Jacobs Engineering Group
J
$139.15
+0.40%
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is a global provider of engineering, design, procurement, construction, and maintenance services, alongside cyber engineering and security solutions, serving industrial, commercial, and government clients across water, transportation, healthcare, technology, and chemicals end markets. The firm operates as a scaled, diversified player in the Engineering & Construction industry, distinguished by its infrastructure-heavy backlog and its PA Consulting segment, which adds a higher-margin advisory and digital transformation layer to an otherwise project-based delivery model. The current investor narrative centers on a sharp top-line acceleration — fiscal Q3 2026 revenue grew 34.6% year over year to $4.08 billion — yet this growth has been accompanied by margin compression and a swing to a quarterly net loss in fiscal Q2, leaving the market to debate whether the revenue surge reflects durable share gains or lower-quality, pass-through-heavy work. With the stock down roughly 10.5% over the past year while the S&P 500 gained 16%, sentiment is clearly cautious, and the debate now hinges on whether management can convert backlog growth into restored profitability and cash generation.…
J
Jacobs Engineering Group
$139.15
Investment Opinion: Should I buy J Today?
The synthesized recommendation is Hold. The core thesis is that Jacobs offers a compelling long-term infrastructure story with 34.6% revenue growth and a forward PE of 16.8x, but near-term margin compression and earnings volatility create too much uncertainty to justify a Buy at the current price of $139.15. The analyst consensus rating of 'buy' with an average target of $162.47 implies 16.8% upside, but the wide target range of $144 to $181 reflects genuine disagreement about whether the revenue surge will translate into sustainable profitability.
Supporting evidence for the Hold rating includes: (1) revenue growth of 34.57% year-over-year in Q3 2026, which is exceptional for the engineering & construction sector; (2) a forward PE of 16.83x, which is roughly in line with the sector average and well below the distorted trailing PE of 61.87x; (3) trailing twelve-month free cash flow of $644.5 million, with Q3 2026 alone generating $431.0 million; and (4) a low beta of 0.698 and a 0.86% dividend yield, providing defensive characteristics. However, these positives are offset by a gross margin of 19.89% in Q3 2026, down from 24.95% a year earlier, and a Q2 2026 net loss of $45.9 million. The EV/EBITDA of 20.75x is a premium to the sector's 10–14x range, leaving limited valuation cushion.
The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are: (1) a failure to restore gross margins above 24%, which would keep earnings depressed and make the forward EPS estimate of $11.43 unreachable; (2) another quarterly loss or a working capital drain similar to Q2 2026's $501.1 million, which would strain the balance sheet and potentially force a dividend cut; and (3) a breakdown below the $135 support level, which would confirm the lower-high pattern and likely trigger a retest of the 52-week low of $105.68. This Hold would upgrade to Buy if gross margins recover above 24% for two consecutive quarters and free cash flow remains positive, or downgrade to Sell if revenue growth decelerates below 15% or another quarterly loss occurs. On valuation, the stock appears fairly valued on forward earnings but overvalued on EV/EBITDA relative to peers, suggesting the market is already pricing in a margin recovery that has yet to materialize.
Sign up to view all
J 12-Month Price Forecast
The forward-looking view is neutral with medium confidence, as the company's growth trajectory is impressive but the quality of that growth is questionable. The 34.6% revenue acceleration is offset by a 506 basis point decline in gross margin and a Q2 2026 net loss, leaving the market to debate whether the revenue surge is durable or pass-through-heavy. The forward PE of 16.8x appears fair, but the EV/EBITDA of 20.75x prices in a margin recovery that has not yet materialized, creating asymmetric downside if execution disappoints. Analyst sentiment remains constructive with a buy rating and 16.8% upside, but the wide target range and absence of recent rating changes suggest a wait-and-see approach. I would upgrade to bullish if gross margins recover above 24% for two consecutive quarters and free cash flow remains positive, and downgrade to bearish if another quarterly loss occurs or revenue growth decelerates below 15%.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Jacobs Engineering Group's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $162.47 and implied upside of +16.8% versus the current price.
Average Target
$162.47
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+16.8%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$144 - $181
Analyst target range
Coverage on Jacobs is solid, with 15 analysts contributing to a consensus recommendation of "buy" and a recommendation mean of 1.94 (where 1.0 is a strong buy and 3.0 is a hold). The average price target of $162.47 implies roughly 16.8% upside from the current price of $139.15, a meaningful premium that suggests the sell-side views the recent pullback as an opportunity rather than a warning. The consensus leans bullish, with the buy rating intact despite the stock's 10.5% one-year decline, indicating that analysts are looking through the near-term margin noise toward the revenue acceleration and the forward EPS estimate of $11.43.
The target range is relatively wide, spanning from a low of $144.00 to a high of $181.00 — a spread of $37, or about 26% of the current price — which signals meaningful disagreement about the company's trajectory. The low target of $144 implies only 3.5% upside and likely assumes that margin compression persists, working capital remains a drag, and the revenue growth proves lower-quality than hoped. The high target of $181 implies 30.1% upside and would require multiple expansion on top of earnings recovery, likely predicated on gross margins returning above 24%, PA Consulting reaccelerating, and infrastructure backlog converting at healthier economics. Institutional ratings show a stable pattern — RBC Capital has maintained Outperform since May, UBS reiterated Buy in August, and Truist has held a Hold rating throughout — with no recent downgrades or upgrades, suggesting the analyst community is in a wait-and-see mode pending evidence that the Q3 revenue surge translates into sustainable profitability. The absence of any rating changes in the past two months, combined with the wide target spread, points to genuine uncertainty rather than strong conviction in either direction.
Bulls vs Bears: J Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger evidence due to concrete margin deterioration and earnings instability, while the bull case relies on forward estimates that have not yet materialized. The most important tension is whether the 34.6% revenue growth is high-quality and sustainable or merely pass-through-heavy infrastructure work that dilutes margins. If gross margins recover above 24% in coming quarters, the forward PE of 16.8x would look very attractive and the stock could re-rate toward the $162 average target. Conversely, if margin compression persists and another loss quarter occurs, the premium EV/EBITDA multiple would compress and the stock could retest its 52-week low of $105.68.
Bullish
- Revenue accelerating at 34.6% YoY: Fiscal Q3 2026 revenue reached $4.076 billion, up 34.57% from $3.029 billion a year earlier, with sequential acceleration from $3.293 billion in Q1 to $3.695 billion in Q2. This growth is driven by the core Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities segment ($3.747 billion), validating Jacobs' positioning in large government and water/transportation programs.
- Forward PE of 16.8x is undemanding: The forward PE of 16.83x, based on estimated EPS of $11.43, sits in the mid-teens and is roughly in line with the engineering & construction sector average. This is a stark contrast to the distorted trailing PE of 61.87x, which reflects a depressed trailing earnings base rather than a true valuation premium.
- Analyst consensus buy with 16.8% upside: 15 analysts rate the stock a 'buy' with a recommendation mean of 1.94 and an average target price of $162.47, implying 16.8% upside from $139.15. The high target of $181 implies 30.1% upside, and no downgrades have occurred in the past two months despite the stock's 10.5% one-year decline.
- Defensive low-beta profile: Beta of 0.698 means Jacobs is roughly 30% less volatile than the broader market, making it a relatively defensive industrial holding. This low beta, combined with a 0.86% dividend yield and a 52.7% payout ratio, offers downside cushion in turbulent markets.
Bearish
- Severe gross margin compression: Q3 2026 gross margin fell to 19.89%, down from 24.31% in Q4 2025 and 24.95% in Q3 2025. This 500 basis point year-over-year decline indicates that the revenue surge is coming from lower-margin, pass-through-heavy infrastructure work rather than higher-value advisory services.
- Earnings volatility and Q2 loss: The company swung to a Q2 2026 net loss of $45.9 million (EPS -$0.34) with negative EBITDA of $33.3 million, driven by a $130.6 million pre-tax loss. This followed a 6.15% net margin in Q3 2025 and preceded a 3.35% net margin in Q3 2026, highlighting unreliable earnings quality.
- Elevated EV/EBITDA at 20.7x: The EV/EBITDA of 20.75x is at a premium to the typical engineering & construction sector range of 10–14x. This premium is only justified if margins recover toward 24%+ gross margin levels, leaving limited valuation cushion if execution disappoints.
- Weak cash flow coverage of debt: Cash flow coverage of debt is only 0.112, meaning operating cash flow covers just 11% of total debt. With debt-to-equity at 0.744 and a current ratio of 1.30, the balance sheet is manageable but not fortress-like, and Q2 2026 saw a $504.9 million FCF burn due to a $501.1 million working capital drain.
J Technical Analysis
Jacobs is in a choppy, range-bound consolidation rather than a clean trend, with the current price of $139.15 sitting roughly 82.6% of the way up its 52-week range of $105.68 to $168.44. The 1-year price change of -10.48% confirms the stock has been a laggard, and the 34.77% max drawdown underscores how violent the mid-year selloff was — from a May 5 high of $136.55, the stock collapsed to $107.27 by May 13, a roughly 21% drop in six sessions. This positioning near the upper-middle of the range, but still well below the high, suggests the stock is neither an oversold value opportunity nor a momentum leader, but rather a recovering name that has retraced most of its spring losses without reclaiming leadership.
Short-term momentum is mixed and diverging from the longer-term picture: the 1-month change of -1.83% is negative, while the 3-month change of +10.59% and 6-month change of +13.25% are solidly positive, indicating the recovery has stalled over the past month. Relative strength tells the same story — J has outperformed SPY by 7.46 percentage points over three months but underperformed by 3.95 points over the past month and by a striking 26.48 points over the past year. The stock's recent peak of $151.98 on August 28 has given way to a pullback toward $139, and the failure to hold above $150 despite the strong Q3 revenue print suggests the market is fading the growth story on quality concerns. Volume of roughly 652,000 shares and a short ratio of 4.1 days indicate moderate but not extreme positioning, with no evidence of a squeeze dynamic.
Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $105.68, with secondary support around the $135 area that has held repeatedly since late September, while resistance is anchored at the 52-week high of $168.44 and more immediately at the $150–$152 zone that capped the August rally. A breakout above $152 on volume would signal that the market is finally willing to pay for the revenue acceleration and could open a path toward the high; a breakdown below $135 would confirm the recent lower-high pattern and likely retest the $125–$128 region. With a beta of just 0.698, Jacobs is roughly 30% less volatile than the broader market, which makes it a relatively defensive industrial holding — but it also means the stock lacks the torque to stage a rapid recovery without a fundamental catalyst, and position sizing should reflect that muted volatility profile.
Beta
0.70
0.70x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-34.8%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$106-$168
Price range past year
Annual Return
-10.5%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | J Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | -1.8% | +1.9% |
| 3m | +10.6% | +3.9% |
| 6m | +13.2% | +12.1% |
| 1y | -10.5% | +19.2% |
| ytd | +2.8% | +14.2% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
J Fundamental Analysis
Jacobs' revenue trajectory has inflected sharply upward, with fiscal Q3 2026 (period ended June 26, 2026) revenue of $4.076 billion representing 34.57% year-over-year growth versus the $3.029 billion reported in the year-ago quarter. Sequentially, revenue has climbed from $3.293 billion in Q1 2026 to $3.695 billion in Q2 and $4.076 billion in Q3, a clear acceleration pattern. The Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities segment dominates the mix at $3.747 billion, while PA Consulting contributes $329.5 million, meaning the growth is overwhelmingly driven by the core infrastructure business rather than the higher-value advisory arm. This concentration is a double-edged sword: it validates Jacobs' positioning in large government and water/transportation programs, but it also exposes the company to the lower-margin, pass-through-heavy economics that typically accompany big infrastructure awards.
Profitability is the weak link in the story. While Q3 2026 net income of $136.6 million and a 3.35% net margin were positive, the quarter's gross margin of 19.89% is well below the 24.31% reported in Q4 2025 and the 24.95% in Q3 2025, indicating meaningful margin compression as the revenue mix shifted. The Q2 2026 quarter was outright unprofitable, with a net loss of $45.9 million and negative EBITDA of $33.3 million, driven by a $87.6 million SG&A load and a $130.6 million pre-tax loss. The trailing gross margin of 24.81% and operating margin of 7.18% are respectable for engineering and construction but thin relative to asset-light peers, and the volatility — swinging from a 6.15% net margin in Q3 2025 to -1.24% in Q2 2026 and back to 3.35% in Q3 2026 — suggests project timing and cost overruns are creating earnings instability that undermines the quality of the growth narrative.
The balance sheet is manageable but not fortress-like. Debt-to-equity stands at 0.744, the current ratio is 1.30, and cash flow coverage of debt is a modest 0.112, meaning operating cash flow covers only about 11% of total debt. Free cash flow on a trailing twelve-month basis is $644.5 million, but the quarterly pattern is highly erratic — Q3 2026 generated $431.0 million in FCF, while Q2 2026 burned $504.9 million, largely due to a $501.1 million working capital drain and $219.8 million of buybacks. ROE of 7.97% and ROA of 4.55% are uninspiring, and with a payout ratio of 52.7% and a dividend yield of just 0.86%, the company is returning cash while simultaneously carrying meaningful leverage. The net cash change of -$299.4 million in Q3, driven by $505 million of debt repayment, shows management is deleveraging, but the reliance on working capital swings to fund operations means the cash flow story remains fragile.
Quarterly Revenue
$4.1B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
+34.6%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
19.9%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$644544000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is J Overvalued?
Because Jacobs reported positive trailing net income (EPS of $0.0163 on a trailing basis, with quarterly net income of $136.6 million in Q3 2026), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, though the trailing figure is distorted by the Q2 loss. The trailing PE of 61.87x is extraordinarily elevated and largely an artifact of the depressed trailing earnings base, while the forward PE of 16.83x — based on estimated EPS of $11.43 — tells a far more constructive story. The enormous gap between the 61.9x trailing and 16.8x forward multiple implies the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery, with forward EPS of $11.43 versus a trailing figure near zero, a swing that requires both margin normalization and the absence of further loss quarters.
On a peer-relative basis, the picture is more nuanced. Jacobs trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.48x and an EV/Sales of 1.34x, which are modest for a company with 34.6% revenue growth, and its price-to-book of 4.88x is elevated but not extreme for a services firm with limited tangible assets. The EV/EBITDA of 20.75x is the more telling metric — it sits at a premium to the typical engineering and construction sector range of roughly 10–14x, reflecting the market's willingness to pay up for Jacobs' consulting mix and infrastructure exposure. The PEG ratio of -0.99 is not meaningful given the negative earnings base, but the forward PE of 16.8x against a sector average in the mid-to-high teens suggests Jacobs is roughly fairly valued on normalized earnings, with the premium in EV/EBITDA justified only if margins recover toward the 24%+ gross margin levels seen in 2025.
Historically, Jacobs' valuation has been volatile. The PE ratio ranged from 12.76x in Q4 2024 to 534.8x in Q2 2025 (distorted by near-zero earnings), and the price-to-sales ratio has ranged from 2.95x in Q4 2022 to 5.66x in Q1 2025, with the current 1.48x PS ratio sitting near the low end of that historical band. The price-to-book of 4.88x, however, is near the high end of its multi-year range (versus 1.89x in Q4 2022 and 2.03x in Q1 2023), reflecting both accumulated goodwill and the market's premium for the consulting pivot. The current setup — low PS, high PB, and a forward PE in the mid-teens — suggests the stock is priced for a margin recovery that has not yet materialized, leaving limited valuation cushion if execution disappoints.
PE
61.9x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 13x~42x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
20.7x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Jacobs faces significant financial and operational risks stemming from its margin compression and earnings volatility. Gross margin fell to 19.89% in Q3 2026 from 24.95% a year earlier, a 506 basis point decline that directly threatens profitability. The company swung to a Q2 2026 net loss of $45.9 million with negative EBITDA of $33.3 million, and trailing twelve-month EPS is just $0.0163, making the trailing PE of 61.87x meaningless as a valuation anchor. Cash flow coverage of debt is only 0.112, and the Q2 2026 free cash flow burn of $504.9 million was driven by a $501.1 million working capital drain, highlighting the fragility of cash generation. With a payout ratio of 52.7% and debt-to-equity of 0.744, the company is returning cash while carrying meaningful leverage, leaving little room for error if project timing or cost overruns worsen.
Market and competitive risks are amplified by Jacobs' premium valuation relative to peers and its low-beta profile. The EV/EBITDA of 20.75x sits well above the typical engineering & construction sector range of 10–14x, implying the market expects margin recovery that has not yet occurred. If sector rotation favors higher-growth or higher-margin industrials, Jacobs could continue to lag; it has already underperformed SPY by 26.48 percentage points over the past year. The beta of 0.698 means the stock lacks the torque to stage a rapid recovery without a fundamental catalyst, and its 34.77% max drawdown from May 5 to May 13 shows how violently sentiment can shift. Additionally, the concentration in Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities ($3.747 billion of $4.076 billion Q3 revenue) exposes the company to government spending cycles and competitive bidding pressure, while PA Consulting's $329.5 million contribution is too small to offset core margin weakness.
The worst-case scenario involves a continuation of margin compression, another quarterly loss, and a failure to convert backlog into profitable revenue. This would likely trigger analyst downgrades and a compression of the EV/EBITDA multiple toward the sector average of 12x, implying a stock price near the 52-week low of $105.68. From the current price of $139.15, that represents a downside of approximately 24%. If the low analyst target of $144 is breached and the stock breaks below the $135 support level that has held since late September, a retest of the $125–$128 region is likely, and a break below $105.68 would signal a deeper fundamental deterioration. In this adverse scenario, an investor could lose 24% to 35% from current levels, with the 34.77% max drawdown serving as a historical precedent for the magnitude of such a selloff.
FAQ
The most severe risk is margin compression: gross margin fell to 19.89% in Q3 2026 from 24.95% a year earlier, and if this persists, the forward EPS estimate of $11.43 becomes unreachable. The second risk is earnings volatility: the company swung to a Q2 2026 net loss of $45.9 million with negative EBITDA of $33.3 million, and trailing twelve-month EPS is just $0.0163, making the trailing PE of 61.87x meaningless. The third risk is balance sheet fragility: cash flow coverage of debt is only 0.112, and Q2 2026 saw a $504.9 million free cash flow burn due to a $501.1 million working capital drain. The fourth risk is competitive and macro: concentration in Infrastructure & Advanced Facilities ($3.747 billion of $4.076 billion Q3 revenue) exposes the company to government spending cycles, and the low beta of 0.698 means the stock lacks the torque to recover quickly without a fundamental catalyst. Ranked by severity: margin compression, earnings volatility, balance sheet fragility, and competitive/macro risks.
The 12-month forecast has three scenarios: a bull case with 25% probability targeting $168.44–$181.00, a base case with 55% probability targeting $144.00–$162.47, and a bear case with 20% probability targeting $105.68–$144.00. The base case is most likely, assuming revenue growth decelerates to 15–20%, gross margin stabilizes at 21–22%, and forward EPS of $11.43 is achieved, supporting the 16.8x forward PE. The bull case requires gross margin recovery above 24% and PA Consulting reacceleration, while the bear case involves another quarterly loss and multiple compression to the sector-average EV/EBITDA of 12x. The key assumption behind the base case is that the company avoids further quarterly losses and maintains positive free cash flow, even if margins do not fully recover to 2025 levels.
J appears fairly valued on forward earnings but overvalued on EV/EBITDA relative to peers. The forward PE of 16.83x is roughly in line with the engineering & construction sector average in the mid-to-high teens, suggesting the market is paying a fair price for estimated EPS of $11.43. However, the EV/EBITDA of 20.75x is a significant premium to the sector's typical 10–14x range, implying the market expects a margin recovery that has not yet materialized. The price-to-sales ratio of 1.48x is near the low end of its historical range (versus 5.66x in Q1 2025), which could signal undervaluation on a revenue basis. The price-to-book of 4.88x is near the high end of its multi-year range, reflecting accumulated goodwill and the market's premium for the consulting pivot. Overall, the valuation implies the market expects gross margins to recover above 24% and forward EPS of $11.43 to be achieved; if either disappoints, the stock could de-rate.
From a risk/reward perspective, J is a Hold rather than a Buy at the current price of $139.15. The stock offers 16.8% upside to the analyst average target of $162.47, but this is offset by a 24% downside risk to the 52-week low of $105.68 if margin compression persists. The forward PE of 16.83x is reasonable, but the EV/EBITDA of 20.75x is a premium to the sector's 10–14x range, leaving limited valuation cushion. The biggest downside risk is another quarterly loss similar to Q2 2026's $45.9 million net loss, which would likely trigger analyst downgrades. For long-term investors with a 2–3 year horizon and tolerance for near-term volatility, the infrastructure backlog and PA Consulting optionality make it a reasonable buy on dips below $130. For short-term traders, the lack of momentum and low beta make it a poor candidate for quick gains.
J is better suited for long-term investment with a minimum holding period of 2–3 years, given its low beta of 0.698, defensive characteristics, and infrastructure backlog that supports multi-year revenue visibility. The stock is in a choppy consolidation phase, with a 34.77% max drawdown over the past year and a 10.48% one-year decline, making it a poor candidate for short-term trading. The 0.86% dividend yield and 52.7% payout ratio provide modest income, but the primary return driver will be margin recovery and earnings growth. Earnings visibility is currently low due to quarterly volatility, so investors should be prepared for further swings. A concrete suggested minimum holding period is 24 months, allowing time for the infrastructure backlog to convert into revenue and for margin normalization to materialize. Short-term traders should avoid the stock until it breaks above $152 on volume or establishes a clear uptrend.