VF Corporation
VFC
$12.73
+0.16%
VF Corporation is a global apparel, footwear, and accessories company whose portfolio of roughly 10 brands — led by The North Face, Vans, Timberland, and Altra — spans the active and outdoor categories, sold through wholesale partners, e-commerce, and company-owned and partner-operated stores across the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Unlike pure-play athletic peers, VF is a multi-brand platform whose identity rests on the outdoor/active lifestyle consumer, with The North Face serving as the growth engine and Vans as the historically dominant but now challenged casual-footwear franchise. The current investor narrative is a high-stakes turnaround and brand-rehabilitation story: management has been cutting costs, paying down debt, and attempting to stabilize Vans, and the July 2026 fiscal fourth-quarter report — a wider-than-expected loss driven by Vans weakness that overshadowed raised guidance — triggered a sharp sell-off and crystallized the debate over whether the recovery is on track. With the stock down materially year-to-date and underperforming the S&P 500 by a wide margin, the market is pricing skepticism about the pace of margin recovery, the health of the consumer, and the balance sheet, making execution on Vans and cash generation the central swing factors for the equity.…
VFC
VF Corporation
$12.73
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy VFC Today?
Rating: Hold. VF is a high-risk turnaround story where the market is pricing in a dramatic earnings recovery (forward PE of 9.83x on $1.76 EPS) that has yet to materialize, and the analyst consensus of 'hold' with a $18.77 average target (+42.5% upside) reflects a 'show-me' stance rather than conviction. The core thesis is that the deep value (0.67x sales, 3.46x book) and The North Face's resilience could reward patient investors if Vans stabilizes, but the 2.69x debt-to-equity and 1.82x interest coverage make this a binary bet on execution.
Supporting evidence for a Hold: (1) valuation is undemanding at 0.67x PS and 0.72x EV/Sales, well below branded-apparel peers at 1.5x–2.5x sales; (2) revenue returned to marginal growth at +1.04% year-over-year in the March 2026 quarter, and gross margin improved to 56.41% from 53.36% a year ago; (3) trailing free cash flow is positive at $510 million, and the current ratio of 1.84x provides liquidity; (4) the average analyst target of $18.77 implies 42.5% upside, and there are no Sell ratings among 21 analysts. However, these positives are offset by a 2.65% net margin, a 6.32% operating margin, and a 55.2% dividend payout ratio that may be unsustainable if earnings do not recover.
The biggest risks that could invalidate the Hold thesis are: (1) a continued Vans decline that drags consolidated revenue negative and forces a dividend cut; (2) a consumer slowdown that pressures The North Face and Outdoor margins; and (3) a balance-sheet event (covenant breach or equity raise) that dilutes shareholders. The rating would upgrade to Buy if Vans returns to positive comparable sales growth and gross margins hold above 55% for two consecutive quarters, or if the forward PE compresses below 8x on stable earnings. It would downgrade to Sell if revenue growth turns negative, interest coverage falls below 1.5x, or the dividend is cut. Relative to its own history (PS of 2.0x–3.0x in 2024–2025) and peers, VF is undervalued on sales and book but fairly valued to expensive on earnings quality — a classic value trap unless execution improves.
Sign up to view all
VFC 12-Month Price Forecast
VF is a show-me turnaround where the valuation is cheap on sales (0.67x PS) but expensive on the earnings recovery it implies (9.83x forward PE on $1.76 EPS). The bear case has stronger near-term evidence: flat revenue, Vans weakness, high leverage, and a stock in a persistent downtrend. However, the deep discount to historical multiples and the 42.5% analyst target upside create a favorable risk/reward for patient investors willing to tolerate volatility. I would upgrade to bullish if Vans comparable sales turn positive and gross margins hold above 55% for two quarters; I would downgrade to bearish if revenue turns negative or interest coverage falls below 1.5x. The 12-month outlook is balanced with a slight downside bias, and the stock is best suited for risk-tolerant investors with a multi-year horizon.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on VF Corporation's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $18.53 and implied upside of +45.6% versus the current price.
Average Target
$18.53
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+45.6%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$13 - $40
Analyst target range
Coverage is broad with 21 analysts, but sentiment is decidedly cautious: the consensus recommendation is "hold" with a recommendation mean of 2.52 (where 1 = strong buy and 5 = strong sell), indicating a neutral-to-slightly-negative tilt. The average target price of $18.77 implies roughly +42.5% upside from the current $13.17, which sounds bullish in isolation but must be weighed against the fact that the average target has likely been drifting lower and that the consensus rating itself is only "hold." The distribution of recent institutional actions reinforces the lukewarm stance: of the ten most recent ratings, only two are outright Buys (BTIG on 2026-05-06 and Seaport Global on 2026-04-14), one is Overweight (Barclays), and the remainder are Neutral, Equal Weight, or Hold — with no Sell ratings, suggesting analysts see limited downside from here but also little urgency to upgrade. The consensus is best characterized as a "show-me" stance: analysts are waiting for evidence that Vans has stabilized and margins are recovering before turning constructive. The target range is extraordinarily wide, from a low of $13.00 to a high of $40.00 — a 3.1x spread that signals very low conviction and high uncertainty about the company's trajectory. The low target of $13.00 is essentially the current price, implying that the bear case assumes no recovery at all — continued margin compression, Vans weakness, and leverage constraining equity value. The high target of $40.00 (3.0x the current price) would require a full-blown turnaround: Vans re-accelerating, gross margins expanding toward 60%, debt reduction restoring the balance sheet, and multiple expansion back toward historical norms. The fact that the average ($18.77) sits much closer to the low than the high reflects the market's skepticism that the bull case will materialize. Notably, the consensus FY EPS estimate of $1.76 (range $1.67–$1.83) is relatively tight, suggesting analysts agree on near-term earnings but disagree violently on the terminal value — a classic setup for a stock that will be driven by execution news flow rather than multiple re-rating.
Bulls vs Bears: VFC Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger evidence: revenue is flat at +1.04%, Vans remains a drag, leverage is high at 2.69x debt-to-equity, and the stock is in a persistent downtrend with a 41.44% max drawdown. The bull case rests on deep value (0.67x sales, 9.83x forward PE) and a 42.5% analyst target upside, but these are contingent on an earnings recovery that has yet to appear. The single most important tension is whether Vans can stabilize and margins recover toward historical levels — if Vans stops declining and gross margins hold above 55%, the forward PE of 9.83x could compress the stock's discount; if Vans continues to deteriorate, the 2.69x debt-to-equity and 1.82x interest coverage could force a dividend cut or equity dilution. Until there is concrete evidence of a Vans turnaround, the risk/reward remains skewed to the downside despite the optically cheap valuation.
Bullish
- Deep value on sales and book: VF trades at just 0.67x sales and 3.46x book, near the bottom of its multi-year range (PS was 2.0x–3.0x in 2024–2025 and 7.5x–8.4x in 2021–2022). If margins normalize toward historical levels, the equity is priced for a severe permanent impairment that may not materialize.
- Forward PE implies huge earnings recovery: The forward PE of 9.83x versus a trailing PE of 25.23x reflects consensus FY EPS of $1.76, a roughly 44x increase from the current $0.04. The market is pricing a dramatic recovery that, if delivered, would make the stock look extremely cheap at today's price.
- Analyst target implies 42.5% upside: The average analyst target of $18.77 implies +42.5% from the current $13.17, and the high target of $40.00 implies +204%. With 21 analysts covering and no Sell ratings, the consensus sees limited downside from here even if it is only a 'hold'.
- Positive free cash flow and liquidity: Trailing free cash flow is $510 million and the current ratio is 1.84x, providing adequate near-term liquidity. The December 2025 quarter generated $966.5 million in FCF, demonstrating the company's ability to convert working capital into cash during peak seasons.
Bearish
- Severe leverage constrains flexibility: Debt-to-equity is 2.69x, total debt-to-capitalization is 72.9%, and interest coverage is just 1.82x. With cash-flow-to-debt of only 0.0067, the balance sheet offers little cushion if earnings disappoint, and the 2.20% dividend consumes roughly $140 million annually.
- Vans weakness and flat revenue: Revenue grew just 1.04% year-over-year in the March 2026 quarter, and the Active segment (Vans) is now less than half the size of Outdoor. The July 2026 earnings report featured a wider-than-expected loss driven by Vans weakness, overshadowing raised guidance and triggering a sharp sell-off.
- Thin and volatile profitability: Trailing net margin is 2.65% and operating margin is 6.32%, far below what a branded apparel company with 54.8% gross margins should earn. The company swung from a $300.8 million profit in December 2025 to a $119.3 million loss in March 2026, highlighting earnings instability.
- Falling knife technicals: The stock is down 27.48% year-to-date, 25.34% over three months, and sits just 7.2% above its 52-week low of $12.46. It has underperformed SPY by 31.14 percentage points over one year, and the 41.44% maximum drawdown shows no durable bottom has formed.
VFC Technical Analysis
VF Corp is in a clear, sustained downtrend across every meaningful horizon. The shares are down 14.92% over the past year, 25.34% over three months, and 27.48% year-to-date, with the current price of $13.17 sitting at just 7.2% above the 52-week low of $12.46 and 40.9% below the 52-week high of $22.27 — in other words, trading at roughly 7% of its 52-week range, deep in the lower reaches of the band. That positioning is characteristic of a falling-knife setup rather than a value opportunity: the stock is not merely consolidating near lows, it is making new lows, and the burden of proof is on buyers to demonstrate stabilization. The one-year relative strength versus SPY of -31.14 percentage points confirms this is a severe, persistent underperformer rather than a market-beta story. Short-term momentum is negative but decelerating in its rate of decline. The 1-month change of -9.61% is worse than the 3-month change of -25.34% would imply on a pro-rata basis, meaning the sell-off has been front-loaded and the pace of decline has actually moderated somewhat; the 6-month change of -17.48% versus the 1-year change of -14.92% shows the bulk of the damage occurred in the last two quarters. The most recent session, however, produced a sharp +4.36% bounce off the $12.62 close, suggesting buyers are defending the $12.50 area, and the 1-month relative strength of -8.55 points versus SPY (-1.06%) shows VF is still lagging a modestly weaker market. With no RSI provided, the price action alone — a 41.44% maximum drawdown and a string of lower highs from the April peak near $21.55 — indicates deeply oversold conditions that have not yet produced a durable reversal. Key levels are well defined. Support sits at the 52-week low of $12.46, just 5.4% below the current $13.17 price; a decisive breakdown below that level would open the door to new multi-year lows and likely accelerate selling, while a hold here would form a potential double-bottom base. Resistance is layered: the $14.30–$15.00 zone (the late-July/early-August shelf) is the first hurdle, followed by the 52-week high of $22.27, which is 69% above the current price and would require a full trend reversal to reach. With a beta of 0.974, VF is slightly less volatile than the market on a trailing basis, which is somewhat surprising given the 41.44% drawdown — it implies the stock's risk is idiosyncratic (company-specific execution and brand risk) rather than systematic, meaning position sizing should be driven by fundamental conviction and event risk (earnings, Vans turnaround milestones) rather than broad market hedging.
Beta
1.60
1.60x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-41.4%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$12-$22
Price range past year
Annual Return
-13.3%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | VFC Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -12.1% | -2.4% |
| 3m | -26.5% | +1.0% |
| 6m | -21.8% | +16.3% |
| 1y | -13.3% | +14.3% |
| ytd | -29.9% | +10.6% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
VFC Fundamental Analysis
VF's revenue trajectory is stagnant at best, with the most recent quarter (ending 2026-03-28) posting revenue of $2.166 billion, up just 1.04% year-over-year — a marginal return to growth after a string of declines. The multi-quarter trend is choppy and seasonal: revenue ran $1.761 billion in the June 2025 quarter, $2.803 billion in September 2025, $2.876 billion in December 2025, and $2.166 billion in March 2026, and the year-over-year comparison against the March 2025 quarter's $2.144 billion shows essentially flat performance. Segment data reveals the core problem: Outdoor (led by The North Face) generated $1.340 billion while Active (led by Vans) contributed only $589 million, meaning the struggling Vans franchise is now less than half the size of Outdoor — a dramatic reversal from Vans' historical role as the profit engine. The investment case therefore hinges on whether Outdoor can carry the company while Vans is restructured, and the 1% growth rate suggests neither brand is currently compounding. Profitability is thin and volatile, with the company swinging between profits and losses. The March 2026 quarter produced a net loss of $119.3 million (EPS of -$0.30) on a gross margin of 56.41%, an improvement from the year-ago quarter's -$150.8 million loss and 53.36% gross margin, but still a loss. The December 2025 quarter was strongly profitable ($300.8 million net income, 10.46% net margin, 55.55% gross margin), while the June 2025 quarter lost $116.4 million — this whipsaw reflects both seasonality and the impact of restructuring charges and interest expense. Trailing net margin is just 2.65% and operating margin 6.32%, both far below what a branded apparel company of VF's scale should earn (gross margins near 55% imply substantial SG&A and interest drag), and the trailing PE of 25.2x on $0.04 of EPS shows how little earnings power currently exists. The balance sheet is the key risk. Debt-to-equity stands at 2.69x, total debt-to-capitalization is 72.9%, and long-term debt-to-capitalization is 65.6% — a heavily levered capital structure for a consumer cyclical. The current ratio of 1.84x provides adequate near-term liquidity, and trailing free cash flow of $510 million is positive, but the quarterly cash flow pattern is erratic: FCF was -$8.0 million in the March 2026 quarter, +$966.5 million in December 2025 (working-capital driven), and -$274.8 million in September 2025. ROE of 13.78% and ROA of 10.76% look respectable but are flattered by the small equity base created by leverage; the cash-flow-to-debt ratio of just 0.0067 and interest coverage of 1.82x in the latest quarter highlight how little cushion exists if earnings disappoint. The company is paying a dividend (yield 2.20%, payout ratio 55.2%) while carrying this debt load, a policy that consumes roughly $140 million annually and may need revisiting if the turnaround stalls.
Quarterly Revenue
$2.2B
2026-03
Revenue YoY Growth
+1.0%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
56.4%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$510015000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is VFC Overvalued?
Because VF's trailing net income is positive but negligible ($0.04 EPS), the trailing PE of 25.23x is economically meaningless and distorted by a near-zero denominator; the more informative metric is the forward PE of 9.83x, which reflects consensus FY estimates of $1.76 in EPS and implies the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery. The gap between the 25.2x trailing and 9.8x forward multiple — a 61% compression — is the single most important valuation signal: the market is pricing in a roughly 44x increase in earnings, which is an extraordinarily optimistic assumption for a company growing revenue at 1%. On a sales basis, the picture is far less demanding: PS of 0.67x and EV/Sales of 0.72x are low absolute multiples, and EV/EBITDA of 13.4x is moderate, suggesting the equity is cheap only if margins normalize. Relative to the broader apparel/footwear sector, VF screens as a mixed bag: its 0.67x PS and 0.72x EV/Sales are at a discount to branded-apparel peers that typically trade at 1.5x–2.5x sales, but that discount is justified by VF's 2.65% net margin, 6.32% operating margin, and 2.69x debt-to-equity — all materially worse than healthier peers. The forward PE of 9.83x versus a sector average in the mid-to-high teens represents a roughly 30–40% discount, which the market is applying as compensation for execution risk, leverage, and the unresolved Vans turnaround. In short, VF is a classic "cheap for a reason" situation: the discount is real but so are the fundamental impairments. Historically, VF has traded at a wide range of multiples depending on its earnings cycle. The historical ratios show PS ratios ranging from roughly 2.0x–3.0x during 2024–2025 and as high as 7.5x–8.4x in 2021–2022 when the company was highly profitable, versus the current 0.67x — near the bottom of its own multi-year band. Similarly, PB has compressed from 7.8x–10.1x in 2021 to 3.46x today, and the historical PE has swung wildly (from 5.3x to negative territory) as earnings collapsed. The current valuation therefore sits near historical lows on sales and book value, which could signal a genuine value opportunity if the turnaround succeeds — but the negative PEG ratio of -0.11 and the erratic earnings history warn that the "cheapness" is a function of depressed and unreliable earnings rather than a stable, undervalued franchise.
PE
25.2x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Mid-Range
5-Year PE Range 5x~38x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
13.4x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
VF's financial risk is dominated by its leveraged balance sheet: debt-to-equity of 2.69x, total debt-to-capitalization of 72.9%, and long-term debt-to-capitalization of 65.6% leave little room for error. Interest coverage is just 1.82x in the latest quarter, and the cash-flow-to-debt ratio of 0.0067 means operating cash flow covers only a tiny fraction of obligations. The company is paying a $0.09 quarterly dividend (2.20% yield, 55.2% payout ratio) while carrying this debt, consuming roughly $140 million annually that could otherwise reduce leverage. With trailing net margin at 2.65% and operating margin at 6.32%, any revenue or margin shortfall could quickly pressure the ability to service debt and maintain the dividend.
Market and competitive risks are elevated by VF's premium valuation relative to its own history on some metrics and its deep discount on others. The forward PE of 9.83x is a roughly 30–40% discount to the sector average in the mid-to-high teens, but that discount is justified by 2.65% net margins and 2.69x leverage. The stock's beta of 0.974 suggests it is slightly less volatile than the market, but its 41.44% max drawdown and -31.14 percentage point one-year relative strength versus SPY show that the risk is idiosyncratic — driven by Vans execution and balance-sheet concerns rather than broad market moves. The July 2026 earnings miss, where a wider-than-expected loss and Vans weakness overshadowed raised guidance, illustrates how quickly sentiment can deteriorate. Competitors like Kontoor Brands, which recently delivered strong organic growth and an upbeat outlook, highlight the opportunity cost of VF's stalled turnaround.
The worst-case scenario is a continued Vans decline combined with a consumer slowdown that pressures Outdoor, leading to revenue contraction, margin compression, and a breach of debt covenants. In that scenario, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $12.46 (5.4% below the current $13.17) and potentially break below it, with the analyst low target of $13.00 offering little support. A more severe outcome — a dividend cut or equity raise to shore up the balance sheet — could drive the stock toward the $10–$11 range, representing a 16–24% decline from current levels. The 41.44% maximum drawdown over the past year shows that such a move is within the realm of possibility, and the 3.1x spread between the analyst low ($13.00) and high ($40.00) targets underscores the extreme uncertainty.
FAQ
The most severe risk is financial: 2.69x debt-to-equity, 72.9% total debt-to-capitalization, and 1.82x interest coverage leave little cushion, and a dividend cut or equity raise could dilute shareholders. Second is operational: Vans weakness drove a wider-than-expected loss in July 2026, and the Active segment is now less than half the size of Outdoor, so a continued decline could drag consolidated revenue negative. Third is competitive: peers like Kontoor Brands are delivering strong organic growth, highlighting VF's stalled turnaround and potential market-share loss. Fourth is macro: a consumer slowdown could pressure The North Face and Outdoor margins, while the stock's 41.44% max drawdown shows how quickly sentiment can deteriorate.
The 12-month forecast is balanced with a slight downside bias: 25% bull case ($18.77–$22.27), 50% base case ($13.00–$18.77), and 25% bear case ($10.00–$13.00). The base case assumes low-single-digit revenue growth and stable margins, keeping the stock range-bound between the 52-week low of $12.46 and the analyst average target of $18.77. The bull case requires Vans to stabilize and gross margins to expand toward 58–60%, while the bear case assumes continued Vans deterioration and a dividend cut. The most likely scenario is the base case, with the key assumption being that revenue grows 1–3% and free cash flow remains positive.
VF is undervalued on sales and book value but fairly valued to expensive on earnings quality. The PS ratio of 0.67x and PB of 3.46x are near multi-year lows, well below the 2.0x–3.0x sales range in 2024–2025 and the 7.8x–10.1x book range in 2021. However, the trailing PE of 25.23x is distorted by near-zero EPS of $0.04, and the forward PE of 9.83x assumes a 44x earnings increase to $1.76. The market is paying a deep discount on sales because of 2.65% net margins and 2.69x leverage, implying it expects the company to remain impaired. If margins normalize, the stock is undervalued; if not, the discount is justified.
VFC is a high-risk, high-reward turnaround bet rather than a conventional good buy. The average analyst target of $18.77 implies 42.5% upside, and the forward PE of 9.83x suggests the market expects a massive earnings recovery. However, the stock is down 27.48% year-to-date, trades just 7.2% above its 52-week low, and carries 2.69x debt-to-equity with only 1.82x interest coverage. It is a good buy only for investors who can tolerate volatility and a multi-year horizon, and who believe Vans can stabilize and margins can recover. For most investors, the risk/reward is not compelling until there is concrete evidence of a turnaround.
VFC is better suited for long-term, risk-tolerant investors than short-term traders. The stock's beta of 0.974 is slightly below the market, but its 41.44% max drawdown and -31.14 percentage point one-year relative strength versus SPY show that the risk is idiosyncratic and event-driven, making short-term trading hazardous. The dividend yield of 2.20% is modest and at risk of a cut, so income is not a reason to hold. Earnings visibility is low, with a 3.1x spread between analyst low and high targets. A minimum holding period of 2–3 years is appropriate to allow the Vans turnaround and debt reduction to play out, and investors should size positions based on their tolerance for a potential 20–30% further decline.