Alright, let's proceed with "stop everything and reposition." I'll first clarify your current holdings, then provide a layout strategy.

Current Holdings Structure (RockFlow Data)

| Sub-account | Asset | Cost | Market Value | Unrealized P/L | |---|---|---|---|---| | Copy Trade 0001 | Stable Income Defensive Portfolio | 200,000 USD | 206,786 USD | +6,786 USD (+3.4%) | | Copy Trade 0002 | Chengda Physics Institute Li Yuren | 100,000 USD | 67,708 USD | -32,292 USD (-32.3%) | | Default | TSLA 0.22 Shares | 363.56 USD/share | 81 USD | +1.10 USD |

Total net unrealized loss is about 25,505 USD. The two copy trade sub-accounts combined have approximately 274,494 USD in market value. Adding the main account’s available funds of 26,406 USD, after stopping and closing positions, you will have roughly around 300,000 USD available for repositioning.

Regarding stopping copy trading: RockFlow offers two options—you can keep the holdings merged back into the main account and sell yourself, or choose to have positions automatically closed at market price on the most recent trading day once the plan ends. Since you want to "stop everything and reposition," choosing automatic closing is cleaner and more straightforward.

Repositioning strategy:

Your issue is not "whether to stop," but how to avoid repeating the same mistakes after stopping. The portfolio that lost 32% had the problem of excessive concentration in a single theme—the RockStar heavily invested in GEV (55.6%, +83% gain), CCJ (+32%), CEG (-10%), OKLO (-45%), all focused on nuclear power/energy transition, which caused extremely high volatility—big gains but also big losses.

For repositioning, I recommend the "Core + Satellite" structure, which is also the mainstream institutional approach currently (163.com - 11 hours ago):

• Core portion (70-80%): Use broad-based indexes like VOO (S&P 500) to secure average market returns and reduce the risk of betting on a single theme (caifuhao2.eastmoney.com - Mar 4, 2026)
• Satellite portion (20-30%): If you still want to keep some offensive exposure, allocate to growth themes you understand, but individual holdings should not exceed 10-15% to avoid repeating the "one OKLO lost 45%" situation.

Your previously gained 3.4% "Stable Income Defensive Portfolio" actually performed quite well—positive returns and low volatility, showing you have the ability for stable allocation, just dragged down by that aggressive portfolio.

My preference: Stopping everything is fine, but when repositioning, don’t revert to the old path of "following a RockStar concentrating heavily on a single theme." Use broad-based indexes for the core and control the satellite portion—this is more stable than risking another big bet on a single sector.

Would you like me to help you generate a specific portfolio card based on this idea? You can view it in the App and create it if you find it suitable.