R

Ryder

$280.33

-0.00%
Jun 12, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Ryder System, Inc. is a leading provider of transportation and supply chain solutions, operating through three core segments: Fleet Management Solutions (full-service leasing, rental, and maintenance of commercial vehicles), Supply Chain Solutions (integrated logistics and distribution management), and Dedicated Transportation Solutions (turnkey dedicated fleet services). The company is a dominant player in the North American commercial vehicle leasing and logistics industry, distinguished by its asset-heavy, full-service model that provides customers with operational flexibility and cost predictability. The current investor narrative is focused on the company's successful execution of a strategic transformation, shifting its portfolio towards higher-margin, asset-light supply chain and dedicated transportation services, which has driven a significant re-rating of the stock as evidenced by its strong price performance over the past year.

People also watch

United Rentals

United Rentals

URI

Analysis
FTAI Aviation Ltd. Common Stock

FTAI Aviation Ltd. Common Stock

FTAI

Analysis
Air Lease

Air Lease

AL

Analysis
Avis Budget Group

Avis Budget Group

CAR

Analysis
Herc Holdings Inc.

Herc Holdings Inc.

HRI

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy R Today?

Rating: Hold. The core thesis is that while Ryder's strategic transformation and earnings inflection story are compelling, the stock's powerful rally has priced in much of the near-term optimism, creating a balanced risk/reward profile at current levels.

Supporting evidence includes a forward P/E of 13.63x which is reasonable for expected growth, a very low Price-to-Cash Flow of 3.08x indicating strong cash generation, and a high ROE of 16.35% demonstrating capital efficiency. However, the PEG ratio of 1.99 suggests full valuation, recent relative strength has turned negative, and the stock trades just 8% below its 52-week high, limiting near-term upside potential.

The thesis would upgrade to a Buy if the forward P/E compressed below 12x on market weakness, if the stock decisively broke above the $259 resistance on high volume, or if quarterly results confirmed earnings are tracking toward the $20+ EPS target. It would downgrade to a Sell if the price broke below the $227 support level, if debt levels increased further, or if there were signs of margin contraction. Based on the PEG ratio and proximity to cycle highs, the stock appears fairly valued to slightly overvalued in the near term, awaiting clearer confirmation of the earnings trajectory.

Sign up to view all

R 12-Month Price Forecast

The outlook for R is a story of execution versus valuation. The bull case is credible given the analyst EPS forecasts, but the stock's strong run and full PEG ratio of 1.99 suggest much of this optimism is already priced in. The base case of range-bound trading as the company proves out its earnings is the most probable path. The stance would upgrade to bullish on a confirmed breakout above $259 with strong volume, signaling a new leg up in the transformation story. It would turn bearish if the stock breaks below the $227 support level, which would indicate a failure of the recent consolidation and potential for a deeper correction toward the 52-week low.

Historical Price
Current Price $280.33
Average Target $244.5
High Target $285
Low Target $143

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Ryder's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $364.43 and implied upside of +30.0% versus the current price.

Average Target

$364.43

4 analysts

Implied Upside

+30.0%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

4

covering this stock

Price Range

$224 - $364

Analyst target range

Buy
1 (25%)
Hold
2 (50%)
Sell
1 (25%)

Analyst coverage for Ryder is limited, with only 4 analysts providing estimates, indicating this is not a widely followed large-cap name. This limited coverage can lead to higher volatility and less efficient price discovery, as fewer institutional eyes are scrutinizing the business. The analyst data provided focuses solely on estimated EPS and revenue, with no consensus price target, recommendation, or target range available. Due to the absence of price target data, the implied upside or downside to a consensus target cannot be calculated, and the sentiment (bullish, neutral, bearish) among analysts is unclear. The estimated EPS range for the forward period is $19.76 to $20.86, with an average of $20.26, showing a relatively tight spread which suggests agreement on the near-term earnings outlook. However, without accompanying price targets, the market's valuation of those earnings remains undefined, presenting a key informational gap for investors.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: R Investment Factors

The evidence currently favors the bullish thesis, primarily driven by a powerful technical uptrend and a compelling valuation re-rating story centered on expected massive earnings growth. However, the bearish points highlight significant near-term risks, including fading momentum, high leverage, and a full valuation on a growth basis. The single most important tension in the investment debate is whether the company can successfully execute its strategic transformation to deliver the projected ~$20 EPS, thereby justifying its forward multiple and sustaining the rally, or if operational challenges, macroeconomic headwinds, or simply over-optimism will cause earnings to disappoint and trigger a derating from current elevated levels.

Bullish

  • Powerful Technical Uptrend: The stock has delivered a remarkable 1-year return of +57.74% and a 6-month gain of +41.72%, significantly outperforming the SPY over these periods. This sustained momentum, with the price trading at 92% of its 52-week range, reflects strong market conviction in the company's strategic transformation.
  • Attractive Forward Valuation: The forward P/E of 13.63x represents a discount to the trailing P/E of 16.03x, implying analysts expect significant earnings growth. Furthermore, the Price-to-Cash Flow ratio of 3.08x is exceptionally low, suggesting the market is undervaluing the company's cash generation capacity.
  • High Return on Equity: Ryder generates a robust Return on Equity (ROE) of 16.35%, a key metric for shareholder value creation. This high ROE is driven by operational efficiency and the effective use of financial leverage, which is typical for its asset-heavy leasing model.
  • Analyst Consensus on Earnings Growth: The four covering analysts show a tight consensus on forward earnings, with an average EPS estimate of $20.26, representing a massive increase from the trailing EPS of $0.062. This projected earnings inflection is the core driver of the forward valuation discount.

Bearish

  • Recent Relative Weakness & Consolidation: The stock has underperformed the SPY over the last 1 and 3 months, with relative strength readings of -2.26 and -1.31, respectively. After a sharp rally to $253, the price has pulled back and consolidated, suggesting bullish momentum may be stalling near the 52-week high of $259.
  • Thin Margins and Low Trailing Earnings: The company operates on thin profitability, with a net margin of 3.94% and trailing EPS of just $0.062. This low earnings base makes the stock highly sensitive to any operational missteps or cost pressures, as small changes have a large percentage impact on profits.
  • High Financial Leverage and Liquidity Risk: Ryder's balance sheet is highly leveraged, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.84. Furthermore, the current ratio of 0.89 indicates potential liquidity constraints, as current assets do not fully cover current liabilities, increasing vulnerability in a downturn.
  • Full Valuation on Growth Basis: The PEG ratio of 1.99, calculated using the trailing P/E, suggests the stock is fully valued or even at a premium relative to its expected growth rate. This limits near-term multiple expansion potential unless growth accelerates beyond current expectations.

R Technical Analysis

The stock is in a sustained, powerful uptrend, evidenced by a 1-year price change of +57.74% and a 6-month gain of +41.72%. As of the latest close at $238.45, the price is trading approximately 92% of its 52-week range ($143.34 to $259.00), positioning it near cycle highs and signaling strong bullish momentum, though also suggesting potential for near-term consolidation or profit-taking. Recent momentum shows a divergence, with a solid 3-month gain of +6.42% but a more modest 1-month increase of +3.23%; notably, the stock has underperformed the SPY over these periods, with relative strength readings of -1.31 over 3 months and -2.26 over 1 month, indicating a potential pause or rotation out of the name despite the longer-term uptrend. Key technical support is anchored at the 52-week low of $143.34, with more immediate support likely forming around the recent pullback low near $227 seen in mid-May. The primary resistance is the 52-week high of $259.00; a decisive breakout above this level would confirm the continuation of the primary bull trend. The stock exhibits a beta of 1.03, indicating its volatility is nearly identical to the broader market, which is notable for a cyclical industrial company and suggests its price movements are closely tied to macro-economic sentiment rather than idiosyncratic swings. The price action from the provided data shows a sharp rally from below $170 in late November 2025 to a peak above $253 in late April 2026, followed by a pullback and consolidation between $227 and $242. The recent close of $238.45 sits within this consolidation zone, with the 1-month price change of +3.23% suggesting the stock is attempting to stabilize and build a base for its next directional move. Volume data shows an average of 307,629 shares, and the short ratio of 2.2 indicates a moderate level of short interest that could fuel further upside on positive catalysts.

Beta

1.02

1.02x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-17.5%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$147-$284

Price range past year

Annual Return

+87.3%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodR ReturnS&P 500
1m+23.3%-0.1%
3m+49.2%+12.0%
6m+47.9%+8.8%
1y+87.3%+22.9%
ytd+44.4%+8.8%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

R Fundamental Analysis

Revenue trajectory analysis is constrained as specific quarterly revenue and growth rate figures are not available in the provided dataset. The analyst data provides an estimated annual revenue average of $14.80 billion, but without historical comparatives or segment breakdowns, a definitive growth trend cannot be established. This lack of granular revenue data is a significant gap in assessing the fundamental investment case for Ryder. Profitability metrics show a company with thin but positive margins. The net margin is 3.94%, supported by a gross margin of 19.77% and an operating margin of 8.57%. Trailing twelve-month earnings per share is $0.062, which, while positive, is very low. The forward P/E of 13.63 suggests analysts expect significant earnings improvement. The payout ratio of 29.06% and a dividend yield of 1.81% indicate a commitment to returning capital to shareholders, albeit from a modest earnings base. Balance sheet health shows a leveraged profile typical for an asset-intensive leasing business, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.84. The current ratio of 0.89 indicates potential liquidity constraints, as current assets do not fully cover current liabilities. Return metrics are mixed: Return on Equity (ROE) is a solid 16.35%, benefiting from financial leverage, but Return on Assets (ROA) is a much lower 3.90%, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the operations. The price-to-cash-flow ratio of 3.08 appears low, suggesting the market may be valuing the company's cash generation capacity conservatively.

Quarterly Revenue

N/A

N/A

Revenue YoY Growth

N/A

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

N/A

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

N/A

Last 12 Months

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is R Overvalued?

Given a positive net margin and EPS, the primary valuation metric is the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio. The trailing P/E is 16.03x, while the forward P/E is lower at 13.63x. This forward discount implies analysts expect earnings to grow, with the market pricing in an earnings increase that justifies a lower multiple on future profits. Compared to typical industrial sector averages (which are not provided in the data), a trailing P/E of 16x could be considered reasonable or slightly elevated depending on growth prospects. The Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of 0.63x and EV/Sales of 1.39x appear low, potentially indicating the market assigns a discount due to the company's asset-heavy model and lower margin profile. The PEG ratio of 1.99, using the trailing P/E, suggests the stock may be fully valued relative to its expected growth rate, as a PEG above 1.0 often indicates a premium. Historical context for the stock's own valuation range is unavailable due to missing historical ratios data. Therefore, it is impossible to determine if the current P/E of 16x is near the top or bottom of its own historical band. This lack of historical comparison limits the ability to assess whether the current multiple reflects peak optimism or presents a value opportunity relative to the company's own trading history.

PE

16.0x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

N/A

5-Year PE Range 17x~59x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

5.0x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial & Operational Risks are pronounced. Ryder's high debt-to-equity ratio of 2.84 creates significant interest expense and refinancing risk, particularly in a rising rate environment. The current ratio of 0.89 signals potential liquidity strain, meaning a sudden drop in cash flow could pressure operations. Furthermore, the business model is capital-intensive, as evidenced by the low Return on Assets (ROA) of 3.90%, and profitability is thin with a net margin under 4%, leaving little buffer for cost overruns or pricing pressure.

Market & Competitive Risks center on valuation and cyclicality. The stock's PEG ratio of 1.99 suggests it is pricing in substantial growth; failure to meet these expectations could lead to multiple compression. With a beta of 1.03, R's performance is tightly correlated to broader market and economic cycles, exposing it to a potential industrial sector slowdown. The recent underperformance versus the SPY over 1 and 3 months may indicate early investor rotation away from the name, questioning the sustainability of its premium valuation.

Worst-Case Scenario involves a cyclical downturn coinciding with a failure to achieve forecasted earnings growth. This could trigger a liquidity crisis due to the high debt and low current ratio, forcing asset sales or equity dilution. Analyst sentiment, already limited, could turn negative. In this adverse scenario, the stock could realistically retrace to its 52-week low of $143.34, representing a downside of approximately -40% from the current price of $238.45. The historical max drawdown of -17.52% from the recent peak shows the stock is capable of sharp corrections even within its bull trend.

FAQ

The key risks are, in order of severity: 1) Financial Risk: High debt-to-equity (2.84) and a weak current ratio (0.89) create vulnerability to rising rates and economic downturns. 2) Execution Risk: The entire investment thesis hinges on delivering massive EPS growth to ~$20; any stumble would crater the valuation. 3) Cyclical/Macro Risk: With a beta of 1.03, the stock is exposed to broader industrial and economic cycles which could dampen demand for leasing and logistics. 4) Liquidity/Valuation Risk: Limited analyst coverage (4) can lead to exaggerated price swings, and the stock's high position within its 52-week range increases susceptibility to profit-taking.

Our 12-month forecast outlines three scenarios. The Base Case (50% probability) sees the stock trading between $230 and $259 as it meets consensus EPS estimates of ~$20.26. The Bull Case (30% probability) targets $259 to $285 on earnings beats and multiple expansion. The Bear Case (20% probability) warns of a drop to between $143 and $200 if earnings disappoint amid a macroeconomic slowdown. The Base Case is most likely, centered on the company successfully proving out its earnings transformation but not exceeding the already high expectations baked into the current price.

The valuation sends mixed signals. On one hand, the forward P/E of 13.63x and Price-to-Cash Flow of 3.08x appear low and potentially undervalued relative to the company's cash generation. On the other hand, the PEG ratio of 1.99 (using trailing P/E) suggests the stock is fully valued relative to its growth expectations. Compared to its own recent trading, the stock is at the high end of its range. Overall, the market appears to be paying a fair price that embeds high expectations for earnings growth from the current very low base; it is not clearly overvalued or undervalued, but priced for successful execution.

R presents a nuanced opportunity. For investors who already believe in the successful execution of its strategic transformation, the forward P/E of 13.63x could be attractive if the projected ~$20 EPS materializes. However, following a 57.74% one-year rally, the stock is trading near cycle highs and its PEG ratio of 1.99 suggests it is fairly to fully valued. It is a good buy for patient, risk-tolerant investors seeking a cyclical turnaround, but not for those seeking a clear margin of safety or low volatility. The most significant downside risk is a failure to hit earnings targets, which could trigger a sharp derating.

R is more suitable for a medium- to long-term investment horizon of 2-3 years. The thesis is based on a multi-quarter strategic transformation and earnings inflection, which requires time to fully play out. The stock's beta of 1.03 and history of sharp drawdowns (like the recent -17.52% peak-to-trough) make it volatile for short-term trading. Furthermore, its modest 1.81% dividend yield is not a primary income driver. Investors should be prepared to hold through cyclical volatility to capture the potential value creation from the business model shift.