UNG
UNGUnited States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the price of natural gas futures contracts.
It provides investors with direct exposure to natural gas price movements without the need to trade futures directly, serving as a key liquidity and hedging tool in the commodities market.
Updated: January 14, 2026, 16:00 EST
Investment Opinion: Should I buy UNG Today?
Based on the provided analysis, UNG presents a high-risk, speculative opportunity suitable only for investors with a strong tolerance for volatility.
Technical & Risk Profile: The fund is in a deep downtrend, trading near its 52-week low and exhibiting extreme volatility (Beta of 2.64) with a maximum drawdown of over -56% in the past year. While technically oversold, there is no clear sign of a trend reversal, and its structure exposes it to persistent value erosion from contango.
Valuation & Fundamentals: The negative P/E ratio confirms a lack of profitability, and the absence of fundamental financial data makes it impossible to assess the company's underlying health. The valuation is challenging to contextualize without peer comparisons.
Recommendation: HOLD / NOT A BUY. UNG is best viewed as a tactical trading instrument for speculating on short-term natural gas price spikes, not a long-term investment. The combination of extreme volatility, structural headwinds, and lack of profitability makes it unsuitable for most investors seeking capital appreciation or stability. Current investors might hold for a potential rebound, but new buying carries significant risk without a clear, sustained bullish catalyst for natural gas.
UNG 12-Month Price Forecast
RockFlow Model Forecast: Three Scenarios for 2026
Of course. Here is a 12-month outlook for the United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG):
Over the next 12 months, UNG's performance will be dictated primarily by weather patterns (demand for heating/cooling) and any supply disruptions, as its structural flaws make it a poor long-term hold. The key catalyst for a rally would be an unexpectedly active hurricane season disrupting Gulf of Mexico production or a severe winter driving higher heating demand. However, significant risks persist, including the persistent contango in the futures market that steadily erodes the fund's value, high volatility (beta of 2.64), and the potential for mild weather leading to oversupply. Given these substantial headwinds and its current oversold condition, a cautious approach is warranted; any price recovery toward the $14-$16 range would likely face strong resistance, while a break below current levels could see a test of further lows.
Wall Street Consensus
Most Wall Street analysts are optimistic about UNG's 12-month outlook, with consensus target around $10.24, indicating expected upside potential.
Bulls vs Bears: UNG Investment Factors
Overall, UNG has investment potential but also faces challenges. Here are key factors to weigh before investing.
Bullish
- Natural gas demand surge: Strong demand growth from AI electricity needs and LNG exports boosting prices
- Price momentum positive: UNG jumped 7.5% as Henry Hub futures rebounded on colder forecasts
- AI electricity demand driver: Artificial intelligence growth creating substantial new electricity demand benefiting natural gas
- LNG export expansion: Increasing U.S. LNG exports providing structural demand support for natural gas prices
- 2026 recovery projected: Market expects natural gas demand rebound in 2026 after muted 2025 performance
Bearish
- Weather dependency risk: Prices heavily influenced by weather patterns creating unpredictable volatility
- Leveraged ETF volatility: Related ETFs like BOIL dropped 53% showing extreme price swings possible
- Seasonal demand patterns: Natural gas subject to strong seasonal demand fluctuations affecting consistency
- Renewable competition: Long-term transition to renewables could pressure natural gas demand growth
- Storage levels uncertainty: High inventory levels could cap price rallies despite demand improvements
UNG Technical Analysis
Of course. Here is the technical analysis of UNG's performance based on the provided data.
Overall Assessment UNG has experienced a deeply bearish and highly volatile trend over the past year, significantly underperforming the broader market and currently trading near its 52-week low.
Short-term Performance The stock's recent performance remains firmly negative, with a 1-month drop of -13.46% and a 3-month decline of -11.15%. While the relative strength versus the market over 3 months is listed as a positive +14.52%, this figure is misleading; it indicates that UNG's loss of -11.15% was 14.52 percentage points *less severe* than the market's decline, but the fund is still in a pronounced downtrend. The extreme beta of 2.64 confirms that UNG's moves are vastly more amplified than the market's.
Current Position UNG is currently trading much closer to its 52-week low of $10.38 than its high of $24.33, indicating a severely oversold condition from a technical perspective. With a maximum drawdown of -56.36% over the past year, the security has shown immense downside volatility and appears to be searching for a bottom, though the persistent negative momentum suggests caution is warranted.
| Period | UNG Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -19.6% | +1.3% |
| 3m | -16.9% | +5.7% |
| 6m | -27.9% | +10.6% |
| 1y | -46.4% | +16.5% |
| ytd | -15.1% | +1.1% |
UNG Fundamental Analysis
Based on the information provided, a fundamental analysis of UNG cannot be performed. The provided data indicates that both the recent quarterly report and financial ratios are unavailable.
Without access to revenue, profitability, debt levels, or cash flow statements, it is impossible to assess the company's financial health or operational efficiency. Any analysis would be speculative in the absence of this foundational financial data.
To conduct a proper fundamental review, the company's actual financial statements including its income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement are required.
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
RockFlow Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
Try Now & Get Tesla Stock RewardValuation Analysis: Is UNG Overvalued?
Valuation Level
UNG presents a challenging valuation profile. The negative trailing PE ratio of -9.37 indicates the company is currently unprofitable on a trailing twelve-month basis, making traditional PE-based valuation meaningless. The price-to-book (PB) ratio of approximately 1.18 suggests the stock is trading slightly above its book value, which is not particularly expensive, but this metric is less informative without earnings to support the asset base.
Peer Comparison
A direct peer comparison is not possible as the required industry average data is unavailable. Without industry benchmarks for PE, PB, or other key ratios, it is impossible to contextualize UNG's valuation metrics relative to its sector peers. Further analysis would be dependent on obtaining relevant industry comparison data to determine if its current valuation is attractive.
Investment Risk Disclosure
Of course. Here is a risk analysis for UNG based on the provided metrics.
UNG exhibits exceptionally high volatility risk, as evidenced by its Beta of 2.64, indicating it is significantly more volatile than the broader market. This extreme sensitivity to market movements is further confirmed by a severe maximum drawdown of -56.36% over the past year, meaning the fund lost more than half of its value from a previous peak. Investors must be prepared for substantial price swings and potential for rapid, deep losses in a relatively short period.
Beyond volatility, UNG faces significant structural risks inherent to its strategy of tracking near-month natural gas futures. The fund is highly susceptible to the negative effects of contango in the futures market, which can lead to value erosion over time as it rolls contracts. Furthermore, the extreme price swings in the underlying commodity make it very challenging to predict short-term performance, and while short interest is not a current concern, liquidity can become an issue during periods of market stress due to the fund's specialized nature.
FAQs
Opinion: Bearish
Core Reasons: 1. UNG has severely underperformed with a -56% drawdown over the past year and trades near 52-week lows 2. The fund's beta of 2.64 indicates extreme volatility versus the broader market 3. Negative trailing PE ratio and structural risks from futures contract contango create headwinds
Suitable Investor Types: Only suitable for sophisticated traders who understand commodity futures risks and can tolerate extreme volatility. Not appropriate for long-term investors or those seeking stable returns.
Bottom Line: While natural gas fundamentals show potential long-term promise, UNG's technical weakness and structural risks make it unsuitable for most investors at this time.
Based on the limited data provided, UNG appears to be fairly valued to slightly overvalued, primarily due to its lack of profitability. The negative P/E ratio of -9.37 is the most significant metric, indicating the company is currently unprofitable and cannot be valued on an earnings basis. The Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of approximately 1.18 suggests the stock trades slightly above its book value, which is reasonable but not compelling without earnings. Without industry averages or forward-looking metrics (like Forward P/E or PEG), a precise comparison is impossible, but the negative earnings signal that the current price is not supported by profitability, leaning toward overvaluation.
Based on the provided analysis, here are the key risks of holding UNG:
1. Extreme Volatility Risk: The fund's exceptionally high Beta of 2.64 signifies extreme sensitivity to market movements, leading to rapid and deep price swings, as evidenced by its -56.36% maximum drawdown over the past year. 2. Structural Roll Cost Risk: The fund is highly susceptible to value erosion from contango in the futures market, a structural flaw where rolling expiring near-month contracts into more expensive longer-dated ones consistently erodes its net asset value over time. 3. Commodity Price Risk: The fund's performance is directly and volatilely linked to the price of natural gas, which is subject to unpredictable swings driven by factors like weather, storage levels, and geopolitical events, making short-term performance very difficult to predict. 4. Persistent Bearish Momentum Risk: Technically, the fund is in a pronounced downtrend, trading near its 52-week low with sustained negative momentum, indicating a lack of positive catalyst to reverse the current bearish price action.
Based on its fundamental characteristics and the nature of the natural gas futures market, forecasting UNG to 2026 is highly speculative. The primary goal for an investor should be capital preservation, as the fund's structural decay makes long-term price appreciation exceptionally difficult.
* Target Price Range: A reasonable base case for 2026 is a price significantly lower than the current $11.32, potentially in the $6-$8 range, due to the persistent erosion from contango. A bull case, dependent on a sustained multi-year period of extreme weather and supply shortages, might see the fund hold near current levels or briefly spike toward $14-$16. * Key Growth Drivers: The only potential drivers are external factors: 1) a succession of severe winters/hot summers boosting demand, and 2) prolonged geopolitical or weather-related supply disruptions. * Main Assumptions: This outlook assumes the structural flaws of contango and roll yield will continue to be the dominant forces outweighing any short-term commodity price moves. * Uncertainty: This forecast carries extreme uncertainty; UNG is a trading vehicle for short-term speculation, not a long-term investment, and its value is likely to erode over a multi-year horizon.