Wesfarmers
WES
$44.46
-0.27%
Western Midstream Partners, LP is a master limited partnership that owns, operates, acquires and develops midstream energy infrastructure, gathering, processing, compressing, treating and transporting natural gas, condensate, NGLs and crude oil across the Rocky Mountains, the Mid-Continent and Texas. The partnership occupies a focused niche as an asset-heavy, fee-based gatherer and processor anchored in the Delaware and DJ basins, with a structure and scale that place it among the larger pure-play midstream MLPs rather than a diversified integrated energy company. The current investor debate centers on distribution durability and capital allocation: WES carries an outsized roughly 9% distribution yield, and headlines framing midstream MLPs as sources of decades of passive income have drawn income investors even as the payout ratio sits above 100% of trailing earnings, raising questions about coverage on a GAAP basis versus distributable cash flow. Competitive consolidation in the Permian, highlighted by peer acquisition activity such as ONEOK's Brazos Midland deal, keeps the strategic value of midstream footprints in focus and frames WES as either a consolidator or a potential target in a consolidating basin.…
WES
Wesfarmers
$44.46
Related headlines
WES 12-Month Price Forecast
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Wesfarmers's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $49.46 and implied upside of +11.3% versus the current price.
Average Target
$49.46
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+11.3%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$41 - $58
Analyst target range
Thirteen analysts cover WES with a consensus recommendation of buy and a mean rating of 2.4 on a scale where lower is more bullish, indicating a moderately constructive but not unanimous stance. The average target price is $49.69, which implies roughly 11.4% upside from the current $44.62, a meaningful but not dramatic return expectation that is consistent with a mature income-oriented midstream name. Consensus estimates call for average EPS of $5.17, with a range of $4.65 to $5.54, and average revenue of approximately $4.80 billion, with a range of $4.43 billion to $5.06 billion, framing expectations for stable rather than explosive growth. The consensus leans bullish but with tempered conviction, reflecting the tension between an attractive distribution yield and questions about payout coverage. The target range spans $41.00 to $58.00, a spread of about 41% of the low end, which signals moderate rather than high uncertainty and suggests reasonable analyst conviction. The high target of $58.00, roughly 30% above the current price, would require multiple expansion toward the upper end of midstream EV/EBITDA ranges and likely assumes distribution coverage improvement, Permian volume growth or strategic consolidation activity such as the peer M&A seen with ONEOK's Brazos Midland acquisition. The low target of $41.00, about 8% below the current price, prices in margin compression, weaker throughput volumes or concern that the above-100% payout ratio forces a distribution reset. Notably, the low target sits above the $36.90 52-week low, implying analysts see limited downside even in a bear case, and the absence of institutional ratings data prevents identifying whether analysts have been recently upgrading or downgrading.
Bulls vs Bears: WES Investment Factors
The bear case currently has slightly stronger near-term evidence: a payout ratio of 122.35% against trailing earnings, a momentum divergence with -6.08 one-month relative strength, and a forward PE that rests on an unverifiable $5.17 EPS consensus. The bull case is durable but slower-moving, anchored by a 9.05% yield, 41.26% operating margins, a 0.708 beta and an 11.4% analyst target upside. The single most important tension is distribution coverage: whether distributable cash flow comfortably covers the 9.05% payout despite GAAP earnings falling short. If coverage is confirmed, the yield looks safe and the stock is cheap; if coverage narrows, the entire income thesis and the 122% payout ratio become the catalyst for a re-rating lower.
Bullish
- 9.05% yield anchors income case: WES pays a 9.05% distribution yield, roughly six times the S&P 500's typical payout and far above the sector's average income offering. For income-focused investors, this yield is the dominant valuation anchor and provides a substantial cash return even if unit price appreciation stalls.
- Strong margins reflect toll-road economics: Net margin of 30.43%, gross margin of 68.46% and operating margin of 41.26% are strong even by midstream standards. These margins reflect the fee-based gathering and processing model, where revenue is tied to volumetric throughput rather than direct commodity price exposure, supporting cash-flow stability.
- Analyst consensus buy with 11.4% upside: Thirteen analysts rate WES a buy (mean 2.4) with an average target of $49.69, implying roughly 11.4% upside from $44.62. The low target of $41.00 sits above the $36.90 52-week low, suggesting analysts see limited downside even in a bear case.
- Low beta and contained drawdown: Beta of 0.708 means WES is roughly 29% less volatile than the market, and its max drawdown of 11.37% is modest for an energy name. This supports larger position sizing for income-oriented holders and makes the 9% yield more reliable in risk-adjusted terms.
Bearish
- Payout ratio exceeds 100% of earnings: The payout ratio of 122.35% means the distribution exceeds trailing GAAP earnings, so coverage depends entirely on distributable cash flow and adjusted EBITDA rather than net income. If cash flow weakens or capex rises, a distribution reset becomes a real risk for a stock whose entire thesis rests on the 9.05% yield.
- Trailing EPS of $0.074 distorts valuation: Trailing EPS of just $0.074 against a $44.62 price produces a trailing PE of 13.12x that looks cheap only because of the partnership's unit-based structure and depreciation burden. The forward PE of 11.65x relies on consensus EPS of $5.17, a figure wildly inconsistent with trailing earnings and unverifiable given empty quarterly financials.
- Elevated leverage typical of MLPs: Debt-to-equity of 2.22x is elevated and typical of leveraged midstream MLPs, while the current ratio of 1.34 indicates only adequate short-term liquidity. With a payout above 100% of earnings and a capital-intensive asset footprint, WES likely depends on debt markets to fund both growth and distributions.
- Momentum divergence versus the market: WES is down 4.86% over the past month and 2.94% over three months, badly lagging SPY's +1.22% and +2.69%, producing relative-strength readings of -6.08 and -5.63. This classic momentum divergence suggests profit-taking after the August peak near $49.80 and raises the risk of a breakdown below $44 support.
WES Technical Analysis
WES is in a sustained but maturing uptrend: the stock is up 18.58% over the past year versus a 15.53% gain for SPY, a 3.05-point relative-strength edge, and at $44.62 it sits at roughly 59% of its 52-week range of $36.90 to $50.07. That positioning is mid-to-upper range rather than at the highs, meaning the stock retains a constructive trend structure without the overextension that typically precedes sharp mean reversion. The 12.34% YTD gain and 10.06% six-month advance confirm the primary trend remains positive, though the stock has spent the last several months consolidating rather than making new highs. Recent momentum has clearly decelerated and diverged from the longer-term trend: the stock is down 4.86% over the past month and 2.94% over three months, badly lagging SPY's +1.22% and +2.69% over the same windows, producing relative-strength readings of -6.08 and -5.63. This is a classic momentum divergence, with the 1-month and 3-month trends conflicting with the 1-year uptrend, and it most likely reflects profit-taking and rotation after the August peak near $49.80 rather than a fundamental breakdown, given the stock has stabilized with a +1.09% bounce on the latest session. Key levels are well defined: support sits at the $36.90 52-week low, with intermediate support around the $44 area where the stock has repeatedly found buyers in October, while resistance lies at the $50.07 52-week high and the $49.80 August peak. A breakout above $50 would signal trend resumption and likely open a new leg higher, whereas a breakdown below $44 would put the 52-week low in play and confirm the short-term downtrend. With a beta of 0.708, WES is roughly 29% less volatile than the market, which supports larger position sizing for income-oriented holders and helps explain the contained 11.37% max drawdown.
Beta
0.71
0.71x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-11.4%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$37-$50
Price range past year
Annual Return
+15.9%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | WES Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -3.5% | -1.2% |
| 3m | -6.3% | +3.4% |
| 6m | +8.3% | +7.0% |
| 1y | +15.9% | +14.4% |
| ytd | +11.9% | +12.0% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
WES Fundamental Analysis
Revenue trajectory data is not available in the provided inputs, as quarterly financials, income statement line items and revenue segments are all empty, so the multi-quarter growth trend cannot be quantified directly. What can be inferred is scale and stability: consensus analyst estimates point to average revenue of approximately $4.80 billion, with a range of $4.43 billion to $5.06 billion, and a market capitalization of roughly $15.8 billion to $16.3 billion. The absence of segment detail prevents identifying which basins are driving or dragging growth, but the fee-based gathering and processing model implies revenue is tied to volumetric throughput rather than direct commodity price exposure, which supports the investment case as a stable cash-flow compounder rather than a growth story. Profitability is robust on a margin basis: net margin is 30.43%, gross margin 68.46% and operating margin 41.26%, levels that are strong even by midstream standards and reflect the high fixed-cost, toll-road economics of pipeline and processing assets. However, trailing EPS of just $0.074 against a $44.62 share price produces a trailing PE of 13.12x that looks optically cheap only because of the partnership's unit-based structure and depreciation burden, while the forward PE of 11.65x against consensus EPS of $5.17 implies a dramatic earnings step-up that is difficult to reconcile with the trailing figure and warrants caution. The payout ratio of 122.35% against a 9.05% distribution yield is the key profitability tension: the distribution exceeds trailing GAAP earnings, so coverage depends on distributable cash flow and adjusted EBITDA rather than net income, and investors should monitor whether the gap narrows. Balance sheet and cash flow metrics are mixed: debt-to-equity of 2.22x is elevated and typical of leveraged midstream MLPs, the current ratio of 1.34 indicates adequate short-term liquidity, and ROE of 29.09% is exceptionally high, though it is flattered by a thin equity base relative to debt. ROA of 7.49% is more modest and better reflects the capital-intensive asset base, while the PCF ratio of 7.21x suggests the business generates meaningful cash relative to its market value. Free cash flow and detailed cash flow statement data are not available, so the assessment of internal funding capacity is incomplete, but the combination of high leverage, a payout above 100% of earnings and a capital-intensive asset footprint means WES likely depends on a mix of internally generated cash and debt markets to fund growth and distributions.
Quarterly Revenue
N/A
N/A
Revenue YoY Growth
N/A
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
N/A
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
N/A
Last 12 Months
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is WES Overvalued?
Because trailing net income is positive, albeit marginally at an EPS of $0.074, the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, and the trailing PE of 13.12x versus a forward PE of 11.65x implies the market expects roughly 11% earnings growth over the next twelve months. That gap is modest and suggests the market is not pricing in aggressive acceleration, which is consistent with a mature, fee-based midstream MLP. However, the forward PE is derived from consensus EPS of $5.17, a figure wildly inconsistent with trailing EPS, so the forward multiple should be treated with skepticism until quarterly financials confirm the earnings base. On peer comparison, WES trades at a PS ratio of 4.12x and an EV/Sales of 6.33x, with an EV/EBITDA of 10.39x and a price-to-book of 3.93x; industry average multiples are not provided in the valuation data, so a precise premium or discount cannot be quantified. Qualitatively, an EV/EBITDA near 10x is at the higher end of the typical midstream range of roughly 8x to 11x, suggesting the stock is priced at a modest premium that is arguably justified by its 41.26% operating margin and 30.43% net margin, both strong for the sector. Historical ratio data is not available, so the current valuation cannot be positioned within the stock's own PE or PS band; absent that context, the 13.12x trailing PE and 3.93x price-to-book should be judged against the 9.05% distribution yield, which is the dominant valuation anchor for MLP investors. A yield near 9% with a payout ratio above 100% of earnings suggests the market is pricing in either confidence in distributable cash flow coverage or a degree of skepticism about distribution sustainability, and the negative PEG ratio of -0.51 is not meaningful given the distorted trailing earnings base.
PE
13.1x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
N/A
5-Year PE Range 17x~59x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
10.4x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on distribution coverage and leverage. The payout ratio of 122.35% means the 9.05% distribution exceeds trailing GAAP earnings, so coverage depends on distributable cash flow and adjusted EBITDA rather than net income, and any throughput decline or capex step-up could force a reset. Debt-to-equity of 2.22x is elevated and typical of leveraged midstream MLPs, while the current ratio of 1.34 leaves only adequate short-term liquidity. Trailing EPS of $0.074 against a $44.62 price makes the 13.12x trailing PE optically cheap but structurally distorted, and the forward PE of 11.65x relies on a $5.17 consensus EPS that cannot be reconciled with trailing figures given empty quarterly financials. Revenue concentration in fee-based gathering and processing across the Delaware and DJ basins means volumetric throughput, not commodity price, is the key swing factor, and the absence of segment detail prevents identifying which basins are driving or dragging growth.
Market and competitive risks are moderate but rising. At an EV/EBITDA of 10.39x, WES sits at the higher end of the typical midstream range of roughly 8x to 11x, leaving limited room for multiple expansion and exposing the stock to compression if rates stay elevated or sector rotation favors cheaper peers. Beta of 0.708 means WES is roughly 29% less volatile than the market, which cushions drawdowns but does not eliminate sensitivity to energy-sector sentiment. Consolidation in the Permian, highlighted by ONEOK's Brazos Midland acquisition, raises the risk that larger players build scale and compete for volumes, potentially pressuring WES's strategic position. Recent momentum divergence, with one-month relative strength of -6.08 and three-month of -5.63, signals that the market is already rotating away from the name after the August peak near $49.80.
The worst-case scenario is a distribution cut triggered by narrowing coverage, compounded by a Permian volume slowdown and multiple compression. In that chain of events, the 9.05% yield would no longer anchor valuation, and the stock could retest its $36.90 52-week low, a decline of roughly 17.3% from $44.62. The analyst low target of $41.00 implies a milder 8.1% downside, but it sits above the 52-week low, so a true bear case could overshoot analyst expectations. Historical max drawdown of 11.37% understates this risk because it reflects a low-beta uptrend rather than a distribution-reset scenario. An investor could realistically lose 17% to 20% from the current price in this adverse scenario, with the distribution itself at risk of being cut.