VFC

VF Corporation

$20.64

-0.48%
Nov 11, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
V.F. Corporation designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel, footwear, and accessories across active and outdoor categories, operating a portfolio of roughly ten labels including Vans, The North Face, Timberland, and Altra, sold through wholesale channels, e-commerce, and company-owned and partner stores across the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. The company is a legacy multi-brand platform in the global apparel manufacturing space, distinct for the breadth of its outdoor and action-sports brand stable rather than for any single label, though that breadth has also been a source of complexity and capital misallocation over the past several years. The current investor narrative is a turnaround story: management has been cutting debt, divesting non-core assets, and rebuilding margins, and the most recent quarter delivered an earnings beat on margin gains and brand strength with reaffirmed guidance, which the market has read as evidence the turnaround is gaining traction. The debate now centers on whether Vans can return to sustainable growth and whether the outdoor franchise can carry the portfolio while leverage remains elevated, with the July selloff on a wider-than-expected loss and Vans weakness a reminder that the recovery path is uneven.

People also watch

Ralph Lauren Corporation

Ralph Lauren Corporation

RL

Analysis
Levi Strauss & Co.

Levi Strauss & Co.

LEVI

Analysis
PVH Corp.

PVH Corp.

PVH

Analysis
Kontoor Brands

Kontoor Brands

KTB

Analysis
Columbia Sportswear Company

Columbia Sportswear Company

COLM

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy VFC Today?

Rating: Hold. V.F. Corp is a genuine but unproven turnaround trading at $20.35, essentially at the $20.05 average analyst target (about -1.5% implied downside) after a 41.52% one-month surge, with a 2.42 recommendation mean that reads neutral in practice given 14 of 22 analysts at Hold. The core thesis is that margin recovery and deleveraging are real, but the market has already paid for the easy part of the re-rating, so the risk/reward is balanced rather than compelling at this price.

The supporting evidence is mixed but tilts constructive on operations: the latest quarter delivered $285.3 million of net income and $0.73 EPS versus a $97.2 million loss in fiscal Q1, with operating margin swinging from -4.98% to +13.65% and gross margin holding in a 54.9%-56.4% band across four quarters. Valuation is undemanding on forward earnings at 14.54x forward PE versus 25.23x trailing, implying consensus EPS of $1.76 against $0.04 trailing, and 0.67x sales and 9.55x price-to-cash-flow sit near the bottom of the stock's historical 2.05x-7.89x PS range. Against that, revenue is still contracting at -3.84% year-over-year, debt-to-equity is 2.69x with debt at 71.1% of capitalization, and the latest quarter burned $206.9 million of free cash flow on working capital despite $635.9 million TTM FCF.

The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are a Vans relapse that keeps revenue negative, a leverage scare that forces a choice between the $35.4 million quarterly dividend and deleveraging, and simple valuation compression given the stock already trades above consensus fair value with a beta of 1.522. This Hold would upgrade to Buy on a decisive break above the $22.27 52-week high accompanied by positive revenue growth and debt-to-equity below 2.0x, and would downgrade to Sell on a return below the $17-$18 shelf or a second consecutive quarter of negative free cash flow. Net verdict: fairly valued to modestly expensive relative to its own history on earnings, cheap on sales only because the market is pricing structural margin impairment — not a bargain at $20.35.

Sign up to view all

VFC 12-Month Price Forecast

The forward view is balanced: the earnings inflection is real and the forward multiple of 14.54x is undemanding, but the stock has already run 41.52% in a month to trade above its $20.05 consensus target, leaving little analyst-driven cushion. The 0.67x sales multiple is at the bottom of the historical 2.05x-7.89x range, which is either a deep-value entry or a warning that the market expects structural margin impairment, and only a Vans recovery resolves that ambiguity. With debt-to-equity at 2.69x and free cash flow negative $206.9 million in the latest quarter, the deleveraging path is the swing factor for equity holders. I would upgrade to bullish on a break above $22.27 with positive revenue growth and debt-to-equity below 2.0x, and downgrade to bearish on a drop below the $17-$18 shelf or a second negative free cash flow quarter.

Historical Price
Current Price $20.64
Average Target $20.13
High Target $40.00
Low Target $12.46

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on VF Corporation's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $20.05 and implied upside of -2.9% versus the current price.

Average Target

$20.05

24 analysts

Implied Upside

-2.9%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

24

covering this stock

Price Range

$16 - $40

Analyst target range

Buy
9 (38%)
Hold
14 (58%)
Sell
1 (4%)

Coverage is broad with 22 analysts, and the distribution of 9 Buy, 14 Hold, and 1 Sell produces a recommendation mean of 2.42 and a consensus label of "buy" that in practice leans neutral given the Hold majority. The average target price of $20.05 is essentially at the current $20.35 price, implying roughly -1.5% downside, which means the stock has already run past the consensus fair value after its 41.52% one-month surge. The consensus is therefore best characterized as cautiously constructive but fully valued, with the recent price action having closed the gap to targets faster than analysts have revised them. The target range is extraordinarily wide, from a low of $16.00 to a high of $40.00, a 150% spread that signals deep disagreement about the durability of the turnaround. The $40.00 high target implies roughly 97% upside and would require multiple expansion toward historical PS levels plus a genuine Vans recovery and margin normalization toward prior peaks, while the $16.00 low target implies about 21% downside and prices in continued revenue erosion, margin compression, and leverage constraining reinvestment. Institutional ratings show a clear positive drift over the past two months, with Truist upgrading to Buy from Hold on 2026-10-13, Piper Sandler moving to Overweight from Neutral the same day, JP Morgan lifting to Neutral from Underweight on 2026-10-09, and BNP Paribas raising to Neutral from Underperform on 2026-10-29, while Barclays has held Overweight through 2026-11-05. That pattern of upgrades into the Q2 beat supports the momentum in the shares, but the wide target dispersion and the fact that the average sits below the current price argue for patience rather than chasing the move at $20.35.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: VFC Investment Factors

The bull case currently has the stronger near-term evidence: the Q2 earnings beat, the swing to a 13.65% operating margin, four consecutive quarters of stable 54.9%-56.4% gross margin, and a wave of analyst upgrades into the print all point to a turnaround that is gaining traction rather than stalling. The bear case is structural rather than cyclical, resting on 2.69x debt-to-equity, a still-negative -3.84% revenue growth rate, and a stock that has already run past its $20.05 average target after a 41.52% one-month surge. The single most important tension is whether Vans returns to sustainable growth: the Outdoor segment at $1.733 billion can carry the portfolio, but only a Vans recovery would justify multiple expansion toward the $40.00 high target and validate the forward PE of 14.54x as conservative rather than optimistic. Until revenue growth turns positive, the 0.67x sales multiple reads as a warning about structural margin impairment rather than a bargain, and the 150% spread between the $16.00 low and $40.00 high targets captures exactly how unresolved that question is.

Bullish

  • Earnings inflection is real and sharp: The latest quarter (ended 2026-09-26) delivered net income of $285.3 million and EPS of $0.73, a dramatic reversal from the fiscal Q1 loss of $97.2 million and Q4 loss of $119.3 million. Operating margin swung from -4.98% in Q1 to +13.65% in Q2, showing that cost discipline and seasonal leverage are translating into genuine bottom-line recovery rather than a one-off.
  • Forward multiple is undemanding: The forward PE of 14.54x against a trailing PE of 25.23x implies consensus EPS of $1.76 versus the current $0.04 trailing figure, a roughly 74% earnings step-up that is anchored to a depressed base rather than hypergrowth. At 0.67x sales and 9.55x price-to-cash-flow, the market is valuing the enterprise at a steep discount to revenue despite a 54.8% gross margin.
  • Analyst upgrades confirm momentum: Institutional sentiment has drifted clearly positive, with Truist upgrading to Buy and Piper Sandler to Overweight on 2026-10-13, JP Morgan lifting to Neutral on 2026-10-09, and BNP Paribas to Neutral on 2026-10-29, while Barclays held Overweight through 2026-11-05. The 9 Buy versus 1 Sell split and a $40.00 high target (roughly 97% upside) show a credible bull path exists if Vans recovers.
  • Outdoor franchise carries the portfolio: Segment data shows Outdoor at $1.733 billion versus Active at $700 million, meaning The North Face-led outdoor business is the dominant revenue engine and is not dependent on a Vans turnaround to sustain the enterprise. Gross margin has held in a remarkably stable 54.9%-56.4% band across the last four quarters, indicating pricing and mix are intact even as revenue declines.

Bearish

  • Leverage leaves little room for error: Debt-to-equity stands at 2.69x with total debt to capitalization at 71.1%, and the 4.90x equity multiplier shows the 13.78% ROE is heavily levered rather than operationally earned. Interest expense of $31.6 million in the latest quarter consumes a meaningful share of the $367.9 million operating income, so deleveraging from internally generated cash is the swing factor for equity holders.
  • Revenue still contracting year-over-year: The latest quarter posted revenue of $2.695 billion, down 3.84% year-over-year from $2.803 billion, and the Active segment anchored by Vans remains the smaller and more troubled piece at $700 million. The July selloff on a wider-than-expected loss and Vans weakness is a reminder that the recovery path is uneven and that a return to positive comps is not yet proven.
  • Stock has run past consensus fair value: The average analyst target of $20.05 sits essentially at the current $20.35 price, implying roughly -1.5% downside after a 41.52% one-month surge, meaning the move has closed the gap to targets faster than analysts have revised them. The recommendation mean of 2.42 with 14 of 22 analysts at Hold is a consensus that leans neutral in practice despite the 'buy' label.
  • Free cash flow is lumpy and working-capital driven: TTM free cash flow of $635.9 million masks a negative $206.9 million in the latest quarter as receivables of $680.8 million absorbed cash, and the company continues to pay $35.4 million in quarterly dividends against a 55.2% payout ratio. A 2.65% trailing net margin and 6.32% operating margin remain thin for branded apparel, leaving little buffer if wholesale demand softens.

VFC Technical Analysis

V.F. Corp is in a pronounced recovery uptrend following a deep drawdown, with the stock up 42.71% over the trailing year and 12.06% year-to-date, and at $20.35 it sits at roughly 80.6% of its 52-week range of $12.46 to $22.27. That positioning near the upper end of the range signals momentum and growing conviction in the turnaround rather than a falling-knife value setup, though it also means the stock is approaching the zone where prior rallies have stalled. The 41.44% maximum drawdown on record underscores how violent the prior decline was, and the current advance represents a meaningful retracement of that damage rather than a fresh all-time-high breakout. Short-term momentum is exceptionally strong and accelerating: the stock is up 41.52% over the past month and 35.76% over three months, versus a 4.99% decline in SPY over the same one-month window, producing a relative strength reading of 46.51. The one-month gain far exceeds the 7.22% six-month change, indicating the bulk of the move is recent and concentrated in the October-November leg, which raises the risk of near-term overextension even as it confirms a genuine trend reversal rather than a mean-reversion bounce. Volume of roughly 11.26 million shares alongside the sharp advance suggests institutional participation rather than thin speculative flow. Key technical support sits at the 52-week low of $12.46, with the September consolidation around $12.62-$13.09 forming a secondary floor, while resistance is defined by the 52-week high of $22.27, only about 9.4% above the current $20.35 price. A decisive breakout above $22.27 would confirm the multi-year downtrend is broken and likely invite momentum and turnaround-fund flows, whereas a failure and breakdown back below the $17-$18 shelf that capped the stock through the summer would signal the rally was a countertrend squeeze. With a beta of 1.522, the stock is roughly 52% more volatile than the market, meaning position sizing should be scaled down accordingly and stop levels set wider than for a market-beta name.

Beta

1.52

1.52x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-41.4%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$12-$22

Price range past year

Annual Return

+39.3%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodVFC ReturnS&P 500
1m+30.7%-2.4%
3m+40.0%-2.3%
6m+23.7%+2.8%
1y+39.3%+11.3%
ytd+13.7%+11.4%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

VFC Fundamental Analysis

Revenue is contracting but the trajectory is stabilizing: the most recent quarter (ended 2026-09-26) posted revenue of $2.695 billion, down 3.84% year-over-year, an improvement from the prior-year comparable quarter's $2.803 billion and a sharp rebound from the seasonally weak fiscal Q1 of $1.669 billion. Segment data shows Outdoor at $1.733 billion and Active at $700 million, confirming that the outdoor franchise (led by The North Face) is the dominant revenue engine while the Active segment anchored by Vans remains the smaller and more troubled piece. The multi-quarter pattern is highly seasonal and uneven, with Q1 revenue of $1.669 billion and Q4 of $2.166 billion bracketing the stronger Q2 and Q3 periods, and the modest YoY decline implies the company is no longer shrinking at the double-digit pace implied by earlier periods. For the investment case, the key question is whether the -3.84% YoY figure marks the trough, since a return to positive comps would validate the turnaround narrative that has driven the stock's 42.71% one-year gain. Profitability has swung decisively positive: the latest quarter generated net income of $285.3 million on a 55.38% gross margin and 13.65% operating margin, a dramatic reversal from the fiscal Q1 loss of $97.2 million and Q4 loss of $119.3 million. Gross margin has been remarkably stable in the 54.9%-56.4% band across the last four quarters, indicating pricing and product mix are holding even as revenue declines, while the swing in operating margin from -4.98% in Q1 to +13.65% in Q2 reflects both seasonal leverage and genuine cost discipline. The trailing net margin of 2.65% and operating margin of 6.32% remain thin for branded apparel, and the negative PEG ratio of -0.11 reflects the still-depressed earnings base rather than a valuation signal. Balance sheet risk is the central fundamental concern: debt-to-equity stands at 2.69x with total debt to capitalization at 71.1%, and while the current ratio of 1.84 provides adequate near-term liquidity, the leverage profile leaves little room for error. Free cash flow is lumpy and working-capital driven, with TTM FCF of $635.9 million but a negative $206.9 million in the latest quarter as receivables of $680.8 million absorbed cash, and the company continues to pay $35.4 million in quarterly dividends against a 55.2% payout ratio. ROE of 13.78% and ROA of 4.68% are respectable on the recovering earnings base, but the 4.90x equity multiplier shows those returns are heavily levered, and the company's ability to deleverage from internally generated cash rather than asset sales is the swing factor for equity holders.

Quarterly Revenue

$2.7B

2026-09

Revenue YoY Growth

-3.8%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

55.4%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$635879000.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Active
Outdoor

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is VFC Overvalued?

Because net income is positive on a trailing basis, the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, and the trailing PE of 25.23x against a forward PE of 14.54x implies the market expects earnings to grow roughly 74% over the next twelve months, consistent with consensus EPS of $1.76 versus the current $0.04 trailing figure. That gap is enormous and reflects a depressed, near-breakeven trailing earnings base rather than genuine hypergrowth, so the forward multiple is the more meaningful anchor and it is not demanding in absolute terms. The PS ratio of 0.67x and EV/Sales of 1.34x are low for a branded apparel portfolio, while EV/EBITDA of 13.40x and P/B of 3.46x sit in more normal territory for the sector. Peer comparison is constrained by the absence of an explicit industry-average multiple in the provided valuation data, but the internal spread is instructive: a 0.67x sales multiple alongside a 3.46x book multiple and 2.69x debt-to-equity indicates the market is valuing the enterprise at a discount to revenue while the equity carries a premium to book because of leverage. The 2.20% dividend yield and 9.55x price-to-cash-flow provide some valuation support, and the 0.67x PS is well below the 2.0x-2.6x PS range the stock carried through 2025, suggesting the market is pricing in structural margin impairment rather than a full recovery. Historically, V.F. Corp's PS ratio has ranged from roughly 2.05x to 7.89x over the past several years, and the current 0.67x is at the very bottom of that band, while the trailing PE of 25.23x compares to historical readings that swung between single digits in strong quarters and deeply negative in loss quarters. The stock is therefore cheap on sales and cash flow relative to its own history but expensive on trailing earnings, a classic signature of a turnaround where the market is paying for normalized rather than current profitability. If margins recover toward the 10%-13% operating levels seen in the December 2025 quarter, the forward PE of 14.54x would prove conservative; if revenue keeps declining at -3.84% and leverage stays above 2.6x, the low sales multiple is a warning rather than an opportunity.

PE

25.2x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Mid-Range

5-Year PE Range 5x~38x

vs. Industry Avg

21.3x

Industry PE ~21.3x*

EV/EBITDA

13.4x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial and operational risks center on a leveraged balance sheet with a thin earnings buffer. Debt-to-equity of 2.69x and total debt to capitalization of 71.1% mean the 13.78% ROE is amplified by a 4.90x equity multiplier rather than earned on a strong asset base, and interest expense of $31.6 million in the latest quarter absorbed roughly 8.6% of the $367.9 million operating income. Free cash flow is unreliable, with TTM FCF of $635.9 million but a negative $206.9 million in the latest quarter as receivables of $680.8 million consumed cash, while the company still pays $35.4 million in quarterly dividends at a 55.2% payout ratio. Revenue concentration compounds this: Outdoor at $1.733 billion versus Active at $700 million means the enterprise leans heavily on The North Face, and a -3.84% overall revenue decline with a 2.65% trailing net margin leaves little cushion if wholesale orders soften.

Market and competitive risks are dominated by valuation compression and brand execution. The stock trades at 0.67x sales, far below the 2.0x-2.6x range it carried through 2025, but that discount reflects the market pricing structural margin impairment rather than a full recovery, so a failure to deliver positive comps would validate the low multiple rather than close it. With a beta of 1.522, the shares are roughly 52% more volatile than the market, and the 41.52% one-month gain versus a 4.99% SPY decline leaves the position vulnerable to any sector rotation out of turnaround names. Competitive pressure is acute in the Active segment, where Vans weakness drove the July selloff on a wider-than-expected loss, and peer Kontoor Brands' strong organic growth and upbeat 2026 outlook highlight how execution gaps get punished in this sector. The 14 of 22 analysts at Hold with an average target of $20.05 below the $20.35 price also means there is little analyst-driven support left to absorb bad news.

A worst-case scenario would combine a Vans relapse with a wholesale channel slowdown and a leverage scare: revenue growth stays negative, the 54.8% gross margin finally cracks under promotional pressure, and free cash flow stays negative on working capital, forcing the company to choose between the dividend and deleveraging. In that chain, the stock would retest the 52-week low of $12.46, roughly -39% from the current $20.35, and the $16.00 analyst low target would likely be revised lower rather than act as a floor. The 41.44% maximum drawdown on record is a realistic template for the magnitude of damage, and with a 1.522 beta the decline would likely be faster than the market's. An investor buying at $20.35 could therefore lose roughly 39% in this adverse scenario before any recovery, which argues for scaled position sizing and wider stop levels than a market-beta name would require.

FAQ

From a risk/reward standpoint VFC is balanced rather than compelling at $20.35, because the average analyst target of $20.05 sits essentially at the current price (about -1.5% implied downside) after a 41.52% one-month surge that has already closed the gap to consensus. The upside case is real: 9 Buy ratings against 1 Sell, a $40.00 high target implying roughly 97% upside, a 14.54x forward PE against 25.23x trailing, and a Q2 that delivered $285.3 million of net income versus a $97.2 million loss in fiscal Q1. The downside is equally concrete: 2.69x debt-to-equity, a -3.84% revenue decline, and a $16.00 low target implying about 21% downside, with the 52-week low of $12.46 roughly 39% below the current price. It is a reasonable buy only for risk-tolerant investors building a position in tranches on pullbacks toward the $17-$18 shelf, and a poor entry for anyone chasing the recent momentum at the top of the 52-week range.