F

Ford Motor Company

$12.28

+1.07%
Oct 6, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Ford Motor Company is a global automotive manufacturer producing vehicles under the Ford and Lincoln brands, with operations spanning traditional internal combustion vehicles (Ford Blue), battery-electric vehicles (Ford Model e), commercial vehicles (Ford Pro), and captive financing through Ford Credit. The company holds over 13% U.S. market share and roughly 10% in the UK, positioning it as a legacy Detroit incumbent rather than a growth disruptor, though its 2022 reorganization into separate combustion and EV units was designed to sharpen strategic focus. The current investor narrative is dominated by the tension between Ford's deeply negative trailing profitability — driven by a massive Q4 2025 loss tied to EV reset charges and asset impairments — and a forward consensus that projects a sharp earnings recovery, with analysts debating whether the EV restructuring is a one-time cleanup or a symptom of structural competitive erosion. Competitive pressure from BYD and other Chinese automakers expanding aggressively into Europe, alongside tariff headwinds and Ford's unusual partnership with Geely to leverage a competitor's EV platform, frame the debate around whether Ford can defend its core franchise while funding an expensive electrification transition.

People also watch

Tesla

Tesla

TSLA

Analysis
General Motors

General Motors

GM

Analysis
Rivian Automotive

Rivian Automotive

RIVN

Analysis
Lucid Motors

Lucid Motors

LCID

Analysis
Amazon

Amazon

AMZN

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy F Today?

The synthesized recommendation is Hold, with a bias toward accumulating on weakness for income-focused investors. The core thesis is that Ford's deep value (forward PE of 6.19, PS of 0.28) and 5.73% dividend yield offer a margin of safety, but the negative trailing earnings, high debt, and competitive threats warrant caution until there is clearer evidence of an earnings recovery. The analyst consensus rating of 'buy' (mean 2.35) and average target price of $16.03 imply 32.5% upside, but the wide target range ($12.80–$20.00) and the stock trading below the lowest target suggest significant uncertainty.

Supporting evidence for a Hold includes: 1) the forward PE of 6.19 is well below the market average and Ford's own historical profitable-range, 2) revenue growth is negative at -3.76% year-over-year, but free cash flow remains strong at $7.28 billion trailing, 3) the dividend yield of 5.73% is attractive but not covered by earnings (payout ratio -36.53%), and 4) the implied upside to the average analyst target is 32.5%, but the low target of $12.80 is only 5.8% above the current price. Compared to peers, Ford's PS ratio of 0.28 is significantly lower than the industry average, but this discount is justified by its negative profitability and high leverage.

The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are: 1) a failure to achieve the projected EPS of $3.36, which would make the forward PE misleading, 2) a dividend cut if losses continue, and 3) further market share losses to BYD and other competitors. The rating would upgrade to Buy if Ford demonstrates two consecutive quarters of positive net income and revenue growth stabilizes, or if the forward PE remains below 7x with improving margins. It would downgrade to Sell if revenue declines accelerate beyond 5% year-over-year, or if the dividend is cut. Relative to its history and peers, Ford appears undervalued on a price-to-sales basis, but the market is pricing in a high risk of earnings disappointment, so the stock is fairly valued given the risks.

Sign up to view all

F 12-Month Price Forecast

Ford presents a classic value trap versus deep value debate, with the market pricing in a severe earnings downturn that may or may not materialize. The forward PE of 6.19 and PS of 0.28 are compelling if the projected EPS of $3.36 is achieved, but the negative trailing profitability and high debt load create substantial risk. The technical picture is bearish, with the stock near its 52-week low and underperforming the S&P 500 by over 22 percentage points year-to-date. Analyst sentiment is moderately bullish, but the wide target range and recent upgrades suggest a contrarian opportunity for those willing to stomach volatility. I would upgrade to bullish if Ford reports two consecutive quarters of positive net income and revenue growth stabilizes; I would downgrade to bearish if the dividend is cut or if revenue declines accelerate beyond 5%.

Historical Price
Current Price $12.28
Average Target $14.42
High Target $20.00
Low Target $11.11

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Ford Motor Company's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $15.92 and implied upside of +29.6% versus the current price.

Average Target

$15.92

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+29.6%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

—

covering this stock

Price Range

$13 - $20

Analyst target range

Ford is covered by 18 analysts with a consensus recommendation of "buy" and a recommendation mean of 2.35, reflecting a moderately bullish tilt despite the stock's severe underperformance. The average price target of $16.03 implies approximately 32.5% upside from the current price of $12.10, a substantial projected return that suggests analysts believe the market is significantly undervaluing Ford's recovery potential. The consensus leans bullish, but the recommendation mean of 2.35 (on a scale where 1 is strong buy and 5 is strong sell) indicates that the bullishness is moderate rather than conviction-driven, and the recent institutional ratings show a mix of Overweight, Buy, Hold, and Neutral ratings with several firms maintaining rather than upgrading their positions. Notably, Citigroup upgraded from Neutral to Buy on July 29, 2026, and Jefferies upgraded from Hold to Buy on July 27, 2026, suggesting some analysts see the selloff as overdone, while BNP Paribas, RBC Capital, TD Cowen, and Barclays remain on the sidelines with Neutral, Sector Perform, Hold, and Equal Weight ratings respectively. The target price range spans from a low of $12.80 to a high of $20.00, a spread of $7.20 or 56% of the low target, which signals considerable disagreement about Ford's trajectory and high uncertainty in the outlook. The low target of $12.80 implies only 5.8% upside and essentially prices in a scenario where Ford's earnings recovery stalls, margins remain compressed under tariff and competitive pressure, and the EV transition continues to consume capital without generating returns. The high target of $20.00 implies 65.3% upside and would require a combination of successful EV restructuring, margin recovery toward historical norms, multiple expansion from the current depressed PS ratio, and resolution of tariff headwinds — an optimistic but not implausible scenario given the forward EPS estimate of $3.36. The wide spread between targets, combined with the fact that the stock is trading below even the lowest analyst target, suggests that either the market is pricing in a scenario more bearish than any analyst envisions, or that analysts have been slow to revise downward and further estimate cuts may be forthcoming.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: F Investment Factors

The bear case currently has stronger evidence, driven by Ford's negative trailing profitability, massive debt load, and accelerating technical decline. The bull case rests on a forward earnings recovery that is far from guaranteed, with analysts projecting EPS of $3.36 against a trailing loss. The single most important tension is whether the Q4 2025 EV charges were a one-time cleanup or a symptom of structural competitive erosion; if the former, the stock is deeply undervalued, but if the latter, the forward estimates are overly optimistic. The wide analyst target range of $12.80 to $20.00 reflects this binary outcome, and the stock trading below the lowest target suggests the market is pricing in a more bearish scenario than any analyst envisions.

Bullish

  • Deep Value on Forward Earnings: Ford trades at a forward PE of just 6.19x based on estimated EPS of $3.36, a steep discount to the broader market and many auto peers. The price-to-sales ratio of 0.28 is dramatically below its historical range of 0.82–2.20, suggesting the market is pricing in a severe, potentially temporary earnings downturn.
  • Analyst Consensus Sees 32% Upside: The average analyst target price of $16.03 implies 32.5% upside from the current $12.10, with 18 analysts maintaining a consensus 'buy' rating (mean 2.35). Recent upgrades from Citigroup and Jefferies suggest some analysts view the selloff as overdone.
  • Strong Free Cash Flow Generation: Despite reporting a Q2 2026 net loss of $1.33 billion, Ford generated $1.96 billion in free cash flow in the quarter and $7.28 billion on a trailing basis. This cash generation supports the 5.73% dividend yield and provides a buffer for restructuring.
  • EV Losses Are One-Time Charges: The massive Q4 2025 loss of $11.06 billion was driven by $13.90 billion in other expenses, primarily EV-related write-downs and restructuring charges. Excluding these, the core business remains profitable, as evidenced by Q1 2026 net income of $2.55 billion and a 5.89% net margin.

Bearish

  • Revenue Stagnation and Margin Compression: Q2 2026 revenue declined 3.76% year-over-year to $48.30 billion, continuing a pattern of top-line softness. Gross margin has been erratic, falling to 12.59% in Q2 2026 from 18.36% in Q1 2026, and operating margin is razor-thin at 1.35%.
  • Massive Debt and Negative Profitability: Ford carries a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.66 and a total-debt-to-capitalization of 82.05%, with a cash flow to debt ratio of only 0.027. Trailing EPS is -$0.16 and ROE is -22.76%, indicating the company is currently destroying shareholder value.
  • Dividend Sustainability in Question: The 5.73% dividend yield is attractive, but the payout ratio of -36.53% means the dividend is not covered by earnings. If losses persist, the dividend could be at risk, removing a key support for the stock price.
  • Intensifying Competition from BYD: Chinese automakers, led by BYD, are rapidly gaining market share in Europe, threatening Ford's roughly 10% UK share and broader European presence. Ford's just over 1% share in China makes it vulnerable to further losses in that key market.

F Technical Analysis

Ford is in a sustained downtrend that has erased nearly all of its 1-year return, with the stock down 0.98% over the trailing year and sitting at $12.10 against a 52-week range of $11.11 to $17.78 — trading at just 14.8% of that range, perilously close to the 52-week low. This positioning near the bottom of the annual range signals persistent selling pressure and a lack of buyer conviction rather than a value opportunity being actively accumulated, especially given the stock is down 9.30% year-to-date versus SPY's +12.86%, a staggering 22.16 percentage point relative underperformance. The stock's failure to hold the mid-year rally above $17 suggests the market has rejected higher valuations and is repricing Ford toward its trough. Recent momentum has deteriorated sharply, with the 1-month change at -14.43% and the 3-month change at -9.43%, both far worse than the 1-year figure, indicating that the decline is accelerating rather than stabilizing. This negative short-term momentum diverges bearishly from the modestly positive 6-month change of +4.31%, which reflects the fading of a spring rally that peaked near $17.44 in late May before rolling over. Relative strength versus SPY is deeply negative across every timeframe — -15.02% over 1 month, -12.77% over 3 months, and -22.16% YTD — confirming that capital is rotating decisively out of Ford and into the broader market. The stock's beta of 1.835 means it is approximately 83.5% more volatile than the S&P 500, amplifying both the downside risk in the current decline and the position-sizing implications for any investor considering a contrarian entry. Key technical levels are clearly defined: the 52-week low at $11.11 represents the critical support zone, and a breakdown below it would likely trigger momentum-driven selling and open the door to new multi-year lows, while the 52-week high at $17.78 stands as formidable resistance that would require a fundamental catalyst to challenge. The maximum drawdown of -30.85% underscores the severity of the current correction, and with the stock only about 9% above its 52-week low, the risk-reward skews toward further downside unless a clear base forms.

Beta

1.94

1.94x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-30.9%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$11-$18

Price range past year

Annual Return

-3.3%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodF ReturnS&P 500
1m-16.0%+1.2%
3m-9.0%+4.5%
6m+0.3%+14.6%
1y-3.3%+16.0%
ytd-7.9%+14.3%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

F Fundamental Analysis

Ford's revenue trajectory is stagnating, with Q2 2026 revenue of $48.30 billion representing a 3.76% year-over-year decline from the $50.18 billion reported in Q2 2025, continuing a pattern of sequential softness from Q1 2026's $43.25 billion and Q3 2025's $50.53 billion. The company-excluding-Ford-Credit segment generated $44.89 billion, dwarfing Ford Credit's $3.41 billion, confirming that the core automotive business drives the vast majority of revenue and is the primary source of the top-line pressure. The multi-quarter trend shows revenue oscillating between roughly $40.7 billion and $50.5 billion without a clear growth direction, which for a capital-intensive manufacturer with 169,000 employees implies limited operating leverage and vulnerability to volume declines. The 3.76% YoY contraction, combined with intensifying Chinese competition in Europe and tariff pressures, suggests the top line is unlikely to inflect upward without either a significant product cycle or market share gains that currently appear elusive. Profitability has swung violently into negative territory, with Q2 2026 net income of -$1.33 billion and a net margin of -4.37%, a dramatic reversal from Q1 2026's positive $2.55 billion net income and 5.89% net margin. The Q4 2025 quarter was catastrophic, posting a -$11.06 billion net loss with a -24.11% net margin, driven by $13.90 billion in other expenses that reflect EV-related write-downs and restructuring charges. Gross margin has been erratic, ranging from 18.36% in Q1 2026 to just 3.72% in Q4 2025 and 12.59% in Q2 2026, well below the 15-20% range typical of established automakers and indicative of pricing pressure and unfavorable mix. The operating margin of 1.35% is razor-thin and leaves virtually no cushion for adverse cost developments, while the trailing EPS of -$0.16 and ROE of -22.76% confirm that the company is currently destroying shareholder value on a trailing basis. Ford's balance sheet carries substantial leverage, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.66 and a total-debt-to-capitalization ratio of 82.05%, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the auto business and its captive finance arm. The current ratio of 1.07 is barely above the threshold of liquidity comfort, and the quick ratio of 0.93 suggests that near-term obligations are covered only marginally by liquid assets. On a positive note, free cash flow remains solidly positive at $7.28 billion on a trailing basis, and Q2 2026 free cash flow was $1.96 billion, demonstrating that the core business still generates meaningful cash even amid reported losses. Cash at end of period stood at $18.90 billion, providing a substantial liquidity buffer, though the cash flow to debt ratio of just 0.027 highlights how modest that cash generation is relative to the enormous debt load. The dividend yield of 5.73% is attractive but the payout ratio of -36.53% signals that the dividend is not currently covered by earnings, raising questions about its long-term sustainability if losses persist.

Quarterly Revenue

$48.3B

2026-06

Revenue YoY Growth

-3.8%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

12.6%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$7.3B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Ford Credit
Company excluding Ford Credit

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is F Overvalued?

Because Ford's trailing net income is negative (EPS of -$0.16, net margin of -4.37%), the trailing PE ratio of -6.37 is not meaningful, and the appropriate primary metric is the price-to-sales ratio of 0.28, which is exceptionally low and reflects the market's deep skepticism about Ford's earnings power. The forward PE of 6.19 is the more informative valuation signal, as it implies the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery to roughly $3.36 per share in estimated EPS, and the enormous gap between the meaningless trailing PE and the low forward PE captures the binary nature of the investment case — either Ford's earnings normalize sharply or the forward estimates prove badly optimistic. The EV/Sales ratio of 1.01 and EV/EBITDA of -42.88 further underscore that on current depressed EBITDA, valuation metrics are distorted, making the forward earnings-based framework the only coherent lens. Compared to the broader auto manufacturing sector, Ford's forward PE of 6.19 and PS ratio of 0.28 represent a significant discount to the market and to many peers, though this discount is at least partially justified by the company's negative trailing profitability, 4.66 debt-to-equity ratio, and exposure to tariff and competitive headwinds. The PB ratio of 1.45 is modest in absolute terms but sits above Ford's own historical trough levels, suggesting the market is not pricing the stock at liquidation value despite the operational challenges. The dividend yield of 5.73% is well above the market average and provides a valuation floor of sorts, but the negative payout ratio means the yield is being funded from cash flow rather than earnings, which caps how much support it can provide. Historically, Ford's PS ratio has ranged from roughly 0.82 to 2.20 over the past several years, and the current 0.28 is dramatically below even the low end of that historical band, indicating that the market is pricing in a severe and possibly prolonged earnings downturn. Ford's PE ratio history shows wide swings from single digits in profitable years (4.5x in Q1 2026, 5.4x in Q4 2024) to deeply negative in loss quarters, and the current forward PE of 6.19 is toward the lower end of its historical profitable-range, suggesting that if earnings materialize as forecast, the stock is cheap relative to its own history. However, the historical data also shows that Ford's PS ratio was above 1.0 as recently as Q1 2026, meaning the compression to 0.28 reflects a genuine deterioration in market confidence rather than a mere cyclical dip, and investors must weigh whether this represents a generational value opportunity or a value trap.

PE

-6.4x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Low-End

5-Year PE Range 2x~16x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

-42.9x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Ford faces significant financial and operational risks, primarily stemming from its enormous debt burden and negative profitability. The debt-to-equity ratio of 4.66 and total-debt-to-capitalization of 82.05% leave little room for error, especially with a cash flow to debt ratio of just 0.027. The company's trailing net margin is -4.37%, and its operating margin of 1.35% is razor-thin, providing virtually no cushion for adverse cost developments or pricing pressure. Revenue concentration in the US (65% of 2025 revenue) exposes Ford to regional economic downturns and tariff impacts, while the 3.76% year-over-year revenue decline in Q2 2026 signals eroding top-line momentum. The dividend payout ratio of -36.53% raises concerns about the sustainability of the 5.73% yield, which could be cut if losses persist, further pressuring the stock.

Market and competitive risks are intensifying, particularly from Chinese automakers like BYD that are aggressively expanding into Europe. Ford's roughly 10% market share in the UK and just over 1% in China are vulnerable to share gains by lower-cost competitors. The company's beta of 1.835 means it is 83.5% more volatile than the S&P 500, so any market downturn could disproportionately impact Ford's stock. Valuation compression risk is also high: while the forward PE of 6.19 appears cheap, it is based on optimistic earnings estimates that may not materialize. The PS ratio of 0.28 is far below the historical range of 0.82–2.20, but this could reflect a permanent de-rating rather than a temporary dip. Recent news highlights BYD's global ascent and tariff headwinds, which could further pressure Ford's margins and market share.

The worst-case scenario for Ford involves a continued decline in core automotive demand, exacerbated by tariff escalations and competitive losses, leading to further earnings misses and potential dividend cuts. In this scenario, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $11.11, representing a 8.2% decline from the current price of $12.10. If the low is broken, the next support might not emerge until much lower levels, given the lack of historical trading range below $11. The maximum drawdown over the past year was -30.85%, and a similar decline from the current price would take the stock to approximately $8.37. The analyst low target of $12.80 is only 5.8% above the current price, indicating that even the most bearish analyst sees limited downside, but the market is already trading below that target, suggesting further estimate cuts could be forthcoming.

FAQ

The key risks include: 1) Financial risk: Ford has a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.66 and a cash flow to debt ratio of only 0.027, leaving little margin for error. 2) Competitive risk: BYD and other Chinese automakers are gaining market share in Europe, threatening Ford's 10% UK share and 1% China share. 3) Dividend risk: The payout ratio is -36.53%, meaning the dividend is not covered by earnings and could be cut. 4) Macro risk: With a beta of 1.835, Ford is highly sensitive to market downturns, and tariffs could further pressure margins. These risks are ranked from most to least severe, with financial and competitive risks being the most immediate.

The 12-month forecast has three scenarios: bull case (25% probability) with a target range of $16.03–$20.00, base case (50% probability) with a range of $12.80–$16.03, and bear case (25% probability) with a range of $11.11–$12.80. The base case is most likely, assuming Ford achieves its forward EPS of $3.36 but faces headwinds from competition and tariffs. The key assumption is that the EV restructuring charges are one-time and core operations remain profitable. If earnings disappoint, the bear case could see the stock break below its 52-week low of $11.11.

Ford appears undervalued on a price-to-sales basis, with a PS ratio of 0.28, far below its historical range of 0.82–2.20. The forward PE of 6.19 is also low compared to the broader market, but this is based on estimated EPS of $3.36, which may be optimistic given the company's recent losses. The market is pricing in a severe earnings downturn, as evidenced by the negative trailing PE of -6.37 and the stock trading below the lowest analyst target of $12.80. If Ford achieves its forward estimates, the stock is cheap; if not, it could be a value trap. Relative to peers, Ford's PS ratio is among the lowest in the auto sector, but this discount reflects its high debt and negative profitability.

Ford is a high-risk, high-reward investment that may be suitable for income-focused investors with a long time horizon. The stock offers a 5.73% dividend yield and trades at a forward PE of 6.19, implying 32.5% upside to the average analyst target of $16.03. However, the company reported a trailing net loss of $1.33 billion in Q2 2026, has a debt-to-equity ratio of 4.66, and faces intense competition from BYD. The dividend is not covered by earnings (payout ratio -36.53%), so a cut is possible. For those willing to accept these risks, Ford could be a value play, but it is not a safe investment for conservative portfolios.

Ford is more suitable for long-term investment, with a suggested minimum holding period of 2–3 years to allow for the EV restructuring and earnings recovery to play out. The stock is not ideal for short-term trading due to its high volatility (beta 1.835) and negative momentum (-14.43% in the past month). The dividend yield of 5.73% provides some compensation for waiting, but the risk of a dividend cut means income investors should monitor payout sustainability. Long-term investors with a value tilt may find the current price attractive, but they must be prepared for further downside if the bear case materializes.