BAH

Booz Allen Hamilton

$71.10

-3.89%
Jun 17, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is a leading global consulting firm specializing in technology solutions, with a core focus on artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and digital transformation for the defense, intelligence, and civil sectors. The company is a prominent government services contractor, leveraging its deep expertise to serve U.S. federal agencies and commercial clients as a trusted advisor and systems integrator. The current investor narrative revolves around the company's positioning to capitalize on the U.S. government's strategic pivot towards AI and advanced defense technologies, as highlighted by recent news of the Pentagon's AI-driven capital reallocation, which is expected to drive long-term, high-margin revenue streams. However, this is juxtaposed against recent quarterly results showing a year-over-year revenue decline, creating a debate between the long-term growth story and near-term execution and contract timing challenges.

People also watch

Equifax

Equifax

EFX

Analysis
TransUnion

TransUnion

TRU

Analysis
Gartner

Gartner

IT

Analysis
FTI Consulting

FTI Consulting

FCN

Analysis
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

CAT

Analysis

BAH 12-Month Price Forecast

Historical Price
Current Price $71.1
Average Target $71.1
High Target $81.76499999999999
Low Target $60.434999999999995

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Booz Allen Hamilton's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $92.43 and implied upside of +30.0% versus the current price.

Average Target

$92.43

7 analysts

Implied Upside

+30.0%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

7

covering this stock

Price Range

$57 - $92

Analyst target range

Buy
2 (29%)
Hold
3 (43%)
Sell
2 (29%)

Analyst coverage for BAH is limited, with only 7 analysts providing estimates, indicating it is a mid-cap stock with moderate institutional following. The provided data includes EPS and revenue estimates but does not contain a consensus price target, Buy/Hold/Sell distribution, or target price range, which is insufficient to determine a clear consensus sentiment or implied upside/downside. The lack of detailed analyst targets typically suggests higher uncertainty and less efficient price discovery for the stock.

Without explicit price targets, the signal strength from analyst sentiment is unclear. The institutional ratings data shows a pattern of neutral to negative bias among the few firms that have recently published opinions, with actions including 'Hold', 'Neutral', 'Underweight', and 'Sell' from firms like Stifel, Citigroup, Jefferies, Goldman Sachs, UBS, and JP Morgan since late 2025. Notably, TD Cowen downgraded the stock from 'Buy' to 'Hold' in October 2025. This pattern suggests the analyst community is cautious or bearish on the near-term outlook, likely due to the revenue declines and margin pressures evident in the financials. The absence of a defined target price range further underscores the uncertainty surrounding the stock's fair value amidst its operational challenges and strategic opportunities.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: BAH Investment Factors

The evidence currently favors the bearish thesis due to concrete, deteriorating fundamentals—specifically the severe -10.19% YoY revenue decline and cautious analyst sentiment—outweighing the long-term strategic narrative. The bullish case rests on valuation near historical lows, strong FCF, and future defense/AI spending, but these are forward-looking and contingent on a business turnaround. The single most important tension in the investment debate is whether the company's positioning for long-term AI and defense budget tailwinds can overcome the near-term operational headwinds and revenue contraction evident in the financials. The resolution of this tension—visible in future quarterly revenue growth—will determine if the stock is a value trap or a value opportunity.

Bullish

  • Strong Free Cash Flow Generation: The company generates robust free cash flow, with TTM FCF of $933 million. This provides a strong financial cushion, supporting its 2.87% dividend yield and share repurchases despite a high debt load.
  • Attractive Valuation at Historical Lows: BAH trades at a trailing PE of 11.3x, near the bottom of its multi-year historical range which has exceeded 37x. This significant compression suggests the market has priced in substantial pessimism, potentially creating a value opportunity.
  • Positioned for Long-Term AI/Defense Tailwinds: Recent news highlights the Pentagon's aggressive capital reallocation towards AI-driven systems, creating a potential long-term, high-margin revenue stream. As a trusted government advisor, BAH is well-positioned to capture this spending shift.
  • High Return on Equity: The company reports an exceptionally high ROE of 77.0%, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital. However, this metric is amplified by significant financial leverage (Debt/Equity of 3.73).

Bearish

  • Severe Revenue Contraction: The most recent quarterly revenue of $2.62 billion represents a -10.19% year-over-year decline. This stark reversal from prior growth raises serious concerns about contract timing, execution, and the company's ability to secure new business.
  • High Financial Leverage: The company carries a high debt-to-equity ratio of 3.73, indicating aggressive use of debt financing. While FCF is strong, this leverage increases financial risk, especially if interest rates remain elevated or earnings decline.
  • Analyst Sentiment is Cautious to Bearish: Recent institutional actions include downgrades to 'Hold', 'Neutral', 'Underweight', and 'Sell' from major firms like Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. The lack of a clear consensus price target underscores high uncertainty and negative near-term sentiment.
  • Technical Downtrend and Underperformance: The stock is down 24.18% over the past year, severely underperforming the SPY (+22.86%). It is trading near the lower end of its 52-week range, having experienced a maximum drawdown of -44.8%, indicating significant technical damage.

BAH Technical Analysis

The stock is in a pronounced downtrend, with a 1-year price change of -24.18%, significantly underperforming the SPY's +22.86% gain. As of the latest close at $77.41, the price is trading near the lower end of its 52-week range, approximately 35% above its 52-week low of $68.84 but only 64% of the way towards its 52-week high of $120.05, indicating the stock is in a deep correction and presenting a potential value opportunity, albeit with significant technical damage. Recent momentum shows a short-term rebound, with a 1-month price change of +8.13%, which contrasts sharply with the negative 3-month change of -1.10% and the severe 6-month decline of -16.57%. This divergence suggests the stock may be attempting to find a bottom after its steep decline, though the 1-month rally has occurred on relatively weak volume, averaging around 1.3 million shares, and the stock's low beta of 0.32 indicates it has been far less volatile than the broader market during this turbulent period.

Key technical support is clearly defined at the 52-week low of $68.84, while resistance is at the recent high near $102.23 from January 2026. A sustained break above the $80-$85 zone, which has acted as resistance in recent months, would signal the beginning of a more meaningful recovery. Conversely, a decisive break below the $68.84 support would open the door for further downside, potentially extending the -44.8% maximum drawdown experienced over the observed period. The stock's low beta of 0.32 suggests it has exhibited only about one-third of the market's volatility, which is unusual for a stock in a sharp downtrend and may indicate it is being treated as a defensive holding despite its price action.

Beta

0.32

0.32x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-45.2%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$69-$120

Price range past year

Annual Return

-30.4%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodBAH ReturnS&P 500
1m-5.1%+0.3%
3m-12.0%+12.3%
6m-16.6%+8.9%
1y-30.4%+24.0%
ytd-16.2%+8.7%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

BAH Fundamental Analysis

Revenue growth has decelerated, with the most recent quarterly revenue of $2.62 billion representing a -10.19% year-over-year decline, a stark reversal from the stronger growth seen in prior quarters. The revenue mix shows a heavy reliance on Cost Reimbursable Contracts at $1.52 billion, with Fixed-price and Time-and-materials contracts contributing $521 million and $584 million respectively, indicating potential margin pressure as the revenue base contracts. This negative growth trajectory raises concerns about the company's ability to secure and ramp up new contracts to offset legacy program declines, directly impacting the investment thesis.

The company remains profitable, posting net income of $200 million in the latest quarter, translating to a net margin of 7.6%. However, profitability has compressed; gross margin for the quarter was 51.95%, but the key metrics data shows a trailing twelve-month gross margin of 20.9% and an operating margin of 9.75%, indicating significant variance and potential cost pressures or mix shifts on a TTM basis. The quarterly net income of $200 million and diluted EPS of $1.64 show the company is still generating earnings, but the margin compression trend from higher-margin periods is a key watch item for investors.

The balance sheet carries significant leverage with a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.73, which is high and indicates aggressive use of debt financing. However, liquidity appears adequate with a current ratio of 1.78. The company is a robust generator of free cash flow, with TTM FCF of $933 million, providing ample coverage for its dividend (payout ratio of 32.4% and yield of 2.87%) and share repurchases. The return on equity is exceptionally high at 77.0%, but this is heavily amplified by the high financial leverage, which also increases financial risk. The strong FCF generation is a positive offset to the elevated debt levels.

Quarterly Revenue

$2.6B

2025-12

Revenue YoY Growth

-0.10%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

+0.51%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$933437000.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Cost Reimbursable Contract
Fixed-price Contract
Time-and-materials Contract

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is BAH Overvalued?

Given the company's positive net income, the primary valuation metric selected is the Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio. The stock trades at a trailing PE of 11.3x and a forward PE of 11.28x, based on estimated EPS of $7.56. The negligible gap between trailing and forward multiples suggests the market has minimal expectations for near-term earnings growth, aligning with the recent revenue contraction.

Compared to industry averages (data not available in the provided set), a direct peer comparison is not possible. However, a trailing PE of approximately 11.3x for a consulting and IT services firm with a high ROE and strong FCF generation could be considered reasonable, especially if growth expectations are muted. The stock's valuation must be assessed against its own fundamentals, including its high debt load and recent revenue decline, which likely suppress the multiple.

Historically, the stock's own valuation has compressed significantly. The provided historical ratios show the PE ratio has ranged from highs above 37x in early 2024 to the current level near 11x. The current PE of 11.3x is at the lower end of this multi-year historical range, suggesting the market is pricing in significant pessimism regarding growth and margin prospects. This positioning near historical lows may indicate a value opportunity if the company can stabilize its revenue and execute on the anticipated AI/defense spending tailwinds, but it also reflects genuine fundamental deterioration.

PE

11.3x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Mid-Range

5-Year PE Range -45x~111x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

10.5x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial & Operational Risks are pronounced. The company's revenue contracted -10.19% YoY in its latest quarter, signaling potential issues with contract renewals, timing, or competitive pressures. While free cash flow generation remains strong at $933M TTM, profitability is compressing, with TTM operating margin at 9.75% and gross margin at 20.9%. The balance sheet carries significant leverage with a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.73, amplifying financial risk if interest expenses rise or earnings falter. Revenue concentration in government contracts, while providing stability, also creates dependency on federal budget cycles and procurement decisions.

Market & Competitive Risks center on valuation and sentiment. The stock's PE of 11.3x is at the low end of its historical range, but this compression reflects genuine fundamental deterioration rather than mere market mispricing. The stock has severely underperformed the market (-24.18% vs. SPY +22.86% over 1 year), indicating a loss of investor confidence. Competitive risks are inherent in the consulting and IT services sector, where firms vie for large government contracts. Furthermore, the stock's low beta of 0.32, while defensive, may also reflect its perception as a value or 'show-me' story, limiting upside participation in broader market rallies until fundamentals improve.

Worst-Case Scenario involves a continuation of the revenue decline coupled with margin pressure, leading to missed earnings estimates and a potential dividend cut despite the current 32.4% payout ratio. This could trigger further analyst downgrades and a loss of the defensive, income-oriented investor base. The chain of events would likely see the stock re-test and break its 52-week low of $68.84. Given the current price of $77.41, this scenario implies a realistic downside of approximately -11% to that key support level. A breach below $68.84 could open the door to further declines, potentially revisiting the -44.8% maximum drawdown from the peak, though that would require a more systemic failure of the business model.