Textron
TXT
$75.93
+1.04%
Textron is a diversified aerospace and defense conglomerate that designs, manufactures, and services specialty aircraft through its Textron Aviation (Cessna, Beechcraft) and Bell helicopter and tiltrotor segments, while Textron Systems supplies uncrewed aircraft, armored vehicles, and military simulation and training products. The company occupies a distinctive niche as one of the few manufacturers spanning business jets, commercial and military rotorcraft, and defense systems, giving it exposure to both corporate aviation cycles and defense budgets. The current investor narrative centers on Textron's strategic pivot toward becoming a pure-play aerospace and defense company through the divestiture of its Industrial segment (plastic fuel tanks, golf carts, and ATVs), a move management and analysts frame as a catalyst for higher growth and multiple re-rating. That thesis is being tested by supply-chain friction and program-specific uncertainties in business jets and rotorcraft, which have weighed on sentiment even as commercial aerospace suppliers broadly enter a multi-year upcycle.…
TXT
Textron
$75.93
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy TXT Today?
Rating: Hold with a constructive bias. The core thesis is that Textron is a fundamentally sound aerospace and defense conglomerate trading at a depressed valuation (10.51x forward PE) with a clear catalyst — the Industrial divestiture — that could re-rate the multiple, but near-term momentum and execution risks argue for patience. The consensus 'buy' rating (mean 2.19) and average target of $100.27 (+32.1% upside) anchor the view that the selloff has overshot, yet the cluster of neutral ratings from major banks suggests waiting for evidence is prudent.
Supporting evidence is compelling on valuation: PS of 1.06, EV/Sales of 1.03, and EV/EBITDA of 10.77 are modest for an aerospace and defense name, and the PEG ratio of 1.01 suggests the stock is priced in line with growth. Revenue grew 2.99% in Q2 2026, profitability is stable (6.48% net margin, 18.13% gross margin), and TTM free cash flow of $759M provides a 4.8-5.7% FCF yield. The forward PE of 10.51x is near the low end of the historical 12.9x-25.4x range, implying the market expects either deterioration or high uncertainty; if the $7.66 EPS estimate is met, the stock is undervalued.
Key risks that could invalidate the thesis include a delay in the Industrial divestiture, continued supply-chain friction in business jets and rotorcraft, and a cut to forward EPS estimates. This Hold would upgrade to Buy if the stock reclaims the mid-$80s or if the divestiture closes with margin expansion evidence; it would downgrade to Sell if revenue growth decelerates below 2% or if the stock breaks below the $71.87 52-week low on volume. Relative to its history and peers, Textron is undervalued on forward earnings but fairly valued on trailing metrics, reflecting justified skepticism that may prove excessive.
Sign up to view all
TXT 12-Month Price Forecast
Textron presents a classic value-versus-momentum tension: the valuation is undemanding at 10.51x forward earnings with a 4.8-5.7% FCF yield, and the analyst community sees 32.1% upside to the average target, yet the stock is in a persistent downtrend with flat margins and sluggish 2.99% revenue growth. The pure-play aerospace transformation is a credible catalyst, but the cluster of neutral ratings and supply-chain friction suggest the market needs tangible evidence before re-rating. I would upgrade to bullish if the Industrial divestiture closes with margin expansion and the stock reclaims the mid-$80s, and downgrade to bearish if forward EPS estimates are cut or the $71.87 low breaks. With a beta of 0.908 and a wide $86-$115 target range, the risk/reward is balanced but lacks a near-term trigger, warranting a neutral stance with a constructive bias.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Textron's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $99.47 and implied upside of +31.0% versus the current price.
Average Target
$99.47
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+31.0%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$86 - $115
Analyst target range
Coverage is robust with 15 analysts, and the consensus recommendation is "buy" with a mean rating of 2.19 (on a scale where lower is more bullish), though the distribution skews neutral in practice: recent institutional actions show a heavy concentration of Hold/Neutral ratings from TD Cowen, JP Morgan, UBS, Citigroup, and Bernstein, with only Jefferies maintaining a Buy. The average target price of $100.27 implies roughly +32.1% upside from the current $75.93, a wide gap that reflects analysts' belief the selloff has overshot fundamentals even as their ratings remain cautious.
The target range of $86.00 to $115.00 is wide, spanning 34% between low and high, which signals meaningful uncertainty about the pace of the pure-play transformation and aerospace demand. The high target of $115 assumes successful Industrial divestiture, margin expansion, and a re-rating toward peer multiples, while the low target of $86 still implies +13.3% upside and likely prices in continued supply-chain friction and modest growth without a full re-rating. Notably, no analyst target sits below the current price, suggesting the Street views the stock as fundamentally undervalued at these levels, but the absence of recent upgrades and the cluster of Neutral ratings indicate analysts are waiting for tangible evidence of the transformation before turning more constructive.
Bulls vs Bears: TXT Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: the stock is in a sustained downtrend with -22.5% relative underperformance, revenue growth of just 2.99%, flat margins, and a cluster of neutral analyst ratings. However, the bull case rests on a powerful valuation disconnect — a 10.51x forward PE against a $100.27 average target (+32.1% upside) and a pure-play transformation that could re-rate the multiple. The single most important tension is whether the Industrial divestiture and aerospace upcycle deliver the EPS growth implied by the $7.66 forward estimate; if they do, the current price is a deep value opportunity, but if estimates are cut, the stock could break below its $71.87 52-week low. Near-term momentum favors the bears, but the risk/reward skews favorably for patient investors given no analyst target sits below the current price.
Bullish
- Deep discount to analyst targets: The average analyst target of $100.27 implies +32.1% upside from $75.93, and even the lowest target of $86.00 sits +13.3% above the current price. With 15 analysts covering and a consensus 'buy' rating (mean 2.19), the Street sees the selloff as overdone.
- Forward PE compression signals value: The stock trades at 17.00x trailing but only 10.51x forward earnings, a 38% compression that implies the market expects meaningful EPS growth toward the $7.66 consensus estimate. This forward multiple is near the low end of Textron's historical 12.9x-25.4x PE range.
- Pure-play aerospace transformation catalyst: The divestiture of the Industrial segment (plastic fuel tanks, golf carts, ATVs) would remove a low-growth drag and refocus the portfolio on higher-margin Aviation ($1.485B Q2 revenue) and Bell ($1.07B) businesses. Management and analysts frame this as a multiple re-rating catalyst.
- Solid balance sheet and cash generation: Debt-to-equity of 0.54, current ratio of 1.84, and $1.606B of cash provide financial flexibility, while TTM free cash flow of $759M yields roughly 4.8-5.7% against the market cap. The company repurchased $209M of stock in Q2 2026 alone, signaling confidence.
Bearish
- Persistent downtrend and relative weakness: The stock is down 12.77% YTD and 7.01% over one year versus the S&P 500's +15.53%, a -22.54% relative strength gap. It sits only 5.6% above its 52-week low of $71.87 and at roughly 13.7% of its annual range, signaling distribution rather than accumulation.
- Sluggish revenue growth: Q2 2026 revenue grew just 2.99% year-over-year to $3.827B, and the Q1 2026 11.8% growth was flattered by an easy comparison. The Industrial segment ($786M) remains a drag, and the investment case depends on portfolio transformation rather than organic acceleration.
- Thin and flat margins: Gross margin was 18.13% in Q2 2026 versus 19.08% a year earlier, and net margin held at 6.48% versus 6.59%, showing no operating leverage. For an aerospace manufacturer, these mid-to-high teens gross margins are unremarkable and constrain earnings growth.
- Analyst ratings skew neutral: Despite the 'buy' consensus, recent institutional actions show a cluster of Hold/Neutral ratings from TD Cowen, JP Morgan, UBS, Citigroup, and Bernstein, with only Jefferies maintaining a Buy. The absence of recent upgrades suggests analysts are waiting for tangible transformation evidence.
TXT Technical Analysis
Textron is in a sustained downtrend, with the stock down 7.01% over the past year and 12.77% year-to-date, a stark underperformance versus the S&P 500's +15.53% one-year return (relative strength of -22.54%). At $75.93, the stock sits at roughly 13.7% of its 52-week range of $71.87 to $101.57, meaning it is trading near the bottom of its annual band and only about 5.6% above the 52-week low. This positioning signals persistent distribution and a lack of buyer conviction rather than a value opportunity being aggressively defended, and the -27.53% max drawdown underscores how deeply the stock has retrenched from its highs.
Short-term momentum is decisively negative and accelerating to the downside: the stock is down 5.92% over the past month and 16.99% over three months, with the 3-month decline far outpacing the 1-year decline, indicating the selling pressure has intensified rather than stabilized. Relative strength is negative across every window (-7.14% vs. SPY over one month, -19.69% over three months, -24.60% over six months), confirming the weakness is idiosyncratic rather than market-driven. The most recent session did show a modest bounce of +1.04% on volume of roughly 1.69 million shares, but this looks like a reflex rally within a downtrend rather than a trend reversal, and the 4.27 short ratio suggests bears remain comfortable holding positions.
Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $71.87, just 5.6% below the current price, while resistance is anchored at the 52-week high of $101.57, roughly 33.8% above. A breakdown below $71.87 would signal a fresh leg lower and likely trigger momentum-driven selling, whereas reclaiming even the mid-$80s would be needed to suggest the downtrend is exhausting. With a beta of 0.908, Textron is slightly less volatile than the market, so the magnitude of its decline is a function of company-specific deterioration rather than high-beta amplification, which makes the underperformance more concerning for holders.
Beta
0.91
0.91x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-27.5%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$72-$102
Price range past year
Annual Return
-7.0%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | TXT Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -5.9% | +0.2% |
| 3m | -17.0% | +2.9% |
| 6m | -17.1% | +8.4% |
| 1y | -7.0% | +14.9% |
| ytd | -12.8% | +11.9% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
TXT Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is growing but only modestly: Q2 2026 revenue of $3.827 billion rose 2.99% year-over-year from $3.716 billion, continuing a pattern of low-single-digit expansion (Q1 2026 revenue of $3.695 billion was up 11.8% from $3.306 billion a year earlier, though that comparison benefited from an easy base). Segment data shows Textron Aviation as the largest contributor at $1.485 billion, followed by Bell at $1.07 billion, Industrial at $786 million, and Textron Systems at $338 million, meaning the aviation and rotorcraft businesses carry the growth burden while the soon-to-be-divested Industrial unit remains a meaningful drag on the consolidated growth rate. The trajectory implies a stable but unspectacular top line, and the investment case hinges more on portfolio transformation and margin mix than on organic acceleration.
The company is solidly profitable, with Q2 2026 net income of $248 million on a 6.48% net margin and gross profit of $694 million (18.13% gross margin), while operating income of $267 million equates to a 6.98% operating margin. Margins have been essentially flat to slightly improving: gross margin was 18.13% in Q2 2026 versus 19.08% in Q2 2025 and 18.19% in Q1 2026, while net margin held at 6.48% versus 6.59% a year ago, suggesting stable but thin profitability for an aerospace manufacturer. The Q4 2025 quarter showed an anomalous 12.10% gross margin due to accounting classification quirks, but the underlying trend is a mid-to-high teens gross margin business with limited near-term expansion, which constrains operating leverage as revenue grows slowly.
Financial health is adequate but not fortress-like: debt-to-equity stands at 0.54, the current ratio is a healthy 1.84, and TTM free cash flow is $759 million against a market cap of roughly $13.4-15.7 billion, implying an FCF yield of roughly 4.8-5.7%. Cash flow is seasonally lumpy, with Q1 2026 free cash flow of -$250 million (driven by a -$518 million working capital swing) followed by +$209 million in Q2 2026, and the company returned capital aggressively via $209 million of buybacks in Q2 alone. ROE of 11.70% and ROA of 4.55% are respectable but unremarkable, and with interest coverage of roughly 8x and $1.606 billion of cash at the end of Q2 2026, Textron can fund operations internally, though the working-capital volatility and modest margins mean external financing flexibility remains relevant.
Quarterly Revenue
$3.8B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
+3.0%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
18.1%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$759000000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is TXT Overvalued?
Because Textron is profitable (Q2 2026 net income of $248 million), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric: the stock trades at 17.00x trailing earnings but only 10.51x forward earnings, a 38% compression that implies the market expects meaningful EPS growth. That gap is corroborated by the consensus forward EPS estimate of $7.66 versus the trailing EPS of $0.06 reported in the key metrics feed (an apparent data anomaly), and the PEG ratio of 1.01 suggests the stock is priced roughly in line with its expected growth rate rather than at a premium.
Against its own sector, Textron screens cheap on most measures: a PS ratio of 1.06, EV/Sales of 1.03, and EV/EBITDA of 10.77 are modest for an aerospace and defense name, and the forward PE of 10.51x is well below the premium multiples typically commanded by pure-play defense primes and commercial aerospace suppliers. The discount appears justified by Textron's below-peer growth (2.99% revenue growth), thin 6.22% net margin, and the overhang of its Industrial divestiture, but it also embeds skepticism that may prove excessive if the pure-play transformation lifts margins and growth. The 1.99x price-to-book and 12.35x price-to-cash-flow are similarly mid-range, offering no clear signal of either deep value or overvaluation.
Historically, Textron's PE has ranged from roughly 12.9x to 25.4x over the past several years, and the current trailing 17.00x sits near the middle of that band, while the PS ratio of 1.06 is dramatically below the 3.8x-5.9x range seen from 2021 through 2026 (reflecting the market cap discrepancy in the data feed). The forward PE of 10.51x, however, is near the low end of the historical range, suggesting the market is pricing in either fundamental deterioration or a highly uncertain earnings outlook. If the divestiture and aerospace upcycle deliver on the forward estimates, the current multiple would represent a value opportunity; if estimates are cut, the stock could de-rate further.
PE
17.0x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Low-End
5-Year PE Range 13x~25x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
10.8x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on Textron's thin profitability and lumpy cash flow. Gross margin of 18.13% and net margin of 6.48% leave little buffer against cost inflation or program delays, and Q1 2026 free cash flow was -$250M due to a -$518M working capital swing before recovering to +$209M in Q2. Debt-to-equity of 0.54 and interest coverage of roughly 8x are adequate but not fortress-like, and revenue concentration in Textron Aviation ($1.485B) and Bell ($1.07B) means a downturn in business jets or rotorcraft orders would hit consolidated results disproportionately. The Industrial segment ($786M) remains a drag on growth until the divestiture closes, and any delay in that transaction would prolong the low-growth mix.
Market and competitive risks include valuation compression if the forward EPS estimate of $7.66 proves optimistic. The stock's 10.51x forward PE already embeds skepticism, but a further de-rating toward the low end of its historical 12.9x-25.4x range on trailing earnings could pressure shares if growth stalls. Competitive disruption is evident in recent news: Howmet Aerospace is capitalizing on strong commercial aerospace demand while Textron struggles with supply-chain issues, creating a clear divergence. With a beta of 0.908, Textron is slightly less volatile than the market, but its -22.5% relative underperformance over one year is idiosyncratic, meaning sector rotation toward defense primes or commercial aerospace suppliers could continue to leave Textron behind. Regulatory and program-specific risks in defense (Textron Systems) add another layer of uncertainty.
The worst-case scenario would combine a delay or unfavorable terms on the Industrial divestiture, a business jet order slowdown, and a cut to the $7.66 forward EPS estimate, triggering analyst downgrades and a break below the 52-week low of $71.87. From the current $75.93, that represents a -5.3% decline to the 52-week low, but a momentum-driven selloff could overshoot toward the $65-70 range, implying a -8% to -14% downside. The max drawdown of -27.53% over the past year shows how deeply the stock can retrench; a repeat from current levels would imply a price near $55, a -27.5% loss. The analyst low target of $86.00 is above the current price, so the Street does not currently model a worst-case collapse, but the wide $86-$115 target range (34% spread) signals meaningful uncertainty.
FAQ
The most severe risk is execution on the Industrial divestiture: a delay or unfavorable terms would remove the primary re-rating catalyst and prolong the low-growth mix, with the Industrial segment contributing $786M of Q2 revenue. Financial risk is moderate given 18.13% gross margins and lumpy cash flow (Q1 2026 FCF of -$250M), leaving little buffer against cost inflation. Competitive risk is evident as peers like Howmet capitalize on the commercial aerospace upcycle while Textron struggles with supply-chain issues, contributing to -22.5% relative underperformance. Macro and company-specific risks include a business jet order slowdown and a break below the $71.87 52-week low, which could trigger momentum selling toward the $65-70 range; the -27.53% max drawdown shows the stock's capacity for deep retrenchment.
The 12-month forecast has three scenarios: a base case (50% probability) of $86-$100 as revenue grows 2-4% and margins hold, a bull case (25%) of $100-$115 if the Industrial divestiture closes with margin expansion and forward EPS of $7.66 is validated, and a bear case (25%) of $65-$86 if the divestiture is delayed and EPS estimates are cut. The base case is most likely, anchored by the analyst average target of $100.27 and low target of $86.00, with the key assumption being that gross margin holds in the 18-19% range and no major program cancellations occur. The wide $86-$115 target range (34% spread) reflects uncertainty about the pace of the pure-play transformation.
TXT screens undervalued on forward metrics: the 10.51x forward PE is well below the 17.00x trailing multiple and near the low end of the historical 12.9x-25.4x range, while PS of 1.06 and EV/EBITDA of 10.77 are modest for an aerospace and defense name. The PEG ratio of 1.01 suggests the stock is priced in line with its expected growth rate rather than at a premium. However, the discount is partly justified by below-peer growth (2.99% revenue growth) and thin 6.48% net margins, and the trailing PE of 17.00x sits mid-range historically. The market is pricing in skepticism about the Industrial divestiture and forward EPS of $7.66; if those estimates are met, the stock is undervalued, but if they are cut, the current multiple could prove fair or even rich.
From a risk/reward perspective, TXT offers a favorable skew for patient investors: the average analyst target of $100.27 implies +32.1% upside, and even the lowest target of $86.00 is +13.3% above the current $75.93. The stock trades at 10.51x forward earnings, near the low end of its historical range, with a 4.8-5.7% FCF yield and a 0.54 debt-to-equity ratio. The biggest downside risk is a break below the $71.87 52-week low, which would imply roughly -5.3% near-term but could extend toward $65-70 (-8% to -14%) in a momentum selloff. It is a good buy for value-oriented investors with a 12-18 month horizon who can tolerate near-term volatility, but momentum traders should wait for a reclaim of the mid-$80s before entering.
TXT is better suited for long-term holding with a minimum 12-18 month horizon, as the Industrial divestiture and aerospace upcycle are multi-quarter catalysts that require patience. The low beta of 0.908 and dividend yield of just 0.12% (payout ratio 2.06%) mean the stock offers limited income and modest volatility, making it a poor short-term trading vehicle given the persistent downtrend (-16.99% over three months). Earnings visibility is moderate: forward EPS of $7.66 is well above trailing results, but the 34% analyst target spread and supply-chain friction add uncertainty. Short-term traders should wait for a technical reversal above the mid-$80s, while long-term investors can accumulate near the $71.87-$75.93 range for the transformation thesis.