unusually well-defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $7.21, just $1.06 (12.8%) below the current $8.27 price, while resistance is anchored at the 52-week high of $57.42, a level so distant it is functionally irrelevant to near-term trading. A breakdown below $7.21 would signal a fresh leg lower and likely trigger momentum-driven selling, whereas a sustained reclaim of the September 8 high of $11.18 would be the first evidence of a genuine trend change. Volatility risk is extreme: the beta of 2.309 means the stock is roughly 131% more volatile than the market, so a 1% SPY move implies a ~2.3% SMR move — position sizing must be dramatically reduced relative to a market-weight holding, and the short ratio of 1.91 days indicates bears are not yet aggressively pressed but have ample room to add.

Beta

2.31

2.31x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-85.8%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$7-$57

Price range past year

Annual Return

-81.2%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodSMR ReturnS&P 500
1m-6.5%+1.0%
3m-19.1%+5.4%
6m-24.8%+17.8%
1y-81.2%+16.5%
ytd-46.1%+13.4%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

SMR Fundamental Analysis

NuScale's revenue trajectory is deteriorating sharply and is effectively non-existent at commercial scale: Q1 2026 revenue was just $565,000, a -95.78% year-over-year decline from $13.375 million in Q1 2025, and down sequentially from $1.808 million in Q4 2025 and $8.242 million in Q3 2025. The multi-quarter trend shows revenue collapsing from $34.224 million in Q4 2024 to sub-$1 million levels, reflecting the completion of early engineering and licensing service work without replacement commercial contracts; the only disclosed segment is "Other" at $32,000, underscoring the absence of a diversified revenue base. For the investment case, this means the company is entirely a call option on future contract awards — there is no current earnings stream to anchor valuation, and the analyst consensus revenue estimate of $1.487 billion (range $690 million to $2.994 billion) implies the market is pricing in a step-function inflection that has not yet appeared in reported results.\n\nProfitability remains deeply negative and is worsening on a margin basis: Q1 2026 net income was -$44.015 million on $565,000 of revenue, producing a net margin of -77.90% and an operating margin of -101.81%, with gross profit of -$244,000 (gross margin of -43.19%) — meaning the company loses money on the direct cost of the little revenue it books. The trailing net margin of -11.30% and gross margin of 36.31% in the key metrics data reflect a longer averaging period that masks the recent deterioration, while the quarterly income statement shows operating expenses of $57.28 million (including $12.805 million of R&D and $24.839 million of G&A) against negligible revenue. Compared to typical capital-goods and electrical equipment peers, which generally operate at 10-20% net margins, NuScale's negative gross margin is an outlier that reflects a pre-commercial cost structure; the loss trajectory is not narrowing — Q1 2026's -$44.015 million net loss compares unfavorably to Q1 2025's -$14.005 million, though the Q3 2025 loss of -$273.319 million was inflated by a $519.222 million G&A charge tied to non-cash items.\n\nThe balance sheet is the company's one genuine strength but is being consumed rapidly: debt-to-equity is 0 and the current ratio is 4.30 (with a quick ratio of 29.36 in the Q1 2026 historical ratios data), and cash stood at $346.229 million at quarter-end versus $841.517 million at the start of Q1 2026 — a $495.288 million net cash decline in a single quarter. Free cash flow is deeply negative at -$316.2 million for Q1 2026 and -$753.465 million on a trailing twelve-month basis, with operating cash flow of -$314.678 million, meaning the company is burning cash at a rate that would exhaust its remaining $346 million in roughly one to two quarters absent new financing. The company has been funding itself through equity issuance — $737.882 million of common stock issued in Q4 2025 and $37.792 million in Q1 2026 — which is highly dilutive (shares outstanding rose from 127.7 million in Q1 2025 to 163.7 million in Q1 2026, a 28% increase) and explains the ROE of -30.44% and ROA of -10.60%; with no debt and no dividend, the FCF yield is deeply negative and the equity story depends entirely on capital markets remaining open to pre-revenue nuclear developers.

Quarterly Revenue

$565000.0B

2026-03

Revenue YoY Growth

-95.8%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

-43.2%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$-753464999.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Other

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is SMR Overvalued?

Because NuScale's net income is negative (-$44.015 million in Q1 2026, with trailing EPS of -$0.153), the PE ratio is not meaningful and I am leading with the price-to-sales (PS) ratio, supplemented by EV/Sales given the negative EBITDA of -$46.376 million. The trailing PS ratio is 73.70x and the EV/Sales ratio is 242.92x, both extraordinarily high in absolute terms, while the forward PE of -12.53x and trailing PE of -6.53x confirm the company is unprofitable on both a current and forecast basis (consensus EPS estimate of -$0.186). The gap between the trailing PS of 73.70x and the forward revenue estimate of $1.487 billion — which would imply a forward PS of roughly 3.5x on the current $5.17 billion market cap — shows the market is pricing in a roughly 20x revenue inflection, an expectation that is either a massive growth option or a severe overvaluation depending on contract execution.\n\nPeer comparison is difficult because NuScale's multiples are distorted by near-zero revenue, but the spread versus the broader Industrials/Electrical Equipment sector is extreme: a PS of 73.70x versus a sector that typically trades in the 1-3x PS range represents a premium of well over 2,000%, and the EV/Sales of 242.92x is without parallel among profitable capital-goods peers. Even against nuclear-adjacent peers cited in recent coverage — such as BWX Technologies, described as "the cheapest nuclear stock" with monopoly-like defense contracts — NuScale trades at a dramatic premium despite having no revenue, no backlog of firm contracts, and negative gross margins. The premium can only be justified if the 6-gigawatt deployment program and Big Tech SMR deals convert to binding contracts; absent that, the valuation reflects pure option value on a binary outcome, and the PB ratio of 1.98x is the only metric that looks reasonable, though it is flattered by the company's cash-heavy, asset-light balance sheet.\n\nHistorically, NuScale's PS ratio has been wildly volatile and is now near the high end of its own range despite the stock's collapse: the PS ratio was 3,141x in Q1 2026, 1,283x in Q4 2025, 645x in Q3 2025, and 135x in Q1 2025, versus 48.85x in Q4 2024 and 55.48x in Q4 2023 — meaning the current 73.70x PS is elevated relative to the 2023-2024 period but far below the 2025 peak distortion caused by collapsing revenue. The PB ratio of 1.98x is near the low end of its historical band (which ranged from 1.52x in Q1 2026 to 10.43x in Q1 2022), suggesting the market has already marked down the equity substantially, but with negative ROE of -30.44% and a cash burn that will require further dilution, book value is a weak anchor. Net-net, the valuation is not "cheap" on any cash-flow-based measure and is only defensible as a long-dated, high-risk call option on SMR commercialization.

PE

-6.5x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

N/A

5-Year PE Range 17x~59x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

-6.5x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

NuScale's financial and operational risks are severe and quantifiable. The company burned $495.3 million in cash in Q1 2026 alone, leaving $346.2 million on the balance sheet, which at the current burn rate implies a funding runway of only one to two quarters. Revenue collapsed 95.78% year-over-year to $565,000 in Q1 2026, and gross margin turned negative at -43.19%, meaning the company loses money on the direct cost of the little revenue it books. With no debt but a negative operating cash flow of -$314.7 million and trailing free cash flow of -$753.5 million, the company is entirely dependent on capital markets remaining open to pre-revenue nuclear developers, and further equity issuance would be highly dilutive given shares outstanding already rose 28% from 127.7 million in Q1 2025 to 163.7 million in Q1 2026.

Market and competitive risks are equally pronounced. The stock trades at a PS ratio of 73.70x and EV/Sales of 242.92x, versus a typical Electrical Equipment sector PS of 1-3x, leaving enormous room for valuation compression if contract news disappoints. NuScale's exclusion from the Trump administration's 'Project Prometheus' initiative, which selected competitors X-Energy, Oklo, and Standard Nuclear, signals potential loss of government support and competitive disadvantage. The beta of 2.309 means the stock is roughly 131% more volatile than the market, so a 1% SPY decline implies a ~2.3% SMR decline, and the stock has already underperformed SPY by 93.32% over one year. Peer Holtec's cancelled IPO and a major shareholder exit further highlight shifting market sentiment toward SMR developers.

The worst-case scenario involves NuScale failing to convert its non-binding 6-GW program into firm contracts, leading to continued cash burn and a dilutive equity raise at depressed prices, followed by a loss of investor confidence. In this scenario, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $7.21, representing a 12.8% decline from the current $8.27, or fall to the analyst low target of $6.00, a 27.4% decline. A more severe outcome, such as a bankruptcy or liquidation, could see the stock approach zero, though the debt-free balance sheet and $346 million cash position make this less likely in the near term. Given the maximum drawdown of -85.79% over the past year, investors should be prepared for the possibility of losing the majority of their investment if commercialization fails.

FAQ

The most severe risk is financial: NuScale burned $495.3 million in cash in Q1 2026, leaving $346.2 million, which could be exhausted in one to two quarters without new financing. Second, commercialization risk is high, as revenue collapsed 95.78% year-over-year to $565,000 and no binding contracts have been signed. Third, competitive and regulatory risk is rising, evidenced by NuScale's exclusion from Project Prometheus and peer Holtec's cancelled IPO. Fourth, market risk is amplified by a beta of 2.309, meaning the stock is roughly 131% more volatile than the market, and it has underperformed SPY by 93.32% over one year. These risks are ranked from most to least severe, with the cash burn being the most immediate threat.

The 12-month forecast is divided into three scenarios: a bull case with 20% probability targeting $15-$20, a base case with 50% probability targeting $9-$13, and a bear case with 30% probability targeting $6-$7.21. The base case assumes no binding contract within 12 months but continued negotiations, with the stock trading in a range as analysts maintain a 'hold' consensus. The bull case requires a firm contract announcement and government support, while the bear case involves a failed contract conversion and a distressed equity raise. The most likely scenario is the base case, with the key assumption being that NuScale survives the next year without a major liquidity crisis but also without a transformative contract.

SMR is overvalued on any current cash-flow metric but could be undervalued if future contracts materialize. The trailing PS ratio is 73.70x and EV/Sales is 242.92x, versus a typical Electrical Equipment sector PS of 1-3x, representing a premium of over 2,000%. The forward PE is -12.53x, reflecting negative earnings, and the PB ratio of 1.98x is the only metric that looks reasonable, though it is flattered by a cash-heavy balance sheet. The market is pricing in a roughly 20x revenue inflection to the analyst consensus estimate of $1.487 billion, which implies a forward PS of about 3.5x. If that revenue fails to materialize, the stock could see significant multiple compression.

SMR is a high-risk, speculative buy only for investors with a high tolerance for volatility and a long time horizon. The stock trades at $8.27, just 2.1% above its 52-week low of $7.21, and the analyst average target of $11.97 implies 44.7% upside, but this upside is contingent on converting non-binding agreements into firm contracts. The biggest downside risk is a further cash burn that forces a dilutive equity raise, potentially driving the stock toward the analyst low target of $6.00, a 27.4% decline. With a beta of 2.309 and a 78.31% one-year decline, the stock is not suitable for conservative investors. A good entry point would be after a binding contract announcement or at a price closer to $6 with a clear path to financing.

SMR is suitable only for long-term investment, with a minimum suggested holding period of 3-5 years, and even then only as a small, speculative position. The company is pre-revenue with negative earnings, no dividend, and a cash burn that requires ongoing financing, so short-term trading is extremely risky due to the beta of 2.309 and the potential for 10%+ daily swings. The investment thesis depends on SMR commercialization, which is a multi-year process, and the stock's 78.31% one-year decline shows that short-term momentum is negative. Long-term investors should be prepared for significant volatility and the possibility of losing their entire investment if the company fails to secure contracts before cash runs out.