Boeing
BA
$193.56
+0.67%
Boeing is a global aerospace and defense manufacturer operating three core segments: Commercial Airplanes, which builds narrowbody and widebody jets competing directly with Airbus; Defense, Space & Security, which produces military aircraft, satellites, and weapons systems; and Global Services, which provides aftermarket support, parts, and maintenance to airlines worldwide. As one of only two dominant players in large commercial aircraft manufacturing, Boeing occupies a uniquely entrenched position in the global aviation supply chain, though its duopoly status has been tested by years of operational and safety crises. The current investor narrative centers on Boeing's production recovery — the company is building 737s at its fastest pace in years, and commercial aerospace suppliers are entering a multi-year upcycle — but this optimism is tempered by an October strike authorization from its engineers union and persistent cash burn. The recent divestiture of Boeing's Wisk, SkyGrid, and Insitu units to Archer Aviation signals a strategic narrowing of focus toward core commercial and defense programs, while the Trump administration's JATM missile defense procurement deal offers a potential tailwind for the defense segment.…
BA
Boeing
$193.56
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy BA Today?
The synthesized recommendation is Hold, with a bias toward accumulating on weakness for investors with a multi-year horizon. The core thesis is that Boeing's recovery is real but fragile — revenue is growing at 13.96% YoY and analysts see 38.1% upside to their $273.50 average target, yet the company is burning cash, carries 9.98x debt-to-equity, and faces an October strike threat that could derail the production ramp. The consensus 'strong_buy' rating from 26 analysts is compelling, but the market's refusal to close the gap between the current $198.07 price and the $246-305 target range suggests investors are pricing in execution risk that analysts may be underestimating.
The supporting evidence for a Hold is balanced. On the positive side, Q1 2026 revenue of $22.22 billion grew 13.96% YoY, gross margin recovered to 11.46% from negative territory in prior quarters, and the PS ratio of 1.85x sits well below the historical 4.5-8.5x range. The forward PE of 47.27x on estimated EPS of $14.90 implies a dramatic earnings recovery, and the estimated average revenue of $145.2 billion represents 63% growth from trailing levels. On the negative side, free cash flow is -$1.04 billion TTM, operating margin is -6.05%, and the company's ROA of -1.98% shows it is not yet generating positive returns on its asset base. The 1.85x PS ratio appears cheap versus history, but this discount reflects the market's recognition that Boeing's revenue is less profitable and more uncertain than in prior cycles.
The biggest risks that could invalidate the Hold thesis are: (1) the October engineers strike materializing and extending beyond a few weeks, which would delay deliveries and worsen cash burn; (2) a failure to achieve the estimated $14.90 EPS, which would make the 47.27x forward PE look unsustainable; and (3) another safety or regulatory incident that triggers a grounding or delivery halt. The rating would upgrade to Buy if Boeing resolves the strike threat, demonstrates positive free cash flow for two consecutive quarters, and shows gross margin holding above 10%. It would downgrade to Sell if free cash flow deteriorates below -$2 billion in a quarter, if the debt-to-equity ratio rises above 12x, or if revenue growth decelerates below 5% YoY. Relative to its own history and peers, Boeing appears undervalued on a PS basis but fairly valued to slightly overvalued on forward earnings given the execution risk — the stock is a show-me story, not a clear bargain.
Sign up to view all
BA 12-Month Price Forecast
Boeing presents a classic recovery story with substantial upside if execution improves, but the near-term risk/reward is balanced by the October strike threat and persistent cash burn. The stock's 1.85x PS ratio is well below its historical 4.5-8.5x range, suggesting the market has already priced in significant operational challenges, while the 38.1% upside to analyst targets implies that any positive resolution could trigger a sharp re-rating. However, the 9.98x debt-to-equity ratio and negative free cash flow mean the company has little margin for error, and a prolonged strike could force another dilutive capital raise. I would upgrade to bullish if Boeing resolves the strike, reports positive free cash flow for two consecutive quarters, and shows gross margin holding above 12%. I would downgrade to bearish if the strike extends beyond four weeks, free cash flow deteriorates below -$2 billion in a quarter, or a new safety incident occurs.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Boeing's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $273.42 and implied upside of +41.3% versus the current price.
Average Target
$273.42
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+41.3%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$248 - $305
Analyst target range
Boeing is covered by 26 analysts with a consensus recommendation of "strong_buy" and a recommendation mean of 1.48 (where 1.0 is a Strong Buy and 5.0 is a Sell). The average target price is $273.50, which implies approximately 38.1% upside from the current price of $198.07. This consensus is notably bullish relative to the stock's recent price action, suggesting that analysts are looking through near-term operational challenges toward a multi-year recovery. The estimated average EPS of $14.90 for the forward period, if achieved, would represent a dramatic turnaround from the current near-zero earnings, and the estimated average revenue of $145.2 billion implies roughly 63% growth from trailing levels — an ambitious but not implausible target if production rates normalize.
The target price range spans from a low of $246.00 to a high of $305.00, a spread of $59.00 or approximately 24% of the average target. The high target of $305.00 assumes successful execution on production ramp, resolution of the strike risk, and margin expansion toward historical norms, while the low target of $246.00 — still 24.2% above the current price — implies that even the most conservative analysts see significant upside. Institutional ratings show a consistent pattern of Buy and Overweight ratings from major firms including Citigroup, UBS, JP Morgan, and Jefferies, with Morgan Stanley maintaining an Equal Weight stance. The absence of any Sell ratings and the tight clustering of targets above the current price suggest strong institutional conviction in Boeing's recovery story, though the wide gap between the consensus target and the current market price also signals that the market is pricing in substantial execution risk that analysts may be underestimating.
Bulls vs Bears: BA Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger evidence based on hard financial data: negative free cash flow of -$1.04 billion TTM, a 9.98x debt-to-equity ratio, and severe underperformance versus the S&P 500 (-24.46 percentage points relative strength over one year). However, the bull case rests on forward-looking factors that could rapidly change the narrative: a 13.96% YoY revenue recovery, a strong_buy analyst consensus with 38.1% upside to the $273.50 average target, and a multi-year commercial aerospace upcycle. The single most important tension is whether Boeing can execute its production ramp without a strike or further operational setbacks — if it can, the stock's 1.85x PS ratio and depressed earnings base offer substantial recovery potential; if it cannot, the cash burn and debt burden could force another dilutive capital raise. The October strike authorization is the immediate swing factor that will determine which scenario unfolds.
Bullish
- Analyst Consensus Strong Buy with 38% Upside: 26 analysts rate BA a consensus 'strong_buy' with a mean recommendation of 1.48 and an average target price of $273.50, implying 38.1% upside from the current $198.07. Even the lowest analyst target of $246.00 sits 24.2% above the current price, indicating that institutional analysts see substantial recovery value despite near-term operational challenges.
- Revenue Recovery Accelerating at 14% YoY: Q1 2026 revenue of $22.22 billion grew 13.96% year-over-year from $19.50 billion in Q1 2025, marking a clear stabilization after the Q4 2024 trough of $15.24 billion. The multi-quarter trend shows revenue has settled into a $22-24 billion quarterly range, with Q4 2025 hitting $23.95 billion, suggesting the production ramp is translating into top-line momentum.
- Commercial Aerospace Multi-Year Upcycle: Boeing is building 737s at its fastest pace in years, and the broader commercial aerospace supply chain is entering a multi-year upcycle according to industry reports. As one of only two dominant large commercial aircraft manufacturers, Boeing is uniquely positioned to capture this demand, with estimated average revenue of $145.2 billion implying roughly 63% growth from trailing levels.
- Defense Segment Tailwind from JATM Deal: The Trump administration's JATM missile defense procurement deal signals sustained increases in missile defense spending, benefiting prime contractors like Boeing. Boeing's Defense, Space & Security segment generated $7.60 billion in Q1 2026, providing a balanced revenue base alongside Commercial Airplanes ($9.20 billion) and Global Services ($5.37 billion).
Bearish
- Massive Debt Burden at 9.98x Debt-to-Equity: Boeing's debt-to-equity ratio of 9.98x reflects the enormous debt accumulated during the 2019-2024 crisis period, leaving the balance sheet highly leveraged. With only $10.17 billion in cash against ongoing quarterly capital expenditures of $1.28 billion, the company remains dependent on debt markets and its investment portfolio to fund operations.
- Persistent Cash Burn and Negative FCF: Free cash flow turned negative again in Q1 2026 at -$1.45 billion, following -$1.18 billion in Q4 2025, with trailing twelve-month FCF at -$1.04 billion. This persistent cash burn undermines the recovery thesis and raises questions about how long the company can sustain its current investment plans without additional capital raises.
- Engineers Strike Authorization Threatens Production: Boeing's engineers union authorized an October strike, directly threatening the production ramp that underpins the entire recovery narrative. A strike could delay certification and delivery targets, potentially reversing the revenue momentum that has driven the stock's brief 6-month gain of 3.96%.
- Severe Underperformance vs. S&P 500: BA is down 7.24% over the past year and 13.04% year-to-date, massively underperforming the S&P 500's 17.22% one-year gain and 13.11% YTD gain. Relative strength metrics show BA trailing SPY by 24.46 percentage points over one year and 26.15 percentage points YTD, indicating deep negative sentiment and capital flight.
BA Technical Analysis
Boeing is in a sustained downtrend, with the stock down 7.24% over the past year and 13.04% year-to-date, significantly underperforming the S&P 500's 17.22% one-year gain. At a current price of $198.07, the stock sits at just 27.4% of its 52-week range (52-week low of $176.77, high of $254.35), placing it much closer to the bottom than the top. This positioning reflects persistent selling pressure and negative sentiment, though it also raises the question of whether the stock is approaching a value zone or remains a falling knife given the unresolved operational risks. The maximum drawdown of -24.96% over the period underscores the severity of the decline from peak levels.
Short-term momentum remains negative and is diverging from the already weak longer-term trend. The stock is down 6.61% over the past month and 8.83% over the past three months, both worse than the 1-year decline of 7.24%, indicating that selling pressure has actually accelerated in recent months. Relative strength metrics confirm this underperformance: BA trails SPY by 7.30 percentage points over one month and 14.64 percentage points over three months. The 6-month change of +3.96% is the sole positive data point, suggesting a brief rally earlier in 2026 that has since fully reversed — a pattern consistent with a failed recovery attempt rather than a durable trend change.
Key technical levels are well-defined: the 52-week low of $176.77 serves as critical support, while the 52-week high of $254.35 represents major resistance. A breakdown below $176.77 would signal capitulation and likely trigger further selling, while a breakout above $254.35 would require a fundamental catalyst to reverse the current narrative. With a beta of 1.213, Boeing is approximately 21% more volatile than the broader market, meaning position sizing should account for amplified moves in both directions. The short ratio of 0.01 is remarkably low, indicating minimal short-selling interest — which paradoxically removes a potential source of short-covering rallies while also suggesting the bearish case is not overcrowded.
Beta
1.21
1.21x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-26.9%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$177-$254
Price range past year
Annual Return
-11.0%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | BA Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -7.3% | +0.6% |
| 3m | -14.5% | +3.3% |
| 6m | -7.0% | +17.4% |
| 1y | -11.0% | +15.0% |
| ytd | -15.0% | +12.9% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
BA Fundamental Analysis
Boeing's revenue trajectory is showing signs of recovery, with Q1 2026 revenue of $22.22 billion representing 13.96% year-over-year growth from Q1 2025's $19.50 billion. The multi-quarter trend reveals a business that troughed in late 2024 — Q4 2024 revenue was just $15.24 billion — and has since stabilized in the $22-24 billion quarterly range, with Q4 2025 hitting $23.95 billion. Segment data shows Commercial Airplanes generating $9.20 billion, Defense Space & Security contributing $7.60 billion, and Global Services adding $5.37 billion, indicating a relatively balanced portfolio. However, the growth is off a depressed base, and the October strike authorization threatens to disrupt the production ramp that underpins the recovery thesis.
Profitability remains deeply challenged despite some improvement. Q1 2026 net income was essentially breakeven at -$4 million, a dramatic improvement from Q3 2025's -$5.34 billion loss but still far from sustainable profitability. Gross margin in Q1 2026 was 11.46%, up from the negative gross margins seen in Q3 2025 (-10.21%) and Q4 2024 (-10.43%), but the trailing twelve-month gross margin of just 4.79% and operating margin of -6.05% highlight how far the company has to go. The Q4 2025 quarter showed a massive $8.22 billion net income driven by a $9.13 billion other income item — likely a one-time gain — which distorts the trailing figures and explains the anomalous trailing PE of 87.2x despite minimal actual earnings power.
Boeing's balance sheet remains the central risk, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 9.98x reflecting the massive debt accumulated during the 2019-2024 crisis period. Free cash flow turned negative again in Q1 2026 at -$1.45 billion, following -$1.18 billion in Q4 2025, and the trailing twelve-month FCF stands at -$1.04 billion. The current ratio of 1.19 provides modest liquidity cushion, but with $10.17 billion in cash at the end of Q1 2026 and ongoing capital expenditure of $1.28 billion per quarter, the company remains dependent on its investment portfolio and debt markets. The ROE of 40.98% is misleading — it reflects the extremely small or negative equity base rather than genuine profitability, and the ROA of -1.98% is a more accurate reflection of the company's current returns on its asset base.
Quarterly Revenue
$24.6B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
+8.0%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
9.8%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$-210000000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is BA Overvalued?
Given that Boeing's trailing net income is barely positive (EPS of $0.0135) and heavily distorted by one-time items, the PE ratio is not a reliable primary metric. Instead, the PS ratio of 1.85x is the most appropriate valuation gauge, as it captures the company's substantial revenue base of approximately $89 billion without the noise of volatile earnings. The forward PE of 47.27x, based on estimated EPS of $14.90, implies the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery — a gap that reflects both the market's optimism about production normalization and the extremely low current earnings base. The EV/Sales of 1.96x and EV/EBITDA of 28.40x further illustrate that Boeing trades at a premium to its revenue but at elevated multiples relative to its depressed EBITDA.
Compared to the broader Aerospace & Defense sector, Boeing's PS ratio of 1.85x appears modest, but this comparison is misleading given the company's compressed margins. The gross margin of just 4.79% (TTM) versus a typical aerospace prime contractor range of 15-25% means Boeing is generating far less profit per dollar of revenue than peers like Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman. The PB ratio of 30.35x is extraordinarily elevated and reflects the near-depletion of book equity after years of losses, making it essentially meaningless as a valuation tool. The PEG ratio of -0.77 is negative due to the lack of meaningful earnings growth, further confirming that traditional valuation frameworks break down for Boeing in its current state.
Historically, Boeing's PS ratio has ranged from approximately 4.5x to 8.5x over the past five years, with the current 1.85x sitting well below that range. However, this apparent discount is not a straightforward value signal — it reflects the market's recognition that Boeing's revenue base is less profitable and more uncertain than in prior cycles. The historical PE ratio has been negative or wildly volatile for most quarters since 2019, making historical PE comparisons unreliable. The current valuation essentially prices in a successful production recovery and margin normalization; if those fail to materialize, the stock could remain range-bound or decline further despite the seemingly low PS multiple.
PE
87.2x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
N/A
5-Year PE Range 17x~59x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
28.4x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Boeing's financial and operational risks are severe and quantifiable. The debt-to-equity ratio of 9.98x reflects a balance sheet burdened by years of crisis-era borrowing, while free cash flow remains negative at -$1.04 billion on a trailing twelve-month basis and -$1.45 billion in Q1 2026 alone. With only $10.17 billion in cash and $1.28 billion in quarterly capital expenditures, the company has limited liquidity cushion, and the current ratio of 1.19 provides only modest short-term coverage. Revenue concentration in Commercial Airplanes ($9.20 billion of $22.22 billion in Q1 2026) means any production disruption — such as the authorized October engineers strike — would disproportionately impact the entire company's financial trajectory. The trailing twelve-month gross margin of 4.79% and operating margin of -6.05% highlight how far profitability remains from sustainable levels, and the ROA of -1.98% confirms the company is currently destroying value on its asset base.
Market and competitive risks compound the financial challenges. Boeing's beta of 1.213 means the stock is approximately 21% more volatile than the broader market, amplifying downside moves during sector rotations or macro risk-off periods. The stock's relative strength versus SPY is deeply negative across all timeframes — trailing by 24.46 percentage points over one year and 26.15 percentage points year-to-date — indicating persistent capital outflows and negative sentiment that could become self-reinforcing. Competitive pressure from Airbus remains intense, and Boeing's ability to win new orders depends on restoring its delivery reliability and safety reputation. The recent divestiture of Wisk, SkyGrid, and Insitu to Archer Aviation signals a strategic narrowing, but also raises questions about Boeing's long-term innovation pipeline in autonomous and defense technologies. Regulatory scrutiny of Boeing's manufacturing processes remains elevated, and any new safety incident could trigger another grounding or delivery halt.
The worst-case scenario for Boeing involves a confluence of operational and financial setbacks. If the October engineers strike materializes and extends for several weeks, production rates would decline, revenue would miss estimates, and free cash flow would deteriorate further, potentially forcing another equity or debt raise that dilutes existing shareholders. In this scenario, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $176.77, representing a decline of approximately 10.8% from the current price of $198.07. A more severe outcome — such as a new safety incident or a prolonged strike combined with a macro recession — could push the stock below the 52-week low toward the $160-170 range, implying a loss of 14-19% from current levels. The maximum drawdown of -24.96% over the past year demonstrates that such declines are within the realm of recent historical experience, and the low short ratio of 0.01 means there is little short-covering support to cushion a selloff.
FAQ
The most severe risk is financial: Boeing's debt-to-equity ratio of 9.98x and negative free cash flow of -$1.04 billion TTM leave the company with limited flexibility, and another dilutive capital raise would harm existing shareholders. The second major risk is operational: the October engineers strike authorization threatens to disrupt the production ramp that underpins the entire recovery thesis, potentially delaying deliveries and worsening cash burn. Third, competitive and regulatory risks persist — Airbus continues to gain market share, and any new safety incident could trigger another grounding or delivery halt, similar to the 737 MAX crisis. Fourth, macro sensitivity is a concern given Boeing's beta of 1.213, meaning a market-wide selloff would likely hit BA harder than the broader index, and a recession could reduce airline demand for new aircraft. Ranked by severity, the financial and operational risks are most immediate, followed by competitive/regulatory and macro risks.
The 12-month forecast presents three scenarios: a bull case with 30% probability targeting $273-305 (analyst average to high target), a base case with 50% probability targeting $220-250, and a bear case with 20% probability targeting $176-200 (52-week low range). The base case is most likely, assuming Boeing avoids a prolonged strike, grows revenue 10-15% YoY, and approaches free cash flow breakeven by year-end 2026. The key assumption behind the base case is that the production ramp continues without major disruption and that margins improve gradually from the current 11.46% gross margin. The bull case requires a ratified labor agreement, 737 production exceeding 42 per month, and positive free cash flow in the second half of 2026. The bear case would be triggered by a prolonged strike, a new safety incident, or a macro recession that reduces airline demand.
Boeing's valuation is best assessed through its PS ratio of 1.85x, which sits well below its five-year historical range of 4.5x to 8.5x, suggesting the stock is undervalued relative to its own history. However, this discount is not a straightforward value signal — it reflects the market's recognition that Boeing's revenue base is less profitable than in prior cycles, with a trailing twelve-month gross margin of just 4.79% versus a typical aerospace prime contractor range of 15-25%. The forward PE of 47.27x on estimated EPS of $14.90 implies the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery, and the EV/EBITDA of 28.40x is elevated relative to the company's depressed EBITDA. Compared to peers like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, Boeing trades at a premium on earnings-based metrics but a discount on sales-based metrics, reflecting its unique position as a leveraged recovery story. The market is essentially pricing in a successful production recovery and margin normalization; if those fail to materialize, the stock could remain range-bound despite the seemingly low PS multiple.
From a risk/reward perspective, BA offers 38.1% upside to the analyst average target of $273.50, but this potential comes with substantial downside risk to the 52-week low of $176.77, representing a 10.8% decline from the current $198.07. The stock trades at 1.85x PS, well below its historical 4.5-8.5x range, which suggests the market has already priced in significant operational challenges. However, with free cash flow at -$1.04 billion TTM and a debt-to-equity ratio of 9.98x, the company has limited financial flexibility if the October engineers strike materializes. For long-term investors with a 3-5 year horizon and tolerance for volatility, BA could be a compelling recovery play if production ramps successfully. For short-term traders or risk-averse investors, the binary nature of the strike risk makes it a less attractive entry point at current levels.
BA is better suited for long-term investment with a minimum holding period of 3-5 years, given the company's early-stage recovery, high volatility (beta of 1.213), and the multi-year nature of the commercial aerospace upcycle. The dividend yield of just 0.20% provides negligible income, so the investment case rests entirely on capital appreciation from operational recovery and multiple expansion. Short-term trading is risky because the stock's direction is heavily dependent on binary events like the October strike vote and quarterly earnings, which can cause sharp moves in either direction. Earnings visibility remains low, with trailing twelve-month EPS of just $0.0135 and a forward PE of 47.27x that depends on achieving $14.90 in estimated EPS. For investors with a long horizon, the current price near the lower end of the 52-week range ($176.77-$254.35) may offer an attractive entry point, but position sizing should account for the potential of further downside if operational risks materialize.