Cleveland-Cliffs
CLF
$9.09
-4.32%
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is a vertically integrated flat-rolled steel producer and iron ore pellet manufacturer in North America, operating primarily within the Steel industry. The company is a major supplier to the North American automotive sector and distinguishes itself through its full integration from raw materials to finished steel products, positioning it as a key domestic producer. The current investor narrative is dominated by the stock's extreme volatility and the debate over whether its recent dramatic price decline represents a deep-value opportunity or a fundamental deterioration, as management has forecasted a strong recovery in 2026 amidst a challenging cyclical environment for steel.…
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
$9.09
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy CLF Today?
Rating & Thesis: The stock is a Hold for only the most risk-tolerant, speculative investors, as it represents a high-risk bet on a steel cycle recovery that is not yet evidenced in the financials. The minimal analyst coverage and lack of a consensus price target underscore the high uncertainty, making a definitive Buy or Sell call premature without signs of fundamental stabilization.
Supporting Evidence: The primary valuation metric, the PS ratio of 0.35, is at a deep historical discount, but this is justified by catastrophic margins (gross margin -4.43%) and negative cash flow. The forward PE of 19.18 is not meaningful without credible earnings visibility. Revenue is in a clear downtrend, declining -0.28% YoY in the latest quarter. The stock's 21.52% one-month rally offers a glimmer of technical hope but follows a -29% three-month decline, highlighting its extreme volatility (beta 1.92).
Risks & Conditions: The two biggest risks are 1) the cash burn rate accelerating, threatening liquidity, and 2) management's 2026 recovery failing to materialize, turning the stock into a value trap. This Hold rating would upgrade to a Speculative Buy only if Q1 2026 results show a clear sequential improvement in gross margin towards breakeven and a stabilization of revenue. It would downgrade to a Sell on a breakdown below the $5.63 support level or a further significant deterioration in free cash flow. The stock is fairly valued for its current distressed state but would be undervalued only if a credible path to profitability emerges.
Sign up to view all
CLF 12-Month Price Forecast
The outlook for CLF is binary and hinges entirely on the validity of management's 2026 recovery forecast. The base case of continued distress and range-bound trading is most probable, given the severe margin deterioration and cash burn. The bull case requires a dramatic and swift fundamental improvement that is not yet in the data. The bear case, while less probable, carries severe downside risk to the $5.63 level. The stance would upgrade to cautiously bullish only upon seeing two consecutive quarters of gross margin improvement and reduced cash burn. It would turn bearish on a confirmed breakdown below the $7.82 low.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Cleveland-Cliffs's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $11.82 and implied upside of +30.0% versus the current price.
Average Target
$11.82
5 analysts
Implied Upside
+30.0%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
5
covering this stock
Price Range
$7 - $12
Analyst target range
Analyst coverage is very limited, with only 3 analysts providing estimates, indicating this is not a widely followed institutional name. The consensus sentiment, inferred from recent institutional ratings, is neutral to bearish, with actions including a downgrade from Seaport Global (Buy to Neutral in Jan 2026) and a maintained 'Sell' from GLJ Research. The average revenue estimate for the next period is $20.57 billion, but no average price target is provided in the data, making a precise upside/downside calculation impossible. The lack of a clear target price range and the minimal number of analysts signal high uncertainty and typically correlate with higher volatility and less efficient price discovery. The recent pattern of ratings shows downgrades and cautious stances (e.g., Keybanc moving to Sector Weight from Overweight), suggesting the analyst community is growing more pessimistic or neutral despite the stock's price decline. The wide dispersion in revenue estimates (low of $18.77B to high of $21.47B) further reflects the significant uncertainty surrounding the company's near-term operational and financial trajectory.
Bulls vs Bears: CLF Investment Factors
The evidence currently favors the bear case, as the catastrophic deterioration in profitability and cash flow represents a fundamental breakdown, not a typical cyclical trough. The bull case rests almost entirely on a deep valuation discount and hope for a 2026 recovery, which lacks supporting current financial data. The single most important tension in the investment debate is whether management's forecast for a 2026 recovery is a credible signal of an impending cyclical rebound or merely optimistic guidance in the face of a more severe, structural downturn. The resolution of this tension—specifically, whether Q1 and Q2 2026 results show tangible margin improvement—will determine if the stock is a deep-value opportunity or a value trap.
Bullish
- Extreme Valuation Discount: The stock trades at a trailing Price-to-Sales ratio of 0.35, which is near the bottom of its historical range and represents a severe discount to its revenue base. This deep value pricing suggests the market has priced in a worst-case scenario, leaving significant room for multiple expansion if the company's fundamentals stabilize.
- Recent Technical Rebound & High Short Interest: The stock has rallied 21.52% over the past month, significantly outperforming the SPY's 7.36% gain. This rebound, coupled with a high short ratio of 4.43, suggests the potential for a sustained short squeeze if positive catalysts emerge, providing near-term upward momentum.
- Management's 2026 Recovery Forecast: Management has publicly forecasted a strong recovery in 2026, providing a specific timeline for a cyclical turnaround. This forward guidance, while unproven, offers a narrative anchor for value investors betting on a steel cycle rebound.
- Vertical Integration & Automotive Focus: As a vertically integrated, domestic supplier to the North American automotive sector, CLF possesses a strategic operational structure. This integration could provide cost advantages and customer stickiness when the industry cycle eventually turns upward.
Bearish
- Catastrophic Margin Deterioration: The company reported a gross margin of -4.43% and a net income of -$243 million in Q4 2025, with gross profit turning from +$285 million in Q1 2024 to -$191 million. This severe and rapid margin collapse indicates fundamental operational distress, not just a mild cyclical downturn.
- Severe Cash Burn & Financial Risk: CLF generated negative free cash flow of -$1.023 billion on a TTM basis and negative operating cash flow of -$13 million in the latest quarter. With a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.34, this cash burn elevates financial risk and reliance on external financing in a challenging environment.
- Pronounced Revenue & Earnings Downtrend: Revenue has declined sequentially from $5.199 billion in Q1 2024 to $4.313 billion in Q4 2025, with a YoY growth of -0.28%. The company is deeply unprofitable, with a trailing ROE of -24.17%, showing no near-term earnings power to support the valuation.
- High Volatility & Lack of Analyst Conviction: The stock's beta of 1.92 indicates it is nearly twice as volatile as the market, amplifying downside risk. Analyst coverage is minimal (3 analysts) with recent downgrades to Neutral and Sell, reflecting a lack of institutional conviction in a near-term recovery.
CLF Technical Analysis
The stock is in a pronounced downtrend, having declined 25.38% over the past six months and 29.0% over the past three months, culminating in a current price of $9.94. Trading at approximately 59% of its 52-week range (between $5.63 and $16.70), this positioning near the lower end suggests the market is pricing in significant distress, though it may also attract value-oriented investors seeking a cyclical bottom. Recent momentum shows a sharp divergence, with the stock rallying 21.52% over the past month, which strongly contrasts with the longer-term downtrend; this could signal a potential short-term oversold bounce or mean reversion, but the sustainability is questionable given the stock's high beta of 1.92, indicating it is nearly twice as volatile as the broader market. Key technical support is clearly defined at the 52-week low of $5.63, while resistance looms at the 52-week high of $16.70. A sustained breakdown below the $5.63 support would signal a continuation of the bearish trend and potentially new multi-year lows, whereas a move above the recent high near $16.18 (from October 2025) would be needed to suggest a more durable recovery is underway. The stock's beta of 1.92 underscores its high-risk, cyclical nature, meaning position sizing must account for its propensity for violent swings relative to the S&P 500, which gained 2.67% over the same 3-month period where CLF fell 29.0%. The price action from the provided 180-day data illustrates the severe decline, falling from a close near $16.18 in late October 2025 to a low of $7.82 in March 2026 before the recent bounce. The 1-month relative strength of +14.16 versus the SPY's +7.36% confirms the stock's recent outperformance on the rebound, but this follows a period of severe underperformance, with a 3-month relative strength of -31.67. The high short interest, implied by a short ratio of 4.43, could be fueling this volatile rebound through short covering.
Beta
1.92
1.92x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-51.7%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$6-$17
Price range past year
Annual Return
+20.6%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | CLF Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +9.4% | +8.5% |
| 3m | -39.8% | +2.8% |
| 6m | -30.8% | +4.6% |
| 1y | +20.6% | +32.3% |
| ytd | -33.2% | +3.9% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
CLF Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is under significant pressure, with the most recent quarterly (Q4 2025) figure of $4.313 billion representing a slight year-over-year decline of -0.28%. The multi-quarter trend shows a clear deceleration and contraction, as revenue has fallen sequentially from $5.199 billion in Q1 2024 to the current level, indicating the company is in a pronounced cyclical downturn. With 100% of revenue derived from its Steelmaking segment, the company has no diversified growth drivers to offset the industry-wide weakness, which severely challenges the investment case for near-term growth. The company is deeply unprofitable, reporting a net income of -$243 million and a gross margin of -4.43% for Q4 2025. Margins have deteriorated catastrophically; gross profit was -$191 million in the latest quarter, compared to a positive $285 million in Q1 2024. This compression from positive to negative gross margins over the past year highlights severe operational and pricing challenges, moving the company sharply away from profitability typical for the industry during stronger periods. The balance sheet shows elevated financial risk, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.34 and negative free cash flow of -$1.023 billion on a TTM basis. The current ratio of 1.95 indicates adequate short-term liquidity, but the negative return on equity of -24.17% and return on assets of -3.78% reflect destructive capital efficiency. The company is not generating internal cash to fund operations or growth, as evidenced by the negative operating cash flow of -$13 million in Q4 2025, increasing its reliance on external financing and elevating financial risk in a rising interest rate environment.
Quarterly Revenue
$4.3B
2025-12
Revenue YoY Growth
+0.00%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
-0.04%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$-1.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is CLF Overvalued?
Given the negative net income and EBITDA, the primary valuation metric selected is the Price-to-Sales (PS) ratio. The trailing PS ratio is 0.35, which is exceptionally low and reflects the market's severe discounting of the company's revenue stream due to its lack of profitability and negative cash flow. A forward PE ratio of 19.18 is cited, but this is based on estimated future profitability which remains highly uncertain given current fundamentals. Compared to sector averages, the stock's PS ratio of 0.35 is likely at a deep discount, though a precise industry average PS is not provided in the data. The extreme discount is a direct function of the company's negative margins and cash flow; the valuation implies the market has little confidence in a near-term return to normalized steel industry profitability. The negative EV/EBITDA of -325.55 further underscores that the enterprise value is not supported by current earnings power. Historically, the current PS ratio of 0.35 is near the bottom of its own range observed in the historical ratios data, which shows figures as high as 2.91 in early 2021. Trading at these depressed historical levels suggests the market is pricing in a worst-case scenario or fundamental deterioration. For context, the stock's own historical PE ratio has swung wildly, currently at a trailing -4.42, compared to positive readings above 5 during profitable periods in 2021-2022, indicating the current valuation is contingent on a dramatic earnings recovery that is not yet visible.
PE
-4.4x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Low-End
5-Year PE Range -42x~910x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
-325.6x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial & Operational Risks: The company faces severe financial risks stemming from its destructive cash burn and negative profitability. With TTM free cash flow at -$1.023 billion and a gross margin of -4.43%, CLF is not self-funding and must rely on its balance sheet, which carries a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.34. The 100% revenue concentration in the cyclical Steelmaking segment, coupled with a sequential revenue decline from $5.199B to $4.313B over five quarters, creates extreme earnings volatility and dependence on a swift steel price recovery to avoid further financial strain.
Market & Competitive Risks: The primary market risk is valuation compression despite an already-low PS ratio of 0.35, as further earnings disappointments could lead to a re-rating towards even more distressed levels. The stock's high beta of 1.92 makes it acutely sensitive to broader market downturns and sector rotations away from cyclical industrials. Competitive and macro risks include prolonged weakness in key end markets like automotive, potential import pressure, and the impact of sustained higher interest rates on its leveraged balance sheet and customer demand.
Worst-Case Scenario: The worst-case scenario involves a continuation of the current operational downturn into 2026, invalidating management's recovery forecast. This would lead to sustained negative cash flow, a potential liquidity crisis forcing dilutive financing, and a breach of the key technical support at the 52-week low of $5.63. In this adverse scenario, the stock could realistically retest and break below that low, implying a downside of approximately -43% from the current price of $9.94. A drawdown to the $5-$6 range would be consistent with its historical max drawdown of -51.67% and reflect a market pricing in a prolonged, deeply unprofitable cycle.
FAQ
The key risks are, in order of severity: 1) Financial Risk: The company is burning cash at a rate of -$1.023 billion TTM with a leveraged balance sheet (D/E of 1.34), risking liquidity. 2) Operational Risk: Gross margins have turned deeply negative (-4.43%), indicating the business is fundamentally unprofitable at current steel prices. 3) Cyclical/Market Risk: 100% revenue reliance on the volatile steel cycle, with the stock's beta of 1.92 amplifying market downturns. 4) Execution Risk: Management's forecast for a 2026 recovery may fail to materialize, turning the stock into a value trap.
The 12-month forecast is highly uncertain, with three distinct scenarios. The base case (50% probability) sees the stock trading between $8 and $12 as fundamentals show only marginal improvement. The bull case (25% probability), aligning with management's recovery forecast, targets a range of $14 to $16.70. The bear case (25% probability) projects a decline to the $5.63 to $7 range if the downturn worsens. The base case is most likely, implying a stock that remains volatile and range-bound, heavily influenced by quarterly earnings results and steel price sentiment rather than a clear directional trend.
CLF is fairly valued relative to its current distressed fundamentals but would be deeply undervalued if a recovery materializes. The trailing Price-to-Sales ratio of 0.35 is near historical lows and represents a severe discount, but it is justified by a gross margin of -4.43% and negative earnings. The forward PE of 19.18 is not a reliable metric given the lack of earnings visibility. The valuation implies the market expects continued operational pain and assigns a low probability to management's 2026 recovery forecast. It is not overvalued, but its cheapness is a function of fundamental weakness, not market mispricing.
CLF is not a good stock to buy for most investors. It is a highly speculative, high-risk bet on a steel cycle recovery that lacks current fundamental support. While the valuation is deeply discounted at a PS ratio of 0.35, this reflects catastrophic margins and negative cash flow. The stock's high beta of 1.92 and 43% potential downside to its 52-week low make it suitable only for aggressive, risk-tolerant traders or deep-value specialists who have high conviction in a 2026 turnaround and can withstand extreme volatility.
CLF is unsuitable for short-term investment due to its extreme volatility (beta 1.92) and lack of near-term catalysts beyond technical bounces. It is theoretically a long-term investment for those betting on a multi-year steel cycle recovery, but this carries high risk as the company must survive its current cash burn. A realistic minimum holding period for a recovery thesis is 18-24 months to allow management's 2026 forecast to be tested. Given the binary outcome, it is best suited for a speculative sleeve of a portfolio, not a core long-term holding.