BorgWarner
BWA
$50.89
-0.20%
BorgWarner Inc. is a tier-one automotive supplier that designs and manufactures turbochargers, thermal management systems, drivetrain components, powerdrive systems, and battery and charging technologies for global original equipment manufacturers, operating within the Consumer Cyclical sector's Auto Parts industry. The company is a scaled, diversified incumbent rather than a disruptor — its foundational combustion-vehicle business (Air Management and Drivetrain) still generates more than 80% of group revenue, while its e-Propulsion & Drivetrain segment represents the strategic bet on electrification and, increasingly, data center energy management. The current investor debate centers on whether BorgWarner's electrification pivot can offset a shrinking legacy powertrain base, with the most recent quarter showing revenue declining 2.9% year over year to $3.49 billion and gross margin compressing to 18.98% from 19.76% sequentially. Sentiment has soured sharply into the November print — the stock has fallen roughly 22% in a month and 29% in three months despite a still-positive 8.4% one-year return — as investors weigh margin pressure, EV-program timing risk, and customer concentration (Volkswagen and Ford accounted for 23% of 2024 revenue) against a forward earnings multiple in the single digits.…
BWA
BorgWarner
$50.89
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy BWA Today?
Rating: Hold with a constructive, valuation-anchored bias. The core thesis is that BorgWarner's 8.29x forward PE on consensus EPS of $8.26 and a 12.2% TTM free cash flow yield ($1.18 billion on a $9.65 billion market cap) already discount a great deal of bad news, while the 12 Buy / 3 Hold / 0 Sell consensus and $77.93 average target (+59.7% from $48.81) argue the Street still sees substantial recovery value — but a 2.9% YoY revenue decline and two consecutive quarters of gross margin compression (19.76% in Q2 to 18.98% in Q3) mean the operating trend has not yet turned.
Supporting evidence is genuinely cheap on cash-based measures: PS of 0.67x and EV/Sales of 0.816x sit far below the stock's own historical band (PS ranged roughly 1.77x to 3.72x), EV/EBITDA of 8.89x is at or below typical auto-parts levels, and the balance sheet is solid with a 2.07 current ratio and 0.745 debt-to-equity. Profitability has normalized after the one-off Q4 2025 loss — Q1/Q2/Q3 2026 net income of $242M, $277M, and $221M with diluted EPS of $1.16, $1.34, and $1.08 — yet ROE of 5.09% and TTM net margin of 1.93% remain weak, and the 42.96% payout ratio leaves only modest dividend cushion at a 1.23% yield. The gap between the $60 low target and the $48.81 price is the key asymmetry: even the bear on the Street is 23% above the market.
Three risks could invalidate the thesis: (1) a Q4 miss or 2027 guidance below the $17.51 billion consensus revenue line, which would force the estimate cuts the 8.3x multiple is implicitly pricing; (2) further gross margin erosion below 18.98%, which would pressure the 12.2% FCF yield that underpins the valuation floor; and (3) OEM program risk given Volkswagen and Ford at 23% of 2024 revenue. This Hold would upgrade to Buy on evidence of gross margin stabilizing above 19% plus e-Propulsion revenue scaling beyond the current $464 million, or on a reclaim of the $55-58 breakdown shelf; it would downgrade to Sell on a break below the $47.53 recent low that opens the $40.73 52-week floor. Verdict: undervalued versus its own history and on cash flow, but only fairly-to-cheaply valued versus peers until the revenue and margin trajectory inflects.
Sign up to view all
BWA 12-Month Price Forecast
BorgWarner is a deeply discounted cyclical whose 8.29x forward PE and 12.2% FCF yield already embed a permanent de-rating that the operating results have not yet disproven — revenue is down 2.9% YoY and gross margin has compressed for two consecutive quarters to 18.98%. The tension is that the entire Street sits above the market price (low target $60, average $77.93), a divergence that historically resolves through either a sharp rally or estimate cuts, and the 21.7% one-month decline suggests the market is currently voting for the latter. The balance sheet (0.745 debt-to-equity, 2.07 current ratio) and normalized earnings ($1.08-$1.34 diluted EPS across the last three quarters) mean this is a valuation and timing debate, not a solvency one. I would upgrade to bullish on gross margin stabilizing above 19% plus a reclaim of the $55-58 shelf, and downgrade to bearish on a break below $47.53 that opens the $40.73 floor. With a 50% base-case weight and a 25/25 bull-bear split, the risk/reward is skewed favorably but the catalyst is not yet in hand.
Wall Street consensus
Coverage is robust, with 15 analysts and a clearly bullish tilt: 12 Buy ratings, 3 Hold, and 0 Sell, producing a recommendation mean of 1.73 (Buy) and a consensus average target price of $77.93. Against the current $48.81 price, that implies roughly +59.7% upside to consensus — an unusually wide gap that reflects how far the stock has fallen below where the Street's models sit rather than fresh optimism. The consensus is unambiguously bullish, and the recent institutional actions reinforce it: BofA upgraded to Buy from Neutral on October 15, Morgan Stanley upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight on October 6, and Barclays, Evercore ISI, RBC, and UBS all reiterated Buy/Outperform ratings in late October and early November.\n\nThe target range of $60.00 to $95.00 is extremely wide — a 58% spread from low to high — signaling high uncertainty about the pace of the EV transition and margin recovery. The $95 high target implicitly assumes multiple re-rating toward the mid-teens forward PE alongside successful e-Propulsion scaling and margin expansion, while the $60 low target (still 23% above the current price) prices in continued revenue contraction and margin compression but no catastrophic scenario. Notably, even the most bearish analyst target sits well above the market price, a divergence that typically resolves either through a sharp rally or through downward estimate revisions — and with the stock down 21.7% in a month despite unanimous Street support, the burden of proof now falls on the Q4 print and 2027 guidance to validate the bulls' case.
Bulls vs Bears: BWA Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: revenue is contracting 2.9% YoY, gross margin has compressed for two consecutive quarters to 18.98%, and the stock has fallen 21.7% in a month and 28.7% in three months despite unanimous Street support. The bull case rests on valuation and cash flow — 8.29x forward PE, a 12.2% FCF yield, a 2.07 current ratio, and a $77.93 consensus target implying +59.7% upside — which are compelling but have not yet arrested the decline. The single most important tension is whether the 8.3x forward multiple represents a deep-value opportunity or a permanent de-rating of legacy auto-supplier earnings; resolution hinges on the Q4 print and 2027 guidance showing margin stabilization and e-Propulsion scaling. Until the stock reclaims the $55-58 breakdown shelf, the market is voting for the de-rating, but the gap between the $60 low analyst target and the $48.81 price means the risk/reward is asymmetrically skewed if estimates hold.
Bullish
- Forward PE of 8.3x is deeply discounted: At $48.81, BWA trades at just 8.29x consensus forward EPS of $8.26, roughly a 30-40% discount to an auto-parts sector that typically trades in the low-to-mid teens. The trailing PE of 34.9x is distorted by the one-off Q4 2025 loss, so the forward multiple is the economically meaningful figure and it embeds almost no optimism.
- Unanimous Street support with 60% upside: All 15 covering analysts are constructive — 12 Buy, 3 Hold, 0 Sell — with a recommendation mean of 1.73 and an average target of $77.93, implying +59.7% upside from $48.81. Even the lowest target of $60.00 sits 23% above the current price, a divergence that typically resolves through a rally or upward estimate revisions.
- 12.2% FCF yield provides valuation floor: TTM free cash flow of $1.18 billion against a $9.65 billion market cap yields roughly 12.2%, a cash-flow profile rare among cyclicals. Q3 operating cash flow of $320 million comfortably funded $125 million of capex and $35 million of dividends while the company retired $858 million of debt and repurchased $175 million of stock.
- Balance sheet and liquidity are solid: Debt-to-equity of 0.745 is moderate for a tier-one supplier and the current ratio of 2.07 signals ample near-term liquidity. The 1.23% dividend yield is covered by a 42.96% payout ratio, and the last three quarters delivered $221M, $277M, and $242M of net income, confirming the Q4 2025 loss was a one-off impairment event rather than operating deterioration.
Bearish
- Revenue is contracting, not growing: Q3 2026 revenue of $3.487 billion fell 2.9% year over year from $3.591 billion, continuing a flat-to-down trajectory across four quarters ($3.533B, $3.648B, $3.487B versus $3.572B in Q4 2025). Consensus forward revenue of $17.51 billion implies continued low-single-digit contraction, so the thesis rests on mix shift rather than top-line growth.
- Margins are compressing sequentially: Gross margin slipped to 18.98% in Q3 from 19.76% in Q2 and 19.16% in Q1, while operating margin fell to 8.66% from 10.14% sequentially. TTM net margin is just 1.93% and ROE of 5.09% is well below what a 1.77x book multiple would normally demand.
- Legacy business dominates and is the drag: Air Management ($1.974B) and Drivetrain ($1.196B) still generate more than 80% of group revenue, while e-Propulsion & Drivetrain contributes only $464 million — too small to bend the consolidated growth curve. The electrification pivot is not yet large enough to offset a shrinking combustion base.
- Severe technical breakdown and underperformance: The stock is down 21.73% in one month and 28.66% in three months, trailing SPY by 16.74 and 23.75 percentage points respectively, and sits only 21.5% above its 52-week low of $40.73. The -38.3% max drawdown from the June peak near $77.03 confirms a violent de-rating, and at 21% of its 52-week range it is a falling knife rather than a momentum breakout.
BWA Technical Analysis
BorgWarner is in a clear intermediate-term downtrend that has overwhelmed its longer-term recovery: the stock is up 8.44% over the past year but has collapsed 28.66% over three months and 21.73% over the past month, leaving it at $48.81 — only about 21.5% above its 52-week low of $40.73 and 38.1% below its 52-week high of $78.82. Measured against the 52-week range, the shares sit at roughly 21% of the band (($48.81 − $40.73) / ($78.82 − $40.73)), a positioning that signals a falling knife rather than a momentum breakout, with the stock having surrendered nearly all of its 2026 gains (YTD +4.65% versus a 7.83% SPY gain). The -38.3% max drawdown confirms the severity of the de-rating from the June peak near $77.03.\n\nShort-term momentum is decisively negative and diverging violently from the trailing-year trend: the 1-month change of -21.73% and 3-month change of -28.66% contrast with the +8.44% 1-year return, a classic pattern of trend reversal rather than benign mean reversion. Relative strength confirms the underperformance — BWA trails SPY by 16.74 percentage points over one month, 23.75 points over three months, and 19.86 points over six months, even as SPY itself fell 4.99% in the past month. The lone bright spot is the most recent session, with the stock up 2.69% on the day from a $47.53 close on volume of roughly 2.95 million shares, suggesting tentative dip-buying near the $47–48 zone; however, one up-day after a 21% monthly decline is stabilization, not a reversal signal.\n\nKey technical levels are well defined: immediate support sits at the recent $47.53 low and the 52-week floor of $40.73, while resistance is stacked at the $55–58 shelf (the October breakdown zone) and the $78.82 52-week high. A breakdown below $47.53 would open the door to the $40.73 low and likely trigger further momentum selling, whereas reclaiming $55 would be the first evidence of a durable bottom. With a beta of 1.175, BorgWarner is roughly 17.5% more volatile than the market, meaning position sizing should account for amplified drawdowns — the -38.3% max drawdown versus SPY's far milder pullback illustrates that this is a high-beta cyclical where risk management matters more than in defensive names.
Beta
—
—
Max Drawdown
-38.3%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
—
Price range past year
Annual Return
+12.1%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | BWA Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -13.0% | -2.3% |
| 3m | -25.9% | -2.8% |
| 6m | -19.5% | +2.1% |
| 1y | +12.1% | +12.3% |
| ytd | +9.1% | +10.6% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
BWA Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is stagnating-to-declining: Q3 2026 revenue of $3.487 billion fell 2.9% year over year from $3.591 billion, continuing a flat-to-down trajectory across the last four quarters ($3.533B in Q1, $3.648B in Q2, $3.487B in Q3, versus $3.572B in Q4 2025). Segment data shows Air Management at $1.974 billion and Drivetrain at $1.196 billion still dominate, while e-Propulsion & Drivetrain contributes just $464 million — the legacy combustion business is the anchor and the drag, and the electrification segment is not yet large enough to bend the consolidated growth curve. Consensus estimates $17.51 billion of revenue for the forward year, implying continued low-single-digit contraction, so the investment case rests on mix shift and margin defense rather than top-line acceleration.\n\nProfitability is positive but thin and compressing: Q3 2026 net income was $221 million (6.34% net margin) on gross profit of $662 million, a 18.98% gross margin that slipped from 19.76% in Q2 and 19.16% in Q1, while operating margin fell to 8.66% from 10.14% sequentially. The trailing twelve-month picture is distorted by a Q4 2025 loss of $262 million (driven by $638 million of other expenses and a $969 million operating expense line), which drags trailing net margin to just 1.93% and operating margin to 3.74% — explaining the optically extreme 34.9x trailing PE. Importantly, the loss was a one-off impairment-type event, not an operating deterioration: the last three quarters delivered $221M, $277M, and $242M of net income, and diluted EPS of $1.08–$1.34, which is why the forward PE of 8.3x sits so far below the trailing figure.\n\nThe balance sheet is solid and cash generation is adequate: debt-to-equity of 0.745 is moderate for an auto supplier, the current ratio of 2.07 signals ample liquidity, and TTM free cash flow of $1.18 billion against a $9.65 billion market cap implies a roughly 12.2% FCF yield — a genuinely cheap cash-flow profile. Q3 operating cash flow of $320 million funded $125 million of capex and $35 million of dividends, while the company retired $858 million of debt and repurchased $175 million of stock, evidencing disciplined capital allocation. The weak spots are returns — ROE of 5.09% and ROA of 6.52% are well below what a 1.77x book multiple would normally demand — and a payout ratio of 42.96% that, while covered, leaves limited cushion if margins compress further.
Quarterly Revenue
$3.5B
2026-09
Revenue YoY Growth
-2.9%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
19.0%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$1.2B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is BWA Overvalued?
Because trailing net income is positive ($221 million in Q3, TTM net margin 1.93%), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, but it must be read with care: the trailing PE of 34.93x is inflated by the Q4 2025 loss, while the forward PE of 8.29x reflects consensus EPS of $8.26 and is the economically meaningful figure. The enormous gap between 34.9x trailing and 8.3x forward implies the market expects a full normalization of earnings — essentially pricing the stock as if the impairment quarter never happened — and at 8.3x forward, the shares embed very little optimism about growth or margin recovery.\n\nOn peer-relative grounds the stock screens cheap across nearly every multiple: PS of 0.67x, EV/Sales of 0.816x, EV/EBITDA of 8.89x, and P/B of 1.77x are all at or below typical auto-parts supplier levels, where EV/EBITDA in the high single digits and PS near 1x are more common. The PEG ratio of -2.40 is not meaningful given the negative earnings-growth denominator, but the 8.3x forward PE versus a sector that generally trades in the low-to-mid teens implies a discount of roughly 30–40%, which the market is justifying through revenue contraction (-2.9% YoY), thin 1.93% net margin, and structural EV-transition risk. The 1.23% dividend yield and 12.2% FCF yield provide a valuation floor that pure-growth peers lack.\n\nHistorically, BorgWarner has traded in a wide PE band — from roughly 5.9x in Q3 2022 and 8.0x in Q2 2025 to 15.1x in Q3 2025 and 34.9x today — and its PS ratio has ranged from about 1.77x (Q1 2025) to 3.72x (Q2 2026), versus 0.67x now. The current PS of 0.67x is far below even the low end of its own five-year range, and the forward PE of 8.3x sits near the bottom of its historical band, suggesting either a deep value opportunity or a market verdict that legacy auto-supplier earnings deserve a permanent de-rating. Given the 38.3% max drawdown and 23.75-point three-month relative underperformance, the market is currently voting for the latter.
PE
34.9x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 6x~18x
vs. Industry Avg
13.4x
Industry PE ~13.4x*
EV/EBITDA
8.9x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on margin compression and revenue contraction. Gross margin fell to 18.98% in Q3 from 19.76% in Q2, operating margin dropped to 8.66% from 10.14%, and revenue declined 2.9% YoY to $3.487 billion, so the company is shrinking while its profitability thins. TTM net margin of just 1.93% and ROE of 5.09% leave little buffer, and the 42.96% payout ratio means the 1.23% dividend has limited cushion if margins compress further. Customer concentration adds a structural risk: Volkswagen and Ford accounted for 23% of 2024 revenue, so a single OEM program cancellation or EV ramp delay could materially hit the top line, and the e-Propulsion segment at $464 million is not yet large enough to offset declines in the 80%+ legacy combustion base.
Market and competitive risks are dominated by valuation compression and cyclicality. The stock trades at 8.29x forward PE versus a sector in the low-to-mid teens, and the market is currently voting that legacy auto-supplier earnings deserve a permanent de-rating — a verdict reinforced by a 23.75-point three-month relative underperformance versus SPY. With a beta of 1.175, BorgWarner is roughly 17.5% more volatile than the market, so any macro deterioration in auto production or a sector rotation away from cyclicals amplifies the downside. Competitive disruption from EV-native suppliers and the pace of the electrification transition add uncertainty, and the extremely wide $60-$95 analyst target range (a 58% spread) signals that even the Street cannot agree on the pace of margin recovery.
Worst-case scenario: a Q4 earnings miss combined with 2027 guidance below consensus would trigger downward estimate revisions, breaking the $47.53 recent low and opening the door to the 52-week floor of $40.73 — a decline of roughly 16.6% from the current $48.81. A more severe scenario, where the market applies a permanent de-rating and the stock retests its -38.3% max drawdown trajectory, could see further downside toward the low-$30s, implying losses of 30% or more. The realistic quantified downside from here is -16.6% to the $40.73 52-week low, with tail risk extending to -35% if margin compression accelerates and the dividend coverage comes into question.
FAQ
The most severe risk is earnings-estimate risk: revenue is contracting 2.9% YoY to $3.487 billion and gross margin has fallen two straight quarters to 18.98% from 19.76%, so a Q4 miss or 2027 guidance below the $17.51 billion consensus would force the cuts the 8.3x multiple is already braced for. Second is customer concentration — Volkswagen and Ford were 23% of 2024 revenue, so a single OEM program cancellation or EV ramp delay hits the top line directly. Third is valuation and cyclicality risk: with a beta of 1.175 the shares are about 17.5% more volatile than the market, and the stock has already suffered a -38.3% max drawdown from its June peak near $77.03. Fourth is dividend and returns risk — a 42.96% payout ratio on a 1.23% yield leaves limited cushion, and ROE of 5.09% with a 1.93% TTM net margin means there is little profitability buffer if margins compress further.
The base case carries 50% probability with a $55-65 target range, assuming forward EPS near the $8.26 consensus, gross margin stabilizing around 19%, and FCF holding near $1.18 billion — a slow grind back toward the $55-58 October breakdown shelf without closing the gap to the $77.93 consensus. The bull case at 25% probability targets $77.93-95.00 and requires a Q4 beat with 2027 guidance at or above $17.51 billion, gross margin recovering above 19.5%, and visible e-Propulsion contract wins driving a re-rating from 8.3x toward the low-to-mid teens. The bear case at 25% probability targets $40.73-48.81, driven by a Q4 miss, guidance below consensus, and margin erosion below 18.98% that breaks the $47.53 low. The base case is most likely, and its key assumption is that the Street's $77.93 average target is directionally right but early — the stock stabilizes before it converges.
On cash-based measures it is clearly undervalued versus its own history. PS of 0.67x and EV/Sales of 0.816x sit far below the stock's historical PS band of roughly 1.77x to 3.72x, and the 8.29x forward PE is near the bottom of a five-year range that has stretched from about 5.9x to 34.9x. The trailing PE of 34.93x is misleading because it is distorted by the one-off Q4 2025 loss of $262 million, which is why the forward multiple is the economically meaningful figure. Versus peers the picture is less dramatic: EV/EBITDA of 8.89x and P/B of 1.77x are at or below typical auto-parts levels, implying a 30-40% discount to a sector trading in the low-to-mid teens. The market is effectively pricing a permanent de-rating of legacy auto-supplier earnings — the question is whether that verdict is too harsh given a 2.07 current ratio and 0.745 debt-to-equity.
The risk/reward is asymmetric but not yet confirmed. At $48.81 you pay 8.29x forward EPS of $8.26 and collect a 12.2% TTM FCF yield on $1.18 billion of free cash flow, while the average analyst target of $77.93 implies +59.7% upside and even the $60 low target sits 23% above the market. The downside is well mapped: a break of the $47.53 recent low opens the $40.73 52-week floor, roughly -16.6%, with tail risk toward the low-$30s if margin compression accelerates. It is a good buy for valuation-disciplined investors who can wait 12-24 months for margin stabilization and 2027 guidance, but the 21.7% one-month decline and 28.7% three-month decline show the market is still voting against the thesis, so scaling in rather than buying in full size is the more defensible approach.
This is a long-term value-recovery holding, not a short-term trade. The company is a mature, scaled tier-one supplier with 37,500 employees and more than 80% of revenue from legacy combustion products, so there is no growth-stage momentum to ride; the return case rests on multiple normalization from 8.29x forward PE and a 12.2% FCF yield, which takes quarters to play out. The beta of 1.175 and -38.3% max drawdown mean short-term holders face amplified volatility — the stock fell 21.7% in a single month — and the 1.23% dividend yield is too small to compensate for that risk over short windows. Earnings visibility is limited until the Q4 print and 2027 guidance clarify the margin trajectory, so a minimum holding period of 12-24 months is appropriate, with position sizing that accounts for a potential retest of the $40.73 52-week low before the thesis is validated.