Louisiana-Pacific
LPX
$73.76
-1.46%
Louisiana-Pacific Corp. is a building-products manufacturer that produces oriented strand board (OSB) and engineered wood siding, trim, soffit, and fascia for new home construction and repair-and-remodel markets, operating through three segments: Siding, OSB, and LP South America. The company is best understood as a branded, value-added siding franchise bolted onto a commodity OSB cyclical — Siding is the majority revenue contributor and the strategic centerpiece, while OSB provides operating leverage that swings violently with wood-product pricing. The current investor debate centers on a sharp cyclical downdraft: trailing revenue has contracted (Q2 2026 revenue of $664M, down 12.05% year-over-year) and gross margin has compressed to 17.5% from the mid-20s a year ago, pushing trailing EPS to roughly $0.03 and the trailing P/E to nearly 39x on depressed earnings. Bulls argue the Siding-led mix shift and a fortress balance sheet (debt-to-equity of 0.23, current ratio of 2.78) make this a trough-earnings entry point, while bears point to a 22.4% one-year share-price decline, negative trailing free cash flow, and a Goldman Sachs Sell rating as evidence the housing and OSB cycle has further to fall.…
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific
$73.76
Investment Opinion: Should I buy LPX Today?
Rating: Hold, with a constructive bias toward accumulating on weakness. The core thesis is that LPX is a quality branded Siding franchise trading at a cyclical valuation trough, but the earnings inflection that justifies the 24.5x forward P/E has not yet been confirmed by the fundamentals. The analyst consensus of Buy (mean 1.57 across 14 analysts) and an average target of $87.79, +25.3% upside, anchor a favorable risk/reward, but the Goldman Sell and $64 low target keep the range genuinely two-sided.
Supporting evidence is mixed but tilts positive on quality and valuation. P/S of 2.09x sits at the bottom of a multi-year range that peaked at 10.66x in Q4 2024, and P/B of 3.27x is in the lower third of its 2.65x–5.58x band, so the market is not paying a premium on sales or book. The balance sheet is the standout: debt-to-equity of 0.23, current ratio of 2.78, and $81M of Q2 2026 free cash flow demonstrate the company can weather the cycle. Offsetting this, revenue is down 12.05% YoY, gross margin has compressed to 17.47%, trailing FCF is -$19M, and trailing EPS of $0.026 makes current profitability negligible — the forward P/E of 24.5x is only reasonable if the $3.97 consensus EPS materializes.
The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are a prolonged OSB price depression, a further leg down in housing starts, and a Q3 earnings miss that triggers downgrades and target cuts toward $64. This Hold would upgrade to Buy if Q3 gross margin stabilizes above 20% and management guides to positive full-year FCF, or if the stock pulls back toward the $62–$64 zone where downside is bounded by the 52-week low and analyst floor. It would downgrade to Sell if gross margin breaks below 15% or if consensus 2027 EPS is cut materially below $3.50. On balance, LPX is fairly valued to modestly undervalued relative to its own history but expensive relative to mid-cycle industry multiples — a trough-cycle stock that requires patience rather than urgency.
Sign up to view all
LPX 12-Month Price Forecast
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Louisiana-Pacific's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $87.79 and implied upside of +19.0% versus the current price.
Average Target
$87.79
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+19.0%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$64 - $107
Analyst target range
Coverage is solid with 14 analysts and a consensus recommendation of "buy" (mean rating 1.57 on a 1–5 scale, where 1 is Strong Buy). The average target price of $87.79 implies +25.3% upside from the current $70.05, a bullish signal that stands in stark contrast to the stock's -22.4% one-year performance. Consensus 2027 EPS of $3.97 and revenue of $2.93B underpin that target, meaning the Street is explicitly forecasting a full earnings recovery — the average target is essentially a bet that forward EPS materializes at roughly 22x. Sentiment leans bullish, but the dispersion tells a more nuanced story.
The target range of $64.00 to $107.00 is exceptionally wide — a 67% spread from low to high — signaling high uncertainty rather than strong conviction. The $107 high target assumes multiple expansion on a genuine housing recovery and OSB price normalization, while the $64 low sits 8.6% below the current price and effectively prices in continued margin compression and a prolonged downturn. Institutional ratings show a split house: DA Davidson, Truist, Barclays, and B of A are consistently Buy/Overweight, while Goldman Sachs has maintained a Sell rating through multiple updates (most recently August 6, 2026) — a notable bearish anchor. There have been no upgrades or downgrades in the recent tape, only reiterations, suggesting analysts are waiting for the Q3 print to validate or break the recovery thesis; the wide spread and the Goldman Sell mean position sizing should account for binary earnings-event risk.
Bulls vs Bears: LPX Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: revenue has declined YoY in every recent quarter, gross margin has compressed roughly 1,000 bps from the Q1 2025 peak, trailing FCF is negative, and the stock has underperformed the S&P 500 by 37.9 points over twelve months. The bull case rests on structural quality — a Siding-led mix at two-thirds of revenue, a 0.23 debt-to-equity balance sheet, and a P/S of 2.09x at the bottom of its multi-year range — plus a 25.3% implied upside to the $87.79 average target. The single most important tension is whether the consensus 2027 EPS of $3.97 is achievable: that figure is roughly 150x trailing EPS, so the entire forward valuation (24.5x) collapses or validates based on whether OSB pricing and Siding margins inflect. Until a quarterly print confirms the earnings inflection, the evidence favors caution, but the downside is cushioned by the balance sheet and trough valuation.
Bullish
- Siding franchise anchors the mix: Siding generated $441M of the latest quarter's $664M revenue versus $182M from OSB, meaning roughly two-thirds of the business is a branded, specification-driven product rather than a pure commodity. This mix is the structural reason LPX trades at a premium to commodity lumber peers on P/B (3.27x) and P/S (2.09x).
- Fortress balance sheet cushions the cycle: Debt-to-equity of 0.23 and a current ratio of 2.78 are conservative for a cyclical, and Q2 2026 produced $140M of operating cash flow against $59M of capex for $81M of free cash flow. With $228M of cash, the company can fund the downturn without dilution or dividend cuts.
- Analyst consensus implies 25% upside: 14 analysts carry a mean rating of 1.57 (Buy) and an average target of $87.79, +25.3% from the $70.05 price. Consensus 2027 EPS of $3.97 and revenue of $2.93B explicitly assume an earnings recovery, and the $107 high target shows the upside optionality if housing normalizes.
- Valuation at multi-year trough on sales: P/S of 2.09x sits at the very bottom of the multi-year range (roughly 3.76x at the 2022 peak to 10.66x in Q4 2024), and P/B of 3.27x is in the lower third of its 2.65x–5.58x band. For a cyclical, buying near trough sales multiples has historically offered asymmetric payoff.
Bearish
- Revenue contracting every quarter YoY: Q2 2026 revenue of $664M fell 12.05% YoY, Q1 2026 fell ~20.7% ($574M vs $724M), and Q4 2025 fell ~16.6% ($567M vs $680M). Every recent quarter is below its prior-year counterpart, and consensus 2027 revenue of $2.93B implies stabilization, not recovery.
- Margins compressed ~1,000 bps peak-to-trough: Gross margin fell to 17.47% in Q2 2026 from 23.58% a year earlier and 27.35% in Q1 2025, with operating margin now just 9.56%. This is operating deleverage from OSB price deflation, and it is not yet visibly bottoming.
- Trailing earnings near zero, FCF negative: Trailing EPS of $0.026 makes the 38.6x trailing P/E economically meaningless, and trailing twelve-month free cash flow is -$19M after a -$98M FCF quarter in Q1 2026 when working capital consumed $114M. The 53.4% payout ratio leaves limited cushion if the downturn deepens.
- Severe underperformance and downtrend: LPX is down 22.39% over one year and 14.29% YTD versus SPY's +15.53% and +11.93%, a -37.92 relative-strength reading over twelve months, with a -34.51% max drawdown. The one-month bounce is a counter-trend rally off a deeply oversold base, not a confirmed reversal.
LPX Technical Analysis
LPX is in a sustained downtrend that has only recently begun to stabilize. The stock is down 22.39% over the past year and 14.29% year-to-date, a dramatic underperformance versus the S&P 500's +15.53% one-year and +11.93% YTD returns, producing a relative strength reading of -37.92 over twelve months. At $70.05, the stock sits at roughly 20.6% of its 52-week range of $62.18–$100.34 — near the lower quartile, which historically signals either a value opportunity or a falling knife, and the -34.51% max drawdown confirms the latter has been the dominant experience for holders. The price is, however, 12.7% above the 52-week low, suggesting the floor is being defended rather than freely breaking.
Short-term momentum has turned decisively positive and is diverging from the longer-term trend. The stock is up 7.18% over the past month versus a 1.22% gain for SPY, delivering +5.96 points of relative strength — the only positive relative-strength reading across all measured horizons (1M +5.96, 3M -8.00, 6M -16.47, 1Y -37.92). That said, the 3-month change of -5.31% and 6-month change of -8.99% show the one-month bounce is a counter-trend rally off a deeply oversold base rather than a confirmed reversal; the October move from $64.55 on September 30 to $70.05 on October 16 (+8.5% in roughly two weeks) is sharp enough to warrant caution about near-term overextension. Volume of 1.34M shares is modest, and with a short ratio of 8.51 days-to-cover, a meaningful short base exists that could fuel further squeezes on any positive catalyst.
Key technical levels are well defined. Support sits at the 52-week low of $62.18, roughly 11.2% below the current price; a breakdown there would confirm the downtrend's resumption and likely target new lows. Resistance lies at the 52-week high of $100.34, some 43.2% above spot, with intermediate resistance likely in the $75–$80 zone where the stock repeatedly failed in June and August. A beta of 1.619 means LPX is roughly 62% more volatile than the market — position sizing should reflect that a 10% SPY move implies a ~16% LPX move, and the 8.51 short ratio amplifies gap risk in both directions.
Beta
1.62
1.62x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-34.5%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$62-$100
Price range past year
Annual Return
-18.7%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | LPX Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +8.4% | -1.0% |
| 3m | -1.0% | +2.9% |
| 6m | -2.1% | +6.5% |
| 1y | -18.7% | +13.1% |
| ytd | -9.8% | +11.4% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
LPX Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is contracting, and the trend is worsening rather than stabilizing. Q2 2026 revenue of $664M fell 12.05% year-over-year from $755M in Q2 2025, following a Q1 2026 print of $574M (versus $724M in Q1 2025, a ~20.7% decline) and Q4 2025 revenue of $567M (versus $680M in Q4 2024, a ~16.6% decline). The sequential path — $567M → $574M → $664M — shows a seasonal spring pickup, but every quarter is below its prior-year counterpart, and the segment mix (Siding $441M, OSB $182M in the latest disclosure) confirms that the commodity OSB leg is the drag while the branded Siding business carries the franchise. Consensus 2027 revenue of ~$2.93B implies the Street expects stabilization, not recovery, and the investment case now hinges on whether Siding volume can offset OSB price weakness.
Profitability has compressed sharply and the company is only marginally profitable on a trailing basis. Q2 2026 net income was $26M on a 3.92% net margin, with gross margin of 17.47% — down from 23.58% in Q2 2025 and 27.35% in Q1 2025, a roughly 1,000-basis-point peak-to-trough compression that reflects OSB price deflation and operating deleverage. Trailing EPS of $0.026 and net margin of 5.39% mask a volatile quarterly path: EPS went from $1.30 (Q1 2025) to $0.77, $0.13, -$0.11, then $0.39 and $0.38 — a full boom-to-bust-to-recovery arc in six quarters. The Q4 2025 loss (-$8M) was the trough; the last two quarters show sequential recovery, and consensus forward EPS of $3.97 versus trailing $0.03 implies the market expects a dramatic earnings rebound, which is the central fundamental risk in the thesis.
Balance-sheet strength is the standout and the primary downside cushion. Debt-to-equity of 0.232 is conservative for a cyclical, the current ratio of 2.78 signals ample liquidity, and cash stood at $228M at Q2 2026 after generating $140M of operating cash flow in the quarter against $59M of capex, producing $81M of free cash flow. However, trailing twelve-month FCF is -$19M, dragged by a -$98M FCF quarter in Q1 2026 when working capital consumed $114M — a reminder that this business is working-capital intensive and cash generation is lumpy. ROE of 8.44% and ROA of 2.66% are well below the company's mid-cycle norms, and the 1.38% dividend yield with a 53.4% payout ratio is covered but leaves limited room if the downturn deepens.
Quarterly Revenue
$664000000.0B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
-12.0%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
17.5%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$-19000000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is LPX Overvalued?
Because trailing net income is positive but negligible ($0.026 EPS), the trailing P/E of 38.6x is economically meaningless and I lead instead with the forward P/E of 24.5x, cross-checked against EV/EBITDA of 16.3x and P/S of 2.09x. The gap between 38.6x trailing and 24.5x forward is enormous and tells the entire story: the market is pricing a roughly 150x earnings recovery from $0.03 to the consensus $3.97, which is a bet on OSB price normalization and Siding margin recovery rather than a valuation on current earnings power. EV/Sales of 2.03x and P/B of 3.27x are the more stable anchors for a cyclical at trough.
Against its Basic Materials / Paper, Lumber & Forest Products peer set, LPX screens as a premium asset on book and sales but not egregiously so on forward earnings. A P/B of 3.27x and P/S of 2.09x are rich for a commodity-exposed lumber producer — typical forest-products peers trade closer to 1.0–1.5x book at cycle troughs — but the premium is defensible given the Siding segment's branded, higher-margin profile versus pure OSB commodity players. The forward P/E of 24.5x versus a sector that typically trades in the mid-teens reflects the same quality premium, and the PEG ratio of -0.60 is a statistical artifact of negative trailing growth and should be disregarded. On EV/EBITDA of 16.3x, the stock is expensive relative to mid-cycle multiples of 6–10x for this industry, implying the market is already discounting a meaningful EBITDA recovery from the current $69M quarterly run-rate.
Historically, LPX's own valuation band has been wide and cycle-dependent. The P/S ratio has ranged from roughly 3.76x (Q2 2022, peak earnings) to 10.66x (Q4 2024), and the current 2.09x sits at the very bottom of that multi-year range — a level last seen only in the 2022 commodity boom when earnings were exploding. Similarly, P/B of 3.27x compares to a 2021–2024 range of roughly 2.65x to 5.58x, placing it in the lower third. The interpretation is genuinely two-sided: either the market is pricing in a deep, prolonged housing recession (bear case), or the stock is at a cyclical valuation trough with asymmetric upside if OSB and siding demand normalize (bull case). The negative trailing FCF and 38.6x trailing P/E argue the former deserves respect until the earnings inflection is confirmed.
PE
38.6x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 3x~52x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
16.3x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on earnings fragility and cash-flow lumpiness. Trailing EPS of $0.026 and a 5.39% net margin mean the company is only marginally profitable, and gross margin of 17.47% is down from 23.58% a year ago, so a further leg down in OSB pricing would push the business toward losses — Q4 2025 already printed a -$8M net loss and -$0.11 EPS. Trailing twelve-month free cash flow is -$19M, driven by a -$98M FCF quarter in Q1 2026 when working capital consumed $114M, showing that cash generation is highly seasonal and working-capital intensive. The 53.4% payout ratio on a 1.38% dividend yield is covered but leaves little room if the downturn extends, and ROE of 8.44% and ROA of 2.66% are well below mid-cycle norms. Revenue concentration in housing is the structural vulnerability: Siding ($441M) and OSB ($182M) both ultimately depend on new construction and remodel activity.
Market and competitive risks are dominated by valuation compression and cyclicality. At 24.5x forward earnings and 16.3x EV/EBITDA — versus mid-cycle multiples of 6–10x for forest products — the stock already discounts a meaningful EBITDA recovery from the current $69M quarterly run-rate, so any disappointment triggers multiple compression on top of earnings cuts. A beta of 1.619 means LPX is roughly 62% more volatile than the market, so a 10% SPY drawdown implies a ~16% LPX move, and the 8.51 short ratio amplifies gap risk in both directions around earnings. The Goldman Sachs Sell rating and the $64–$107 target spread (67% wide) signal genuine disagreement about the cycle, and with no recent upgrades or downgrades, analysts are explicitly waiting on the Q3 print — a binary event. Housing affordability, mortgage rates, and OSB spot pricing remain the external swing factors the company does not control.
In a worst-case scenario, OSB prices stay depressed through 2027, Siding volumes decline with housing starts, and the consensus $3.97 EPS fails to materialize, forcing analysts to cut targets toward the $64 low. That would put the stock at the analyst low, roughly -8.6% from $70.05, and a break of the $62.18 52-week low — about -11.2% from spot — would confirm the downtrend's resumption and likely target new lows. The historical max drawdown of -34.51% shows how far this name can fall in a cycle; a repeat from current levels would imply a price near $46. An investor could realistically lose 11% to the 52-week low in a mild adverse case and 30%+ in a full cyclical unwind, which is why position sizing must reflect the 1.619 beta and binary earnings risk.