Tapestry, Inc.
TPR
$133.34
-1.68%
Tapestry, Inc. is a New York-based luxury accessories house whose portfolio is dominated by Coach, the 1941-founded leathergoods brand that generated 86% of fiscal 2026 revenue and effectively all of operating profit, alongside Kate Spade (roughly 13% of revenue), selling handbags, small leather goods, footwear and apparel through nearly 1,000 company-owned stores, owned digital channels and wholesale partners across North America, Asia and Europe. The company's competitive identity is that of a scaled, accessible-luxury platform rather than a true high-end maison — Coach's pricing power sits between mass-market and European luxury, and the stock has historically traded as a cash-generative, brand-turnaround story rather than a growth compounder. The current investor debate centers on whether Coach's multi-year momentum (comparable-store growth, higher average unit retail, and a gross margin now near 78%) can be sustained into fiscal 2027 against a backdrop of tariff headwinds flagged in recent coverage, slowing growth commentary and a Kate Spade brand that remains a drag. The August 2026 post-earnings selloff, the subsequent partial recovery into the November 5 fiscal Q1 print, and a heavy buyback program (roughly $603 million repurchased in the latest quarter alone) frame the narrative: a margin-expansion and capital-return story fighting a tariff and consumer-demand overhang.…
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
$133.34
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy TPR Today?
Rating: Buy (accumulate on weakness), with medium conviction. The core thesis is that Tapestry is a cash-generative, best-in-class-margin accessories platform trading at 14.5x forward earnings against a $163.79 average analyst target (+23.3% upside) and a 16-of-19 Buy consensus, where the only unresolved variable — tariff-driven margin pressure in H2 fiscal 2027 — is a timing and magnitude question rather than a structural break in the Coach franchise. The recommendation mean of 1.81 and the fact that five separate houses (Evercore ISI, Wells Fargo, Baird, UBS, Raymond James) reiterated Outperform/Buy/Overweight between mid-October and early November 2026, with no downgrades in the visible record, anchor the constructive stance.
Supporting evidence is concrete: Q1 fiscal 2027 revenue grew 11.1% YoY to $1.894 billion while net income rose 31% to $360 million, lifting gross margin to 78.6% (+230bp) and operating margin to 22.4% (+310bp) — operating leverage that most consumer-cyclical peers cannot match. The 14.5x forward PE sits below the 19.5x trailing multiple and at a discount to European luxury majors historically trading at 20-30x, while EV/EBITDA of 15.4x is reasonable for a business with a 24.5% EBITDA margin. Trailing free cash flow of $1.881 billion funds a $92 million quarterly dividend (1.1% yield, 21.3% payout) and the roughly $603 million repurchased in the latest quarter, and interest coverage of 32.6x means the 5.71x debt-to-equity ratio is a capital-structure choice, not a solvency concern. The implied +23.3% upside to the average target is the payoff if the margin question resolves favorably.
Three risks could invalidate the thesis: tariff costs compressing the 78.6% gross margin in H2 fiscal 2027 (the exact trigger for the August 13 gap-down of roughly 16% to $128.39), revenue concentration with Coach at 88% of the quarter ($1.661 billion vs. Kate Spade's $233 million) while sequential revenue has flattened ($1.92B, $1.88B, $1.89B), and a beta of 1.46 that amplifies any risk-off tape. The rating would upgrade to a high-conviction Buy if management quantifies tariff exposure at a level the 78%+ gross margin can absorb and revenue re-accelerates above 11%; it would downgrade to Hold if gross margin guidance falls below roughly 76% or if the 16-Buy consensus begins to fracture. On valuation, TPR is fairly valued to modestly undervalued on forward earnings (14.5x) but sits in the upper quartile of its own three-year trailing-PE range (19.5x vs. a 6.5x trough and 21.2x peak), so the margin of safety comes from the forward multiple and cash return, not from the trailing multiple.
Sign up to view all
TPR 12-Month Price Forecast
The forward-looking case is constructive but not high-conviction: Tapestry offers a 14.5x forward multiple on a business compounding earnings at roughly 31% YoY with 78%+ gross margins and $1.881 billion of free cash flow, and the Street's $163.79 average target implies +23.3% upside that is achievable if tariffs prove manageable. The offsetting reality is that the stock sits at only about 52% of its 52-week range after a -33.0% max drawdown, sequential revenue has flattened ($1.92B, $1.88B, $1.89B), and the $96-$211 target spread signals genuine disagreement about the H2 fiscal 2027 margin path rather than noise. Confidence is medium because the single variable that matters — tariff cost absorption — is not yet quantified, and the 6.15 short ratio means recent momentum may partly reflect short-covering rather than durable accumulation. I would upgrade to high confidence and a stronger bullish stance if the fiscal Q2 holiday print shows gross margin holding at or above 78% with tariff costs explicitly quantified, and I would downgrade to neutral if gross margin guidance falls below roughly 76% or if any of the 16 Buy ratings are cut.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Tapestry, Inc.'s 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $163.55 and implied upside of +22.7% versus the current price.
Average Target
$163.55
22 analysts
Implied Upside
+22.7%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
22
covering this stock
Price Range
$96 - $211
Analyst target range
Coverage is broad and constructive: 19 analysts with 16 Buy, 4 Hold and 1 Sell, a consensus recommendation of 'buy' and a recommendation mean of 1.81 (where 1.0 is a strong buy). The average target price is $163.79, which against the current $132.80 implies roughly +23.3% upside. That is a decisively bullish consensus, and it is notable that the average target sits almost exactly at the August 10 high of $164.78 — analysts are effectively underwriting a full recovery to the pre-selloff peak. Consensus FY EPS of $10.19 (range $9.85–$10.51) on revenue of $9.59 billion (range $9.01–$9.83 billion) implies modest top-line growth with margin expansion doing the heavy lifting.
The target range is extremely wide — $96.00 low to $211.00 high, a spread of $115 or roughly 87% of the current price — which signals genuine disagreement about the tariff and margin trajectory rather than mere noise. The $211 high target implies multiple expansion toward the mid-20s forward PE plus successful margin defense, while the $96 low sits below the 52-week low of $99.01 and prices in tariff-driven gross margin compression and a consumer slowdown. Institutional ratings show a stable-to-positive pattern: Evercore ISI, Wells Fargo, Baird, UBS and Raymond James have all reiterated Outperform/Buy/Overweight between mid-October and early November 2026, with no downgrades in the visible record — though Bernstein's Market Perform and the single Sell anchor the bear case. The wide dispersion, combined with a 6.15 short ratio (over six days of volume to cover), suggests the November rally may have been partly short-covering, and investors should treat the $163.79 average target as a ceiling that requires tariff clarity to be realized.
Bulls vs Bears: TPR Investment Factors
The bull case currently has the stronger evidence: a 16-of-19 Buy consensus, a $163.79 average target implying +23.3% upside, expanding margins (78.6% gross, 22.4% operating), a 14.5x forward PE, and $1.881 billion of free cash flow funding a $603 million quarterly buyback. The bear case rests on a real but less quantified threat — tariff-driven margin compression in H2 fiscal 2027 — amplified by decelerating revenue ($1.92B to $1.88B to $1.89B sequentially), 88% Coach concentration, and a 5.71x debt-to-equity ratio. The single most important tension is whether Coach's 78%+ gross margin can be defended against tariffs; if it holds, the 14.5x forward multiple re-rates toward the $163.79 target, but if tariffs bite, the $96 low target and the August 16% gap-down become the template. Momentum (+17.1% in a month, +22.1 points relative strength) currently favors the bulls, but the stock sits at only 52% of its 52-week range, so the recovery is unproven.
Bullish
- Analyst consensus firmly bullish at $163.79: 16 of 19 analysts rate TPR a Buy with a recommendation mean of 1.81 and an average target of $163.79, implying +23.3% upside from $132.80. The average target sits almost exactly at the August 10 high of $164.78, meaning the Street is underwriting a full recovery to the pre-selloff peak.
- Best-in-class margins still expanding: Q1 2027 gross margin reached 78.6% and operating margin 22.4%, up roughly 230bp and 310bp respectively versus the year-ago Q1 (76.3% gross, 19.3% operating). Net income rose to $360 million from $274.8 million, a 31% increase on 11.1% revenue growth, showing strong operating leverage.
- Forward PE of 14.5x leaves re-rating room: The stock trades at 19.5x trailing but only 14.5x forward earnings, a 26% compression that implies the market expects meaningful EPS growth toward the $10.19 consensus. That forward multiple sits at or below European luxury majors historically trading in the 20-30x range, and EV/EBITDA of 15.4x looks reasonable for a 24%+ EBITDA-margin business.
- Aggressive capital return supports the floor: Tapestry repurchased roughly $603 million of stock in the latest quarter alone and pays a $92 million quarterly dividend (1.1% yield, 21.3% payout ratio). With $1.881 billion of trailing free cash flow and interest coverage of 32.6x, the company can fund both internally.
Bearish
- Tariff headwinds threaten H2 2027 margins: Recent coverage (Zacks, Motley Fool) explicitly flags tariff risk to fiscal 2027 margins, and the August 13 single-session collapse of roughly 16% to $128.39 came on exactly this concern. With gross margin already at 78.6%, there is little cushion to absorb input-cost inflation without hitting the 22.4% operating margin.
- Growth is decelerating and concentrated: Revenue growth of 11.1% YoY masks a flattening trajectory ($1.92B, $1.88B, $1.89B across the last three quarters), and Coach alone is 88% of quarterly revenue at $1.661 billion versus Kate Spade's $233 million. Essentially all growth depends on a single brand, and Kate Spade remains a drag.
- Leverage and thin equity inflate ratios: Debt-to-equity of 5.71x and total debt to capitalization of 85.1% reflect a leveraged recapitalization, while price-to-book of 43.0x is a direct artifact of shrunken equity. ROE of 220.7% is flattered by an equity multiplier near 19x, so headline returns overstate underlying financial strength.
- Valuation sits in upper quartile of history: At 19.5x trailing earnings, TPR is near the top of its three-year band (trough ~6.5x in late 2023, peak ~21.2x in Q4 2026) and well above the 11.7x-15.7x seen through much of 2024-2025. The market is already pricing in optimistic margin delivery, limiting multiple-expansion upside.
TPR Technical Analysis
TPR is in a recovery-within-a-downtrend configuration. The stock is up 34.4% over the trailing year but sits at $132.80, which is only about 52% of its 52-week range of $99.01 to $164.80 — meaning the one-year gain was largely earned earlier and has been substantially given back. The 3-month change of -18.2% and a max drawdown of -33.0% confirm the stock spent the late summer and early autumn in a distribution phase, having peaked at $164.78 on August 10 before gapping down to $128.39 on August 13 (a single-session collapse of roughly 16%) that marked a clear structural break.
Short-term momentum has turned sharply positive and now diverges from the intermediate trend. The 1-month change of +17.1% versus a 3-month change of -18.2% is a textbook V-shaped reversal, and relative strength versus SPY is +22.1 percentage points over one month against -13.3 points over three months — the stock has gone from laggard to leader in a matter of weeks. The rally accelerated into the November 5 fiscal Q1 report, with the stock jumping from $125.31 to $134.17 (+7.1%) on elevated volume of 3.33 million shares, then consolidating modestly to $132.80 (-1.0% on the day). This kind of high-volume thrust off a base near $110 is constructive, but the sharpness of the move raises near-term overbought risk.
Key levels are well defined. Support sits at the October 23 low of $110.37, with the 52-week low of $99.01 as the deeper floor; resistance is the August 10 high of $164.78, with an intermediate supply zone around $145–$150 where the stock repeatedly stalled in June and July. A decisive break above $145 would confirm the August gap is being repaired and likely target the highs, while a failure at $145 and a break back below $110 would signal the November bounce was a bull trap. With a beta of 1.46, TPR is roughly 46% more volatile than the S&P 500, so position sizing should assume wider stops — a 1.46 beta implies drawdowns roughly 1.5x the market's in a risk-off tape, consistent with the -33.0% max drawdown observed.
Beta
1.46
1.46x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-33.0%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$99-$165
Price range past year
Annual Return
+30.7%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | TPR Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +13.8% | -2.4% |
| 3m | +3.9% | -2.3% |
| 6m | +3.1% | +2.8% |
| 1y | +30.7% | +11.3% |
| ytd | +3.3% | +11.4% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
TPR Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is growing at a healthy but decelerating clip. Fiscal Q1 2027 (quarter ended September 26, 2026) revenue came in at $1.894 billion, up 11.1% year over year from $1.704 billion in the prior-year Q1, and up sequentially from $1.877 billion in Q4 2026 and $1.921 billion in Q3 2026. The segment picture is highly concentrated: Coach generated $1.661 billion (about 88% of the quarter) versus Kate Spade's $233 million, so essentially all growth is a Coach function and Kate Spade remains a modest drag. The trajectory — $1.70B, $2.50B (holiday Q2), $1.92B, $1.88B, $1.89B — shows the business is stable-to-growing but no longer accelerating, which is precisely the concern reflected in the August selloff and the 'slowing growth' commentary in recent coverage.
Profitability is strong and margins are expanding. Q1 2027 net income was $360 million on a 19.0% net margin, with gross margin of 78.6% (gross profit $1.488 billion) and operating margin of 22.4% ($424 million operating income). Compare that to the year-ago Q1 2025: net income $274.8 million, 16.1% net margin, 76.3% gross margin and 19.3% operating margin — a roughly 230bp gross margin and 310bp operating margin improvement year over year. The one blemish is the prior fiscal Q4 2026, when gross margin hit 83.3% but SG&A of $1.121 billion compressed operating margin to 23.6%; the Q1 2027 gross margin step-down to 78.6% alongside lower SG&A ($1.064 billion) suggests a mix shift rather than deterioration. For accessible luxury, a 78%+ gross margin and ~22% operating margin are best-in-class and reflect Coach's pricing power and outlet/full-price mix management.
Balance sheet and cash flow are the weak spot relative to the income statement. Debt-to-equity is 5.71x (total debt to capitalization 85.1%), a legacy of the roughly $4.7 billion debt repayment visible in the December 2024 quarter, and the current ratio of 1.75 is adequate but not fortress-like. Free cash flow TTM is $1.881 billion, but quarterly FCF is lumpy — $149 million in Q1 2027 versus $469 million in Q4 2026 and $1.077 billion in Q2 2026 — and Q1 operating cash flow of just $197 million was weighed down by a $251 million working capital build and $48 million of capex. ROE of 220.7% and ROA of 18.7% are optically spectacular but flattered by a very thin equity base (equity multiplier near 19x), so FCF and interest coverage (32.6x in the latest quarter) are the more meaningful health metrics — and both say the company can fund growth and its $92 million quarterly dividend internally, though the aggressive $603 million buyback in Q1 consumed most of the quarter's cash generation.
Quarterly Revenue
$1.9B
2026-09
Revenue YoY Growth
+11.1%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
78.6%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$1.9B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is TPR Overvalued?
Because Tapestry is solidly profitable (Q1 2027 net income of $360 million; trailing EPS positive), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric. The stock trades at 19.5x trailing earnings and just 14.5x forward earnings, a 26% compression that implies the market expects meaningful EPS growth — consistent with consensus FY estimates of roughly $10.19 in EPS on about $9.59 billion of revenue. The PEG ratio of 0.025 is distorted by a near-zero growth denominator and should be disregarded; the more telling signal is the 14.5x forward multiple against a 78% gross margin and 19% net margin business.
On peer comparison, TPR screens cheap on earnings but expensive on book. A 19.5x trailing PE and 14.5x forward PE sit at or below the broad luxury-goods peer set (European luxury majors have historically traded in the 20–30x range), suggesting a discount that reflects TPR's accessible-luxury positioning, tariff exposure and Kate Spade drag. However, the price-to-book of 43.0x and price-to-sales of 3.72x (EV/sales 3.61x, EV/EBITDA 15.4x) are elevated versus a sector where book multiples are typically single-digit — a direct artifact of the leveraged recapitalization that shrank equity. The 15.4x EV/EBITDA is the cleanest cross-check and looks reasonable for a business with 24%+ EBITDA margins, implying the earnings-based discount is real but not extreme.
Historically, TPR's own valuation band has been wide. The trailing PE troughed near 6.5x in late 2023 and peaked around 21.2x in Q4 2026; at 19.5x today the stock sits in the upper quartile of its three-year range, well above the 11.7x–15.7x levels seen through much of 2024–2025. The price-to-sales of 3.72x is actually near the low end of its recent 10.5x–15.9x range (the historical ratios are computed on different share/price bases), so the signals conflict: earnings-based valuation says the market is pricing in optimistic margin delivery, while sales-based valuation says expectations have already been reset lower after the August de-rating. Net, the stock is not cheap on its own history, but the forward PE of 14.5x leaves room for re-rating if tariff headwinds prove manageable.
PE
19.5x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 7x~21x
vs. Industry Avg
21.8x
Industry PE ~21.8x*
EV/EBITDA
15.4x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on leverage and concentration. Debt-to-equity of 5.71x and total debt to capitalization of 85.1% leave a thin equity base (price-to-book 43.0x), and while interest coverage of 32.6x is comfortable, the $603 million Q1 buyback consumed most of the quarter's $197 million operating cash flow, leaving only $149 million of quarterly free cash flow versus $469 million in Q4 2026. Revenue is dangerously concentrated: Coach generated $1.661 billion, or 88% of the quarter, versus Kate Spade's $233 million, so any Coach slowdown hits the entire enterprise, and the sequential revenue trend ($1.92B, $1.88B, $1.89B) shows growth has stalled. Earnings quality also depends on margin expansion doing the heavy lifting, since consensus FY revenue of $9.59 billion implies only modest top-line growth against $10.19 of EPS. Market and competitive risks are dominated by tariff exposure and valuation. The August 13 gap-down of roughly 16% to $128.39 and the -33.0% max drawdown show how violently the market reprices TPR on margin fear, and recent Zacks and Motley Fool coverage explicitly flags tariff headwinds in H2 fiscal 2027 as the key threat to the 78.6% gross margin. With a beta of 1.46, TPR is roughly 46% more volatile than the S&P 500, so a risk-off tape amplifies drawdowns by about 1.5x, and the 6.15 short ratio means positioning is crowded enough that rallies can be short-covering rather than conviction. Competition from European luxury and mass-market handbag players pressures Coach's accessible-luxury pricing power, and the 19.5x trailing PE sits in the upper quartile of its three-year range, leaving little valuation cushion if sentiment turns. The worst-case scenario is a tariff-driven gross margin compression combined with a consumer slowdown that forces analysts toward the $96 low target. From $132.80, a move to the 52-week low of $99.01 would cost roughly -25%, and a slide to the $96 bear target would be about -28%; a repeat of the observed -33.0% max drawdown would take the stock to roughly $89. The chain would be: H2 2027 tariff costs hit gross margin, Q2 holiday-quarter guidance disappoints, the 16-Buy consensus fractures, and the $145-$150 supply zone caps any bounce, trapping recent buyers.
FAQ
Ranked by severity, the first risk is tariff-driven margin compression in H2 fiscal 2027, which threatens the 78.6% gross margin and 22.4% operating margin and already produced a roughly 16% single-session drop to $128.39 on August 13. Second is revenue concentration and deceleration: Coach is 88% of quarterly revenue at $1.661 billion versus Kate Spade's $233 million, and sequential revenue has flattened ($1.92B, $1.88B, $1.89B), so a Coach slowdown hits the whole enterprise. Third is financial leverage — debt-to-equity of 5.71x and total debt to capitalization of 85.1% leave a thin equity base, and the $603 million Q1 buyback consumed most of the quarter's $197 million operating cash flow, leaving only $149 million of quarterly free cash flow. Fourth is market and positioning risk: a 1.46 beta amplifies drawdowns roughly 1.5x versus the S&P 500, the 6.15 short ratio means rallies may be short-covering, and the $96-$211 analyst target spread signals genuine disagreement on the margin path.
The 12-month view is split into three scenarios. The base case (50% probability) targets $145-$165, assuming consensus FY 2027 EPS of $10.19 is broadly delivered, gross margin holds in the 76-78% range, and the 14.5x forward multiple stays roughly steady, so returns come from earnings growth plus the 1.1% dividend. The bull case (30%) targets $164-$180, requiring tariff costs to prove absorbable so gross margin holds near 78% and the multiple re-rates toward 16-18x, with the $211 high target as the upper bound. The bear case (20%) targets $96-$110, where H2 tariff costs bite harder, holiday guidance disappoints, the 16-Buy consensus fractures, and the stock retests the $99.01 52-week low. The base case is most likely, and its key assumption is that tariff exposure is a timing and magnitude question rather than a structural break in the Coach franchise.
The signals conflict depending on the metric. On earnings, TPR looks modestly undervalued: 19.5x trailing compresses to 14.5x forward, a 26% discount that implies the market expects EPS to grow toward the $10.19 consensus, and EV/EBITDA of 15.4x is reasonable for a 24%+ EBITDA-margin business. On book, it looks expensive — price-to-book of 43.0x and debt-to-equity of 5.71x are artifacts of a leveraged recapitalization that shrank equity, so ROE of 220.7% overstates underlying returns. Against its own history, the 19.5x trailing PE sits in the upper quartile of a three-year band that troughed near 6.5x in late 2023 and peaked around 21.2x, though price-to-sales of 3.72x is near the low end of its recent range after the August de-rating. Net, the market is paying a fair-to-slightly-discounted forward price that assumes margin delivery, not a bargain that prices in tariff failure.
On a risk/reward basis TPR screens favorably but not overwhelmingly: at $132.80 it trades at 14.5x forward earnings against a $163.79 average analyst target, implying about +23.3% upside, with 16 of 19 analysts at Buy and a 1.81 recommendation mean. The fundamental support is real — 78.6% gross margin, 22.4% operating margin, 31% net income growth on 11.1% revenue growth, and $1.881 billion of trailing free cash flow funding a $603 million quarterly buyback and a 1.1% dividend. The biggest downside risk is tariff-driven gross margin compression in H2 fiscal 2027, the exact trigger for the August 13 gap-down of roughly 16% to $128.39, with the $96 low target implying about -28% from here. It is a good buy for investors with a 12-24 month horizon who can tolerate a 1.46 beta and a -33.0% max drawdown, ideally accumulating on weakness toward the $110-$120 zone rather than chasing the +17.1% one-month rally, and it is less attractive for income or low-volatility mandates.
TPR is better suited to a medium-to-long-term holding period of at least 12-24 months than to short-term trading. The business is in a mature-but-compounding stage: revenue grew 11.1% YoY to $1.894 billion but has flattened sequentially, while margins (78.6% gross, 22.4% operating) and $1.881 billion of trailing free cash flow provide the durable return engine alongside a modest 1.1% dividend at a 21.3% payout ratio. Earnings visibility is decent given the $10.19 consensus EPS range of $9.85-$10.51, but the 1.46 beta, the -33.0% max drawdown, and the 6.15 short ratio mean short-term price action is dominated by tariff headlines and positioning rather than fundamentals. A concrete minimum holding period of 12 months aligns with the fiscal 2027 tariff resolution and the next two holiday-season prints, and investors should size positions assuming drawdowns roughly 1.5x the market's in a risk-off tape.