GFL Environmental Inc. Subordinate Voting Shares
GFL
$44.68
+1.89%
GFL Environmental Inc. is a North American environmental services company operating in the waste management industry, providing non-hazardous solid waste collection, transfer, recycling and disposal services alongside liquid waste management and soil remediation through its Environmental Services segment. The company is a consolidator in a structurally oligopolistic industry dominated by Waste Connections, Republic Services and WM, positioning itself as the fastest-growing scaled platform in the space, with the majority of revenue generated in the United States and the balance in Canada. The current investor narrative is dominated by the transformative $6.4 billion acquisition of SECURE Waste, announced in April 2026, which management frames as a strategic expansion into energy-related waste and landfill infrastructure but which the market initially punished on dilution and leverage concerns. Sentiment has since repaired materially, with shares recovering from their spring lows as investors refocus on double-digit organic revenue growth, EBITDA margin progression and the deleveraging path, while a persistent valuation debate persists between bulls who see a multi-year free cash flow inflection and skeptics who flag the company's thin GAAP profitability and elevated leverage.…
GFL
GFL Environmental Inc. Subordinate Voting Shares
$44.68
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy GFL Today?
Rating: Hold. GFL presents a balanced risk/reward: the analyst consensus is Buy with a mean rating of 1.857 and an average target of $50.97 (16.2% upside), but the company's thin GAAP profitability, elevated leverage, and 47x forward PE warrant caution until SECURE integration and deleveraging show tangible progress. The core thesis is that GFL is a growth-oriented waste consolidator trading at a reasonable EV/EBITDA of 14.07x, with a multi-year free cash flow inflection potential if margins improve.\n\nSupporting evidence includes 16.32% YoY revenue growth in Q2 2026, well above mature peers; EBITDA of C$498.2 million (25.57% margin) demonstrating cash generation; a valuation de-rated to the low end of its historical EV/EBITDA range; and a 16.2% upside to the average analyst target. However, profitability is weak with a 6.04% operating margin and 20.67% gross margin, both below peer levels. Free cash flow yield is low at ~0.9% (C$192.2M TTM FCF vs. ~$21.8B market cap), and leverage is elevated with debt-to-equity of 1.148x.\n\nThe biggest risks are SECURE integration missteps, margin compression, and a leverage-driven de-rating. The rating would upgrade to Buy if EV/EBITDA compresses below 12x or if EBITDA margins expand toward 30% with positive free cash flow inflection. It would downgrade to Sell if revenue growth decelerates below 10% or if leverage increases further. Relative to its history and peers, GFL appears fairly valued on EV/EBITDA but overvalued on forward PE, reflecting the market's expectation of rapid earnings recovery.
Sign up to view all
GFL 12-Month Price Forecast
GFL offers a balanced risk/reward with a neutral stance. The company's strong revenue growth and solid EBITDA base are offset by weak GAAP profitability, elevated leverage, and a forward PE that demands rapid earnings growth. The valuation has de-rated to the low end of its historical range, providing some downside protection, but the SECURE integration and deleveraging path are critical. Analyst consensus is Buy with 16.2% upside, but the wide target spread signals disagreement. I would upgrade to bullish if EBITDA margins expand above 28% and free cash flow inflects positively; I would downgrade to bearish if revenue growth decelerates below 10% or leverage increases further.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on GFL Environmental Inc. Subordinate Voting Shares's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $51.08 and implied upside of +14.3% versus the current price.
Average Target
$51.08
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+14.3%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$40 - $64
Analyst target range
Coverage is solid with 13 analysts, and the consensus recommendation is a Buy with a mean rating of 1.857 (on a 1-to-5 scale where 1 is Strong Buy), indicating a clearly bullish tilt. The average target price of $50.97 implies roughly 16.2% upside from the current $43.85, and the consensus EPS estimate of $2.36 (range $2.30 to $2.46) supports the forward PE of 47.14x — a multiple that only makes sense if earnings are expected to compound rapidly from a depressed base. The bullish consensus is notable given the stock's 1.62% trailing-year decline and the April selloff on the SECURE deal, suggesting analysts view the dilution as a temporary overreaction rather than a permanent impairment. The target range is wide — $40.34 at the low to $63.54 at the high, a spread of 57.5% — which signals genuine disagreement about the SECURE integration, leverage trajectory and normalized earnings power. The high target of $63.54 (45% above the current price) likely assumes successful deleveraging, EBITDA margin expansion toward peer levels, and multiple re-rating as the market regains confidence in the growth story; the low target of $40.34 (8% below current) prices in margin compression, integration missteps or a leverage-driven de-rating. Institutional ratings show a mixed but stable pattern: TD Cowen reiterated Buy on September 11, Scotiabank maintained Sector Outperform on September 2 and July 31, Citigroup reiterated Buy in April, and Barclays has been Overweight since February — but JP Morgan has been consistently Underweight since downgrading from Neutral in April 2026, a notable bearish outlier. The absence of recent upgrades is a mild negative signal; the stock's recovery appears to be driven by price action and sentiment repair rather than fresh analyst catalysts, and the wide target spread means investors should weight the consensus directionally rather than treating the average as a precise fair value.
Bulls vs Bears: GFL Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: GAAP net losses, compressed margins, elevated leverage, and a 47x forward PE that demands rapid earnings growth. However, the bull case rests on a credible multi-year free cash flow inflection driven by 16.3% revenue growth, a solid EBITDA base, and a valuation that has de-rated to the low end of its historical range. The single most important tension is whether the SECURE acquisition integration and deleveraging proceed on plan—if they do, the stock can re-rate toward peer multiples; if they falter, the leveraged balance sheet and thin liquidity leave little room for error. Analyst consensus remains Buy with 16.2% upside, but the wide target spread and persistent relative underperformance underscore that conviction is not uniform.
Bullish
- Revenue growth outpaces mature waste peers: Q2 2026 revenue grew 16.32% YoY to C$1.949 billion, well above the low-single-digit growth typical of WM and Republic Services. Consensus forward revenue of ~$10.15 billion implies continued mid-to-high single-digit expansion, and the SECURE acquisition adds incremental energy-waste and landfill volume.
- EBITDA base supports deleveraging: Q2 2026 EBITDA of C$498.2 million (25.57% margin) confirms substantial cash earnings despite GAAP net losses driven by non-operating items. This EBITDA base underpins the deleveraging path that bulls argue will drive a multi-year free cash flow inflection.
- Analyst consensus Buy with 16% upside: 13 analysts rate GFL a Buy (mean 1.857), with an average target of $50.97 implying 16.2% upside from $43.85. The high target of $63.54 (45% upside) reflects confidence in successful SECURE integration and multiple re-rating.
- Valuation de-rated to low end of history: EV/EBITDA of 14.07x sits toward the low end of GFL's historical range and roughly in line with scaled waste peers that command 12-16x. The PS ratio of 3.29x is near the low end of its 7.0x-17.4x historical band, suggesting the market no longer pays a growth premium.
Bearish
- GAAP profitability is deeply negative: Q2 2026 net income was a loss of C$159.9 million (EPS -C$0.44), a sharp reversal from Q2 2025's C$276.3 million profit, driven by a C$293.6 million swing in other income/expenses. Gross margin compressed to 19.81% from 22.21%, and operating margin fell to 5.62% from 8.63%.
- Elevated leverage and thin liquidity: Debt-to-equity stands at 1.148x, total debt to capitalization at 57.95%, and the current ratio is a thin 0.583, indicating limited short-term liquidity cushion. The SECURE acquisition adds integration and leverage risk that investors must underwrite.
- Free cash flow yield is low: TTM free cash flow of C$192.2 million against a ~$21.8 billion market cap implies a low FCF yield. Q2 2026 FCF of C$121.9 million followed a negative C$228.3 million in Q1 2026, reflecting heavy capex of C$287.7 million in Q2 and C$387.2 million in Q1.
- Forward PE of 47x demands rapid earnings growth: The forward PE of 47.14x on estimated EPS of $2.36 is the market's real earnings-based yardstick and only makes sense if earnings compound rapidly from a depressed base. The trailing PE of 5.69x is economically meaningless, distorted by a one-off Q1 2025 gain.
GFL Technical Analysis
GFL is in a recovery uptrend within a broader range, with the stock up 12.61% over six months and 10.84% over three months, yet still down 1.62% over the trailing year versus a 15.53% gain for the S&P 500 — a 17.15 percentage point relative underperformance that frames the year as one of repair rather than leadership. At $43.85, the stock sits at roughly 77.1% of its 52-week range of $33.33 to $47.01, meaning it has reclaimed the majority of its drawdown but has not yet challenged the highs — a positioning that suggests improving momentum without the overextension that typically accompanies a blow-off top. The 30.33% maximum drawdown underscores how violent the spring selloff was, and the current price is roughly 31.6% above the 52-week low. Recent momentum is clearly accelerating: the stock is up 6.77% over the past month versus a 1.22% gain for SPY, producing a relative strength of +5.55, and the 3-month relative strength of +8.15 confirms the stock is now outperforming the market after a weak trailing year. The sequence of higher lows — from the $33.54 close on May 29 to the $40.43 October 1 dip and now $43.85 — is textbook trend repair, and the 1-month gain outpacing the 3-month gain implies the pace of appreciation is quickening rather than fading. With a beta of just 0.508, GFL is roughly half as volatile as the market, which means the 30% drawdown was company-specific (deal-related) rather than systemic, and position sizing can be more generous than a high-beta name would warrant. Resistance sits at the $47.01 52-week high, roughly 7.2% above the current price; a clean breakout would confirm the post-SECURE re-rating and likely open a move toward the analyst high target. Support is anchored at the $33.33 52-week low, about 24% below current levels, with intermediate support in the $40.40-$41.00 zone where the stock consolidated in August and early October. A breakdown below $40 would signal the recovery has failed and refocus attention on the low end of the range.
Beta
0.51
0.51x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-29.2%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$33-$47
Price range past year
Annual Return
-1.1%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | GFL Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +5.1% | +0.6% |
| 3m | +16.5% | +2.4% |
| 6m | +12.9% | +7.8% |
| 1y | -1.1% | +15.4% |
| ytd | +4.2% | +12.4% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
GFL Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is growing briskly, with Q2 2026 revenue of C$1.949 billion representing 16.32% year-over-year growth versus C$1.675 billion in Q2 2025, and the sequential progression from C$1.644 billion in Q1 2026 to C$1.949 billion in Q2 shows healthy seasonal build. The multi-quarter trend is one of steady acceleration: Q1 2026 revenue of C$1.644 billion grew from C$1.560 billion a year earlier, and Q4 2025's C$1.686 billion topped Q4 2024's C$1.986 billion on a like-for-like basis once the prior-year period's unusual items are set aside. Consensus estimates of roughly $10.15 billion in forward revenue (range $9.93 billion to $10.48 billion) imply continued mid-to-high single-digit top-line expansion, and the SECURE acquisition should add incremental volume in energy waste and landfill. The growth story is intact, but it is increasingly inorganic, which raises integration and leverage risk that investors must underwrite. Profitability is the weak spot: Q2 2026 net income was a loss of C$159.9 million (EPS -C$0.44), a sharp reversal from Q2 2025's C$276.3 million profit, driven by a C$293.6 million swing in other income/expenses and interest expense of C$164.0 million. Gross margin compressed to 19.81% in Q2 2026 from 22.21% a year earlier, and operating margin fell to 5.62% from 8.63%, while Q1 2026 was worse still with a 2.07% operating margin and a C$215.7 million net loss. The one bright spot is EBITDA, which reached C$498.2 million in Q2 2026 (25.57% margin) versus C$723.7 million a year earlier — the year-over-year decline reflects the prior-year period's outsized other income, but the absolute level confirms the business generates substantial cash earnings even as GAAP net income swings wildly on non-operating items. Balance sheet leverage is meaningful: debt-to-equity stands at 1.148x, total debt to capitalization at 57.95%, and the current ratio is a thin 0.583, indicating limited short-term liquidity cushion. Free cash flow is positive but modest — TTM FCF of C$192.2 million against a $21.8 billion market cap implies a low FCF yield, and Q2 2026 FCF of C$121.9 million followed a negative C$228.3 million in Q1 2026, reflecting heavy capex of C$287.7 million in Q2 and C$387.2 million in Q1. Operating cash flow of C$409.6 million in Q2 2026 was solid, and ROE of 52.5% looks impressive but is distorted by a small, heavily levered equity base rather than genuine capital efficiency; ROA of just 1.26% is the more honest read. The company is funding growth through a mix of internal cash flow and external financing — Q1 2026 saw C$1.71 billion of net financing inflows — which is manageable given the EBITDA base but leaves little room for execution missteps.
Quarterly Revenue
$1.9B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
+16.3%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
19.8%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$192164336.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is GFL Overvalued?
Because trailing net income is positive on a TTM basis (EPS of $0.176) but deeply negative in the most recent quarter, the trailing PE of 5.69x is economically meaningless — it is an artifact of a one-off gain in Q1 2025 (net income of C$3.41 billion) that inflates the trailing denominator. The appropriate primary metric is therefore EV/EBITDA, which at 14.07x reflects the company's true cash-generating economics, supplemented by the forward PE of 47.14x on estimated EPS of $2.36, which is the market's real earnings-based yardstick. The enormous gap between the 5.69x trailing and 47.14x forward PE tells you everything: the trailing figure is noise, and the forward figure implies the market expects normalized earnings power to be roughly one-eighth of the distorted trailing number — a normalization already priced in. On EV/EBITDA of 14.07x and EV/Sales of 3.71x, GFL trades at a premium to the broad industrials sector but roughly in line with scaled waste peers, which historically command 12-16x EBITDA for their recurring revenue, pricing power and landfill moats. The PS ratio of 3.29x and PB of 2.98x are moderate for a company with 16% revenue growth, and the PEG ratio of -0.0096 is not usable given the negative earnings base. The premium to the sector is defensible on growth (16.3% revenue growth versus low-single-digit for mature waste peers) but not on profitability, where GFL's 6.04% operating margin and 20.67% gross margin sit well below the 15-20% operating margins typical of Republic Services or WM. Historically, GFL's PS ratio has ranged from roughly 7.0x in 2022 to 17.4x in Q1 2025, and the current 3.29x (on the provided valuation dataset, which uses a different share basis) sits at the low end of that band — consistent with a stock that has de-rated on dilution and leverage concerns. Its historical PE has swung between -29.6x and +156x, rendering PE-based historical comparison useless; the EV/EBITDA multiple, which has ranged from roughly 42x to 140x on the historical ratio dataset (reflecting different period conventions), is the only stable anchor, and at 14.07x the current reading is toward the low end of the company's own history. The takeaway is that the market is no longer paying a growth premium for GFL — it is pricing the stock as a leveraged consolidator with execution risk, which creates upside if deleveraging and SECURE integration proceed on plan.
PE
5.7x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Low-End
5-Year PE Range 17x~156x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
14.1x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks are significant. GFL carries debt-to-equity of 1.148x and total debt to capitalization of 57.95%, with a current ratio of just 0.583, leaving limited short-term liquidity cushion. The company reported a Q2 2026 net loss of C$159.9 million (EPS -C$0.44), and gross margin compressed to 19.81% from 22.21% a year earlier. Free cash flow is positive but modest at C$192.2 million TTM, and Q1 2026 FCF was negative C$228.3 million due to heavy capex of C$387.2 million. The SECURE acquisition adds integration risk and incremental leverage, and the company's growth is increasingly inorganic, which raises execution risk.\n\nMarket and competitive risks include valuation compression if the stock's premium to the sector is not justified by profitability. GFL trades at EV/EBITDA of 14.07x and a forward PE of 47.14x, which assumes rapid earnings growth; any disappointment could trigger multiple contraction. The waste management industry is oligopolistic, dominated by WM, Republic Services, and Waste Connections, which have higher operating margins (15-20% versus GFL's 6.04%). GFL's beta of 0.508 means it is less sensitive to broad market swings, but sector rotation away from industrials or a rise in interest rates could pressure the stock. Recent news of the dilutive SECURE acquisition initially punished the stock, highlighting market sensitivity to leverage and dilution.\n\nThe worst-case scenario would involve SECURE integration missteps, margin compression, and a leverage-driven de-rating. If EBITDA margins fail to expand and free cash flow remains weak, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $33.33, representing a 24% decline from the current $43.85. The analyst low target of $40.34 implies an 8% downside, but a more severe scenario could see the stock fall to the 52-week low, a loss of approximately 24%. The maximum drawdown over the past year was 30.33%, indicating that a decline of that magnitude is possible in a adverse scenario. Investors could lose 24-30% from current levels if the bear case materializes.
FAQ
The key risks include: 1) Financial risk: elevated leverage with debt-to-equity of 1.148x and a thin current ratio of 0.583, plus negative GAAP earnings (Q2 2026 net loss of C$159.9 million). 2) Integration risk: the $6.4 billion SECURE acquisition may not deliver expected synergies, and integration missteps could pressure margins. 3) Competitive risk: GFL's operating margin of 6.04% is well below peers like WM and Republic Services (15-20%), limiting pricing power. 4) Valuation risk: the forward PE of 47.14x leaves little room for disappointment, and a leverage-driven de-rating could push the stock toward its 52-week low of $33.33 (24% downside).
Our 12-month forecast has three scenarios: Bull case (25% probability) targets $55-$64, assuming successful SECURE integration, EBITDA margin expansion above 28%, and multiple re-rating. Base case (50% probability) targets $48-$53, in line with the analyst average of $50.97, assuming steady integration and high-single-digit revenue growth. Bear case (25% probability) targets $33-$40, reflecting integration disappointments, margin compression, and leverage concerns. The base case is most likely, with the key assumption that GFL delivers on its deleveraging path and maintains EBITDA margins above 25%.
GFL appears fairly valued on an EV/EBITDA basis at 14.07x, which is toward the low end of its historical range and in line with scaled waste peers. However, on a forward PE basis, the stock is overvalued at 47.14x, reflecting the market's expectation of rapid earnings recovery from a depressed base. The trailing PE of 5.69x is distorted by a one-off gain and is not meaningful. The PS ratio of 3.29x is near the low end of its historical band, suggesting the market no longer pays a growth premium. Overall, the valuation implies the market expects successful SECURE integration and margin expansion; if those fail to materialize, the stock could de-rate further.
GFL is a good buy for growth-oriented investors with a medium-to-long-term horizon, but carries above-average risk. The stock trades at $43.85 with a 16.2% upside to the analyst average target of $50.97, and the consensus rating is Buy. Revenue growth of 16.3% YoY and a solid EBITDA base of C$498.2 million support the thesis, but the company's GAAP net loss of C$159.9 million in Q2 2026 and elevated leverage (debt-to-equity 1.148x) are concerns. The biggest downside risk is a retest of the 52-week low of $33.33, a 24% decline. For risk-tolerant investors who believe in the SECURE integration and deleveraging story, GFL offers attractive upside; conservative investors should wait for clearer margin improvement.
GFL is more suitable for medium-to-long-term investment (minimum 2-3 years) given its growth stage, integration story, and deleveraging timeline. The stock's beta of 0.508 indicates lower volatility than the market, but the 30.33% maximum drawdown over the past year shows it can experience sharp declines. The company pays a negligible dividend (yield 0.14%), so returns depend on capital appreciation. Short-term trading is risky due to the wide analyst target spread and event-driven volatility around earnings and SECURE integration updates. Long-term investors can benefit from the multi-year free cash flow inflection if management executes, but should monitor leverage and margin trends closely.